Paracetamol plus Ibuprofen for the treatment of fever in children (PITCH): RCT Journal Club 1st May 2012 SCH.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Appraisal of an RCT using a critical appraisal checklist
Advertisements

Journal Club 17/09/13 Rob Morton.
Tamsulosin for Ureteral Stones in the Emergency Department: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Journal Club by Dr.Suad Al-Abri R4 Sep 2009 Annals of Emergency.
Does the use of antipyretics in children prolong febrile illness? David King Clinical Research Fellow 05/09/2013.
Fluid Administration in the Management of DKA and Cerebral Oedema Journal Club 19th June 2014 Dr James West (ST7)
Randomised Clinical Trial: Lactobacillus reuteri DSM vs. Placebo in Children With Acute Diarrohea Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012:36 (4): R. Francavilla.
1 Health and Disease in Populations 2002 Week 9 – 2/5/02 Randomised controlled trials 2 Dr Jenny Kurinczuk.
Journal Club Usha Niranjan PICU. Rationale 2 x cases of severe dehydration with metabolic acidosis –requesting for HDU management –as given 40mls/kg fluid.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November–December 2014.
Maitland K et al ,N Engl J Med 2011;364:
Introduction to Evidence Based Medicine Pediatric Clerkship LSUHSC.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2013.
Critical Appraisal of an Article on Therapy. Why critical appraisal? Why therapy?
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence March–April 2009.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence May–June 2005.
1.A 33 year old female patient admitted to the ICU with confirmed pulmonary embolism. It was noted that she had elevated serum troponin level. Does this.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence July-August 2006.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence March-April 2006.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2011.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence March–April 2015.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2007.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2010.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November–December 2009.
Triage Nurse Initiation of Corticosteroids in Paediatric Asthma is Associated With Improved Emergency Department Efficiency Zemak et al Pediatrics Volume.
Critical Appraisal of an Article on Therapy (2). Formulate Clinical Question Patient/ population Intervention Comparison Outcome (s) Women with IBS Alosetron.
Gut-directed hypnotherapy for functional abdominal pain or irritable bowel syndrome in children: a systematic review Journal club presentation
SCH Journal Club 9 January 2014 Dr James Donnelly
The early use of Antibiotics in at Risk CHildren with InfluEnza Chief Investigator: Dr Kay Wang Senior Trial.
Progress with the literature reviews for the CHOICE programme Chris Dickens.
JOURNAL CLUB U.NIRANJAN ST6 Paediatrics. Article Effectiveness of home based early intervention on children’s BMI at age 2: randomised controlled trial.
Testing People Scientifically.  Clinical trials are research studies in which people help doctors and researchers find ways to improve health care. Each.
Immunoglobulin plus prednisolone in severe Kawaski disease (RAISE study) Steph Borg 22 November 2012 SCH Journal Club.
Oral Dexamethasone for Bronchiolitis: A randomized Trial Journal club 20/2/14 Alansari K et al. Oral dexamethasone for bronchiolitis: a randomised trial.
Progesterone and Traumatic Brain Injury. from: Progesterone is a female hormone important for the regulation of.
Journal Club by Dr Mohammad Al-Busafi R4.  Compare efficacy of  Ibuprofen 10 mg /kg  Paracetamol and codeine ( cocodamol ! ) 1mg/kg (codeine component.
Critical Appraisal of a Randomized Controlled Trail By ANNERIE HATTINGH 07 January 2009.
Systematic Reviews.
1 ST JOURNAL CLUB Dr.Raihana AL-Anqoudi. OUTLINE ABOUT THE ARTICLE METHOD AND MATERIALS CRITICAL APPRAISAL LIMITATIONS.
Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.
Repair of obstetric anal sphincter tears Journal Club 18 th February 2011 By Dr. Ian Haines GP-ST1 & Nevine te West.
Critical Appraisal Did the study address a clearly focused question? Did the study address a clearly focused question? Was the assignment of patients.
Clinical Writing for Interventional Cardiologists.
What makes difficult asthma difficult? SCH Journal Club Nicki Barker 2012 June 2012 Dysfunctional breathing in children1.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence September–October 2012.
A Randomised, Controlled Trial of Acetaminophen, Ibuprofen, and Codeine for Acute Pain relief in Children with Musculoskeletal Trauma Clark et al, Paediatrics.
Journal Club Season 8 20th August 2015 Saharwash Jamali
How To Design a Clinical Trial
Critical Appraisal (CA) I Prepared by Dr. Hoda Abd El Azim.
SCH Journal Club Use of time from fever onset improves the diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein in identifying bacterial infections Wednesday 13 th.
Afebrile Infants With UTI and the Risk for Bacteraemia Journal Club Sheffield Children’s Hospital Naheed Maher 7 th January 2015.
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
PTP 661 EVIDENCE ABOUT INTERVENTIONS CRITICALLY APPRAISE THE QUALITY AND APPLICABILITY OF AN INTERVENTION RESEARCH STUDY Min Huang, PT, PhD, NCS.
Compliance Original Study Design Randomised Surgical care Medical care.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November-December 2012.
Journal club Pooja Sachdev. Clinical case 4 month old 2 day history of coryzal symptoms, decreased feeding and increased WOB this morning Bilateral wheeze.
Chronic pelvic pain Journal Club 17 th June 2011 Dr Claire Hoxley (GPST1) Dr Harpreet Rayar (GPST2)
Article Title Resident Name, MD SVCH6/13/2016 Journal Club.
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence September–October 2013.
Critical Appraisal of a Paper Feedback. Critical Appraisal Full Reference –Authors (Surname & Abbreviations) –Year of publication –Full Title –Journal.
 Exercise and Vitamin D in Fall Prevention Among Older Women Journal Club, June 2016 Theresa Drallmeier and Tu Dao.
EBM R1張舜凱.
Sample Journal Club Your Name Here.
Chief Investigator: Dr Kay Wang Senior Trial Manager: Tricia Carver
The early use of Antibiotics in at Risk CHildren with InfluEnza
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence
Critical Reading of Clinical Study Results
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence May-June, 2018
DO ANTIPYRETIC DRUGS PREVENT FEBRILE CONVULSIONS
Appraisal of an RCT using a critical appraisal checklist
Presentation transcript:

