Overview of 300 Hz Conventional e + Source for ILC Truly Conventional Collaboration ANL, IHEP, Hiroshima U, U of Tokyo, KEK, DESY, U of Hamburg NIM A672.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider.
Advertisements

ILC Accelerator Kaoru Yokoya (KEK) KIAS 2013/12/13 KIASWS Yokoya1.
JCS e + /e - Source Development and E166 J. C. Sheppard, SLAC June 15, 2005.
Status of Undulator-based Positron Source Baseline Design Leo Jenner, but based largely on a talk given by Jim Clarke to Positron DESY-Zeuthen,
Capture Simulation for ILC Electron-Driven Positron Source Y. Seimiya, M. Kuriki, T. Okugi, T. Omori, M. Satoh, J. Urakawa, and S. Kashiwagi 14 May 2014.
Beam loading compensation 300Hz positron generation (Hardware Upgrade ??? Due to present Budget problem) LCWS2013 at Tokyo Uni., Nov KEK, Junji.
Demonstration of the Beam loading compensation (Preparation status for ILC beam loading compensation experiments at ATF injector in this September) (PoP.
Conventional Source for ILC (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost) Junji Urakawa, KEK LCWS2012 Contents : 0. Short review of 300Hz conventional positron source.
16 th June 2008 POSIPOL 2008L. Rinolfi / CERN CLIC e + sources status L. Rinolfi with contributions from F. Antoniou, H. Braun, A. Latina, Y. Papaphilippou,
R.Chehab/Posipol2008/Hiroshima, june POSITRON SOURCES USING CHANNELING FOR ILC & CLIC R.Chehab, X.Artru, M.Chevallier, IPNL/IN2P3/CNRS, Universite.
Undulator Based ILC Positron Source Studies Wei Gai Argonne National Laboratory CCAST ILC Accelerator Workshop Beijing, Nov 5 – 7, 2007.
What’s been Achieved and What’s to be Done K. Yokoya ILC Annual Meeting 2012/12/20 ILC Annual, Yokoya1.
300 Hz e + Generation for ILC MM with advanced conventional e + sources T. Omori (KEK) 17-Nov-2008, GDE meeting, Chicago Many thanks to Chehab-san, Logachev-san,Urakawa-san,
ILC e+ 源の現状 2 29-June-2015, ADI-J meeting T. Omori.
1 C-Band Linac Development Satoshi Ohsawa 2004.Feb.19LCPAC.
Helical Undulator Based Positron Source for LC Wanming Liu 05/29/2013.
2015/10/261 Present members : KEK: J.Urakawa, T.Omori, T.Suwada, T.Kamitani, BINP, Novosibirsk :Pavel Logachev (BINP), V.M.Strakhovenko, --- Hiroshima:
1 Positron Target R&D at KEK Plan and Status AD&I Meeting 2009/8/27 KEK Hybrid Target Test at KEKB Linac Liquid Lead Target Test at ATF Linac Window Test.
Discussion for Keep Alive Source /Auxiliary Positron Source KURIKI Masao Hiroshima U. /KEK 10/25/2011 ILC Technical Baseline Review, 2011, DESY 1.
Conventional e + Source Rotation Target R/D T. Omori (KEK) ANL, IHEP, Hiroshima U, U of Tokyo, KEK, DESY, U of Hamburg, CERN 3-Sep-2015 POSIPOL 2015, Cockcroft.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
WG3a Sources Summary Jim Clarke on behalf of John Sheppard, Masao Kuriki, Philippe Piot and all the contributors to WG3a.
Key luminosity issues of the positron source Wei Gai.
Positron Source General Update M. Kuriki(Hiroshima U./KEK) ALCW2015, April 2015,Tsukuba/Tokyo, Japan.
Current standing of the undulator based ILC positron source Wei Gai AWLC 14 FNAL, May
Ideas for e+ source and e+ polarization 29-May-2013 ECFA LC Workshop at DESY T. Omori.
20 April 2009 AAP Review Global Design Effort 1 The Positron Source Jim Clarke STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Laser Based Polarized e + e + Source for ILC 8th ACFA Daegu 11-14/Jul/2005 Tsunehiko OMORI (KEK)
A Report from PosiPol2015 to AD&I meeting (10 Sep. 2015) Masao KURIKI (Hiroshima University)
Beam Loading experiment at KEK ATF ( Multi-train acceleration at KEK-ATF Injector ) KEK Masafumi Fukuda and Junji Urakawa LCWS /10/052 train acceleration.
Conventional e + Source Rotation Target R/D T. Omori (KEK) ANL, IHEP, Hiroshima U, U of Tokyo, KEK, DESY, U of Hamburg, CERN 3-Nov-2015 LCWS 2015, The.
