Kevin Bundy, Caltech The Mass Assembly History of Field Galaxies: Detection of an Evolving Mass Limit for Star-Forming Galaxies Kevin Bundy R. S. Ellis,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Mechanisms of Galaxy Evolution Things that happen to galaxies… Galaxy merging Things that happen to galaxies… Galaxy merging.
Advertisements

KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club Comparing the Relation between Star Formation and Galaxy Mass in Different Environments - B. Vulcani et al. 2010, ApJ,
Lecture #4 Observational facts Olivier Le Fèvre – LAM Cosmology Summer School 2014.
Gabriella De Lucia, November 1,Tucson MPA The emergence of the red-sequence Gabriella De Lucia Max-Planck Institut für Astrophysik A Workshop on Massive.
Galaxies and their Environments Nick Cowan UW Astronomy January 26, 2007 Nick Cowan UW Astronomy January 26, 2007.
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS Mass determination Kauffmann et al. determined masses using SDSS spectra (Hdelta & D4000) Comparison with our determination: Relative.
Venice – Gregory RudnickMarch 2006 The Mean SED and Stellar Mass Density at z
Massive galaxies in massive datasets M. Bernardi, J. Hyde and E. Tundo M. Bernardi, J. Hyde and E. Tundo University of Pennsylvania.
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation Section 4: Semi-Analytic Models of Galaxy Formation Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael.
Eight billion years of galaxy evolution Eric Bell Borch, Zheng, Wolf, Papovich, Le Floc’h, & COMBO-17, MIPS, and GEMS teams Venice
Downsizing & Galaxy Formation 2 nd Mitchell Symposium - April 2006 P. McCarthy OCIW Gemini Deep Deep Survey Team.
AGN and Quasar Clustering at z= : Results from the DEEP2 + AEGIS Surveys Alison Coil Hubble Fellow University of Arizona Chandra Science Workshop.
“ Testing the predictive power of semi-analytic models using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey” Juan Esteban González Birmingham, 24/06/08 Collaborators: Cedric.
C. Halliday, A. Cimatti, J. Kurk, M. Bolzonella, E. Daddi, M. Mignoli, P. Cassata, M. Dickinson, A. Franceschini, B. Lanzoni, C. Mancini, L. Pozzetti,
Sugata Kaviraj Hertfordshire Heidelberg 14 July 2014 With: Stas Shabala, Richard Ellis, Adam Deller, Enno Middelberg, Kevin Schawinski, Sukyoung Yi Star.
Galaxies at High Redshift and Reionization Bunker, A., Stanway, E., Ellis, R., Lacy, M., McMahon, R., Eyles, L., Stark D., Chiu, K. 2009, ASP Conference.
Venice – March 2006 Discovery of an Extremely Massive and Evolved Galaxy at z ~ 6.5 B. Mobasher (STScI)
Star Formation Rate and Neutral Gas Content as a Function of Redshift and Environment Collaborators: Mike Pracy, Jayaram Chengalur, Frank Briggs, Matthew.
Evolution of Galaxy groups Michael Balogh Department of Physics University of Waterloo.
Cosmological formation of elliptical galaxies * Thorsten Naab & Jeremiah P. Ostriker (Munich, Princeton) T.Naab (USM), P. Johannson (USM), J.P. Ostriker.
Establishing the Connection Between Quenching and AGN MGCT II November, 2006 Kevin Bundy (U. of Toronto) Caltech/Palomar: R. Ellis, C. Conselice Chandra:
DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey and Post-Starburst galaxies at z~1
Star Formation Downsizing: Testing the Role of Mergers and AGN Kevin Bundy (University of Toronto) Richard Ellis (Caltech), Tommaso Treu (UCSB), Antonis.
Galactic Metamorphoses: Role of Structure Christopher J. Conselice.
The assembly of stellar mass during the last 10 Gyr: VVDS results B.Garilli on behalf of the VVDS consortium 1 topic, 4 approaches, concordant results.
Luminosity and Mass functions in spectroscopically-selected groups at z~0.5 George Hau, Durham University Dave Wilman (MPE) Mike Balogh (Waterloo) Richard.
The Gas Properties of Galaxies on and off of a Star-Forming Sequence David Schiminovich + GALEX Science Team Columbia University.
Conference “Summary” Alice Shapley (Princeton). Overview Multitude of new observational, multi-wavelength results on massive galaxies from z~0 to z>5:
The Extremely Red Objects in the CLASH Fields The Extremely Red Galaxies in CLASH Fields Xinwen Shu (CEA, Saclay and USTC) CLASH 2013 Team meeting – September.
Understanding formation of galaxies from their environments Yipeng Jing Shanghai Astronomical Observatory.
Scaling relations of spheroids over cosmic time: Tommaso Treu (UCSB)
FIRST LIGHT IN THE UNIVERSE Richard Ellis, Caltech 1.Role of Observations in Cosmology & Galaxy Formation 2.Galaxies & the Hubble Sequence 3.Cosmic Star.
Science Achievements of the DEEP2/AEGIS survey by S. M. Faber and the DEEP & AEGIS Teams Supported by CARA, UCO/Lick Observatory, the National Science.