Paracetamol plus Ibuprofen for the treatment of fever in children (PITCH): RCT Journal Club 1st May 2012 SCH

Aim of the study To determine whether paracetamol plus ibuprofen are superior to either drug alone for increasing time without fever and for the relief of fever associated discomfort in febrile children managed at home

falcon Tue 12-Aug-08 16:45:10 I wouldn't give both simultaneously to a child Seeline Wed 07-Mar-12 10:33:18 I have been told by GP that you can give ibuprofen in between Calpol ie both are 4-6 hourly doses so just give the other 2-3 hours after the first and keep alternating allsquareknickersnofurcoat Mon 07-Mar-11 00:35:30 I was told by the doctor that you could take full doses of both as they do different things? Not sure how it works for a child though. Rebelcountycailin Sat 07-Jan-12 20:49:36 Please, please help - thinking I was holding the bottle of Paracetamol, I gave my 2.2yo a double dose of Ibuprofen by accident. Do I need to take him to A&E? He is fine and running around at the moment Gigondas Sat 07-Jan-12 21:05:06 You can give paracetamol with nurofen. Sounds like he has had double the dose so I would take him to A and E to be sure as they can give him something to mop it up Rebelcountycailin Sat 07-Jan-12 21:03:27 He is busy eating brioche rolls and dry cheerios and he's had some water

What do you do? What advice to you give?

So....let’s get to the bottom of this... What is better...? PICO Current practice Methods and Intervention Determine the validity and reliability of the paper chosen using the CASP tool Discuss if it changes our practice

PICO Patient: Children ages between 6 months and 6 years with axillary temperatures of at least 37.8o and up to 41o Intervention: Advice on physical measures to reduce temperatures and the provision of, and advice to give, paracatamol plus ibuprofen, ibuprofen or paracetamol alone. Comparison: Placebo Outcome: Time without fever in the first 4 hours after dose

Current practice: This is what NICE suggest... Consider either paracetamol or ibuprofen as an option if the child appears distressed or is unwell. Take the views and wishes of parents and carers into account when considering the use of antipyretic agents. Do not administer paracetamol and ibuprofen at the same time, but consider using the alternative agent if the child does not respond to the first drug.

Literature Search Medline Paracetamol and Ibuprofen and Fever Limited to Clinical Trial, English, 0-18 years old 44 results Secondary care, single time points, conflicting or insufficient evidence Paracetamol plus ibuprofen for the treatment of fever in children (PITCH): randomised controlled trial Alastair D Hay et al BMJ 2008;337:a1302

Methods Recruited and followed up children between January 2005 and May 2007 Recruitment from all NHS services – research nurses present in waiting rooms, contactable by fax or phone via local GPs, local promotion in media. Once idenitifed, parents of eligible children were contacted and met with another nurse to verify eligibilty and written consent obtained. The nurse then called automated randomised telephone service and randomised to one of three arms Followed up at 24 hours, 48 hours and Day 5

