Fallacies of Induction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The people Look for some people. Write it down. By the water
Advertisements

A.
Understanding Logical Fallacies
Fallacies Related to Cause & Effect
Logical Fallacies AKA “How NOT to Win an Argument”
Step 2: Analysis of Research. As you research your topic, you will naturally be analyzing the arguments of different authors. Both analyzing an argument.
Critical Thinking: Chapter 10
A summary of common fallacies
©2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 16 Thinking and Speaking Critically.
Formal fallacies and fallacies of language
Inductive Reasoning Concepts and Principles ofConstruction.
1 Logical Fallacies Intro to Debate and Argumentation: Snell.
Inductive Reasoning Concepts and Principles ofConstruction.
Critical Thinking Lecture 12 Causal Arguments
Bias, Persuasion, and Propaganda From:
Fallacies!!!! Fun to play with and criticize Terrible to actually use.
Capstone Seminar Mr. Dana Linton. Logical fallacies are common errors of reasoning. If an argument commits a logical fallacy, then the reasons that it.
 Read the following argument. Examine it closely. Do you think it is logically sound? Why?  [T]he acceptance of abortion does not end with the killing.
This is beautiful! Try not to cry.
Persuasive Strategies Copyright 2006 IRA/NCTE. All rights reserved. ReadWriteThink.org materials may be reproduced for educational purposes. Images ©2006.
How We’re Persuaded ETHOS = LOGOS = PATHOS =
Fallacies Information taken from Purdue OWL, Nancy Wood’s Perspectives on Argument and Annette Rottenberg’s Elements of Argument.
What is Knowledge?.
Chapter 31: Fallacies of Weak Induction. Appeal to Authority (pp ) The fallacy of appeal to authority occurs when someone is taken to be an authority.
I am ready to test!________ I am ready to test!________
Sight Words.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is, roughly speaking, an error of reasoning. When someone adopts a position, or tries to persuade someone else to adopt.
INFORMAL FALLACIES. FALLACIES OF RELEVANCE Errors resulting from attempts to appeal to things that are not relevant, i.e., not really connected to or.
1. You will read a test story in which you should treat all the information in the story as true and accurate. 2. A set of statements about the story,
Terms Propositions Fallacies Miscellaneous.
What is a logical fallacy?. Logical fallacies Do you know what a “fallacy” is? Look at the word – it has “falla” in it, which could mean “fault,” “flaw,”
LOGICAL FALLACIES By Jennifer Lynn Abernethy. Part I: AVOIDING THE QUESTION.
District 200 High frequency words
Sight Word List.
Fallacies To error in reason is human; to analyze divine!
Fallacies As you write your rough draft, be careful to avoid fallacies in your reasoning.
Logic Fallacies Debate Class Production Spain Park High School
Logical Fallacies.
High Frequency Words August 31 - September 4 around be five help next
Sight Words.
High Frequency Words.
LOGIC 2+2=4… right?. Logical Reasoning Statements formed from sound thinking and proof of reasoning.
Fallacy An error of reasoning based on faulty use of evidence or incorrect interpretation of facts.
Fallacies The quickest ways to lose arguments. Introduction to Logic O Argument: The assertion of a conclusion based on logical premises O Premise: Proposition.
Errors in Reasoning. Fallacies A Fallacy is “any error in reasoning that makes an argument fail to establish its conclusion.” There are two kinds of fallacies.
Logical Fallacies A logical fallacy is an element of an argument that is flawed If spotted one can essentially render an entire line of reasoning invalid.
All of these children are wrong.
Fallacies Mistakes in reasoning or thinking.  Occurs when a speaker makes a claim that presents a range of choices.  Writers that use either/or are.
Ad Hominem (Personal Attack) An attempt to discredit the argument by discrediting the character of the person advancing it.
Talking points 1. Would Neil still have committed suicide if Mr. Keating had never come into his life? Who is most to blame for Neil’s death? Mr. Keating?
Persuasive Speech Unit Logical Fallacies Fallacy: A mistake in an argument that automatically invalidates it.
Created By Sherri Desseau Click to begin TACOMA SCREENING INSTRUMENT FIRST GRADE.
Unit Four Seminar. Fallacies A.What is a fallacy? 1. A fallacy is a defect in an argument that consists in something other than false premises alone.
ESSENTIAL WORDS.
Informal Logic Fallacies
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
AcDv B61 Recognizing Logical Fallacies
Defect that weakens an argument
Logical Fallacies Unit 2.
Errors in Reasoning.
Induction (generalization) Abduction (causal reasoning)
A bite of a history It’s not good to make important decisions when someone is angry. So, you shouldn’t make this decision right now. All students have.
Logical Fallacies.
Logical Fallacy Notes Comp. & Rhet. ENG 1010.
Errors in Reasoning.
Informal Logical Fallacies
Chapter 14: Argumentation
Logical Fallacies Intro to Debate and Argumentation: Snell
Presentation transcript:

Fallacies of Induction Chapter 7 Fallacies of Induction These arguments are supposed to raise the probability of their conclusion but fail almost entirely.

