1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paul Emma SLAC January 14, 2002 BERLIN CSR Benchmark Test-Case Results CSR Workshop.
Advertisements

Nominal and no CSR (R 56-1 = 55 mm, R 56-2 = 59 mm, R 56-3 = 0) L1 phase = 21 deg, V 3.9 = 55 MV CSR OFF BC3 OFF Elegant Tracking  z1 = mm (post.
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Tessa Charles Australian Synchrotron / Monash University 1 Bunch Compression Schemes for X-band FELs.
Bunch compressors ILC Accelerator School May Eun-San Kim Kyungpook National University.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
Bunch compressor design for eRHIC Yichao Jing and Vladimir Litvinenko FLS2012, Newport News, VA 3/8/2012.
P. Emma FAC Meeting 7 Apr Low-Charge LCLS Operating Point Including FEL Simulations P. Emma 1, W. Fawley 2, Z. Huang 1, C.
Feedback and CSR Miniworkshop on XFEL Short Bunch, SLAC, July 26 – 30, 2004 Juhao Wu, SLAC 1 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Feedback and CSR Miniworkshop on XFEL Short Bunch, SLAC, July 26 – 30, 2004 Juhao Wu, SLAC 1 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator.
RF Systems and Stability Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Influence of the Third Harmonic Module on the Beam Size Maria Kuhn University of Hamburg Bachelor Thesis Presentation.
M. Venturini, Sept. 26, 2013, SLAC 1 ─ M. Venturini, Sept. 26, 2013, SLAC Marco Venturini LBNL Sept. 26, 2013 THE LATE NGLS: OVERVIEW OF LINAC DESIGN,
Steve LidiaICFA Workshop, Chia LagunaJuly, 2002 Flat Beam Photoinjectors for Ultrafast Synchrotron Radiation Sources Steve Lidia Lawrence Berkeley National.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
TTF2 Start-to-End Simulations Jean-Paul Carneiro DESY Hamburg TESLA COLLABORATION MEETING DESY Zeuthen, 22 Jan 2004.
S2E in LCLS Linac M. Borland, Lyncean Technologies, P. Emma, C. Limborg, SLAC.
Collective Effects in the Driver of the Wisconsin Free-Electron Laser (WiFEL) Robert Bosch, Kevin Kleman and the WiFEL team Synchrotron Radiation Center.
Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center July 2, 2002 Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center July 2, 2002 High Brightness Electron Beam Magnetic.
W.S. Graves ASAC Review Sept 18-19, 2003 R&D at Bates William S. Graves MIT-Bates Laboratory Presentation to MIT X-ray laser Accelerator Science Advisory.
Simulation of Microbunching Instability in LCLS with Laser-Heater Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory.
Yujong Kim The Center for High Energy Physics, Korea DESY Hamburg, Germany Alternative Bunch Compressors.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
External Seeding Approaches: S2E studies for LCLS-II Gregg Penn, LBNL CBP Erik Hemsing, SLAC August 7, 2014.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
J. Wu J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer, J. Qiang (LBL), LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting April 11, 2012 Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point LCLS-II.
P. Krejcik LINAC 2004 – Lübeck, August 16-20, 2004 LCLS - Accelerator System Overview Patrick Krejcik on behalf of the LCLS.
‘S2E’ Study of Linac for TESLA XFEL P. Emma SLAC  Tracking  Comparison to LCLS  Re-optimization  Tolerances  Jitter  CSR Effects.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
PAC-2001, Chicago, IL Paul Emma SLAC SLAC Issues and R&D Critical to the LCLS UCLA LLNL.
S2E (start-to-end) Simulations at DESY T. Limberg TESLA Collaboration Meeting in Frascati, May 2003.
Injector Options for CLIC Drive Beam Linac Avni Aksoy Ankara University.
J. Wu J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting May 09, 2012 Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point LCLS-II Accel. Phys., J.
Lessons Learned From the First Operation of the LCLS for Users Presented by Josef Frisch For the LCLS March 14, 2010.
ICFA Workshop on Future Light Source, FLS2012 M. Shimada A), T. Miyajima A), N. Nakamura A), Y. Kobayashi A), K. Harada A), S. Sakanaka A), R. Hajima B)
J. Corlett. June 16, 2006 A Future Light Source for LBNL Facility Vision and R&D plan John Corlett ALS Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting June 16, 2006.
T. Atkinson*, A. Matveenko, A. Bondarenko, Y. Petenev Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie The Femto-Science Factory: A Multi-turn ERL.
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL? P. Castro (DESY).
X-band Based FEL proposal
MAX IV linac overview and scope of automation Sara Thorin.
PAL-XFEL Commissioning Plan ver. 1.1, August 2015 PAL-XFEL Beam Dynamics Group.
A single-shot method for measuring fs bunches in linac-based FELs Z. Huang, K. Bane, Y. Ding, P. Emma.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
SABER Longitudinal Tracking Studies P. Emma, K. Bane Mar. 1, 2006
LSC/CSR Instability Introduction (origin of the instability) CSR/LSC
Beam dynamics for an X-band LINAC driving a 1 keV FEL
Robert Bosch, Kevin Kleman and the WiFEL team
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
X-band FEL beam dynamics issues
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
CSR Benchmark Test-Case Results
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Simulation Calculations
Two-bunch self-seeding for narrow-bandwidth hard x-ray FELs
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Design of Compression and Acceleration Systems Technical Challenges
LCLS Tracking Studies CSR micro-bunching in compressors
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Laser Heater Integration into XFEL. Update.
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
Simulations for the LCLS Photo-Injector C
Introduction to Free Electron Lasers Zhirong Huang
Linac Design Update P. Emma LCLS DOE Review May 11, 2005 LCLS.
Coupler Effects in High Energy Part of XFEL Linac
Review of the European XFEL Bunch Compression System: Introduction and Concept Torsten Limberg.
Electron Optics & Bunch Compression
Bunch Compressor Beam Line Optics
Presentation transcript:

1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear bunch compressing –Wake field and CSR –Various Effects (Chirp Phase, Source..) –Further optimization and S2E Simulation 3.Summary Fuhua Wang, Dong Wang MIT-Bates Laboratory Presentation to MIT X-ray laser Accelerator Science Advisory Committee September 18-19, 2003

2 Beam From the RF Injector: 20 ps, Charge 0.2, 1 nC. Slice emittance 0.6,1.0 um, Slice  p ~ 5KeV Two operation mode: 0.2nC for ps, 1nC for 1ps. Linac RF: TESLA 9cell cavity, 8 cavity cryomodule. Two (Four bends) Bunch Compressors with adjustable R 56. Experiment Station Energy: 1,2,4 GeV What make this linac different from other FEL linac driver? Seeding, HGHG operations requires high energy and timing stability of beam, high compression ratio, extraction at several energies.

3 Linac Layout BC: Bunch Compressor Chicane SW: Switchyard Linac Section (TESLA Cryomodules) 3rd H: Third Harmonic Linearizer  p: Bunch total momentum span  p: slice momentum spread BC1 R56 max  -122mm L b  20 ps  p  ~4% SW2 SW1 RF Gun  p=5KeV Chirp 3 rd H 230 MeV 2 GeV1 GeV 561 MeV 4 GeV 96 MeV200 MeV BC2 R56  -45mm L b  1- 4ps  p  1.4% L b .2- 1ps  p  0.2% 2 Cryomodules 3 C. modules 12 C. modules 6 C. modules

4

5

6

7 2. Bunch Compressor 2.1 System Details RF Chirp : position – energy correlated 3 rd Harmonic RF Section for RF nonlinear distortion correction Cavity is at decelerating phase, V h =V 0 /h 2. Use 3rd harmonic reasons : Technical and lower wake field ( W   2, W    3 ).

8 First magnet chicane bending angles is adjustable. For ps bunch length operation, chose R 56 =-122mm. The large R 56 reduces the required energy chirp. But with issues: more rf nonlinearity, more CSR effects, more sensitive to phase jitter? Chicane locations : 200 MeV and 561 MeV ( initial optimization by P.Emma, April 2003). Necessary of second order corrections : sextupole etc ? Bates Energy Compressor (reverse of bunch compressor) installed Q and S corrections later for first and 2th order system error corrections.

9 Magnet Chicane parameters

Linear Compressing (0.2 ps, no wake fields, CSR etc.) Start: Hard-edge, 0.2nC, 20 ps  p=5KeV Q Variation (rms) ~ %

11 Before Chirp, Chirp phase Before 3rd harmonic linearizer

12 After 3 rd harmonic Linearizer

13 After First Chicance, L b ~2ps

14 After second chicane. L b ~ 0.2 ps.

Wakes and CSR Wakes only(4GeV)Wakes + CSR(4GeV) Bunch length increased to ~0.4 ps

16 Adjusting Chirp phase to compensate Wakefield & CSR effects ? Chirp phase adjustment: => Increased Peak current ~25%Bunch Length down to ~0.3ps

17 But same Chirp phase ( ) without Wakes & CSR –> over chirped <= ~20fs,15kA peak This can’t be real.

18 Coherent Synchrotron Radiation & beam emittance growth Synchrotron radiation will be coherent if >>L bunch. Radiation by the tail will catch up with the head and modulate energy. Analytic emittance growth by P.Emma (‘Stead state’ CSR) Assuming ‘stead-state’ CSR, the incremental rms coherent energy spread at each dipole magnet slice(  L b ) is (Ya. S. Derbenev): Emittance growth:

19 Analytic emittance growth estimation Slice analysis of emittance growth will be performed for more careful study.

20 CSR may do more damage to emittance ? Linear System With Wakes and CSR (No Twiss matching) E=4 GeV, Chirp phase =

Various effects Chirp phase. Sensitive to less than

Chirp phase sensitive (continue) Bunch length (Peak current A) ~ 0.4 ps (~700) ~0.3 ps(~900) ~ 0.1ps(~2200!)  p/p ~ 0.15% ~0.2% ~0.1%

23 Injector Bunch Electron Distribution Effect. (Example of Gaussian beam …) Linear, Chirp phase Wake, CSR See big energy spike

24 Further optimization and S2E Simulation More work could be done to reduce CSR and optimize compressing process, like adjusting initial bunch density, chicane parameters and the optics. Example: lower charge, same peak current shorter pulse 0.1nC, 20 ps. Final: 50fs bunch length, ~1000A peak… Emittance distortion comparable to above mentioned 0.2nC, 20 ps case.

25 About S2E Simulation Start to End Simulation Codes: PARMELA(LANL) photo injector ELEGANT (ANL) Linac + Switchyard GINGER(LBL) FEL Plan: Integrate PARMELA out(beam distribution) to ELEGANT simulation. For better simulation in linac. And down to FEL get responses. Essential for: Design optimization. Beam diagnostics, controls and manipulation. System requirements (error simulations, tolerances).

26 3. Summary Preliminary linac optics and bunch compressor design. Beam parameters close to design requirements. Tough requirements to Chirp phase. S2E simulation required for system optimization and define tolerances Much work needed to reduce nonlinear effects and there is still room to work on it!