Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Florida PDR Presentation. Vehicle Design Diameter: 5.86 Length: 135 Static Stability Margin: 1.4 Total Weight: 23.6 lbs.
Advertisements

Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
UAA Rocketry PDR Presentation NASA Student Launch
University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Critical Design Review February 2, 2015.
Preliminary Design Review University of Colorado Boulder NASA Student Launch
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
Project Λscension. Vehicle Dimensions Weight: 19.6 Ib Length: in (9 ft. 4.5 in) Diameter: 6 in Fin Semi-Span: 6 in.
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
November 7,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6.00 inches  Mass: oz. / 17.34lbs.  Span: inches  Center of Gravity: inches.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Intercollegiate Rocket Engineering Competition Spring 2015 EML Ethics and Design Project Organization.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Project Λscension. Vehicle Dimensions Weight: 87.2N/19.6Ib Length: in. Diameter: 6in. Fin Semi-Span: 6in.
Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Safety ► The safety officer for the entire team is Maia Madrid. ► During launch we will follow NAR safety rules and regulations. ► We will follow standard.
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
3/19/09. Animal Motor Works (AMW) K475WW High Power Rocket Motor. 54 mm casing, 40.3 cm long, 2.9 seconds burn time, 1394 N-sec total impulse, and
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
FAMU PDR Presentation. Table of Contents Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications Static stability margin Plan for vehicle safety verification.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
PLANTATION HIGH PDR PRESENTATION Team 1. VEHICLE DIMENSION & MATERIALS.
Critical Design Review Presentation Alabama Rocket Engineering Systems (ARES) Team The University of Alabama.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
Preliminary Design Review Clear Lake High School Team Rocket.
Project Aegis Preliminary Design Review Team Members:
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
College of Engineering
Critical Design Review Presentation
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
Preliminary Design Review
Critical Design Review February 2, 2015
November 7, 2014.
November 7, 2014.
Final Readiness Review
2019 First Nation Launch – PDR Virtual Review
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Target Altitude Safety Document
University of Iowa USLI
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014

Team Structure

Conceptual 3D Design

Vehicle Dimensions

Vehicle Materials and Justification MaterialLocationJustification AluminumNose Cone Tip CubeSat Chassis Light Weight Electrically Conductive Phenolic TubingAirframeStrength to Weight Ratio PolycarbonateAirframe LiDAR Payload Bay CubeSat Transparency Strength to Weight Ratio Baltic Birch PlywoodFins Centering rings Bulkheads Strength to Weight Ratio FiberglassNose ConeCommercial Availability Carbon Fiber CoatingNose ConeElectrically Conductive

Static Stability Margin Stability Analysis From nose coneWith Booster SectionWithout Booster Section Center of Pressure ” ” Center of Gravity ” ” Static Stability Margin Rail Size/Length1.5” (1515) / 96”

Risk Assessment  Team safety briefings  Consult mentor and industry experts  Verify design with calculations and RockSim analysis  Identify potential hazards for construction and launch  Follow launch checklists and guidelines  NAR High Power Rocket Safety Code  Comply with federal, state, and local laws Plan for Vehicle Safety Verification

Baseline Motor Selection MotorBrand Engine CodeDiameterLengthBurn TimeImpulseThrust BoosterCesaroniJ240 RL54 mm in3.35 s Ns N MainCesaroniL61098mm in8.13s Ns N SustainerCesaroni L3150 Vmax98mm in1.57 s Ns N

Thrust-to-Weight Ratio and Rail Exit Ascent Analysis With Booster SectionWithout Booster Section Rail exit velocity (ft/s) Max velocity (ft/s) Max Mach number Max acceleration (ft/s 2 ) Peak altitude (ft) Thrust-to-Weight Ratio5.63:124.43:1

Launch Vehicle Verification  Verification of the design requirements will be completed for the structure, recovery, and propulsion subsystems  Analysis using computer simulations or calculations  Testing hardware components  Static testing before launch  Inventory of all structural equipment  Inspect fins for damage and stability  Inspect detachable components for secure attachment  Inspect rail buttons for secure attachment  Inspect all parallel boosters and main motors

Recovery System ParameterDrogueMainParallelBooster Diameter62”90”20”55” Deployment Altitude18500’1200’4445’5000’ Velocity at Deployment (f/s) Decent Rate (ft/s) Kinetic Energy (ft- lbs) Recovery Harness Material 1” Tubular Nylon Harness Length (ft)20’30’3’10’

Recovery System Electronics/Ejection Altimeter Make/Model 2x Missile Works mini RRC2 Redundancy Plan Each altimeter has an independent drogue/main charge. Redundant altimeter set to deploy 2 s after apogee and 2 s after 1200 ft. Pad Stay Time (Launch Configuration) > 4 hours Rocket Locators Mini Global GPS Tracker, Adafruit Ultimate GPS v3, USGlobalSat EM-406A Black Powder Mass Drogue Parachute g Black Powder Mass Main Parachute 7.56 g

Recovery System Verification ComponentVerification Method Attachment pointsExpected loads ParachutesSimulated masses Ejection chargesGround tested for adequate force Parallel Boosters Ejection MethodMotor Eject Booster Locators Mini Global GPS Tracker Booster Section Altimeter Make/Model Adept Rocketry DCS1 Deployment Controller Altimeter Pad Stay Time (Launch Configuration) > 4 hours Rocket Locators Mini Global GPS Tracker Black Powder Mass Booster Section Parachute g

LiDAR Hazard Detection System

 Rotating Mirrors  Processing Subsystem  Ranging Subsystem  Ground Station

Parallel Inline Motor System

 Parallel Stage  Inline Stage  Electronics

Tesseract

 Electrometer  CubeSat  Ground Station

Payload Verification  Complete all ground testing pertinent to payload functionality.  Set all control data.  Ensure proper wiring for all electrical components before launch.  Inspect all payload bays and detachment points for structural integrity prior to launch.

Questions?