Overview of 300 Hz Conventional e + Source for ILC T. Omori (KEK) 29-May-2013 ECFA LC Workshop at DESY Truly Conventional Collaboration ANL, IHEP, Hiroshima.
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors LCWS, Arlington, Texas, October 22 th -26 th, 2012Steffen Döbert, BE-RF Overview of the CLIC main beam injectors.
Undulator based polarized positron source for Circular electron-positron colliders Wei Gai Tsinghua University/ANL a seminar for IHEP, 4/8/2015.
22 th October 2010 IWLC Sources working group J. Clarke, T. Omori, L. Rinolfi, A. Variola Summary of Sources working group WG1 with contributions from.
Status of the Compton Experiment at the ATF TILC09 18-April-2009 T.Takahashi Hiroshima University for collaborators.
T.Takahashi Hiroshima /11/5 Tohru Takahashi Hiroshima University 高橋 徹 広島大学.
Target studies for the ILC 300 Hz conventional e + source 29-May-2013 ECFA LC Workshop at DESY T. Omori Target study team: K. Yokoya (KEK), J. Urakawa.
Positron capture simulation for 300Hz electrondriven scheme M. Kuriki, Y. Seimiya, T. Takahashi (Hiroshima U.) T. Okugi, M. Sato, J. Urakawa, T. Omori.
Compton for ILC LCWS2012, UT at Arlington, USA T. Omori (KEK)
Conventional source developments (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost, Part-II) Junji Urakawa, KEK PosiPol-2012 at DESY Zeuthen Contents : 0. Short review.
Truly Conventional e + Source for ILC Special Thanks to Takahashi-san: About half of the slides are taken from Takahash-san's talk at ALCPG11 T. Omori.
A_RD_6: Study and optimization of the power deposition density in new positron targets Masanori Satoh (Accelerator Laboratory, KEK) On behalf of collaborators:
R.Chehab/FCPPL2010/Lyon1 AN HYBRID POSITRON SOURCE FOR ILC -Collaboration IN2P3-IHEP, with BINP, KEK, Hiroshima-U, CERN- X.Artru, R.Chehab, M.Chevallier.
Positron Source for Linear Collider Wanming Liu 04/11/2013.
1 Positron Source Configuration Masao KURIKI ILC AG meeting at KEK, 2006 Jan. Positron Source Configuration KURIKI Masao and John Sheppard  BCD Description.
Some Aspects on Compton Scheme Positron Source Study Wanming Liu ANL Tsunehiko OMORI KEK.
Masao KURIKI (Hiroshima University)
POSIPOL 2016 at LAL/Paris, Sept Peter Sievers-CERN
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
Positron Sources of Next generation B-factories (SuperKEKB, SuperB)
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
NC Accelerator Structures
CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems
CLIC Main Beam Sources and their transfer lines
Heat load at the ILC positron target and collimator system
REVIEW OF POSITRON SOURCE R&D FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS
CLIC Undulator Option for Polarised Positrons
Cost Comparison of Undulator and e-Driven Systems
Truly Conventional e+ Source for ILC
Junji Urakawa (KEK) for ATF International Collaboration
Pol. positron generation scheme for ILC
ILC RDR baseline schematic (2007 IHEP meeting)
CLIC source update CLIC main beam injectors reminder
Summary for the Sources working group
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
CEPC Injector positron source
ATF project meeting, Feb KEK, Junji Urakawa Contents :
CEPC Injector positron source
Presentation transcript:

Overview of 300 Hz Conventional e + Source for ILC Truly Conventional Collaboration ANL, IHEP, Hiroshima U, U of Tokyo, KEK, DESY, U of Hamburg NIM A672 (2012) 52—56 T. Omori (KEK) 7-Oct-2014 LCWS 2014, Hyatt Regency, Belgrade

ILC : International Linear Collider e + lineace - lineacDRsDR E cm = GeV ~ 50 km e- 源e- 源 e+ 源e+ 源

e- source We extract electron from a material. e- source and e+ source e+ source There are no positrons in materials. We have to "create" positrons.

