S Bozzini* and D Friedman** *Safety Engineering International, Goleta, CA, USA **Center for Injury Research, Santa Barbara, CA, USA Presented by: Susie.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Restraint System & Occupant Simulation Capabilities Systems Performance Department August, 2000.
Advertisements

Rollover Protective Structures On Tractors Reasons for ROPS December, 2010.
Rollover Crashes in Vans and Other SUVs: Reducing the Risk ORACLE Course Code SAFI Minutes Training Credit.
Vehicle Roof Structure Design Can Significantly Reduce Occupant Injury
Wheel Alignment CASTER.
SLIPS, TRIPS, & FALLS UNIVERSITY of N ORTHERN C OLORADO.
Driving Safety Culture Home A special safety presentation 1.
Avoiding Rollover Collisions
Introduction: SEI Background and Rollover Injuries Safety Engineering International (SEI) – Designers of HALO™: Mr. Friedman and Mr. Grzebieta have been.
Rotary Motion Physics Montwood High School. Rotary motion is the motion of a body around an internal axis. –Rotary motion – axis of rotation is inside.
Unit 4 Class Notes Accelerated Physics Projectile Motion Days 1 thru 3.
CAM.
D. Friedman, G. Mattos, D. Rico Presented by Donald Friedman to the Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Science Washington D.C. January.
April 9, 2004 – 9:00 am NB Interstate 5 Kings County, California Crash Reconstruction Occupant Dynamics Injury Biomechanics Mauro v. Ford Motor Company.
Do Now for 5/21/13 Take out E83 #6 and get ready to hand in Study for quiz HW: Anything not completed in class. E84 will be checked tomorrow.
The National Crash Analysis Center The George Washington University Un-Constrained Models Comparison For Elastic Roof – Production Roof – Strong Pillars.
Dept. Of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Penn State University Vehicle Dynamic Modeling for the Prediction and Prevention of Vehicle Rollover A Comparative,
Light Vehicle Rollover Background on NHTSA’s Activities in this Area.
Background to NHTSA NCAP Ratings for Rollover Resistance
BEHAVIOUR OF THE LOWER LEVEL (DECK) OF DOUBLE-DECK VEHICLES IN ROLLOVER 99 th GRSG session 2010, October Dr. Matolcsy Mátyás delegate of Hungary Informal.
Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY Vehicle rollovers are dangerous! Have you seen a rollover accident or have you experienced a rollover crash.
Accident simulation and analysis using Vehicle Infrastructure Interaction Simulation Stephan Kunz Young Researchers Seminar 2009 Torino, Italy, 3 to 5.
Car Rollover Test Name: Antonio Sevilla Course: ME 272 FEA Prof. Jose Granda Date:
Stability & Control Chapter 6 Lecture 12.
Integrating OEM Vehicle ROPS to Improve Rollover Injury Probability Susie Bozzini*, Nick DiNapoli** and Donald Friedman*** *Safety Engineering International.
C H A P T E R 2 Kinematics in One Dimension. 2.6 Freely Falling Bodies.
Spinning Out, With Calculus J. Christian Gerdes Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Stanford University.
Forklift and Lift Truck Safety. Survey: Fatalities.
Earthquake Hazards and Safety 1- What kinds of damage can earthquakes cause? The severe shaking produced by seismic waves can damage or destroy buildings.
Linear Equations and Slope Created by Laura Ralston.
Finish Activity 73 ► Follow procedure steps 3-7 ► Discuss in your groups and answer analysis questions 3-5.
Sponsored by ANB45 Occupant Protection Committee ANB45 (1) Rollover Crashworthiness Subcommittee Co-Chairs: Raphael Grzebieta & Ken Digges Other sponsors:
Materials Handling Set 6 Marissa Morton SAAIP Top Jobs Intern.
Middle East Gases Association Transportation Of Dangerous Goods: Bulk Roll Over Accidents and Prevention Paul Vincent.K | Air Liquide Emirates | Dubai.
Timothy Reeves: Presenter Marisa Orr, Sherrill Biggers Evaluation of the Holistic Method to Size a 3-D Wheel/Soil Model.
The Sports Utility Vehicle Anthony Connor. A little about myself.
C H A P T E R 2 Kinematics in One Dimension Kinematics in One Dimension.
INTRODUCTION TO STATISTICAL STUDY OF BUS ACCIDENT ARE THE BUSES SAFE OR NOT? GRSG, 109 th session Sept. – 2. Oct Presented by Dr. MATOLCSY Mátyás.
Accident Scene Safety Module 1 – Vehicle Safety Section 1 - Driving Safety.
Evolution of UNECE R29 OICA proposal
Rollover Protective Structures On Tractors Module One The Real Reasons For ROPS.
RECORD PROCESSING CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE EFFECTS OF TILTING AND TRANSIENTS VLADIMIR GRAIZER California Geological Survey.
Sail Course ® Part 2, Forces 7Stability 8Balance 9Wind 10Sail Shape 11Preparing to Sail.
Speed Sensor Calibration
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Outline Chapter 13 Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker.
CAM MACHINE ELEMENT Prepared by R.A.ARUL RAJA, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR,
APPLICATIONS OF POISSON AND CHI-SQUARED (χ 2 ) DISTRIBUTION FOR COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACCIDENT FREQUENCIES ON HIGHWAYS Dr. S.S. Valunjkar Prof. P. M.
Lowering the CG of an Object The CG of an object tends to take the lowest position available.
General Road Construction Information
The Georgia Police Academy
Controls Chapter 6 Lecture 13.
General Road Construction Information
Types of cams.
ANTI LOCK BRAKING SYSTEM
Physics 101: Lecture 13 Rotational Kinetic Energy and Inertia
Speed Sensor Calibration
HALO™ Rollover Occupant Protection System Development to Application
HALO™ Rollover Occupant Protection System Development to Application
Avoiding Rollover Collisions
Monthly Training Topic NV Transport Inc. Safety & Loss Prevention
Types of Scientific Investigations
Avoiding Rollover Collisions
11.1 Torque To make an object turn or rotate, apply a torque.
Bellringer What is the difference between the words vertical and horizontal? What does the word projectile mean? How is one dimensional (1D), two dimensional.
Chapter 1 Introduction.
Vehicle Roof Structure Design Can Significantly Reduce Occupant Injury
Integrating OEM Vehicle ROPS to Improve Rollover Injury Probability
VRU-proxi IWG Accidentology analysis summary
Securing of children in buses and coaches
Presentation transcript:

S Bozzini* and D Friedman** *Safety Engineering International, Goleta, CA, USA **Center for Injury Research, Santa Barbara, CA, USA Presented by: Susie Bozzini

Types of rollover Events This paper was developed to examine to the difference between a lateral rollover test and a ramp rollover test in relation to predicting occupant injury in rollovers.

Frequencies of different Rollover Types: Trip-Over and Flip-Over = 72% of all Rollovers

Definitions of Trip-Overs The 4 types of trip-overs constituting 59.8% of rollovers are characterized in tests as “lateral” rollovers such as dolly rollovers or JRS rollovers. Trip-Over 1:Curb Trip-Over 2:The vehicle skids sideways on a flat surface and topples over. Trip-Over 3: This is a type of accident where the rollover occurs on a gradient with soft surface and a sideways tilting vehicle. Trip-Over 4:Ascending slope

Definitions of Flip-Overs These 3 types of flip-overs constituting 11.7% are characterized in tests as “ramp” rollovers. Flip-Over 1: This is where a vehicle moves mainly along the longitudinal axis of the vehicle, reaches a mound, which causes it to rotate around its longitudinal axis, and topples over. Flip-Over 2: This is where a vehicle moves mainly along the longitudinal axis of the vehicle, reaches a ditch, which causes it to rotate around its longitudinal axis, and topples over. Flip-Over 3: This is where a vehicle falls sideways off the road onto a significantly lower terrain.

Injury severity grades of belted not ejected occupants for different kinds of rollover Trip vs 65 Flip

Comparison of Trip-Over and Flip-Over Frequency and Injury Level Count/ Frequency % % Not Injured % MAIS 1 % MAIS 2-4 % MAIS 5/6 Total Trip- Over Rollovers 328/59.8% Total Flip- Over Rollovers 66/11.7% times as many MAIS 2-4 and MAIS 5/6 in Trip-overs vs. Flip-overs

Trip-Over Test Method Key components of the Jordan Rollover System (JRS): (1) vehicle, (2) cradle/spit mount, (3) moving roadbed, (4) support towers, (5) coupled pneumatic -roadbed propulsion and roll drive

Vertical Crush in JRS Tests displayed on Residual Crush Injury Probability Chart

Flip-Over Test Method Key components of the Ramp Rollover Test: (1) vehicle, (2) tow motor (3) ramp

Ramp Rollover Impact Parameters vs. Lateral Rollover Impact Parameters Parameter:Ramp Rollover TestLateral Rollover Test Roll Rate (Test) 175 deg/sec at near side contact 244 deg/sec at near side contact Pitch Rate (Test) 15 deg/sec, oscillating from 0 - front/nose up Constant at 10 deg (+/-2) Roll Angle (Test) 105 degrees, a little more than 1/4 turn 145 degrees, more than 1/4 turn – injurious rollover are ~ more than 4 quarter turns Pitch Angle (Test) 18 degrees, front/nose UP 10 degrees, front/nose DOWN

Production SUV roof crush v. roll angle Typical Rollover Result in Lateral Test Method – Significant Far Side A-Pillar Crush

Figure 12. – SUV with HALO™ roof crush v. roll angle

1.Trip-over accidents represent 60% of rollovers and flip-overs represent 12%. Trip-overs are characterized by lateral rollover tests and flip-overs are characterized by ramp rollovers. 2.Typical physical ramp rollover tests at 50 mph are 2 ½ times more energetic than 30 mph lateral tests and do not represent real world flip- over accidents. 3.Comparative virtual testing between ramp rollover and lateral rollover conditions using a typical SUV, suggest that ramp rollovers are typically more benign than lateral rolls. 4.The roof crush in ramp rollover conditions tends to be more significant on the leading impact side and the roll rates at contact with the trailing side are not as high as those observed with lateral roll test conditions 5.Lateral Rollover tests more accurately predict Potential Occupant Injury because the testing parameters are more representative of the real world crash senarios. CONCLUSIONS

ACKNOWLEGEMENTS The Authors would like to thank Friedman Research Corporation for their assistance with the data in this paper. Thank you Questions?

Figure 7. Spreadsheet and Test, Roll and Pitch Velocity - SUV

Figure 8. Spreadsheet and Test, Roll and Pitch Angles - SUV

Figure 9. Spreadsheet and Test, Vehicle c.g. Velocity - SUV

Figure 10. Spreadsheet and Test, Vehicle c.g. Displacement - SUV

Table 7. List of roll sequence segments and serious-to-fatal injury probability