S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Prospects of Compact Crab Cavities for LHC Peter McIntosh LHC-CC Workshop, CERN 21 st August 2008.
Advertisements

Bunch compressors ILC Accelerator School May Eun-San Kim Kyungpook National University.
Super B-Factory Workshop, Hawaii, April 20-22, 2005 Lattice studies for low momentum compaction in LER M.E. Biagini LNF-INFN, Frascati.
01/07/2005 SN 1 of 16 Esti mation of HOM Power in the Interaction Region of ILC Sasha Novokhatski Session “Beam RF Effects” ILC MDI Workshop SLAC January.
Accelerator Summary 1/22/2004 K. Oide (KEK). Accelerator Session: PEP-II IR Upgrade M. Sullivan (SLAC) Super KEKB Optics & IR Y. Ohnishi(KEK) Super-PEP-II.
ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
X-ray Booster IR Linac Harmonic RF RF Systems for NSLS-II J. Rose, A. Blednykh, N. Towne With help from many others at BNL and other institutions.
DESIGN OF A 7-CELLS, HOM DAMPED, SUPERCONDUCTING CAVITY FOR THE STRONG RF FOCUSING EXPERIMENT AT DANE David Alesini, Caterina Biscari, Roberto Boni, Alessandro.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
NON-SCALING FFAGs: questions needing answers Andy Wolski The Cockcroft Institute, and the University of Liverpool Department of Physics. BASROC-CONFORM.
Zenghai Li SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory LHC-CC13 CERN, December 9-11, 2013 HOM Coupler Optimization & RF Modeling.
Beam Instability Workshop, ESRF, 13th - 15th March 2000J. Jacob / 1 Harmonic Cavities:the Pros & Cons Jörn Jacob.
Impedance and Collective Effects in BAPS Na Wang Institute of High Energy Physics USR workshop, Huairou, China, Oct. 30, 2012.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
Photocathode 1.5 (1, 3.5) cell superconducting RF gun with electric and magnetic RF focusing Transversal normalized rms emittance (no thermal emittance)
History and motivation for a high harmonic RF system in LHC E. Shaposhnikova With input from T. Argyropoulos, J.E. Muller and all participants.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
704MHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL July 8, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  July 8, 2015.
Simulation of Beam Instabilities in SPring-8 T. Nakamura JASRI / SPring-8
RF systems for NSLS-II J. Rose, A. Blednykh, P. Mortazavi and Nathan Towne BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES.
FFAG Accelerators for Proton Driver Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France April 12-17, 2007.
KEK R&D for LHC Plan of 800MHz Cavity Calculation of 400MHz Cavity 16 th September 2009, LHC-CC09 at CERN K.Nakanishi.
LLRF Preliminary Design Review Vojtech Pacak/Ron Akre1 BEAM PHASE DETECTOR – PILLBOX CAVITY Basic Requirements and Parameters – Operating frequency:
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
Simulation of trapped modes in LHC collimator A.Grudiev.
RF Tutorial G Burt. TM 010 Monopole Mode E H Beam Z 0 =377 Ohms.
ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop, KEK, Dec 18-20, 2007 Status and Plans for Impedance Calculations of the ILC Damping Rings Cho Ng Advanced Computations.
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
704 MHz warm cavity November 4, 2015 A.Zaltsman: SRF & warm RF components for LEReC1  A single cell 704 MHz warm cavity is used to correct the beam energy.
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
TWO-BEAM, MULTI-MODE, DETUNED ACCSELERATING STRUCTURE S.Kazakov 1,2, S.Kuzikov 3, V.Yakovlev 4 J.L. Hirshfield 1,5, 1 Omega-p,Inc., 199 Whitney Ave., New.
BEAMLINE HOM ABSORBER O. Nezhevenko, S. Nagaitsev, N. Solyak, V. Yakovlev Fermi National Laboratory December 11, 2007 Wake Fest 07 - ILC wakefield workshop.
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
Marcel Schuh CERN-BE-RF-LR CH-1211 Genève 23, Switzerland 3rd SPL Collaboration Meeting at CERN on November 11-13, 2009 Higher.
HOMs in the TESLA 9-cell cavity HOMs in the XFEL and ILC Rainer Wanzenberg SPL HOM workshop CERN, June 25 – 26, 2009.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES FCC Week 2016 Rome, April 2016 Collective Effects in Low-Emittance Rings: Projection for FCC Victor Smaluk NSLS-II,
Impedance & Instabilities
Harmonic system for LHC
CEPC APDR Study Zhenchao LIU
Bocheng Jiang SSRF AP group
T. Agoh (KEK) Introduction CSR emitted in wiggler
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
HOM power in FCC-ee cavities
Cavity-beam interaction and Longitudinal beam dynamics for CEPC DR&APDR 宫殿君
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
FCC-ee: coupling impedances and collective effects
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Beam Loading Effect in CEPC APDR
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Collective effects in CEPC
CEPC APDR SRF considerations(3)
Simulation of trapped modes in LHC collimator
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
CEPC Main Ring Cavity Design with HOM Couplers
PETRA IV System design concept Old and new machine
Physics Design on Injector I
Passive harmonic cavities for bunch shortening
CEPC APDR SRF considerations(4) -LEP Cavity Voltage &BBU
Coherent Synchrotron Radiation Study
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
Parameters Changed in New MEIC Design
RF Parameters for New 2.2 km MEIC Design
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
Transient Beam Loading Effects in RF System for the Electron Storage Rings and its Control Strategies to the MEIC Injection, Storage and Synchronization.
RF Parameters for New 2.2 km MEIC Design
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super B-factory