X 18 X 65 ILC requires HUGE number of positrons.

Target Issues Undulator Scheme (base line) In order to create e+s, it uses e- beam in the main linac. It creates 2600 bunches of e+s in 1 m sec. Heat load is a serious problem. It requires the challenging rotation target (100 m/s). (spreads 2600 bunches in 100 mm length) Difficulty in cooling and vacuum. 300 Hz Truly Conventional It creates 2600 bunches of e+s in 63 m sec. (stretching) We can employ much slower speed target: 3-5 m/s. Heat, Stress, and Vacuum

300 Hz scheme e+ generation in 63 m sec (cf. undulator : in 1 m sec)

Total Number of bunches: 2640 How? Divide into 20 triplets (1 Triplet = 3 Mini-Trains) 300 Hz creation of triplets triplet to triplet time space = 3.3 m sec Each triplet contains 132 bunches 2640 = 20 x 132 Create 20 triplets : 63 m sec Stretching in time

20 triplets, rep. = 300 Hz triplet = 3 mini-trains with gaps 44 bunches/mini-train, T b_to_b = 6.15 n sec DR T b_to_b = 6.15 n sec (3.07) 2640 bunches/train, rep. = 5 Hz T b_to_b = 369 n sec e+ creation go to main linac Time remaining for damping = 137 m sec We create 2640 bunches in 63 m sec Booster Linac 5 GeV NC 300 Hz Drive Linac Several GeV NC 300 Hz Target Amorphous Tungsten Pendulum or Slow Rotation Conventional e+ Source for ILC Normal Conducting Drive and Booster Linacs in 300 Hz operation 2640 bunches 60 mini-trains

20 triplets, rep. = 300 Hz triplet = 3 mini-trains with gaps 44 bunches/mini-train, T b_to_b = 6.15 n sec DR 2640 bunches/train, rep. = 5 Hz T b_to_b = 369 n sec e+ creation go to main linac Time remaining for damping = 137 m sec We create 2640 bunches in 63 m sec Booster Linac 5 GeV NC 300 Hz Drive Linac Several GeV NC 300 Hz Target Amorphous Tungsten Pendulum or Slow Rotation 2640 bunches 60 mini-trains Stretching Conventional e+ Source for ILC Normal Conducting Drive and Booster Linacs in 300 Hz operation T b_to_b = 6.15 n sec (3.07)

Beam before DR Injection: usual kicker ( ~ 1 us) no stacking is necessary <-- the 100 ns gap is required to cure an e- cloud problem in e+ DR. =132 bunches

20 triplets, rep. = 300 Hz triplet = 3 mini-trains with gaps 44 bunches/mini-train, T b_to_b = 6.15 n sec DR 2640 bunches/train, rep. = 5 Hz T b_to_b = 369 n sec e+ creation go to main linac Time remaining for damping = 137 m sec We create 2640 bunches in 63 m sec Booster Linac 5 GeV NC 300 Hz Drive Linac Several GeV NC 300 Hz Target Amorphous Tungsten Pendulum or Slow Rotation 2640 bunches 60 mini-trains Conventional e+ Source for ILC Normal Conducting Drive and Booster Linacs in 300 Hz operation T b_to_b = 6.15 n sec (3.07)

Beam after DR Extraction: fast kicker ( 3 ns kicker: Naito kicker) the same as the baseline

Target and Drive_Beam Optimization

In the case of 300Hz scheme spacing between triplets =3.3ms 132bunches in 992ns good for a FC we can use existing FC technology

Assumptions a triplet: 132 bunches 992ns a train: 20 triplet = 2640 bunches 63ms 3.3ms 132 bunches make a shock wave heat same position on the target each triplet hits different position on the target drive electrons 2×10 10 /bunch pendulum or slow rotation target