Inclusion and Exclusion Inclusion criteria 6 months – 6 years Unwell with temperature of at least 37.8o and up to 41o As a result of illness that could be managed at home Exclusion criteria Required hospital admission Clinically dehydrated Recently participated in another trial Previously participated in PITCH Known allergy, intolerance, contraindication to drugs Chronic neuro, cardiac, respiratory (expect asthma) renal or liver disease Parents who could not read or write in English

Intervention All parents given two bottles – either both active or one active and one placebo Given the difference in dosing schedules parents knew which one was paracetamol/placebo and ibuprofen/placebo Dose determined by weight and either QDS or TDS for 48 hours In the first 4 hours after the drugs were given was the ‘efficacy period’ The drugs were given regularly from 4 to 24 hours – ‘proactive period’ From 24 to 48 hours the parents were told to give the drugs in response to their children’s symptoms – ‘reactive period’ The drugs were then retrieved and parents adviced to use OTC medication until day 5

Outcomes All outcome measures were timed in relation to the first dose of antipyretics Axillary temperature probe for the first 24 hours, measuring temperature every 30 seconds Symptom diary, standard axillary thermometer Primary outcomes – Number of minutes without fever in the first four hours Proportion of children reported as ‘normal’ on the discomfort scale at 48 hours (normal, not quite normal, some distress, very distressed) Secondary outcomes – Collected at three time points In the first 24 hours the time to temperature first falling below 37.2 (fever clearance) Time spent without fever over 24 hours and the proportion of children without fever associated symptoms At 48 hours and day 5 the study obtained data on fever associated symptoms measured by parents

CASP Are the results of the trial valid? 1. Did the trial address a clearly focused issue? Yes 2. Was the assignment of patients to treatments randomized? Yes, telephone service with allocation to one of the three arms of the trial minimised by age, severity of fever, discomfort scale, previous duration of fever and current antibiotic use 3. Were all of the patients who entered the trial properly accounted for at its conclusion? N=51 and n=50 in the flow chart but n=52 in the tables Children reported to be ‘normal’ in table 1 denominators may vary owing to missing data ‘in most cases fewer than 4 children’

CASP Are the results of the trial valid? 4. Were patients, healthcare workers and study personnel blind to treatment? Healthcare workers and study personnel – yes Parents – know which was ibuprofen/placebo and which was paracetamol/placebo due to the dosing regimes 5. Were the groups similar at the start of the trial? Mostly yes – table 1 Baseline characteristics More boys in Ibuprofen alone group Initial discomfort scale ‘crying or very distressed’ more in in the paracetamol plus ibuprofen group

CASP Are the results of the trial valid? 6. Aside from the experimental intervention, were the groups treated equally? Yes, all groups received same treatment and follow up Deviation from the protocol occurred in 13 children who received a fifth dose of paracetamol and 18 children who received a fourth dose of ibuprofen – included in the results

CASP What are the results? 7. How large was the treatment effect? 8. How precise was the estimate of the treatment effect?

Results Summary: Primary outcome Time without fever in the first four hours in the paracetamol plus ibuprofen group was significantly more than paracatamol alone, and similarly with ibuprofen alone compared to paracetamol alone. Suggesting little difference in giving paracetamol plus ibuprofen than giving ibuprofen alone Wide confidence interval and large P values suggest no difference between all three arms of the trial for being ‘normal’ at 48 hours

Results Figure 3

Results Summary Secondary outcome Fever clearance (the time to temperature first falling to below 37.2) was quickest in the paracetamol plus ibuprofen than paracetamol alone, and that ibuprofen was superior to paracetamol alone No evidence for fever associated symptoms

Results Table 4

CASP Will the results help locally? 9. Can the results be applied to the local population? Yes, broad selection of patients accessing different types of healthcare 10. Were all clinically important outcomes considered? Yes, including adverse effects 11. Are the benefits worth the harms and costs? Separate paper suggests there is no strong evidence of a difference in cost between the treatments Risk of unintentionally exceeding the maximum dose – 6 – 13% in just this trial!

Ibuprofen is better than paracetamol alone in the first 4 hours Summary So, the bottom line is... Well designed study but no significant effect found on parent’s opinion of discomfort in their children Ibuprofen is better than paracetamol alone in the first 4 hours Consider adding in paracetamol once considering the risks to reduce fever over 24 hours

Does this change your practice?

Possible Limitations Temperature of 37.8 – arbitary figure Parents not fully blinded to treatment and ability to compare at home if they wanted to –might affect parental recording of discomfort, but not of time without fever Dose by weight Axillary themomter