Tissue biomarkers (BIOM) in colon cancer (COC): The translational study on the randomized phase III trial comparing infused irinotecan / 5-fluorouracil.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Biomarker Analyses in CLEOPATRA: A Phase III, Placebo-Controlled Study of Pertuzumab in HER2- Positive, First-Line Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Baselga.
Advertisements

Synopsis of FDA Colorectal Cancer Endpoints Workshop Michael J. O’Connell, MD Director, Allegheny Cancer Center Associate Chairman, NSABP Pittsburgh, PA.
Statistical Issues in Incorporating and Testing Biomarkers in Phase III Clinical Trials FDA/Industry Workshop; September 29, 2006 Daniel Sargent, PhD Sumithra.
A Report from ASCO 2007 Adjuvant Colorectal Cancer John L. Marshall, MD Chief, Division of Hematology/Oncology Associate Director of Clinical Research.
Departments - Surgery - Gerontology and Geriatrics Department of SurgeryDepartment of Gerontology & Geriatrics Prof. dr. C.J.H. van de VeldeProf. dr. R.G.J.
AZD6244 Detection of BRAF Mutations in Tumour and Serum of Patients with Advanced Melanoma Dr Ruth Board CMGS Spring Scientific Conference March 26 th.
Pilot Experience with Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer – NCCTG Intergroup N0147 J. Huang*, D. J. Sargent*,
Introduction of Cancer Molecular Epidemiology Zuo-Feng Zhang, MD, PhD University of California Los Angeles.
Molecular Testing of lung cancer in routine practice
Re-Examination of the Design of Early Clinical Trials for Molecularly Targeted Drugs Richard Simon, D.Sc. National Cancer Institute linus.nci.nih.gov/brb.
Clinical Relevance of HER2 Overexpression/Amplification in Patients with Small Tumor Size and Node-Negative Breast Cancer Curigliano G et al. J Clin Oncol.
Predictors of HER2 FISH amplification in immunohistochemistry score 2+ infiltrating breast cancer: a single institution analysis Maria Vittoria Dieci 1,
References 1.Salazar R, Roepman P, Capella G et al. Gene expression signature to improve prognosis prediction of stage II and III colorectal cancer. J.
Genetic Alterations of TP53 Gene in Brain Astrocytic Tumours Methodology Θ Eighty-three brain tumor biopsies were collected and used in this study. Thirty.
Taiwan 2000 PETACC 3 ASCO 2009 Molecular markers in colon cancer have a stage specific prognostic value. Results of the translational study on the PETACC.
EN.8 - A PHASE III STUDY OF STANDARD THERAPY VERSUS RIDAFOROLIMUS IN WOMEN WITH RECURRENT OR METASTATIC ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WHO HAVE PREVIOUS HAD CHEMOTHERAPY.
A 14-gene prognosis signature predicts metastasis risk in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive, Tamoxifen-treated breast cancer in different ethnogeographic.
Adjuvant Therapy of Colon Cancer 2005 Daniel G. Haller, M.D. Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.
INT Translational research in head and neck cancer: preoperative chemotherapy in oral cavity cancer based on disease molecular profiling. Paolo Bossi MSO.
A Quantitative Multi-Gene RT-PCR Assay for Prediction of Recurrence in Stage II Colon Cancer (CC): Selection of the Genes in 4 Large Studies and Results.
Guanylyl Cyclase C (GCC) Lymph Nodes (LN) Classification as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Stage II Colon Cancer: A Pooled Analysis Daniel J. Sargent,
*University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
INCREASED EXPRESSION OF PROTEIN KINASE CK2  SUBUNIT IN HUMAN GASTRIC CARCINOMA Kai-Yuan Lin 1 and Yih-Huei Uen 1,2,3 1 Department of Medical Research,
Cancer Stem Cell SNPs Have Opposite Prognostic Outcome in Patients with Gastric Cancer Among Asian and Western Countries Melissa J. LaBonte 1, Takeru Wakatsuki.
NSABP C08 adjuvant colon cancer Best of ASCO, Beirut, July 2009 Prof Eric Van Cutsem, MD, PhD Digestive Oncology Leuven, Belgium.
KRAS MUTATION, CANCER RECURRENCE AND PATIENT SURVIVAL IN STAGE III COLON CANCER: FINDINGS FROM CALGB S. Ogino, J.A. Meyerhardt, N. Irahara, D. Niedzwiecki,
Outcomes Following Adjuvant 5-FU based Treatment (AT) for Colon Cancer vs Impact on Recurrence Rate, Time from Recurrence to Death.
Role of CXCR4 and VEGF expression and metastatic locoregional lymphnodes in rectal carcinoma Tatangelo F.*, Avallone A.**, Delrio P.°, Scala S.§, Botti.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
The Use of Predictive Biomarkers in Clinical Trial Design Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer Institute
Taiwan 2000 Comparative evaluation in tolerance of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant docetaxel based chemotherapy in resectable gastric cancer in a randomized.
Outcome of chemotherapy in synovial sarcoma (sys) patients (pts): review of 15 clinical trials from EORTCc involving advanced sys compared to other Soft.
