Hernani G Golez, Ph. D. Director BPI’S ROLE IN BIOSAFETY REGULATIONS RISK ASSESSMENT TRAINING-WORKSHOP May 24-28, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technical Assistance and Capacity Building Activities: Philippine Setting By: GILBERTO F. LAYESE Director, Bureau of Agriculture and Fisheries Product.
Advertisements

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety -Reducing the Environmental Risks of Modern Biotechnology Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
SEED STATUS REPORT FOR MALAWI
THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STEP 1 PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL STAGE PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE FIRST TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING.
DEPARTMENT: AGRICULTURE SELECT COMMITTEE MEETING Presentation on the re-accession to the international organisation of vine and wine DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
The United States Experience Implementing the WTO SPS Agreement Hangzhou, China December 2008 Roseanne Freese Senior WTO SPS Affairs Officer United States.
Safety Service 5A Lennoxvale Working Safely with Genetically Modified Organisms.
ENVIRONMENT SAFETY: RISK ASSESSMENT AND MONITORING Clarito M. Barron, CESO IV Assistant Director, BPI and Chair, DA-BPI Biotechnology Core Team.
Introduction to Regulatory Affairs: Agencies and Permit Process Advanced Biotechnology (c)(8)(A)
The International Regulation of Biotechnology Lecture No. 19 Further Inf. For further information and video link please click on the right buttons in the.
Industry Actions to Enhance Consumer Confidence in Biotechnology Gregory Jaffe Director, Biotechnology Project Center for Science in the Public Interest.
An introduction to China’s Science & tech. Programs CHENG, Xu May 23,2006 Department of Computer Science and Technology College of EECS, Peking.
Providing Options for Philippine Agriculture BiotechnologyBiotechnology (Revised: June 2003)
FDA’s Policy for Evaluating Bioengineered Foods Jeanette Glover Glew Food and Drug Administration Center For Food Safety and Applied Nutrition September,
DEPARTMENT: AGRICULTURE Genetically Modified Organisms Act, 1997 (Act No. 15 of 1997) By Shadrack R. Moephuli (Dr.) Registrar: GMO Act 14 April 2003.
GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM PRESENTATION 13 September 2013 By Department of Trade and Industry.
Biosecurity Laws and Regulations in Turkey Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Avni Öktem Nanobiotechnology R&D Group, Department of Biological Sciences Middle East Technical.
RYERSON UNIVERSITY 1 1. ADMINISTRATION. RYERSON UNIVERSITY 2 Biological Safety Training – Certificate Holder and User Training BIOLOGICAL SAFETY at RYERSON.
Regulatory Procedure for the Assessment of GM Foods.
Mid-term progress report on Risk Assessment and Monitoring of Environmental Chemicals Dennis R. Sanchez Philippines.
1 Inter-linkages: BCH, Parties, Capacity Building, Compliance and RA Concept Sustainability Biosafety Programme - Secretariat of the Convention on Biological.
Department of Science and Technology: Role in the administration, utilization and management of GM food Ben Durham Chief Director Biotechnology and Health.
Dual Use Research of Concern Boston University and Boston Medical Center.
Important acronyms AO = authorizing official ISO = information system owner CA = certification agent.
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.
Assessment of Egypt’s Compliance with the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) April 18th, 2004 by Sahar Tohamy, ATR World Bank Institute.
Australia’s policy and regulatory framework for gene technology QMAC 2003 (Dr) Sue D Meek Gene Technology Regulator.
XXX_DECRIPT_MON00/1 Quality and impact of Social Science and Operations Research by the Special Programme in Human Reproduction Department of Reproductive.
Potential trade implications of CBD and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety MEA – UNEP meeting on Enhancing MEA and WTO Information Exchange 11 November,
BIOSAFETY FRAMEWORK IN SLOVENIA - PUBLIC PARTCIPATION- Martin Batič and Ruth Rupreht Republic of Slovenia Ministry of the Environment and Spatial Planning.
Introduction to GMOs: Myths and realities Masami Takeuchi, Ph.D. Food Safety Officer.
Introduction to the Obligations of the Party to the Biosafety Clearing-House Manoranjan Hota.
THE BIOSAFETY BILL, 2007 JACARANDA HOTEL, 26 TH JULY 2007.
1 Introduction of Research and Development Project Evaluation System at NEDO Momoko OKADA New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization(NEDO)
OVERVIEW OF THE ROLES OF VARIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR AFLATOXIN CONTROL IN TANZANIA RAYMOND N. WIGENGE DIRECTOR OF FOOD SAFETY TFDA.
CARTAGENA PROTOCOL ON BIOSAFETY NDA- DEAT BILATERAL MEETING 1 August 2003 Presenter : M. Mbengashe.
"Organic Agriculture Act of 2010".
Regional Network for Agricultural Biotechnology in the Near East & North Africa Presented by I. Hamdan Cairo – Egypt, December 15-16, 2007.
Codex Science-based Approach to the Safety of Foods Derived from Modern Biotechnology James H. Maryanski, Ph.D. Food and Drug Administration Center for.
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety And India’s Obligations By Desh Deepak Verma Joint Secretary, Ministry of Environment and.
DOE Data Management Plan Requirements
JOINT FAO/IAEA PROGRAMME of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture 1 Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) &
By Isaac and Christy.  GMOs are regulated by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration), the APHIS (Animal Plant Health Inspection Service), and the EPA.
Tracy McCracken SPS Technical Advisor East Africa Region United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Kenya and East Aferica/Office of Regional.
Important acronyms AO = authorizing official ISO = information system owner CA = certification agent.
Study on the Patent Involved in National Standards China National Institute of Standardization September, 2009.
1. Consumers, Health And Food Executive Agency European and international stakeholders Codex Alimentarius EU National implementations 2.
Priority Agricultural Policies and Standards to Advance Agricultural Trade and Access to Inputs Regional Feed the Future and Trade Africa Meeting
Russian Information-Analytical APEC Center for Agricultural Biotechnology.
SELECT COMMITTEE MEETING
Biosafety at Swinburne
SEED STATUS REPORT FOR MALAWI
Agricultural Biotechnology in Turkey
13 September 2013 By Department of Trade and Industry
Genetically Modified Organisms Act, 1997 (Act No. 15 of 1997)
EFSA Trusted science for safe food Guilhem de Sèze
Overview of the WTO SPS Agreement and the role of
Mexico 8th Meeting of the Steering Committee of INTOSAI Committee on
Clinical Engineering Lecture (3).
THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
Towards the global responsibility
HACCP Essential Tool for Food Safety
Vytenis Andriukaitis European Commissioner for Health and Food Safety
EU Reference Centres for Animal Welfare
PEST Committee hearing, 6 September 2018 Stakeholders' recommendations on the current EU regulation on the approval of plant protection products Franziska.
PEST Committee hearing, 6 September 2018 Stakeholders' recommendations on the current EU regulation on the approval of plant protection products Franziska.
ROLE OF KEPHIS IN SAFE HANDLING, TRANSFER AND USE OF GMOS.
Mexico 8th Meeting of the Steering Committee of INTOSAI Committee on
Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety -Reducing the Environmental Risks of Modern Biotechnology Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
Genetically Modified Organisms Act, 1997 (Act No. 15 of 1997)
Presentation transcript:

