Inference about the Difference Between the

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BA 275 Quantitative Business Methods
Advertisements

Chi Squared Tests. Introduction Two statistical techniques are presented. Both are used to analyze nominal data. –A goodness-of-fit test for a multinomial.
1 1 Slide © 2003 South-Western /Thomson Learning™ Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
Uji Kebaikan Suai (Uji Kecocokan) Pertemuan 23
Statistical Inference for Frequency Data Chapter 16.
1 1 Slide Mátgæði Kafli 11 í Newbold Snjólfur Ólafsson + Slides Prepared by John Loucks © 1999 ITP/South-Western College Publishing.
1 1 Slide © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning™ Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide STATISTICS FOR BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS Seventh Edition AndersonSweeneyWilliams Slides Prepared by John Loucks © 1999 ITP/South-Western College.
1 1 Slide MA4704 Problem solving 4 Statistical Inference About Means and Proportions With Two Populations n Inferences About the Difference Between Two.
1 1 Slide Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University © 2002 South-Western /Thomson Learning.
Sampling Distribution of If and are normally distributed and samples 1 and 2 are independent, their difference is.
1 1 Slide © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
Discrete (Categorical) Data Analysis
1 1 Slide © 2009 Econ-2030-Applied Statistics-Dr. Tadesse. Chapter 11: Comparisons Involving Proportions and a Test of Independence n Inferences About.
Statistical Inference About Means and Proportions With Two Populations
1 Pertemuan 09 Pengujian Hipotesis Proporsi dan Data Katagorik Matakuliah: A0392 – Statistik Ekonomi Tahun: 2006.
Chapter 16 Chi Squared Tests.
Pengujian Hipotesis Proporsi dan Beda Proporsi Pertemuan 21 Matakuliah: I0134/Metode Statistika Tahun: 2007.
1 Pertemuan 09 Pengujian Hipotesis 2 Matakuliah: I0272 – Statistik Probabilitas Tahun: 2005 Versi: Revisi.
Chapter 11a: Comparisons Involving Proportions and a Test of Independence Inference about the Difference between the Proportions of Two Populations Hypothesis.
1 1 Slide © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
1. State the null and alternative hypotheses. 2. Select a random sample and record observed frequency f i for the i th category ( k categories) Compute.
Goodness of Fit Test for Proportions of Multinomial Population Chi-square distribution Hypotheses test/Goodness of fit test.
1 1 Slide © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
1 1 Slide IS 310 – Business Statistics IS 310 Business Statistics CSU Long Beach.
1 1 Slide © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
Business Statistics, A First Course (4e) © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 11-1 Chapter 11 Chi-Square Tests Business Statistics, A First Course 4 th Edition.
1 1 Slide IS 310 – Business Statistics IS 310 Business Statistics CSU Long Beach.
1 1 Slide Slides by John Loucks St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 10 Statistical Inference About Means and Proportions With Two Populations n Inferences About the Difference.
1 1 Slide IS 310 – Business Statistics IS 310 Business Statistics CSU Long Beach.
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 12 Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence n Goodness of Fit Test: A Multinomial Population Goodness of.
Chapter 11 Chi-Square Procedures 11.3 Chi-Square Test for Independence; Homogeneity of Proportions.
Copyright © 2009 Cengage Learning 15.1 Chapter 16 Chi-Squared Tests.
1 1 Slide © 2006 Thomson/South-Western Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 In this case, each element of a population is assigned to one and only one of several classes or categories. Chapter 11 – Test of Independence - Hypothesis.
1 1 Slide Chapter 11 Comparisons Involving Proportions n Inference about the Difference Between the Proportions of Two Populations Proportions of Two Populations.
Chi-Square Procedures Chi-Square Test for Goodness of Fit, Independence of Variables, and Homogeneity of Proportions.
Learning Objectives Copyright © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning Statistical Testing of Differences CHAPTER fifteen.
Introduction to Probability and Statistics Thirteenth Edition Chapter 13 Analysis of Categorical Data.
1 1 Slide © 2009 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1/71 Statistics Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence.
Chapter Outline Goodness of Fit test Test of Independence.
1 1 Slide 統計學 Spring 2004 授課教師:統計系余清祥 日期: 2004 年 3 月 23 日 第六週:配適度與獨立性檢定.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Slides by JOHN LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Sampling Distribution of If and are normally distributed and samples 1 and 2 are independent, their difference is.
1 Pertemuan 24 Uji Kebaikan Suai Matakuliah: I0134 – Metoda Statistika Tahun: 2005 Versi: Revisi.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Chapter 12 Tests of Goodness of Fit and Independence n Goodness of Fit Test: A Multinomial.
1. State the null and alternative hypotheses. 2. Select a random sample and record observed frequency f i for the i th category ( k categories) Compute.
Chapter 11: Categorical Data n Chi-square goodness of fit test allows us to examine a single distribution of a categorical variable in a population. n.
Class Seven Turn In: Chapter 18: 32, 34, 36 Chapter 19: 26, 34, 44 Quiz 3 For Class Eight: Chapter 20: 18, 20, 24 Chapter 22: 34, 36 Read Chapters 23 &
Chi-Två Test Kapitel 6. Introduction Two statistical techniques are presented, to analyze nominal data. –A goodness-of-fit test for the multinomial experiment.
Test of independence: Contingency Table
Chapter 11 – Test of Independence - Hypothesis Test for Proportions of a Multinomial Population In this case, each element of a population is assigned.
St. Edward’s University
St. Edward’s University
CHAPTER 11 CHI-SQUARE TESTS
Chapter 11 Chi-Square Tests.
John Loucks St. Edward’s University . SLIDES . BY.
Statistics for Business and Economics (13e)
Econ 3790: Business and Economics Statistics
Chapter 11 Chi-Square Tests.
CHI SQUARE TEST OF INDEPENDENCE
Analyzing the Association Between Categorical Variables
CHAPTER 11 CHI-SQUARE TESTS
Chapter Outline Goodness of Fit test Test of Independence.
Chapter 11 Chi-Square Tests.
St. Edward’s University
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 11 Comparisons Involving Proportions and a Test of Independence Inference about the Difference Between the Proportions of Two Populations A Hypothesis Test for Proportions of a Multinomial Population Test of Independence: Contingency Tables Ho: p1 - p2 = 0 Ha: p1 - p2 = 0