Fallacies of Generalization Hasty Generalization (Generalizing from Too Few Cases Argument by Anecdote Fallacy of Small Sample But good reasoning can come from small samples Generalizing from Exceptional Cases Biased Sample Self-Selection Accident © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Generalizing from Too Few Cases Often called Hasty Generalization Example: “The food in this town is lousy, judging from this meal.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Which is Hasty Generalizing? “Like, EVERYONE in New York is friendly! Everybody I met was as nice as can be!” “This beer is terrible. I can tell that from one sip.” 2 is okay because the “population” (this beer) is homogeneous. © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Is this hasty generalizing? “Man! Old folks around here are terrible drivers! Did you see that old coot passing me on the right??!!” Yes. © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Hasty Generalization (continued) Two common versions of hasty generalization: Argument by Anecdote Fallacy of Small Sample © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Sometimes Hasty Generalizing takes the form known as: “ARGUING FROM ANECDOTE.” What is an anecdote? © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

An anecdote is a story… “One time I saw this airplane parked right in the middle of the tarmac in everyone’s way. I asked who it belonged to. Someone told me it was John Travolta’s. Folks, that’s the trouble with these Hollywood liberals. They only care about themselves.” —Rush Limbaugh, paraphrased © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

ARGUING FROM ANECDOTE is just a form of Hasty Generalizing. Now you know why statisticians say “Anecdotes don’t prove anything.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Argument by Anecdote “The IRS isn’t interested in the big corporations, just middle-class taxpayers like you and me. I was audited last year—you ever hear of Exxon-Mobile getting nailed?” From 10e ex. 10-31.1 © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Anecdotes are often used to “refute” a body of contrary evidence. “This global warming stuff…what a crock. We had the coldest January on record right here in Columbus last year.” Anecdotes are often used to “refute” a body of contrary evidence. © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