The coordinated growth of stars, haloes and large-scale structure since z=1 Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
The Evolution of Groups and Clusters " Richard Bower, ICC, Durham " With thanks to the collaborators that have shaped my views Mike Balogh, Dave Wilman,
The Large Scale Structure of Seyferts and LINERs and Implications for their Central Engines Anca Constantin Drexel University AGN are not unbiased tracers.
The Environmental Effect on the UV Color-Magnitude Relation of Early-type Galaxies Hwihyun Kim Journal Club 10/24/2008 Schawinski et al. 2007, ApJS 173,
Elizabeth J. McGrath, Aurora Y. Kesseli, Arjen van der Wel, Eric Bell, Guillermo Barro and the CANDELS Collaboration QUIESCENT DISKS IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE.
1 The mid-infrared view of red-sequence galaxies Jongwan Ko Yonsei Univ. Observatory/KASI Feb. 28, 2012 The Second AKARI Conference: Legacy of AKARI: A.
Naoyuki Tamura (University of Durham) The Universe at Redshifts from 1 to 2 for Early-Type Galaxies ~ Unveiling “Build-up Era” with FMOS ~
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs Lan Wang Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann (MPA) Cheng Li (MPA/SHAO, USTC) Gabriella.
A wide field multi-wavelength survey of two clusters at z~0.5 Tommaso Treu (UCSB)
The Star Formation Histories of Red Sequence Galaxies Mike Hudson U. Waterloo / IAP Steve Allanson (Waterloo) Allanson, MH et al 09, ApJ 702, 1275 Russell.
The Role of Galaxy Mergers in Forming the Red-Sequence Galaxies
The epoch of star formation for th e most massive galaxies Sarah Brough (AAO)
Models & Observations galaxy clusters Gabriella De Lucia Max-Planck Institut für Astrophysik Ringberg - October 28, 2005.
The relation between the galaxy stellar mass distribution and the mass of its hosting halo BENEDETTA VULCANI KAVLI IPMU What Regulates Galaxy Evolution?
How do galaxies accrete their mass? Quiescent and star - forming massive galaxies at high z Paola Santini THE ORIGIN OF GALAXIES: LESSONS FROM THE DISTANT.
Galactic Astronomy 銀河物理学特論 I Lecture 3-2: Evolution of Luminosity Functions of Galaxies Seminar: Lily et al. 1995, ApJ, 455, 108 Lecture: 2011/12/12.
Formation and evolution of early-type galaxies Pieter van Dokkum (Yale)
SWIRE view on the "Passive Universe": Studying the evolutionary mass function and clustering of galaxies with the SIRTF Wide-Area IR Extragalactic Survey.
How are galaxies influenced by their environment? rachel somerville STScI Predictions & insights from hierarchical models with thanks to Eric Bell the.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
The GOOD NICMOS Survey (GNS): Observing Massive Galaxies at z > 2 Christopher J. Conselice (University of Nottingham) with Asa Bluck, Ruth Gruethbacher,
Early Results from the DEEP2 Redshift Survey Benjamin Weiner (UCO/Lick Observatory) and the DEEP collaboration.
What is EVLA? Giant steps to the SKA-high ParameterVLAEVLAFactor Point Source Sensitivity (1- , 12 hr.)10  Jy1  Jy 10 Maximum BW in each polarization0.1.
Galaxy mass-to-light ratios at z> 1 from the Fundamental Plane: measuring the star formation epoch and mass evolution of galaxies van der Wel, Rix, Franx,
Galaxy evolution in z=1 groups The Gemini GEEC2 survey Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
9 Gyr of massive galaxy evolution Bell (MPIA), Wolf (Oxford), Papovich (Arizona), McIntosh (UMass), and the COMBO-17, GEMS and MIPS teams Baltimore 27.
The Genesis and Star Formation Histories of Massive Galaxies Sept 27, 2004 P. J. McCarthy MGCT Carnegie Observatories.
The Mass-Dependent Role of Galaxy Mergers Kevin Bundy (UC Berkeley) Hubble Symposium March, 2009 Masataka Fukugita, Richard Ellis, Tom Targett Sirio Belli,
GALAXY MASSES…AND BACK TO DOWNSIZING!. Motivation Great progress in tracking star formation history but: - SF density averages over different physical.
Exploring the formation epoch of massive galaxies O.Almaini, S. Foucaud, C. Simpson, I. Smail, K. Sekiguchi, M. Watson, M. Page, P. Hirst Michele Cirasuolo.
BULGE FRACTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF STAR FORMATION IN SAMI GALAXIES Greg Goldstein PhD student, Dept of Physics and Astronomy, Macquarie University Supervisors:
A self consistent model of galaxy formation across cosmic time Bruno Henriques Simon White, Peter Thomas Raul Angulo, Qi Guo, Gerard Lemson, Volker Springel.
AEGIS-X: Results from the Chandra survey of the Extended Groth Strip
THE FIRST GALAXY FORMATION MODEL WITH THE TP-AGB:
Galaxy Populations in the Most Distant Clusters
Seong-Kook Lee Center for the Exploration of the Origin of the Universe (CEOU), Seoul National University (SNU) (Myungshin Im, Jae-Woo Kim, Minhee Hyun,
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs
Presentation transcript:

Kevin Bundy, Caltech The Mass Assembly History of Field Galaxies: Detection of an Evolving Mass Limit for Star-Forming Galaxies Kevin Bundy R. S. Ellis, C. J. Conselice, J. Taylor, M. Cooper, C. Willmer, B. Weiner, P. Eisenhardt, K. Noeske, A. Coil, DEEP2 Team Galaxies and Structures through Cosmic Time, Venice March 2006 Submitted to ApJ, astro-ph/

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Downsizing In Words The sites of active star formation shift from high-mass galaxies at early epochs (z~1-2) to low-mass galaxies as a function of cosmic time. Term coined by Cowie et al. 1996

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Downsizing In Observations Surveys to z < 2 : Cowie et al. 1996, Brinchmann & Ellis 2000, Bell et al COMBO17, Bauer et al. 2005, Juneau et al. 2005, … Juneau et al Treu et al Other methods : Treu et al. 2005, van der Wel et al. 2005, Heavens et al. 2005, Jimenez et al. 2005, … Higher SFR

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Downsizing in Theory Kevin Bundy, Caltech Galaxy Transformation: Mergers fuel AGN which expel gas and prevent further star formation. But, merging is hierarchical, driven by DM assembly. Redshift z Downsizing Threshold Springel et al Simulated Disk Merger with AGN Feedback age Partial Solution: AGN feedback (Croton et al 2005) The fundamental problem…

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Possible Explanations 1. Local Environment: Massive galaxies live in dense environments that mature more rapidly: ram pressure stripping, encounters, harassment. 2. Internal Physics: Physical processes (AGN, SF) within galaxies depend on both mass and redshift.

