Prop 65 Update October, 2012 T.C.J.J.P. WARNING: This product contains a chemical known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
According to the California Office of the Attorney General, 69% of Prop 65 settlement awards in 2012 went to attorneys fees and costs. Producers have responded.
Advertisements

California Proposition 65 & State Regulations
Arsenic Human Health and the Environment. Introduction to Arsenic Good Element – Bad Chemistry Arsenic Good Element – Bad Chemistry.
IPC 1757 Process Chemical Standard
CONFERENCE ON “ FOOD ADDITIVES : SAFETY IN USE AND CONSUMER CONCERNS“ JOMO KENYATTA UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY NAIROBI, 24 JUNE 2014.
Product Liabilities You Never Anticipated: A California Prop. 65 Executive Briefing Chris Amantea & Malcolm Weiss May 28, 2008.
GHS Science CAPT Embedded Task Brownfield Sites. Does this place look familiar?
Challenges with Proposition 65 Shannon Cole, PMP Director of Science Operations, Chemistry & Biochemistry Grocery Manufacturers Association September 30,
Chemical Screening Programs Ted Smith Dale Phenicie.
What is Bioaccumulation?
Responding to Soil Contamination in the Moanataiari Subdivision And when the NES does and does not apply May 2012.
(H.L.) HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
Food Additive Safety The FD&C Act stipulates that food additives be functional and that they must possess a low or insignificant risk to humman health.
2003 OZONE DATA SHARING PROJECT UPDATE Air Quality Advisory Committee September 23, 2003.
CVM’s Procedure for Setting Tolerances
1 Discussion of the 2006 Inventory Update Reporting Data December 12, 2006 Nhan Nguyen U.S. EPA.
Health Risks From Environmental Exposures 2009 CASN Nursing Research Conference- Interrelationships Between Theory, Research and Practice Barbara MacKinnon.
Pesticide Regulatory Process
A growing number of diseases in children from rural and urban areas are linked to unsafe, degraded environments. However, many health care providers are.
ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT.  History of the Act ◦ The primary purpose of TSCA is to regulate chemical substances and mixtures  It does so by regulating.
HERA at CED XXXI C.Lally 1 Human & Environmental Risk Assessment Human Health Risk Assessment under HERA: Challenges and Solutions Christeine Lally Co-Chair.
Examining Bioaccumulation & Biomagnification: Implications for Ecosystems and Human Health.
ARSENIC CONTAMINATION OF WATER IN BANGLADESH SENGE NGALAME MPH 583 DR. WHEELER.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA’s website for reference purposes only.
Chapter 15 Environmental Health, Pollution and Toxicology.
Chapter 15 Environmental Health, Pollution and Toxicology.
California Proposition 65 History and Current Developments.
Fishing Advisories and Fish Contaminants EEES 4730 Amanda Wendzicki.
Product Liability for Musical Instruments and Accessories NAMM Webinar on Prop 65 James M. Goldberg.
RISK ASSESSMENT. Major Issues to be considered in designing the Study 1.- Emission Inventory What is the relative significance of the various sources.
Preventive Controls for Human Food S upplemental Proposal 1
Moving past one-at-a-time chemical “de-selection”.
Foreign Supplier Verification Programs Supplemental Proposal 1.
Pasadena Water and Power Public Health Goals Report Presented by David Kimbrough, Ph.D. Water Quality Manager City Council September 9, 2013 Item 14.
Route of Exposure: Drinking Water. Measuring chemicals in water The concentration of chemicals in water or soil is often reported in parts or million.
CALIFORNIA proposed SAFER CONSUMER PRODUCT REGULATIONS Marjorie MartzEmerson October 24, 2012.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Malaysia Update on “draft” proposal for the Environmentally Hazardous Substance (“EHS”) Notification and Registration Scheme.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
Board Meeting June 27, 2013 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board Update on Recommendations to the California Public Utilities.
NAAQS and Criteria Pollutant Trends Update US EPA Region 10.
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
Assessing Risks and Benefits. Risk vs. Benefit: Tipping the Scales.
8-2 Service Objectives: Food safety management systems Active managerial control Hazard Analysis Critical Control point (HACCP)
By Michelle Hoang Period 2 APES April 30, 2012 The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
A project of the Toxic-Free Legacy Coalition: Breast Cancer Fund, Healthy Building Network, People For Puget Sound, Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility,
FOOD AND NUTRITIONAL TOXICOLOGY
The Environment and Human Health
Hexavalent Chromium MCL Regulation Guidance Eric Zuniga, PE San Bernardino District SWRCB – DDW.
ARMA Proposition 65 Seminar Understanding How Proposition 65 Affects Your Business!! Carol René Brophy 50 California Street, 34 th Floor San Francisco,
1. Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency Risk assessment with regard to food and feed safety Risk analysis Why risk assessment in the.
UNIT 9 Hazardous Wastes and Risk Assessment. Major Public Agencies Involved in Environmental Health Risk Assessment and Intervention Consumer Product.
Event – Points ! Environmental Laws US.
© Food – a fact of life 2009 Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) HACCP is a system which looks for and prevents potential problems before they.
Proposition 65 Safe Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 Purpose: prevent exposure to toxics through water & other means Two approaches to managing.
National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services William A. Suk, Ph.D., M.P.H. Director, Superfund Research Program Chief, Hazardous.
Department of Environmental Quality
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP).
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
Bi-Weekly Safety Meeting October 1, 2015
Module 42 Heavy Metals and Other Chemicals
Air Pollutants 200 Air pollutants are recognized and assessed by the USEPA Listed in the Clean Air Act.
HACCP HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS
Environmental Health, Pollution and Toxicology
GL18 (R) – Impurities: Residual Solvents in New Veterinary Medicinal Products, Active Substance and Excipients.
City Council Public Hearing August 16, 2010
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
Presentation transcript:

Prop 65 Update October, 2012 T.C.J.J.P. WARNING: This product contains a chemical known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm

What to do now  Know your products  Know your typical concentrations  Know your exposure  Know your NSRLs MADLs  Defend your ingredient  If you receive a Prop 65 Notice  Compounds of concern

Know Your Products  Formula ingredients (Sulfur dioxide, Flavors, i.e., Acetaldehyde, Pulegone-pepperment flavor )  Suppliers and material sources (Country of origin)  Contaminants (Lead, Pesticides)  Reaction by-products (Benzene,)  Product packaging (DEHP)  In-product reactions (4-MEI, Methanol)  Avoidable, removable or manageable?

Know Your Typical Concentrations  Intentionally added ingredients, i.e., sulfur dioxide, flavor – Calculate the concentration in your final product  Contaminants – Calculate the theoretical maximum using specification limits of ingredients – Test ingredients and final product to determine average levels – Determine if you can use the naturally occurring exemption

Know your exposure  Prop 65 limits are based on a per day exposure of the typical consumer  Determine Consumer Usage – Consumer Habits and Usage – Published Studies and Models – Primary Intended Exposure(s) – Secondary Routes/Mechanisms for Exposure – Foreseeable Misuse

Know your NSRLs and MADLs  Determine your No Significant Risk Level (NSRL) and/or Maximum Allowable Dose Level MADL. – Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has published some NSRLs and MADLs. – Where not published, calculate using OEHHA Methods – Request a Safe Use Determination?

Defend Your Ingredients  Monitor OEHHA for listing-related notices and announcements  Track activities of “authoritative bodies” which allow for streamlined chemical listings – National Toxicology Program  Challenge proposed listings of chemicals important to your business  Once a chemical is listed work with OEHHA to get the highest No Significant Risk Level (NSRL) and/or Maximum Allowable Dose Level (MADL) possible.

If you receive a Prop 65 Notice  Obtain Counsel that specializes in Prop 65  Test product to determine if plaintiff’s data is correct  If possible, challenge plaintiffs methodology and references – Test data – Exposure model

Compounds of Concern  Heavy Metals – Lead 0.5 µg/day (240 ml serving = 2 ppb) – Arsenic 10 µg/day (240 ml serving = 41.6 ppb)  Methanol – 23000* µg/day (240 ml serving = 95 ppm)  Pesticide – MADL dependant on individual pesticide  Sulfur Dioxide – First Priority for MADL Development * Proposed MADL

Julie Hill Vice President, Chemistry