Hernani G Golez, Ph. D. Director BPI’S ROLE IN BIOSAFETY REGULATIONS RISK ASSESSMENT TRAINING-WORKSHOP May 24-28, 2004

Existing Biosafety Regulations (1) Executive Order No. 430 Issued on October 15, 1990 Instituting the National Committee on Biosafety of the Philippines (NCBP) Task of formulating national policies and guidelines on biosafety BPI represents the Department of Agriculture in the institutional and individual composition of NCBP

Existing Biosafety Regulations (2) Department of Agriculture’s Administrative Order No. 8, Series of 2002 Importation and Release into the Environment of Plants and Plant Products Derived from the Use of Modern Biotechnology

Guiding Philosophies (1) We shall promote the safe and responsible use of modern biotechnology and its products as one of the means to achieve food security, equal access to health services, a sustainable and safe environment, and industry development. Pres. Gloria M Arroyo July 16, 2001

Accelerate agricultural development, enhance production, and diversify products for food security and global competitiveness Accelerate agricultural development, enhance production, and diversify products for food security and global competitiveness Safe and responsible use of modern biotechnology could increase farm yield, improve quality of farm products, reduce use of pesticides and other inputs, enhance the environment, and reduce farmer/consumer exposure to pesticides Safe and responsible use of modern biotechnology could increase farm yield, improve quality of farm products, reduce use of pesticides and other inputs, enhance the environment, and reduce farmer/consumer exposure to pesticides Guiding Philosophies (2)