Kevin Bundy, Caltech The DEEP2 Redshift + Palomar K-band Survey DEEP2: 40,000 spec-z’s from DEIMOS on Keck II 80 Keck nights, z<1.5 over 3 deg 2, R < 24.1 Spread over 4 fields, including the EGS Palomar K-band: 65 nights with WIRC on 200 inch 1.5 deg 2 to K=20, 0.2 deg 2 to K=21 Combined: 12,000 redshifts with K-band detections GOAL: Chart galaxy evolution as a function of M * over a wide range of environments

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Key Physical Properties 1. SFR Indicator (U-B) Restframe Color, C. Willmer [OII] Equivalent Width, B. Weiner Morphology (from GOODS, Bundy et al ) 2. Stellar Mass Palomar K-band, multi-band SED fitting 3. Environmental Density 3 rd nearest neighbor, M. Cooper Spectroscopic Redshifts and IR are essential

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Results: Galaxy Stellar Mass Function Partitioned by restframe (U-B) color into blue (active) and red (quiescent) populations. Mass Number Density Little total evolution

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Results: Galaxy Stellar Mass Function Partitioned by restframe (U-B) color into blue (active) and red (quiescent) populations. Mass Little total evolution Assembly of early- types without dry merging Number Density

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Results: Galaxy Stellar Mass Function Partitioned by restframe (U-B) color into blue (active) and red (quiescent) populations. Mass Little total evolution Assembly of early- types without dry merging Evolving transition mass Number Density

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Assembly of Red, Early-types Mass Increasing abundance

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Assembly of Red, Early-types Mass Increasing abundance

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Assembly of Red, Early-types Mass Increasing abundance

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Assembly of Red, Early-types de Lucia et al Possible problems in models Mass >10 10 M  >10 11 M 

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Mass Key Result: Quenching Threshold Mass Decreasing abundance

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Mass Key Result: Quenching Threshold Mass Decreasing abundance

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Mass Key Result: Quenching Threshold Mass Decreasing abundance

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Evolution of M Q  SF =  Tot exp (M * /M Q ) Key Result: Quenching Threshold Mass Mass Provides key test for downsizing scenarios

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Other Indicators of Star Formation

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Other Indicators of Star Formation SF cut is median of mid-z bin. More stringent so more early types, fewer late. SF increases in high-z bin.

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Other Indicators of Star Formation SF cut is median of mid-z bin. More stringent so more early types, fewer late. SF increases in high-z bin. Morph from Bundy et al GOODS study. Slower to respond. Not equivalent to color or SFR.

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Extreme Environments Extreme Low Density Extreme High Density Second Cut In Environmental Density

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Extreme Environments Mass Low Density

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Extreme Environments Mass Low Density

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Extreme Environments Mass Low/High Density

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Extreme Environments Mass Moderate dependence on density Downsizing accelerated in dense regions Low/High Density

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Summary & Conclusions Intermediate to high mass galaxies assembled by z~1, but demographics of population changes Early appearance of massive early-types: a continuing problem for models; dry merging not needed Quenching of SF seems to produce downsizing, transformation follows, quantify with M tr and M Q No density dependence in average environments - weak in the extremes Quenching caused by internal mechanism, possibly AGN? M Q provides constraints

Kevin Bundy, Caltech Future Work Probe the mass function at lower masses and higher redshift Study galaxies in the midst of transition: test the merger/AGN scenario directly