CONTROL OF FOODBORNE PATHOGENS IN MEAT PRODUCTS BY SANITATION, DRYING AND ANTIMICROBIALS John N. Sofos Colorado State University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Biofilm in food processing Petra Sedláčková. Biofilm – biologically active matrix of cells and extracellular substances in association with a solid surface.
Advertisements

The methods of inactivation and removal of bacterial biofilm Petra Sedláčková.
Effectiveness of Irradiation in Controlling Pathogenic and Spoilage Microorganisms in Meats Catherine N. Cutter Department of Food Science Pennsylvania.
WORKPACKAGE 2.5: Potential risks associated with strategies DELIVERABLE 2.5.1: Data on the efficiency of current and new preservation/safety interventions.
Milk Hygiene & Farm Management Dept. Veterinary Public Health Fac. Veterinary Medicine University Of Kufa Dr. Akram Motlak.
100% Natural – 100% Effective Fresh Wash – Seafood TM.
Postharvest Alternatives to Chemical Fungicides Dr. Ron Porat Dept. of Postharvest Science of Fresh Produce ARO, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel.
Washes and Sanitizers to Reduce Microbial Contamination JIM DICKSON DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SCIENCE INTER-DEPARTMENTAL PROGRAM IN MICROBIOLOGY Iowa State.
Pillar 2: Control and intervention strategies which can be implemented along the fork to farm chain to ensure safe beef Laboratory of Microbiology and.
Post-Processing Interventions to Control Listeriosis Don L. Zink, Ph.D. Office of Plant and Dairy Foods and Beverages Center for Food Safety and Applied.
Listeria in the Dairy and Cold-Smoked Salmon Industries Presented by Rebecca Robertson October 9, 2008.
1 WORKSHOP 1 The New Listeria Regulation IS THE REGULATION APPLICABLE TO YOUR PRODUCT? Labeling, Identification, and Post-Lethality Control Alternatives.
Kelly J.K. Getty, Ph.D. Kansas State University.  Packaging effects on jerky, snack sticks, kippered beef steak, and turkey tenders  Intrinsic factors.
Listeriosis Outbreak in Cantaloupes 2011 Food Factor Robotics PEGBOTS FLL Team # 7056.
WORKPACKAGE 2.5: Potential risks associated with strategies DELIVERABLE 2.5.6: Data on how bacterial interactions contribute to (i) biofilm formation ability.
Track 11/SubTrack 11-5: Probiotic foods and beverages Probiotic vegetable foods containing health promoting molecules. F. Valerio, S. L. Lonigro, M. Di.
Medical Technology Department, Faculty of Science, Islamic University-Gaza MB M ICRO B IOLOGY Dr. Abdelraouf A. Elmanama Ph. D Microbiology 2008 Chapter.
Cleaning and disinfection a summary FS
Food Safety Issues Regarding Meat and Meat Products
Multiple Hurdle Interventions Against E. coli O157:H7 in Apple Cider Steve Ingham University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Interagency Retail Listeria monocytogenes Risk Assessment Data Sources, Data Review, and Data Gaps - Régis POUILLOT – CFSAN/FDA/HHS June 23, 2009.
CLEANING AND SANITATION of PROCESSING EQUIPMENT Huub Lelieveld FSM Chicago November 2004.
Listeria monocytogenes survival in refrigerator dill pickles Jin Kyung Kim a, Elaine M. D'Sa b, Mark A. Harrison a, Judy A. Harrison b, and Elizabeth L.
The Control of Microbial Growth
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings PowerPoint ® Lecture Slide Presentation prepared by Christine L. Case M I C R.
Control of Bacterial Growth l Definitions –Sterilization - Processes that kills living organisms including spores –Disinfection - Destruction of vegetative.
1 High Hydrostatic Pressure (HHP) Technology presentation.
Eastern Regional Research Center Bacterial Inactivation in Apple Juice by UV-light and Radio Frequency Electric Fields Processing Dike O. Ukuku Ph.D. FSIT-ERRC-ARS-USDA.
Alternatives 1 & 2 for Control for Listeria monocytogenes
Lee Young Jun Korea University Lab of Food Microbiology
Introducing Antimicrobial Fruit & Vegetable Treatment.
Interventions to improve microbial safety –Compounds, Ingredients, Processes 1. Carcass washing - remove, reduce beginning numbers –remove bacteria before.