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 2 of 38 Why Low R/Q Cavities for Super B? Because we need high currents to achieve super high luminosity

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 3 of 38 Low R/Q cavities are: To damp multi-bunch instability To avoid single-bunch instability To decrease HOM power

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 4 of 38 How we can make low R/Q? By decreasing cavity gap –in this case HOM power goes down –but surface fields go up and bring limit very soon By increasing beam pipe radius –smaller R/Q - - closer to cut-off frequency

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 5 of 38 Varying cavity gap length cavity gap  cavity gap  35.5 OhmR/Q 24.3 Ohm 0.39 V/pC HOM loss factor 0.24 V/pC MV/m Max surface electric field * MV/m A/mMax surface magnetic field * A/m * for 1 MeV energy gain, f=952 MHz, bore radius 70 mm

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 6 of 38 Varying beam pipe radius “Wakefield” calculations

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 7 of 38 Wakefield spectrum “Wakefield” calculations

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 8 of 38 Electric Field Distribution Rb=110mm Rb=90mm Rb=70mm “SUPERFISH” calculations

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 9 of 38 Surface fields distribution* *1 MeV energy gain. Electric field – Green. Magnetic field - pink “SUPERFISH” calculations

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 10 of 38 Cavity parameters

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 11 of 38 R/Q and HOM Power

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 12 of 38 Transient time factor and stored Energy

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 13 of 38 Maximum surface fields magnetic electric

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 14 of 38 Periodic Structure. Main mode coupling Distance between cavities mm (5  ) Zero mode  mode Coupling: 0.55/952=5.8E-04 TM01 Cut-off GHz Rb=110mm

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 15 of 38 Trapped TM 11 modes Zero mode  mode TM11 Cut-off GHz “MAFIA” calculations

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 16 of 38 Trapped TE 11 modes Zero mode  mode TE11 Cut-off MHz “MAFIA” calculations

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 17 of 38 Checking single–bunch stability We need to know: Wake potentials Number of cavities Total voltage Momentum compaction

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 18 of 38 Cavity wake Potential Bunch shortening ?

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 19 of 38 Yes, cavity wake produces shorter bunches Bunch Current mA Bunch Charge nC Zero bunchlength 1.80 mm Moment. compact E-04 Ring Energy MeV Energy Spread MeV SR Energy loss MeV per turn RF Voltage: MV Number of cavities 42 Phase Angle degree (0.926 mm) Harmonic Number 6984 Rev. frequency kHz Synchrotron freq kHz (7.995 Turns) Damping turns mm  1.75 mm 1.25MV/cav

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 20 of 38 Resistive-Wall Wake (bunch lengthening) Power SS: MW Al: 7.88 MW Cu: 6.06 MW SR: 22.3 MW

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 21 of 38 IP wake ( large additional part) Power IP HOMs: 4.0 MW

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 22 of 38 All wakes included Bunch Current mA Bunch Charge nC Zero bunchlength 1.80 mm Moment. compact E-04 Ring Energy MeV Energy Spread MeV SR Energy loss MeV per turn RF Voltage: MV Number of cavities 42 Phase Angle degree (0.926 mm) Harmonic Number 6984 Rev. frequency kHz Synchrotron freq kHz (7.995 Turns) Damping turns mm

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 23 of 38 Bunch length in the ring IP cavities 1 3 2

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 24 of 38 IP  1.83 mm

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 25 of 38  2.00 mm Before cavities

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 26 of 38  2.00 mm after cavities

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 27 of 38 IP  1.83 mm IP Cavities

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 28 of 38 More Voltage 1.5 MV/cavity * 42 = 63 MV Momentum compaction goes to 1.128E-03 to have the same bunchlength

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 29 of 38 IP  1.77 mm

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 30 of 38  2.02 mm Before cavities

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 31 of 38  2.02 mm after cavities

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 32 of 38 IP  1.77 mm IP Cavities

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 33 of 38 More focusing We can increase momentum compaction more to bring bunch length to 1.8mm at IP

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 34 of 38 IP  mm

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 35 of 38  mm Before cavities

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 36 of 38  mm after cavities

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 37 of 38 IP  mm IP Cavities

S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 38 of 38 Conclusions Low R/Q cavities are needed for super high luminosity factories. These cavities are superconducting cavities. Low R/Q is achieved by using large beam pipe. Cut-off frequency is very closer to the working frequency. Trapped transverse modes must be damped using external loads. High voltage and correspondent momentum compaction give additional bunch shortening at interaction point.