Inferences About the Difference between the Proportions of Two Populations Sampling Distribution of Interval Estimation of p1 - p2 Hypothesis Tests about p1 - p2

Sampling Distribution of Expected Value Standard Deviation where: n1 = size of sample taken from population 1 n2 = size of sample taken from population 2

Sampling Distribution of Distribution Form If the sample sizes are large (n1p1, n1(1 - p1), n2p2, and n2(1 - p2) are all greater than or equal to 5), the sampling distribution of can be approximated by a normal probability distribution.

Sampling Distribution of p1 – p2

Interval Estimation of p1 - p2 (Confidence) Interval Estimate Point Estimator of

Example: MRA MRA (Market Research Associates) is conducting research to evaluate the effectiveness of a client’s new advertising campaign. Before the new campaign began, a telephone survey of 150 households in the test market area showed 60 households “aware” of the client’s product. The new campaign has been initiated with TV and newspaper advertisements running for three weeks.

Example: MRA A survey conducted immediately after the new campaign showed 120 of 250 households “aware” of the client’s product. Does the data support the position that the advertising campaign has provided an increased awareness of the client’s product?

Example: MRA Point Estimator of the Difference Between the Proportions of Two Populations is p1 = proportion of the population of households “aware” of the product after the new campaign p2 = proportion of the population of households “aware” of the product before the new campaign = sample proportion of households “aware” of the product after the new campaign product before the new campaign

Example: MRA Interval Estimate of p1 - p2: Large-Sample Case For = .05, z.025 = _______: .08 + 1.96(.0510) .08 + .10 -.02 to +.18

Example: MRA Interval Estimate of p1 - p2: Large-Sample Case Conclusion At a 95% confidence level, the interval estimate of the difference between the proportion of households aware of the client’s product before and after the new advertising campaign is ___ to _____.

Hypothesis Tests about p1 - p2 Hypotheses H0: p1 - p2 < 0 Ha: p1 - p2 > 0 Test statistic where takes the _______ part of the value in H0.

Hypothesis Tests about p1 - p2 Point Estimator of where p1 = p2 where:

Example: MRA Hypothesis Tests about p1 - p2 Can we conclude, using a .05 level of significance, that the proportion of households aware of the client’s product increased after the new advertising campaign?