35J/g 500k 100k Parameter Plots for 300 Hz scheme PEDD J/g colored bandaccepted e+/e- dT max by a triplet 12345 e- directly on to Tungsten  =4.0mm Ne - (drive) = 2x10 10 /bunch

35J/g 500k 100k Parameter Plots for 300 Hz scheme PEDD J/g colored bandaccepted e+/e- there seems to be solutions dT max by a triplet 12345 e- directly on to Tungsten  =4.0mm Ne - (drive) = 2x10 10 /bunch

Dependence on Drive beam size  of the Drive e- Beam (mm) 35J/g e+/e- =1.5, Ne - /bunch = 2x10 10

Target Heat Simulation (Wanming)

assumption: 5 m/s Target Heat Simulation (Wanming)

20 triplets, rep. = 300 Hz triplet = 3 mini-trains with gaps 44 bunches/mini-train, T b_to_b = 6.15 n sec DR T b_to_b = 6.15 n sec 2640 bunches/train, rep. = 5 Hz T b_to_b = 369 n sec e+ creation go to main linac Time remaining for damping = 137 m sec Booster Linac 5 GeV NC 300 Hz Drive Linac Several GeV NC 300 Hz Target Amorphous Tungsten Pendulum or Slow Rotation 2640 bunches 60 mini-trains Conventional e+ Source for ILC Normal Conducting Drive and Booster Linacs in 300 Hz operation Truly Conventional * We assume single solid target. * NO Liquid Target or NO Hybrid Target are assumed

R/D items

R&D Issues of the Conventional Source “conventional” but still needs some more R&D High current, high rep rate driver linac Moving target Flux concentrator Capture and Booster linac Overall simulation How to go with the undulator source (compatibility) 2013/8/30 ILC monthly, Yokoya23

Moving Target ~ 3-5m/sec required (1/20 of undulator scheme) 2 possible schemes being developed at Hiroshima/KEK 2013/8/30 ILC monthly, Yokoya24 bellows seal vacuum air ferromagnetic fluid seal airvacuum 5Hz pendulum with bellows seal rotating target with ferromagnetic seal main issue: vacuum common issue: stress by heat main issues: life of bellows, mechanism First step prototype fabricated

Flux Concentrator Almost existing technology – pulse length ~1  sec (cf. ~1msec in undulator scheme) SuperKEKB – aperture 7 mm (diameter) Beam aperture should be a bit larger – ~7mm  ~12mm or more 2013/8/30 ILC monthly, Yokoya25

Linacs Driver linac (~6GeV) – high current – high rep rate (300Hz) Booster linac (~5GeV) – high rep rate – accurate loading compensation (due to uneven bunch structure) 2013/8/30 ILC monthly, Yokoya26 a triplet: 132 bunches 992ns a train: 20 triplet = 2640 bunches 63ms 3.3ms 2×10 10 /bunch

200MW, 3  s 300Hz Power Supply Low Level RF Phase Shifter and Amp. 3dB High Power RF Combiner 50  High Power Terminator 80MW Klystron 3m long constant gradient travelling wave structure precise control of the phase shifters needed 3x10 10 positron/bunch 300Hz triplet beam Less than +/- 0.7% Loading Compensation Scheme Urakawa Test at ATF linac being planned 2013/8/30 ILC monthly, Yokoya27

Overall Simulation DR aperture –  E < MeV –  z < +-34mm – A x +A y < 70  m Must include – target simulation – loading compensation Is S-band linac acceptable? Time (ns) Pz(MeV) Longitudinal Phase Space 2013/8/30 ILC monthly, Yokoya cm

If we start with "Conventional", we need to keep smooth path to "Undulator". footprint compatibility (no change of the tunnel) "300Hz conventional source" should fit the space for "undulator source" undulator e+ source Undulator-Conventional Compatibility

Summary

Conventional e+ source can be a solution for ILC, with 300Hz scheme and optimized beam&target parameters. to go forward -> We need R/Ds – High current, high rep rate driver linac – Moving target – Flux concentrator – Booster linac – Overall simulation – Target R/D