Sacramento County Dependency Drug Court: Specialized Treatment and Recovery Services (STARS) Sandy Robinson, Director STARS Program Presented at Summer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expedited Family Reunification Project
Advertisements

EHDI Information Management Les R. Schmeltz, MS, CCC-A Iowa Les R. Schmeltz, MS, CCC-A Iowa.
1 C hildren and F amily Research Center University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign School of Social Work TM Integrating Substance Abuse Treatment and Child.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
Let’s Start: A Support Process for Women. INSPIRING HOPE: Changing Women’s Lives Reentry has challenges: Reunification with children Overcoming addiction.
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
The San Francisco Parent Training Institute Triple P Program December 7, 2011 Stephanie Romney, PhD Danijela Zlatevski, PhD
Toni J. Moore, Alcohol and Drug Administrator Sacramento County Department of Health and Human Services Sanford Robinson, Director Specialized Treatment.
In the Matter of ASFA: Examining the First Five Years of the Adoption and Safe Families Act Nancy K. Young, M.S.W., Ph.D Irvine Boulevard, Suite.
Denver Family Integrated Drug Court
1 C hildren and F amily Research Center University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign School of Social Work TM Integrating Substance Abuse Treatment and Child.
1 Milwaukee County Child Welfare Legislative Audit Bureau September 2007.
Mission: Protect the Vulnerable, Promote Strong and Economically Self- Sufficient Families, and Advance Personal and Family Recovery and Resiliency. Charlie.
Substance Abuse Treatment: Gone Astray in the Service Array ? Sid Gardner National Center on Substance Abuse & Child Welfare Sharon DiPirro-Beard Sacramento.
Research Findings from the Sacramento County Dependency Drug Court: Systems Changes and its Impact on Permanency Sharon M. Boles, Ph.D. Nancy K. Young,
Specialized Treatment and Recovery Services S T A R S Specialized Treatment and Recovery Services ENGAGING AND MOTIVATING FATHERS IN AOD TREATMENT.
S.T.A.R.T. Cuyahoga County Department of Children and Family Services Sobriety Treatment and Recovery Teams.
«PERSEAS» Counseling Center for Adolescents and Family.
Foster Care, Methamphetamine and Child Welfare Nebraska Family Impact Seminar February 14, 2007 Presented by Nancy K. Young, Ph.D., Director
1 Coordinated Care Systems NIAAA Social Work Education Module 7 (revised 3/04)
AB429: Family Reunification Program Presented by Phyllis Dobbins-Powell.
Positive Living Navajo AIDS Network, Inc. Melvin Harrison, Executive Director Marco Arviso, Arizona Medical Case Manager.
"The Changing Expectations of Juvenile Justice in Texas"
Outpatient Services Programs Workgroup: Service Provision under Laura’s Law June 11, 2014.
Does Case Management Improve Linkage to Substance Abuse Treatment? By Erin.
Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W.
KidsVoice Multidisciplinary Approach to Dependency Advocacy Scott Hollander, Executive Director.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Needs and Gaps FY
Crossover Youth: Research, Policy and Practice CYPM Overview
National NCP Employment Demonstration Grant Jackie Scharping, Director Bureau of Child Support.
Front End Juvenile Justice System Reform Population of Focus Offenders ages 7 through 15 who come into contact with the juvenile justice system through.
LA County Cases: An Overview of Characteristics & Disposition Outcomes Denise C. Herz, Ph.D. California State University—Los Angeles School of Criminal.
Lisa Pion-Berlin, PhD President and Chief Executive Officer Parents Anonymous ® Inc. Leah Davis, California State Parent Team Achieving Shared Leadership®
Pinellas Safe Start Evaluation Prepared by Sandra Ortega For the 2004 Cross-Site Meeting Baltimore, MD November 2004.
National Conference of State Legislatures
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
Polk County Family Drug Court The Honorable Karla Fultz Todd Beveridge, M.S.W., M.S.
 Specialized program within Dependency court designed to treat parents when substance abuse is a core issue.
Clackamas County Juvenile Drug Court Enhancement Evaluation (OR) NPC Research Outcome and Cost Evaluation Results.
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
Recovery Support Services and Client Outcomes: What do the Data Tell Us? Recovery Community Services Program Grantee Meeting December 14, 2007.
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
Positive Living Navajo AIDS Network, Inc. Melvin Harrison, Executive Director Marco Arviso, Arizona Medical Case Manager.
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
Transitional Living Program “Stepping Stone” A program designed to aid youth in their quest for independence. Kimberly Wood Stepping Stone Transitional.
Pennsylvania Permanency Barriers Project Anne Marie Lancour Heidi Redlich Epstein Mimi Laver Kathleen McNaught Elizabeth Thornton Cristina Cooper Jeffrey.
Vermont Treatment Court Dockets Compassion & Accountability ~~~~~ Innovative Practices Conference Vermont Law School November 15, 2013.
1 Orange County Truancy Response Program Presented by: Frank Boehler, Child Welfare & Attend. Director Orange Unified School District Susan Riezman, Deputy.
Child Welfare Title IV-E Waivers. Parental Substance Abuse and Child Maltreatment: Evaluation Results from the NH IV-E Waiver Project Glenda Kaufman Kantor,
Communication Access and Quality Education for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children The Report of the California Deaf and Hard of Hearing Education Advisory.
Early Intervention Program & Early Family Support Services: Analyzing Program Outcomes with the Omaha System of Documentation Presented to: Minnesota Omaha.
Pennsylvania Permanency Barriers Project Anne Marie Lancour Heidi Redlich Epstein Mimi Laver Brenda Shum Andrea Khoury Debra Jenkins David Kelly Kathleen.
1 Milwaukee County Child Welfare Legislative Audit Bureau March 2007.
Screening and Assessment for Family Engagement, Retention and Recovery – SAFERR Guidance for States and Communities Serving Families with Substance Use.
SEXUAL TRAUMA RECOVERY IS NEEDED TO HELP WOMEN SUCCESSFULLY REINTEGRATE AFTER INCARCERATION Proposal for mental health intervention by Portal Houston in.
Parent Partners of NW Iowa Lauri Carlson Parent Partner Director Phone: Website: parentpartnerprogram.com.
First Steps System of Care Family Systems Collaborations Systems to Systems Nancy Gottlieb, MFT.
Hope Anchors the Soul Family Treatment Centre Healing Mothers Empowering Children Anchoring Families Promising Communities Family Treatment Centre 1200-
BY OLIVIA VELASQUEZ Informational Interview with DCFS Social Worker Maribel Rivera, MSW.
No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting
Pennsylvania Permanency Barriers Project
Panhandle Partnership for Health and Human Services
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
CMSD Aspiring Principal Program 2017 – 2018 Cohort 4
Overview of Data from the Statewide FGDM Evaluation
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
MISSION STATEMENT Our mission is to improve the health status of our communities by providing an integrated system of high quality primary and preventive.
SEND Reforms What does this mean for your working practice?
Barbara Ramlow, Melissa Delaney and Carl Leukefeld
Toronto Child & Youth Advocacy Centre (CYAC)
Presentation transcript:

Sacramento County Dependency Drug Court: Specialized Treatment and Recovery Services (STARS) Sandy Robinson, Director STARS Program Presented at Summer 2007 Brown Bag Webinar Series Session 1—Evidence Based Practice June 12, 2007

Five Components of Reform 1.Comprehensive cross-system joint training 2.Substance Abuse Treatment System of Care 3.Early Intervention Specialists 4.Recovery Management Specialists (STARS) 5.Dependency Drug Court Reforms have been implemented over the past eleven years Sacramento County’s Comprehensive Reform

Sacramento County Dependency Drug Court Model Level 3 Monthly Hearings Jurisdiction & Disposition Hearings Detention Hearing Child in Custody STARS Voluntary Participation STARS Court Ordered Participation Level 1 DDC Hearings 30 Days 60 Days 90 Days Level 2 Weekly or Bi-Weekly Hearings 180 Days Graduation Early Intervention Specialist (EIS) Assessment & Referral to STARS Court Ordered to STARS & 90 Days of DDC

STARS  S  Specialized  T  Treatment  A  And  R  Recovery  S  Services

STARS Goals  Effect client change by removing barriers to treatment and providing support  Provide CPS/Dependency Courts with accurate and reliable documentation

The 5 Points of Success Servant Leadership Positivism Customer Service Professionalism Integrity

Obstacles to Change  Late-stage addiction  Resistance to “the system”  Lack of hope  Fathers often dismissed in dependency cases

Achieving our Goals  Intake  Support  Philosophy  Intangibles

Intake  Parent is immediately assessed for AOD issues at Detention Hearing. Each parent is assessed individually, to help break denial surrounding significant other.  Facility location  Rapid intake

Intake  Immediate access to treatment  Immediate contact with Recovery Specialist – gender specific

Three Strategies for Working with Parents  Use of Motivational Interviewing Techniques  Role-modeling  Accountability

Role Models  Recovery Specialists are: Certified addiction specialists Believable and approachable Comfortable with some self- disclosure Non-punitive in approach

Accountability  Our belief is that when we combine an empathetic, supportive environment with one that stresses accountability, we are able to create change in a profound way.

Intangibles  Belief in redemption and recovery  Overcome prejudices that exist  We give 100% for client’s 100%  Passion

Sacramento Family Treatment Court Evaluation Findings 4940 Irvine Blvd. Suite 202 Irvine, CA /

Treatment Admission Rates*** ***p<.001

Treatment Discharge Status* * p<.05 ; no gender differences were found in terms of discharge status

Treatment Discharge Status by Primary Drug Problem*** ***p<.001

24-Month Child Placement Outcomes **p<.01; ***p<.001

24-Month Child Placement Outcomes by Parent Primary Drug Problem *p<.05 ***p<.001

Time to Reunification at 24 Months n.s.

24-Month Cost Savings Due to Increased Reunification Rates Preliminary Findings  Takes into account the reunification rates, time of out-of-home care, time to reunification, and cost per month  27.2% - Reunification rate for comparison group children  43.6% - Reunification rate for court-ordered DDC group children  221 Additional DDC children reunified  33.1 – Average months in out-of-home care for comparison group children  Average months to reunification for court-ordered DDC children  23.7 month differential  $10,049,036 Estimated Savings in Out-of-Home care costs