Efficacy of Produce Wash Product: Use of Fresh Potatoes as Model System for Evaluating Pathogen Control in Produce Processing Peter Gray, Dong-Hyun Kang.
Antimicrobials from Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from turmeric (Curcuma longa linn.) and their applications as biopreservative and in edible film Melada.
Current Strategies used to Eliminate or Reduce Pathogenic Microorganisms from Fruits and Vegetables Lesson 3 of 4 Supported in part by a USDA-CSREES grant.
1 Use of Oriental Mustard and Allyl Isothiocyanate to Control Salmonella, Campylobacter and L. monocytogenes in Poultry Meat Products Amin Naser Olaimat.
3. Curing agents Nitrite (sodium or potassium)….. and sometimes nitrate – functions only by conversion to nitrite first – useful only in dried products.
Inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes, E. Coli O157:H7 and Salmonella in Frozen Ground Beef Patties by Electron Beam Irradiation ABC Research Corporation.
Synergistic effect of ozone and microgard 300 for controlling Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat cooked and cured ham. R. JHALA 1, K. Muthukumarappan,
Foodtecb 1 Food technologies to control the development of microbiological hazards Module 02 - Lecture 04b.
HONEY ANTIMICROBIAL EFFECTS Alicia Grabiec Freeport Senior High School Grade 10.
Danish Research on HACCP and Technical support Hardy Christensen Senior Consultant Meat Preservation and Hygiene HACCP Seminar St.
Microbiological Hazards of Apple Juice/Cider
Overview of Post-Harvest Food Safety in ARS
CSREES and Food Safety Research Mary E. Torrence DVM, Ph.D., DACVPM, FACE National Program Leader for Food Safety.
Efficacy of a novel bactericide for elimination of biofilm in food processing facilities Tong Zhao Center for Food Safety University of Georgia For 3 rd.
Types of meat products Canning of meat Production of sausage
WORKPACKAGE 2.?: DELIVERABLE 2.?.?: PILLAR 2: Control and intervention strategies along the fork-to-farm chain to ensure beef safety Laboratory of Microbiology.
WP 13 and 25 PILLAR 2: Control and intervention strategies along the fork-to-farm chain to ensure beef safety Laboratory of Microbiology & Biotechnology.
Factors affecting the growth of microorganisms
Food Microbiology 1 Unit 4 Microbial Growth. Bacteria are single-celled organisms Bacteria multiply in a process called binary fission in which two cells.
Food Preservation Chemical and Modified Atmosphere Packaging Food Microbiology.
By: Mohmmed Sabah Book: Food processing tecnology Page
Survival of pathogenic microorganisms in spices and herbs Ioanna Stratakou, Ilias Apostolakos, Heidy MW Den Besten and Marcel H Zwietering Introduction.
Listeria monocytogenes serovar prevalence and dominance dynamics in meat products: A useful insight into the underrepresentation of serovar 4b strains.
PORK the Other White Meat Original Power Point Created by Randal Cales Modified by Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office June 2002.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings PowerPoint ® Lecture Slide Presentation prepared by Christine L. Case M I C R.
Lecture 2   Meat drying in combination with additional treatment i) Pre-salting ii) cured dried meat iii) smoked dried meat iv) dried meat with spices.
Establishing shelf life: Use of Predictive modelling
Control Measures.
Thermal and Non-Thermal Preservation
Evaluation of chemical immersion treatments to reduce microbial counts in fresh beef Ahmed Kassem1, Joseph Meade1, Kevina McGill1, James Gibbons1, James.
Scallop Powder Containing Ice for Fresh Fish Preservation: A New-fledged View about Food Safety of Bangladesh Sunzid Ahmed1,Md. Tanvir Islam1*, Sharmin.
Toward food-poisoning proof meat with phage packaging
Meat products eligible for export from Italy to the United States:
The Control of Microbial Growth
Effect of Environmental Conditions on Listeria monocytogenes Attachment and Biofilm Development on Food Plant Surfaces. Angie Rubi1, Ilan Arvelo2, and.
The Control of Microbial Growth
The Control of Microbial Growth
Catherine N. Cutter Department of Food Science
Presentation transcript:

CONTROL OF FOODBORNE PATHOGENS IN MEAT PRODUCTS BY SANITATION, DRYING AND ANTIMICROBIALS John N. Sofos Colorado State University

SANITIZER INACTIVATION OF ACID- ADAPTED AND NONADAPTED LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES BIOFILMS Objective To evaluate the antimicrobial effects of sodium hypochlorite (200 ppm, pH 10.4), pH-adjusted (pH 6.8) sodium hypochlorite (200 ppm), a quaternary ammonium compound (200 ppm), and peroxyacetic acid (150 ppm) on biofilms produced by previously acid-adapted or nonadapted Listeria monocytogenes inoculated in fresh beef decontamination washings.

2 Closed symbols = acid-adapted cells; open symbols = nonadapted cells Stainless steel attached cells; fresh beef washings (15 o C, 2 days) inoculated with Listeria monocytogenes

Closed symbols = acid-adapted cells; open symbols = nonadapted cells Deattached cells; fresh beef washings (15 o C, 2 days) inoculated with Listeria monocytogenes

Conclusions Previous acid adaptation did not affect biofilm formation or inactivation. Intact biofilms were more resistant to inactivation than biofilm cells (deattached) removed into suspension. Peroxyacetic acid was more effective on the attached cells of the natural flora than those of L. monocytogenes. Peroxyacetic acid was relatively less effective on biofilm cells in suspension than on attached biofilm cells when compared with the other sanitizers. Sodium hypochlorite adjusted to pH 6.8 was more effective than when unadjusted (pH 10.4).

FATE OF LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES IN FRESH MEAT DECONTAMINATION FLUIDS AT 4 AND 10 o C Objective To evaluate the potential for survival and growth of acid-adapted, partially acid-adapted or nonadapted Listeria monocytogenes in acid or nonacid (water) spray-washings of fresh beef at low temperatures to simulate conditions encountered in the meat industry.

Behavior of Listeria monocytogenes in meat washings

Conclusions Limited survival of L. monocytogenes for at maximum 4 days may be expected in undiluted acidic (lactate or acetate) meat decontamination washings, or mixed with water washings, when the resulting pH is less than 4.0. Acid-containing washings with a pH above 4.0 may support survival and potential growth for extended times, while in nonacid (water) washings the pathogen may increase to high numbers.

FRESH BEEF DECONTAMINATION AND POPULATIONS OF LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES DURING VACUUM- PACKAGED STORAGE (4 o C, 10 o C) TREATMENTS Control Water (pH 6.7, 55  C) Water (pH 6.7, 75  C) Lactic acid (2%, pH 2.3, 55  C) Acetic acid (2%, pH 2.8, 55  C)

2 a a a a a a a a a a a b b bbb b b b b b b b b b Acid-adapted Listeria monocytogenes in vacuum packaged beef Not-treated:, Water (55°C):, Water (75°C):, Lactic acid (55°C): or Acetic acid (55°C):

2 d b b c a d d c a b c c b a a b b a a a c b b a a

Conclusions Application of organic acids (acetic or lactic acid) to meat can reduce levels of contamination and then inhibit growth of L. monocytogenes during storage at 4 or 10  C. Although 75  C water decreased the initial population of L. monocytogenes on meat, growth of the pathogen occurred during storage. Prior acid-adaptation of this strain did not enhance growth on meat treated with acid or water. This study emphasizes the importance of long-term residual effects of acid and water decontamination treatments and storage temperatures on meat safety.

EVALUATION OF PROCESSES TO DESTROY ESCHERICHIA COLI O157:H7 AND LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES IN WHOLE MUSCLE HOME DRIED BEEF JERKY Objectives To determine the survival of inoculated E. coli O157:H7 populations during preparation of whole muscle beef jerky with and without marinade and acids.

Escherichia coli O157:H7 Beef Jerky o C 68.3 o C Closed symbols = TSA Open symbols = SMAC

Escherichia coli O157:H7 Beef Jerky o C 68.3 o C Closed symbols = TSA; Open symbols = SMAC

Escherichia coli O157:H7 Beef Jerky (68.3 o C) Closed symbols = TSA Open symbols = SMAC 2 Water = 94 o C, 15 secMarinate/store at 4 o C, 24 h Season/store at 4 o C, 24 hHot brine = 78 o C, 90 sec Acetic acid (2.5%), 57.5 o C 20 sec

Escherichia coli O157:H7 Beef Jerky (68.3 o C) Water = 94 o C, 15 secMarinate/store at 4 o C, 24 h Season/store at 4 o C, 24 hHot brine = 78 o C, 90 sec Acetic acid (2.5%), 57.5 o C 20 sec

Escherichia coli O157:H7 Beef Jerky (62.5 o C)

Bacterial counts (TSA+0.1% pyruvate) on jerky (dried at 60.0 o C) inoculated with E. coli 0157:H7 5.0 log reduction

Survival Of L. monocytogenes on beef jerky—(PALCAM) 5.0 log reduction

Conclusions The traditional marination procedure did not result in a 5 log reduction of either pathogen. In addition, the traditional marination procedure may provide protection/resistance of pathogens during drying. In general, application of pre-drying treatments or modified marination was more detrimental to either pathogen than the control or traditional procedures and more detrimental to Listeria monocytogenes than E. coli O157:H7. Bacterial injury may be occurring during drying.