Example: MRA Hypothesis Tests about p1 - p2 Hypotheses H0: p1 - p2 < 0 Ha: p1 - p2 > 0 p1 = proportion of the population of households “aware” of the product ______ the new campaign p2 = proportion of the population of households

Example: MRA Hypothesis Tests about p1 - p2 Rejection Rule Reject H0 if z > 1.645 Test Statistic

Example: MRA Hypothesis Tests about p1 - p2 Conclusion z = ______ < 1.645. Do not reject H0. We cannot conclude, with at least 95 % confidence, that the proportion of households aware of the client’s product increased after the new advertising campaign.

Hypothesis (Goodness of Fit) Test for Proportions of a Multinomial Population 1. Set up the null and alternative hypotheses. 2. Select a random sample and record the observed frequency, fi , for each of the k categories. 3. Assuming H0 is true, compute the expected frequency, ei , in each category by multiplying the category probability by the sample size.

Hypothesis (Goodness of Fit) Test for Proportions of a Multinomial Population 4. Compute the value of the test statistic. 5. Reject H0 if (where  is the significance level and there are k - 1 degrees of freedom).

Example: Finger Lakes Homes (A) Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test Finger Lakes Homes manufactures four models of prefabricated homes, a two-story colonial, a ranch, a split-level, and an A-frame. To help in production planning, management would like to determine if previous customer purchases indicate that there is a preference in the style selected.

Example: Finger Lakes Homes (A) Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test The number of homes sold of each model for ______ sales over the past two years is shown below. Model Colonial Ranch Split-Level A-Frame # Sold 30 20 35 15

Example: Finger Lakes Homes (A) Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test Let: pC = population proportion that purchase a colonial pR = population proportion that purchase a ranch pS = population proportion that purchase a split-level pA = population proportion that purchase an A-frame

Example: Finger Lakes Homes (A) Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test Hypotheses H0: pC = pR = pS = pA = .25 Ha: The population proportions are not pC = .25, pR = .25, pS = .25, and pA = .25

Example: Finger Lakes Homes (A) Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test Rejection Rule With  = .05 and k - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3 degrees of freedom Do Not Reject H0 Reject H0 2 7.815

Example: Finger Lakes Homes (A) Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test Expected Frequencies e1 = .25(100) = 25 e2 = .25(100) = 25 e3 = .25(100) = 25 e4 = .25(100) = 25 Test Statistic = 1 + 1 + 4 + 4 = 10

Example: Finger Lakes Homes (A) Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test Conclusion c2 = 10 > 7.815. We reject the assumption there is no home style preference, at the .05 level of significance.

Test of Independence: Contingency Tables 1. Set up the null and alternative hypotheses. 2. Select a random sample and record the observed frequency, fij , for each cell of the contingency table. 3. Compute the expected frequency, eij , for each cell.

Test of Independence: Contingency Tables 4. Compute the test statistic. 5. Reject H0 if (where  is the significance level and with n rows and m columns there are (n - 1)(m - 1) degrees of freedom).

Example: Finger Lakes Homes (B) Contingency Table (Independence) Test Each home sold can be classified according to price and to style. Finger Lakes Homes’ manager would like to determine if the price of the home and the style of the home are independent variables.

Example: Finger Lakes Homes (B) Contingency Table (Independence) Test The number of homes sold for each model and price for the past two years is shown below. For convenience, the price of the home is listed as either $99,000 or less or more than $99,000. Price Colonial Ranch Split-Level A-Frame < $99,000 18 6 19 12 > $99,000 12 14 16 3

Example: Finger Lakes Homes (B) Contingency Table (Independence) Test Hypotheses H0: Price of the home is independent of the style of the home that is purchased Ha: Price of the home is not independent of the style of the home that is purchased

Example: Finger Lakes Homes (B) Contingency Table (Independence) Test Expected Frequencies Price Colonial Ranch Split-Level A-Frame Total < $99K 18 6 19 12 55 > $99K 12 14 16 3 45 Total 30 20 35 15 100

Example: Finger Lakes Homes (B) Contingency Table (Independence) Test Rejection Rule With  = .05 and (2 - 1)(4 - 1) = 3 d.f., Reject H0 if 2 > 7.81

Example: Finger Lakes Homes (B) Contingency Table (Independence) Test Test Statistic = .1364 + 2.2727 + . . . + 2.0833 = ______

Example: Finger Lakes Homes (B) Contingency Table (Independence) Test Conclusion 2 = ____ > 7.81, so we reject H0, the assumption that the price of the home is independent of the style of the home that is purchased.

End of Chapter 11