COVERAGE: Regulated Article  Any plant which has been altered or produced through the use of modern biotechnology if donor organism, host organism, or vector or vector agent belongs to any of the genera or taxa classified by BPI as meeting the definition of plant pest or is a medium for the introduction of noxious weeds

 Any plant or plant product altered or produced through the use of modern biotechnology which may pose significant risks to human health and the environment based on available scientific and technical information COVERAGE: Regulated Article

TYPES OF PERMIT  Permit to Import for Contained Use  Permit to Field Test  Permit for Propagation  Permit to Import for Direct Use as Food or Feed, or for Processing

General Flowchart Laboratory Testing Field Testing Propagation/ Gen. Release/ Commercialization Direct Use for Food, Feed or For Processing - Importation - Supervision - Importation - Monitoring - Importation

APPLICATION TO IMPORT FOR CONTAINED USE NO APPROVED DENIED Within 15 days from acceptance of application Grace period of 60 days to correct defects Applicant BPI Sufficient in Form & Substance? Process & evaluate within 5 days of receipt YES Submit: 3 copies of Application Form; NCBP Letter of Endorsement

APPLICATION TO FIELD TEST Applicant BPI Sufficient in Form & Substance? Public Hearing by IBC (if STRP reports that release may pose significant risks Process & evaluate within 5 days of receipt YESNO Submit: 3 copies of Application Form support documents (technical dossier; copy of PIS; & NCBP certification that reg.art. has undergone satisfactory testing for contained use in the Phils. APPROVED DENIED Within 120 days from acceptance If reg. art. is to be imported: certification fr. country of import that reg.art. is of similar transformation event approved locally; notification fr. country of import in accordance w/ existing international agreements on GMOs Grace period of 60 days to correct defects For conduct of public consultation Applicant thru IBC Shall post PIS for 3 consecutive wks, & invite comments w/in 30-day pd. STRP For evaluation on risk assessment Shall submit report w/n 30 days For consultation NCBP

APPLICATION TO RELEASE FOR PROPAGATION Applicant BPI Sufficient in Form & Substance? STRP For evaluation on risk assessment For conduct of public consultation Process & evaluate within 5 days of receipt YESNO Submit: 5 copies of Application Form support documents (technical dossier; copy of PIS; & BPI certification that reg.art. has undergone satisfactory field testing in the Phils. APPROVED DENIED Within 90 days from acceptance Applicant Shall publish PIS in 2 papers, & invite comments w/in 30-day pd. If reg. art. is to be imported: certification fr. country of import that reg.art. is of similar transformation event approved locally; notification fr. country of import in accordance w/ existing international agreements on GMOs Grace period of 60 days to correct defects Shall submit report w/n 30 days BAFPS FPA BAI If pest-protected plant In all instances If intended as feed Shall submit report w/n 30 days

Applicant APPROVED DENIED APPLICATION FOR IMPORTATION FOR DIRECT USE Submit: 3 copies of Application Form support documents (copy of PIS, & notification from country of import in accordance w/ existing international agreements on GMOs) NO Grace period of 60 days to correct defects BPI Sufficient in Form & Substance? Process & evaluate within 5 days of receipt Within 60 days of acceptance For evaluation on risk assessment STRP Shall submit report w/n 30 days BAFPS Shall submit report w/n 30 days BAI Shall submit report w/n 30 days Shall publish PIS in 2 papers, & invite comments w/in 30-day pd. Applicant If intended as food If intended as feed For conduct of public consultation YES

PETITION FOR DELISTING Petitioner BPI SatisfactoryRe quirements? Process & evaluate within 5 days of receipt YESNO Submit: 2 copies of Petition published scientific literature relied upon Within 120 days from acceptance STRP For evaluation on risk assessment For publication of petition Petitioner Shall publish petition in 2 papers, & invite comments w/in 60-day pd. Shall submit report w/n 30 days APPROVED ADD’L DATA REQUIRED DENIED

Advocacy 1.Capacity Building – risk assessment, risk communication, risk management, molecular biology, and molecular techniques 2.Public Consultations-biosafety policies and guidelines