TREATMENTS TO CONTROL POST- PROCESSING CONTAMINATION BY LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES ON PORK FRANKFURTERS AND SLICED BOLOGNA STORED AT 4 o C IN VACUUM PACKAGES Objective To evaluate antimicrobials or their combinations in the formulation of frankfurters, or as dipping solutions for bologna slices, against surface inoculated Listeria monocytogenes after peeling/slicing and before vacuum packaging.

2 Bologna slices inoculated with Listeria monocytogenes and then immersed (1 min)

2

2

2

2

Conclusions Listeria monocytogenes inoculated (2-3 log CFU/cm 2 ) on bologna slices before vacuum packaging reached high populations (> 7 log CFU/cm 2 ) in days of storage at 4 o C. Immersion of inoculated bologna slices in acetic acid (2.5 and 5%), lactic acid (5%), sodium diacetate (5%) or potassium benzoate (5%) inhibited Listeria monocytogenes for over 90 days at 4 o C. Lower immersion concentrations of lactic acid (2.5%) and sodium diacetate (2.5%), or immersion in sodium acetate (2.5 and 5%), and sodium lactate (5 and 10%) exhibited lower levels of inhibition.

Conclusions Results of this study revealed that post-processing contamination with L. monocytogenes may be controlled in cured meat products by post-processing exposure to solutions of acetic, lactic, benzoic or sorbic acid or their salts. Sensory evaluation studies should be performed, however to refine the concentrations needed and to determine their effects in product shelf-life before the commercial application of any of the effective treatments of this study. Evaluation of antimicrobial effects at abusive temperature is also suggested and technological innovations are needed for commercial application of the treatments.

2 Frankfurters with antimicrobials included in the formulation inoculated with Listeria monocytogenes

2 Inoculated frankfurters dipped in hot (75 o C) water; open symbols = 1 frankfurter/bag; closed symbols = 2 frankfurters/bag

2 Frankfurters with antimicrobials included in the formulation inoculated with Listeria monocytogenes

Conclusions Listeria monocytogenes inoculated (2-4 log CFU/cm 2 ) on frankfurters after peeling exceed 7 log CFU/cm 2 after day at 4 o C in vacuum packages. Permissible concentrations of sodium acetate and sodium diacetate (both at 0.25% of the total formulation weight) were inhibitory to Listeria monocytogenes inoculated on frankfurters post- processing for up to 30 days at 4 o C. The permissible concentration of sodium lactate (3% of the total formulation weight) inhibited growth of the pathogen for 50 to 70 days during storage at 4 o C under the experimental conditions.

Conclusions Increase of the permissible concentrations of sodium acetate to 0.5% did not affect growth of L. monocytogenes for more than 20 days, while by doubling their permissible concentrations, sodium diacetate and sodium lactate exhibited complete control for 120 days at 4 o C. As applied, post-packaging thermal pasteurization (75-80 o C/30-90sec) had variable effects in reducing initial contamination and was not effective or reliable in controlling growth of L. monocytogenes during storage, especially when two frankfurters were included in a package.

Conclusions The increase in the permissible concentrations of antimicrobials in frankfurters could be avoided by combining a lower level of sodium lactate (1.8%) with sodium acetate (0.25%) or sodium diacetate (0.25%); these combinations inhibited growth of the pathogen for up to 120 days at 4 o C. Post-packaging thermal treatment may enhance the inhibitory activity of the combined antimicrobials during storage at 4 o C. Use of adequate levels of antimicrobials or their combinations, in the formulation of cooked meat products, needs to be evaluated for effects on product quality and shelf-life, and for antimicrobial effects at abusive temperatures.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Faculty –K.E. Belk –P.A. Kendall –J.A. Scanga –G.R. Schmidt –G.C. Smith Post Docs: –J. Samelis –J. Ikeda –M. Calicioglu Research Associate –M.L. Kain Graduate Students : –A. Abushelaibi –S. Albright –C. Anderson –T. Bacon –G. Bedie –J. Burnham –E. Derrickson –T. DiPersio –S. Lakkakula –J. Ransom –K. Segomelo –J. Stopforth –Y. Yoon Funding : USDA-CSREES Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station National Pork Producers Council