DOE Neutrino Program Plans

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 1 View from DOE LB DUSEL Meeting February 27, 2008 UC, Davis Jerry Blazey NIU/DOE.
Advertisements

U.S./DOE Policies and Programs for HEP Data Preservation Amber Boehnlein U.S. Department of Energy Office of High Energy Physics.
Accelerator based Neutrino program around the world 1. Europe: Neutrino platform at CERN ESS second maximum? 2. Japan: T2K and HyperK status 3. USA: LBNF.
1 AAAS Meeting: February 2008  Particle Physics and the Responsible Use of Public Resources.
FACET: The Proposal Process with Q & A Carsten Hast SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
F Future of Neutrino Program at FNAL NuMI Off-Axis Meeting Hugh Montgomery January 12, 2004.
The MINOS Experiment Andy Blake Cambridge University.
2/21/2008 P5 neutrino session1 Conventional neutrino experiments Heidi Schellman P5 February 21, 2008.
Towards a Future Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment Bob Wilson Colorado State University CERN Prototype/Beam Test Meeting CERN, 20 October 2014.
International collaboration in high energy physics experiments  All large high energy physics experiments today are strongly international.  A necessary.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
The meeting in Paris: The agenda has been built and optimized.
Jefferson Lab Strategic Planning Divisional Town Meeting Mission Statement of your Division – What is or should be the mission statement of your division?
BENE Meeting April 28, 2006 A. Bross US Contribution to the IDS Aka WDS BENE IDS/FP7 at RAL April 28, 2006 A. Bross.
Advancing GSMT SWG Recommendations: AURA’s Proposal to the NSF Stephen E. Strom AURA New Initiatives Office Presented to the GSMT SWG 12 February, 2004.
American Neutrino Strategy: Consequences of P5 Report Jim Strait, LBNE Project Director NuFact August 2014.
Department of Energy Advanced Research Projects Agency – Energy (ARPA-E) Basic Energy Science Advisory Committee July 10, 2009.
Management subcommittee closeout Jay Marx (chair, LBNL), Joel Butler (Fermilab), Stan Wojcicki (Stanford) Thanks to all for cooperation and openness!!
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Baseline Jim Yeck NSLS-II Deputy Project Director NSLS-II PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
Physics Priorities S. Dawson July 11, 2007 Fermilab Steering Committee Meeting.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy RHIC Users Meeting BNL; June 8, 2006 Gulshan Rai RHIC/AGS Users Meeting Gulshan Rai Program Manager for Heavy.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Peter Bond Deputy Director for Science and Technology October 29, 2005 New Frontiers at RHIC Workshop.
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.
Future Neutrino Physics Mitch Soderberg Fermilab Institutional Review June 6-9, 2011.
US CMS/D0/CDF Jet/Met Workshop – Jan. 28, The CMS Physics Analysis Center - PAC Dan Green US CMS Program Manager Jan. 28, 2004.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Raymond L. Orbach Director Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Presentation to BESAC December 6, 2004.
Challenges & Issues for SBNE Nigel S. Lockyer 4/4/14.
11 DOE Office of Science High Energy Physics Program AAAC Meeting October 15, 2009 National Science Foundation Dennis Kovar Associate Director of the Office.
Materials Innovation Platforms (MIP): A New NSF Mid-scale Instrumentation and User Program to Accelerate The Discovery of New Materials MRSEC Director’s.
Neutrino Physics Opportunities for Fermilab Steering Group 6/12/07 Andy Lankford UC Irvine.
Pathways to Explore Neutrino Physics Fred Gilman NuFact03 New York June 5, 2003.
An Integrated Intensity Frontier Strategy Steve Holmes & Bob Tschirhart LBNE Reconfiguration Workshop April 25, 2012.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 International Linear Collider In August 2004 ICFA announced their technology selection for an ILC: 1.The.
Physics and Performance Evaluation Group NuFact 07 Okayama University, Japan August 6, 2007 Walter Winter Universität Würzburg for the executive committee:
9/2/2004 TB Strategy J. Yu 1 LC Test Beam Funding and Strategy Large number of detector R&D groups made great progress Technology decision provides great.
PIP-II: Why a new accelerator? Paul Derwent Fermilab Community Advisory Board 23 July 2015.
Proton Improvement Plan: View from the Directorate (and the DOE) Stuart Henderson PIP Meeting Jan 3, 2012.
The RIA Users Organization (RIAUO) Witold Nazarewicz (Tennessee) EURISOL Week, CERN, November 2006 History The Mission Organization Activities Perspectives.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
News Y2K June 25, Summary of June 12 Face-to-Face Meeting.
Plan to go forward Peter Wilson SBN Program Coordinator 27 September 2014.
B.Sadoulet CDMS DUSEL The Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory The process Themes DUSEL and CDMS Bernard Sadoulet Dept. of Physics.
John Womersley 1/13 Fermilab’s Future John Womersley Fermilab May 2004.
1 Eric R. Colby DOE Office of High Energy Physics IPAC 2015 Richmond, VA May 6, 2015 Engagement with Industry: “A funding agent’s viewpoint”
P5 Report: The Particle Physics Roadmap 1 A. Seiden Fermilab May 14, 2007.
BNL Overview DOE Annual HEP Program Review Brookhaven National Laboratory April 17-19, 2006 Sam Aronson.
Office of Science January 28, 2008J.Blazey / SiD Workshop / SLAC1 The View from DOE Moving ForwardMoving Forward HEPAPHEPAP FY08 “in review”FY08 “in review”
1 The next steps – focusing points Define the scope, strategy and cost of the project implementation. Main input: The evolution of the physics findings.
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
Long Baseline Neutrinos How we got here Nigel S. Lockyer Fermilab Open Meeting on Neutrinos 12/12/2014.
Long-Baseline Neutrino Facility LBNF LBNF/DUNE Status N. S. Lockyer
Nigel Lockyer Fermilab Operations Review 16 th -18 th May 2016 Fermilab in the Context of the DOE Mission.
Intensity Frontier Physics with a Mega-Watt Proton Source R. Tschirhart Fermilab Science & Technology Review November
CPAD Instrumentation Frontier Meeting October 5-7, 2015 Glen Crawford, Helmut Marsiske Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy DOE Office of High.
Science Requirements and Instrumentation for Future Neutrino Experiments Gina Rameika, Fermilab Instrumentation Frontier Community Planning January 9 –
K. Long, 25 June, 2016 IDR: structure and overall timeline: Slides are to introduce discussion of how we prepare IDR. Propose to revise slides as we discuss.
K. Long, R. Roser, 23 July 2014 Report from the Neutrino Summit.
David Finley / LArTPC VidCon / June 22, Fermilab Slide 1 Example of a Penultimate Detector: A 3 kton LArTPC On-Axis at Soudan The Ultimate Detector.
What was the goal of the International Meeting ? –Involve world-wide project leaders and agency responsibles to set-up instruments for the encouragement.
Strategic Planning Process Erik Gottschalk Fermilab Physics Advisory Committee Meeting – June 22-25, June 2015.
Fermilab Budget Briefing FY 2014 Intensity Frontier Proton Research KA Breakout February 28, 2013 Office of High Energy Physics Germantown, MD.
Goals of the consultation meetings From the ToR, the goals of the meeting in the first year should be: communicate that the panel exists; collect input.
FNAL SCRF Review R. Kephart. What is this Review? FNAL has argued that SCRF technology is an “enabling” accelerator technology (much like superconducting.
Short Contribution Title Goes Here
for the EURISOL Steering Committee
nuSTORM and the Physics Beyond Colliders workshop
Short Contribution Title Goes Here
IUPAP Neutrino Panel.
Presentation transcript:

DOE Neutrino Program Plans Glen Crawford Director, Research and Technology R&D Office of High Energy Physics Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy

P5 Neutrino Program Recommendations Pursue the physics associated with neutrino mass Several significant changes in direction are recommended: Reformulate the long-baseline neutrino program as an internationally designed, coordinated, and funded program with Fermilab as host. Redirect specific activities and efforts at Fermilab to the PIP-II program of improvements to the accelerator complex, which will provide proton beams with power greater than one megawatt by the time of first operation of the new long-baseline neutrino facility. Recommendation 12: In collaboration with international partners, develop a coherent short- and long-baseline neutrino program hosted at Fermilab. Fermilab has started this process, with our encouragement

P5 Short-Baseline Neutrino Recommendations Recommendation 15: Select and perform in the short term a set of small-scale short baseline experiments that can conclusively address experimental hints of physics beyond the three-neutrino paradigm. Some of these experiments should use liquid argon to advance the technology and build the international community for LBNF at Fermilab. A large fraction of the world’s neutrino program will move to the U.S. The worldwide neutrino community will see the U.S. as the place to do their physics

DOE Process for Intermediate Neutrino Program P5 recommended both: LBNF as top midterm priority major project A balanced and coherent program of short baseline neutrino experiments including small projects Plans for LBNF are moving along well and are described in the Fermilab talk immediately preceding This talk will focus on the latter, near-term item above The FNAL short baseline program using the Booster Neutrino Beam is well advanced in planning stages and will be evaluated by the FNAL PAC in January However, there are many other possible short baseline neutrino experiments using other facilities, with and without accelerator beams Many R&D efforts underway at various stages of development DOE is interested in understanding these various options and plans in more detail Community workshop February 4-6, 2015 at Brookhaven Followed by a possible call for proposals

Workshop Info. Workshop on the Intermediate Neutrino Program February 4-6, 2015 Brookhaven National Laboratory www.bnl.gov/winp Agenda will include: Talks from agencies Lots of physics working groups on various neutrino topics Early registration deadline January 9

DOE Process for Short-baseline Neutrinos Planning for the workshop includes input from NSF and DOE NP as well including PIs supported by those programs See www.bnl.gov/winp for more info The workshop gives us the opportunity, in particular, to hear community ideas for other near term (less than 5 year) small projects (less than ~$10M) that are: Scientifically compelling Competitive in the world program Small enough in scope and technically ready Based on the information gleaned from the workshop and available funds we may announce a new funding opportunity (FOA) for such small projects later in 2015 Specific objectives and requirements would be called out in the FOA

Other Elements of DOE Neutrino program There will be many good ideas that do not fit into the funding or schedule constraints discussed above and we are interested in those, as well For example, there are also important issues to address in technology R&D for future experiments and theory support for the broad neutrino program Reports from the working groups will be helpful in addressing these issues Possible funding for such efforts will be dealt with through the usual proposal process. There may be additional opportunities for partnerships or other collaborative funding.

Backup

Measuring Neutrino Properties Neutrinos are neutral and only interact via the weak force Experiments need to generate a huge number of neutrinos Nuclear power plants produce antineutrinos in all directions Powerful accelerators can produce copious amounts of neutrinos and antineutrinos in a directed beam to a neutrino detector Experiments need very large and sensitive detectors Hundreds to thousands of tons of mass help allow a neutrino interaction High detector sensitivity helps record rare interactions, when they occur Neutrinos are known to change types as they travel and it is not clear if there is a difference in the way neutrinos and antineutrinos interact It takes some time (distance) for neutrinos to change types (oscillate) Optimal distance depends on the properties of the neutrino source Some measurements require hundreds of miles between source and detector Accelerators required to study difference between neutrino & antineutrino Understanding the complex physics of neutrinos requires a complementary set of experiments with different sources and detectors