It won’t work!!! “ARGUING FROM ANECDOTE” is nothing more than generalizing from a single case or two. © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Watch out for a small sample! Small samples provide very weak support! © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Fallacy of Small Sample “This Chihuahua bites. Therefore, all Chihuahuas bite.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Good reasoning from small samples When a sample is taken from a homogeneous population, a generalization can be made from the sample. “This sip of coffee is delicious, therefore all sips of coffee from this cup will be delicious.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Generalizing from Exceptional Cases A fallacy occurs when a speaker or writer attempts to support a general statement by citing an atypical supporting case. © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Generalizing from Exceptional Cases Two varieties of generalizing from exceptional cases: Biased Sample Self-Selection Fallacy © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Fallacy of Biased Sample Basing a generalization about a large heterogeneous population on an atypical or skewed sample. Example: “Judging from what car dealers say, most business people now think the economy is improving.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Fallacy of Biased Sample Example: “George W. Bush was really popular in South America. Look at how many people came out to cheer when he went down there.” The sample (South Americans outside cheering) UNDER-REPRESENTS South Americans who don’t feel like going out. It is atypical. © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Self-Selection Fallacy Example: “Most Americans have a favorable view of the president as a person, judging from an online survey conducted by CNN.” A Self-Selection Fallacy occurs when generalizing from a sample whose members are in the sample by their own choice. © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Accident The Fallacy of Accident occurs when it is assumed that a general statement applies to a specific case even though that case may be an exception. Example: “Everyone should have access to a college education. Therefore, anyone who applies should be admitted to Cal Poly.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Accident Another example: “This city has a very high crime rate; therefore it will be dangerous to shop in this neighborhood.” Fallacy of Accident! To infer from the city’s overall high crime rate, considered in and of itself without regard to anything else, that a particular location in the city has a high crime rate is to commit this fallacy. © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Weak Analogy Arguments based on debatable or unimportant similarities between things. Example: “My mom is just like Adolf Hitler. I doubt she will let me go out with you guys.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Weak analogy? “Hey, the ice caps on Mars are melting, and it isn’t due to fossil fuel emissions!! So melting ice caps here aren’t due to fossil fuel emissions either!” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Weak Analogy! Earth and Mars are physically similar– a good reason to think ice caps COULD melt on Earth in the absence of fuel emissions. Not a good argument for thinking fuel emissions DIDN’T cause melting here. © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. More Fallacies Fallacies based on authority. Fallacies based on popularity or common practice. © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Fallacious Appeal to Authority Trying to support a contention by offering as evidence the opinion of a nonauthoritative source. Example: “My father thinks the president lied. Therefore the president lied.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Three look-alike mistakes Fallacious Appeal to Popularity Fallacious Appeal to Common Practice Fallacious Appeal to Tradition The Args: Popularity, Common Practice, Tradition will move to Ch. 7, Induction fallacies © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Fallacious Appeal to Popularity Treating an issue that cannot be settled by public opinion as if it can. Example: “Hondas get great gas mileage. Everyone knows that.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Fallacious Appeal to Common Practice Trying to justify a practice on the grounds that it is traditional or is commonly practiced. Example: “This is the right way. This is the way it has always been done.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Fallacious Appeal to Tradition Doing X is a tradition. Therefore it should continue being a tradition. Example: “Traditionally marriage has been restricted to heterosexual couples. Therefore it’s right to restrict marriage to heterosexual couples.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Bandwagon fallacy Similar to the fallacious appeal to popularity. “You shouldn’t eat at Applebee’s. No right thinking person does.” The Bandwagon Fallacy plays on our desire to be in step with popular opinion. © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Cause and Effect Fallacies “After I took Zicam my cold went away fast. Therefore taking Zicam caused my cold to go away fast.” How do you know that? This is a cause/effect fallacy. © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc Assuming that the fact that one event came after another establishes that it was caused by it. Example: “After I played poker my cold went away fast. Therefore playing poker caused my cold to go away fast.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Cum Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc Assuming that the fact that one event happened around the same time as another establishes that it was caused by it. Example: “John had a heart attack while he was saying a prayer. Therefore the prayer caused the heart attack.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. “Every day the sun comes up right after the rooster crows; therefore the rooster causes the sun to come up.” Correlation does not prove causation! This is post hoc, ergo propter hoc. Even the fact that one event invariably follows another still does not prove that the first caused the second. © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Varieties of post hoc fallacies—Overlooking regression Example: After a terrible evening with mosquitoes, you wear a copper ‘Mosquito Be-gone’ bracelet. The mosquitoes didn’t seem so bad after that. You conclude that the bracelet works. [If the average value of a variable is atypical on one measurement, it is likely to be less atypical on a subsequent measurement.] © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Varieties of post hoc fallacies—Overlooking random variation Example: “In our tests, we asked randomly selected men to drive a golf ball as far as they could. We then had them wear our magnetic bracelet and try again. On the second occasion the men hit the ball an average of ten feet further. Our bracelet can lengthen your drive as well.” [The average length of the drive will vary randomly from test to test.] © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Varieties of cum hoc fallacies—overlooking reversed causation. Example: “People who walk long distances enjoy good health. Therefore walking long distances will make you healthy.” [Perhaps being healthy makes people more inclined to take long walks] © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Varieties of post and cum hoc fallacies—Overlooking coincidence Example: “After Susan threw out the chain letter, she was in an automobile accident. Therefore throwing out the chain letter caused her to get in an automobile accident.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Varieties of post and cum hoc fallacies—Overlooking coincidence Another example: “I got cancer when I lived under a high-voltage power line. Therefore, the high voltage power line caused my cancer.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Varieties of post and cum hoc fallacies—Overlooking coincidence Another Example: “Chimney fires and long underwear purchases increase in frequency at the very same time. Therefore chimney fires cause people to buy long underwear.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Varieties of post and cum hoc fallacies—Overlooking a common cause Example: “I left the lights on when I went to bed. Next morning I woke up with a headache. Therefore sleeping with the lights on causes headaches.” [Perhaps being tired caused both headache and leaving the lights on] © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Argument by Anecdote (Causal Variety) It is a fallacy to try to support (or disprove) a cause-and-effect claim by telling a story. Example: I’ve heard doctors say eating red meat increases your risk of heart disease, but don’t believe it. My uncle lived to be a 100 and ate red meat 3 times a day. He didn’t die of a heart attack. Explanation should replace ^ © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Slippery Slope A fallacy that occurs when a speaker or writer rests a conclusion on an unsupported warning that is controversial and tendentious, to the effect that something will progress by degrees to an undesirable outcome. Example: “If we legalize pot, the next thing ya know we will be making meth legal, then heroin—it will never end.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

© 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Slippery Slope Another example: “Twenty percent? You want to tip her 20%? Hey, next thing you’ll want to tip 25%! And then 30%! It will never end.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Untestable Explanation Some explanations are vague or circular or not testable even in principle. Such explanations are said to commit the fallacy of Untestable Explanation. Example: “He has heart issues because of sins done in a previous life.” © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

What do these two explanations have in common? “The attack on the Twin Towers was God’s way of telling us we are sinners.” “What brought Todd and Brenda together? Fate.” One thing they have in common: Neither one can be TESTED. © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.

Untestable Explanation A different example: “Men are biologically weaker than women and that’s why they don’t live as long.” —An “expert” quoted in Weekly World News Some assertions can’t be tested due to their vagueness. © 2015 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved.