Real-world validation of distributed network algorithms with the ASGARD platform Oscar Tonelli, Gilberto Berardinelli, Preben Mogensen Aalborg University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A DISTRIBUTED CSMA ALGORITHM FOR THROUGHPUT AND UTILITY MAXIMIZATION IN WIRELESS NETWORKS.
Advertisements

SoNIC: Classifying Interference in Sensor Networks Frederik Hermans et al. Uppsala University, Sweden IPSN 2013 Presenter: Jeffrey.
VSMC MIMO: A Spectral Efficient Scheme for Cooperative Relay in Cognitive Radio Networks 1.
Min Song 1, Yanxiao Zhao 1, Jun Wang 1, E. K. Park 2 1 Old Dominion University, USA 2 University of Missouri at Kansas City, USA IEEE ICC 2009 A High Throughput.
Soc Classification level 1© Nokia Siemens NetworksPresentation / Author / Date Enhanced Uplink Carrier Aggregation for LTE-Advanced Femtocells VTC Fall:
Minimum Energy Mobile Wireless Networks IEEE JSAC 2001/10/18.
2005/12/06OPLAB, Dept. of IM, NTU1 Optimizing the ARQ Performance in Downlink Packet Data Systems With Scheduling Haitao Zheng, Member, IEEE Harish Viswanathan,
RT-WiFi: Real-Time High-Speed Communication Protocol for Wireless Cyber-Physical Control Applications Ramyaa & Malak.
Madhavi W. SubbaraoWCTG - NIST Dynamic Power-Conscious Routing for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks Madhavi W. Subbarao Wireless Communications Technology Group.
PEDS September 18, 2006 Power Efficient System for Sensor Networks1 S. Coleri, A. Puri and P. Varaiya UC Berkeley Eighth IEEE International Symposium on.
Self-Organizing Coalitions for Conflict Evaluation and Resolution in Femtocells Luis G. U. Garcia, Aalborg University Gustavo W. O. da Costa, Aalborg University.
Self-Management in Chaotic Wireless Deployments A. Akella, G. Judd, S. Seshan, P. Steenkiste Presentation by: Zhichun Li.
TD-SCDMA.
DAC: Distributed Asynchronous Cooperation for Wireless Relay Networks 1 Xinyu Zhang, Kang G. Shin University of Michigan.
MIMO and TCP: A CASE for CROSS LAYER DESIGN Soon Y. Oh, Mario Gerla Computer Science Dept. University of California, Los Angeles {soonoh,
Cross Strait Quad-Regional Radio Science and Wireless Technology Conference, Vol. 2, p.p. 980 – 984, July 2011 Cross Strait Quad-Regional Radio Science.
Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Supervisor: Prof. Jyri Hämäläinen Instructor: M.Sc Zhong Zheng A part of NETS2020 project Ying Yang
Practical TDMA for Datacenter Ethernet
Advanced Phasor Measurement Units for the Real-Time Monitoring
COGNITIVE RADIO FOR NEXT-GENERATION WIRELESS NETWORKS: AN APPROACH TO OPPORTUNISTIC CHANNEL SELECTION IN IEEE BASED WIRELESS MESH Dusit Niyato,
International Technology Alliance In Network & Information Sciences International Technology Alliance In Network & Information Sciences 1 Cooperative Wireless.
CCH: Cognitive Channel Hopping in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks Brian Sung Chul Choi, Hyungjune Im, Kevin C. Lee, and Mario Gerla UCLA Computer Science Department.
Dynamic Load Balancing through Association Control of Mobile Users in WiFi Networks 2013 YU-ANTL Seminal November 9, 2013 Hyun dong Hwang Advanced Networking.
COLLABORATIVE SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT FOR RELIABILITY AND SCALABILITY Heather Zheng Dept. of Computer Science University of California, Santa Barbara.
1 11 Subcarrier Allocation and Bit Loading Algorithms for OFDMA-Based Wireless Networks Gautam Kulkarni, Sachin Adlakha, Mani Srivastava UCLA IEEE Transactions.
RT-Link: A Time-Synchronized Link Protocol for Energy-Constrained Multi- hop Wireless Networks Anthony Rowe, Rahul Mangharam and Raj Rajkumar CMU SECON.
Philipp Hasselbach Capacity Optimization for Self- organizing Networks: Analysis and Algorithms Philipp Hasselbach.
Distributed Channel Management in Uncoordinated Wireless Environments Arunesh Mishra, Vivek Shrivastava, Dheeraj Agarwal, Suman Banerjee, Samrat Ganguly.
Developing a SDR Testbed Alex Dolan Mohammad Khan Ahmet Unsal Project Advisor Dr. Aditya Ramamoorthy.
MAC Protocols In Sensor Networks.  MAC allows multiple users to share a common channel.  Conflict-free protocols ensure successful transmission. Channel.
MOJO: A Distributed Physical Layer Anomaly Detection System for WLANs Richard D. Gopaul CSCI 388.
Advanced Spectrum Management in Multicell OFDMA Networks enabling Cognitive Radio Usage F. Bernardo, J. Pérez-Romero, O. Sallent, R. Agustí Radio Communications.
1 WP2.3 “Radio Interface and Baseband Signal Processing” Content of D15 and Outline of D18 CAPANINA Neuchatel Meeting October 28th, 2005 – Marina Mondin.
Adaptive Spectrum Radio: A Feasibility Platform On The Path To Dynamic Spectrum Access International Symposium On Advanced Radio Technologies 4-7 March.
Architectures and Algorithms for Future Wireless Local Area Networks  1 Chapter Architectures and Algorithms for Future Wireless Local Area.
COGNITIVE RADIO NETWORKING AND RENDEZVOUS Presented by Vinay chekuri.
TOPOLOGY MANAGEMENT IN COGMESH: A CLUSTER-BASED COGNITIVE RADIO MESH NETWORK Tao Chen; Honggang Zhang; Maggio, G.M.; Chlamtac, I.; Communications, 2007.
Doc.: IEEE /0523r0 Submission April 2014 Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 MAC simulation results for Dynamic sensitivity control (DSC - CCA adaptation)
Pseudo-Handover Based Power and Subchannel Adaptation for Two-tier Femtocell Networks Hongjia Li, Xiaodong Xu, Dan Hu, Xin Chen, Xiaofeng Tao and Ping.
Doc.: IEEE /161r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Resource management for TVWS network coexistence Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
Performance Evaluation of Mobile Hotspots in Densely Deployed WLAN Environments Presented by Li Wen Fang Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission Eduard Garcia-Villegas Drivers of the dynamic CCA adaptation Authors: Nov Date:
Performance of Adaptive Beam Nulling in Multihop Ad Hoc Networks Under Jamming Suman Bhunia, Vahid Behzadan, Paulo Alexandre Regis, Shamik Sengupta.
1 A Cross-Layer Architecture to Exploit Multi-Channel Diversity Jay A. Patel, Haiyun Luo, and Indranil Gupta Department of Computer Science University.
An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Speaker: hsiwei Wei Ye, John Heidemann and Deborah Estrin. IEEE INFOCOM 2002 Page
Doc.: IEEE /00144r0 Submission 3/01 Nada Golmie, NISTSlide 1 IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks Dialog with FCC Nada.
1 Architecture and Behavioral Model for Future Cognitive Heterogeneous Networks Advisor: Wei-Yeh Chen Student: Long-Chong Hung G. Chen, Y. Zhang, M. Song,
1 Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE b and a Networks using the CSCC Etiquette Protocol Xiangpeng Jing and Dipankar Raychaudhuri, WINLAB Rutgers.
LA-MAC: A Load Adaptive MAC Protocol for MANETs IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference(GLOBECOM )2009. Presented by Qiang YE Smart Grid Subgroup Meeting.
Cognitive Information Service Basic Principles and Implementation of A Cognitive Inter-Node Protocol Optimization Scheme Dzmitry Kliazovich Fabrizio Granelli.
Uplink scheduling in LTE Presented by Eng. Hany El-Ghaish Under supervision of Prof. Amany Sarhan Dr. Nada Elshnawy Presented by Eng. Hany El-Ghaish Under.
SubmissionJoe Kwak, InterDigital1 PHY measurements for interference reduction from 11h Joe Kwak, Marian Rudolf InterDigital doc: IEEE /537r0July.
SMART ANTENNAS SMART ANTENNAS apoorva k. Shetti 2bu09ec006
Experimental Evaluation of Co-existent LTE-U and Wi-Fi on ORBIT Problem DefinitionExperimental Procedure Results Observation WINLAB Conclusion Samuel
Frame counter: Achieving Accurate and Real-Time Link Estimation in Low Power Wireless Sensor Networks Daibo Liu, Zhichao Cao, Mengshu Hou and Yi Zhang.
1 Scalability and Accuracy in a Large-Scale Network Emulator Nov. 12, 2003 Byung-Gon Chun.
MAC Protocols for Sensor Networks
TELFOR 2015, Belgrade, Serbia, November Spectrum Sensing for the Unlicensed Band Cognitive Radio Nenad Milošević, Zorica Nikolić, Filip Jelenković,
MAC Protocols for Sensor Networks
Architecture and Algorithms for an IEEE 802
Yousof Mortazavi, Aditya Chopra, and Prof. Brian L. Evans
Suman Bhunia and Shamik Sengupta
A Framework for Automatic Resource and Accuracy Management in A Cloud Environment Smita Vijayakumar.
Network Coding Testbed
Smita Vijayakumar Qian Zhu Gagan Agrawal
Speaker: Po-Hung Chen Advisor: Dr. Ho-Ting Wu 2016/10/12
Spectrum Sharing in Cognitive Radio Networks
Feasibility of Coordinated Transmission for HEW
Feasibility of Coordinated Transmission for HEW
Presentation transcript:

Real-world validation of distributed network algorithms with the ASGARD platform Oscar Tonelli, Gilberto Berardinelli, Preben Mogensen Aalborg University

Outline Distributed algorithms for 5G: motivation for experimental PoC Inter-cell interference coordination Live execution Offline execution Distributed synchronization

Distributed algorithms for 5G networks 5G networks are expected to deal with the dense deployment of small cells in local area Unplanned interference Limited or non existing backhaul Autonomous and distributed algorithms provide adaptive and flexible solutions for the network management Three key areas for the development of distributed solutions are: Inter-Cell Interference Coordination in frequency-domain (FD-ICIC) Advanced Receivers for interference rejection and cancelling Distributed Synchronization

Experimental proof-of-concept The performance evaluation of distributed algorithms is sensitive to runtime execution aspects and topology characteristics of the network deployment Simulation-based studies should be verified experimentally The validation of distributed network algorithms requires to consider a sufficiently large amount of wireless links. Development of a network testbed based on Software Defined Radio (SDR) hardware FD-ICIC/Synchronization/Advanced Receivers Verify the system implementation and live execution Analysis of network deployments in realistic conditions Optimization of configuration and decision-making parameters

Outline Distributed algorithms for 5G: motivation for experimental PoC Inter-cell interference coordination Live execution Offline execution Distributed synchronization

Inter-Cell Interference Coordination Mechanisms for mitigating the interference problem by dynamically adjusting the allocation of spectrum resources in the cells Common characteristics of distributed RRM processes for ICIC: Autonomous decision-making processes Spectrum sensing/RSRP measurements Explicit coordination Initial activities at AAU focused on the Autonomous Component Carrier Selection Algorithm (ACCS) Interference Signal Acces Point User Goal of validation: verify SINR improvements at the users in the cells Two approaches: Live system execution Offline analysis / Hybrid simulaton

Live system execution on the testbed Dynamic Channel Propagation Mobility Aspects Runtime Errors Execution Delays Performance results Most accurate representation of a real network System features of interest are directly implemented and executed on the testbed nodes The testbed is limited in size Difficult to cover a large amount of deployments Difficult to repeat experiments, hard to implement

”Offline” analysis – Hybrid Simulation Link measurements in static propagation conditions Multiple Network Deployments System-level simulator Performance results Aims for an extensive analysis of the network topology and deployment scenarios Multiple inter-node path loss measurements are performed over a large set of positions Enables repeatable studies exploting existing system-level simulators The static channel propagation assumption strongly limits the applicability of the studies

Indoor measurement campaigns for ”offline” network analysis cm Objective: link path loss measurements Individuate a number of location in the target deployment scenario First campaign in office scenario, 990 measured links. Second campaign in open-area/mall scenario, 1128 measured links.

Testbed setup and TDD based measurements RX TX TX/RX Frame Acquires samples Selects the valid blocks of samples Block of FFT-size samples Performs RSRP measurement per spectrum chunks (CCs), in respect to the transmitting node. Averages in time over multiple blocks of data + = Aggregates measurements in time, from multiple testbed nodes CC1 CC2 CC3 CC... Node 1 Node 2

System Implementation on the ASGARD platform Module A RX Samples ChannelSounderApp TCP Socket Client Interface Node X Node Y TX Signal Module B Testbed Server Module E UHD Communication Valid Rx Samples Sensing Component SensingObject Time Division Sensing DataEvent <SensingObject> StartTime TDD Vector Buffer Module D Data Selector Configuration (Frequency) TDD Frequency Switch Controller AllFreqDone Event SetSTartTime() SendLogData itpp::cvec Tts<int16_t>

ACCS Performance results Comparing to reference studies in the 3GPP dual stripe scenario Normalized cell throughput results Scheme Scenario Outage Avg Peak Reuse 1 NJV12 6.6% 29.7% 60.8% Dual Stripe 20% DR* 5% 60% 100% Dual Stripe 80% DR* 0.9% 21% 64% ACCS 18% 33.3% 65.8% 19% 66% 12% 30% 59% G-ACCS 15.1% 79.4% 17% 70% 6% 32% 72% * from: L. G. U. Garcia, I. Z. Kovács, K. I. Pedersen, G. W. O. Costa and P. E. Mogensen, "Autonomous Component Carrier Selection for 4G Femtocells - A Fresh Look at an Old Problem," IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 525-537, April 2012.

Outline Distributed algorithms for 5G: motivation for experimental PoC Inter-cell interference coordination Live execution Offline execution Distributed synchronization

Distributed Synchronization Time/frequency synchronization among neighbor APs is an important enabler of advanced features such as interference coordination/ suppression. We developed distributed synchronization algorithms based on exchange of beacon messages among neighbor nodes. Upon reception of a beacon, the AP updates its local clock according to a predefined criterion. A A time B B C time C time D D time

Distributed Synchronization Focused on runtime synchronization, i.e. how to maintain time alignment in the network despite of the inaccuracies of the hardware clocks. The initial synchronization is based on the Network Time Protocol (accuracy at ms level)  beacons are round robin scheduled with ms level accuracy (coarse synchronization) Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Inter-beacon time time expected time effective time Time misalignment Goal: achieving tens of µs level time misalignment

Distributed synchronization demo 8 nodes Inter-beacon time: 0.2048 seconds TXCO Clock precision on the USRP N200 boards: ~1-2.5 PPM Sample rate: 4 Ms/s Beacon type: CAZAC sequence Beacon detection based on correlator Running the demo…