Validation of four gene-expression risk scores in a large colon cancer cohort and contribution to an improved prognostic method Antonio F. Di Narzo 1,
The presence of 18q loss of heterozygosity (LOH) predicts decreased disease-free and overall survival in stage II colon cancer: A study of CALGB Protocol.
Using Predictive Classifiers in the Design of Phase III Clinical Trials Richard Simon, D.Sc. Chief, Biometric Research Branch National Cancer Institute.
Taiwan 2000 Is UGT1A1*28 homozygosity the strongest predictor for severe hematotoxicity in patients treated with 5- fluorouracil (5-FU)-irinotecan (IRI)?
How should efficacy of new adjuvant therapies be evaluated in colorectal cancer? Marc Buyse, ScD IDDI, Brussels, Belgium Based on Daniel Sargent’s talks.
0 Adjuvant FOLFIRI +/- Cetuximab in Patients with Resected Stage III Colon Cancer NCCTG Intergroup Phase III Trial N0147 Jocelin Huang, Daniel J Sargent,
Tumor clock protein PER2 as a determinant of survival in patients (pts) receiving oxaliplatin-5-FU- leucovorin as 1st line chemotherapy for metastatic.
Individualizing Adjuvant Therapy on the Basis of Molecular Markers Charles S. Fuchs, MD Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Harvard Medical School Boston, MA.
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
Phase II trial of irinotecan/docetaxel for advanced pancreatic cancer with randomization between irinotecan/docetaxel and irinotecan/docetaxel plus C225,
Phase II trial of irinotecan/docetaxel for advanced pancreatic cancer with randomization between irinotecan/docetaxel and irinotecan/docetaxel plus C225,
Scott Kopetz, MD, PhD Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology
Age > 50 Abstract Background Limited data exists regarding outcomes and AT benefit/toxicity in Y pts with stage II and III CC. We examined overall survival.
Taiwan 2000 PETACC 3 ASCO 2009 PETACC 3 ASCO 2010 Molecular and clinical determinants of survival following relapse after curative treatment of stage II-
Pharmacogenetic analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with second-line irinotecan (IR)+/- cetuximab (CB): The EPIC experience.
Endpoints in adjuvant trials: a systematic review of the literature in colon cancer and proposed definitions for future trials Marc E. Buyse.
Microsatellite Instability Predicts Improved Response to Adjuvant Therapy With Irinotecan, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin in Stage III Colon Cancer In association.
Response-Guided Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Gunter von Minckwitz, Jens Uwe Blohmer, Serban Dan Costa, Carsten Denkert, Holger Eidtmann Journal.
Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy in Non- Small Cell Lung Cancer Seminars in Oncology 2oo5;32 (suppl 2):S9-S15 Kyung Hee Medical Center Department of Thoracic.
Prognostic impact of Ki-67 in Croatian women with early breast cancer (single-institution prospective observational study) Ivan Bilić, Natalija Dedić Plavetić,
Chromosomal instability and chromothripsis as a prognostic factor for metastatic colorectal cancer Elina Skuja, Dagnija Kalniete, Miki Nakazawa-Miklasevica,
Prognostic Factors for First-line Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab or Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights* of the.
Wijendra Senarathne1, Peggy Gates1, Semir Vranic2, Zoran Gatalica1
Picture 3. Higher grade tumors are more frequently Ki67 positive
Microsatellite instability (MSI) in stage II and III colon cancer treated with 5FU-LV or 5FU-LV and irinotecan (PETACC 3-EORTC SAKK 60/00 trial).
EMT inducing transcription factor SIP1: a predictive biomarker of colorectal cancer survival and recurrence? A Patel, R Sreekumar, R Bhome, KA Moutasim,
Increased MAPK1/3 Phosphorylation in Luminal Breast Cancer Related with PIK3CA Hotspot Mutations and Prognosis  Diana Ramirez-Ardila, A. Mieke Timmermans,
Meta-analysis of three trials investigating 5-FU and irinotecan.
MJ O’Connell for the ACCENT Collaborative Group
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Cetuximab with chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies according to KRAS.
KRAS status and efficacy in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with FOLFIRI with or without cetuximab: The.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy
Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) +/- cetuximab for patients with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the.
Uni- & Multivariate Analysis Sponsored by GERCOR (
Aimery de Gramont Association between 3 year Disease Free Survival and Overall Survival delayed with improved survival after recurrence in patients receiving.
DO NOT POST #4054 Gene expression Difference (GED) Revealed Immune Function Gene UP- or Down-regulation as Tumor-associated Inflammatory Cell (TAIC) Infiltration.
Presentation transcript:

Tissue biomarkers (BIOM) in colon cancer (COC): The translational study on the randomized phase III trial comparing infused irinotecan / 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) to 5- FU/FA in stage II-III COC patients (pts) (PETACC 3 - EORTC SAKK 60-00) A.D. Roth 1, S. Tejpar 2, P. Yan 3, R. Fiocca 4, D. Dietrich 5, G. Bodoky 6, R. Labianca 7, D. Cunningham 8, E. Van Cutsem 2, F. Bosman 3 1 Oncosurgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland, 2 Digestive Oncology Unit, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium, 3 Dpt of Pathology, Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland, 4 Dpt of Surgical and Morphological Sciences, University of Genova, Genova, Italy, 5 Swiss Group of Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland, 6 Oncology, St Lazlo Hospital, Budapest, Hungary, 7 Unit of Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo, Italy, 8 Medical Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom.

Rationale New prognostic markers are eagerly needed to better select patients with colon cancer (COC) who need adjuvant chemotherapy The value of tissue biomarkers in COC in adjuvant setting is still a matter of debate because of lack of validation in large data sets We took advantage of PETACC 3, a large adjuvant trial with 3005 patients,to assess in a large cohort the prognostic and predictive value and the individual interactions of tissue biomarkers selected on the basis of their prognostic potential according to the results of previous smaller studies

Objectives To assess the feasibility of biomarker analysis on formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) routine material prospectively collected in a large international study with 386 centers To evaluate or confirm the prognostic relevance of selected biological markers in the whole patient population using DFS and OS as endpoints To assess the predictive effect of some of them on the impact of a chemotherapeutic regimen including irinotecan in addition to 5-FU on disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Methods (1) FFPE tissue blocks prospectively collected and cut in 5-20µ sections Immunohistochemistry (IHC) –P53: mouse mAb clone D07, ABC Basic DAB Detection (Ventana medical system) –SMAD4: mouse mAb clone B8 (IgG1, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Novocastra polymer detection kit –Thymidylate Synthetase (TS): Monoclonal antibody TS 106/4H4B1 (IgG1, Zymed). DAKO EnVision detection system –Telomerase (HTERT): Monoclonal antibody NCL-hTERT (IgG2, Novocastra). DAKO EnVision detection system

Methods (2) DNA was extracted with phenol/chloroform from normal (Nor) and tumoral (Tu) tissues after microdissection of FFPE sections. Molecular analysis: –Microsatellite Instability (MSI): assessed on 10 markers (BAT-25, BAT-26, D5S346, D2S123, D17S250, BAT-40, TGF-ß RII, D18S58, D18S69, D17S787) –18q and 8p LOH: multiple SNPs typing by pyrosequencing on Nor/Tu DNA –KRAS exon 2 and BRAF exon 15: Allele specific real time PCR on Tu DNA –UGT1A1 7/7 genotype: PCR and fragment sizing on Nor DNA

Statistics Determination of cutpoints For markers that have no established cutpoints, potential cutpoints are selected based on the Martingale residuals from a Cox regression of disease-free survival time Associations between two categorical variables were examined by chi- squared or Fisher’s exact test Disease-free survival times of different groups were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and examined by log-rank test The associations between specific toxicities (diarrhea, febrile neutropenia, neutropenia) and UGT1A1 genotype are examined by logistic regression

Statistical constraints Required number of events for a power of 80% (significant level 5%)

Number of patients and events available for this preliminary analysis

Analysis success rate Number of samples with results Total analysed: patient slides analysed by IHC - DNA successfully extracted from 1401 patient slides (91.2%)

Biomarker alteration (mutation, expression or deletion) observed Alterations rate observed Alteration rate reported (literature) P53 overexpression*37%25-76% SMAD4 loss**15%13-63% TS***48%No consistent data available HTERT48%No data available MSI15%10-17% 18q65%70% KRAS37%32-40% BRAF8%10% UGT1A1 (7/7 genotype)12%10-15% * Intense expression, More than 45% cells positive ** Any loss *** Positive = more than 25% cell positive

Patterns of SMAD-4 expression in colon cancer: (a) complete loss of expression in tumor glands as compared with normal crypts (arrow); (b) non-homogeneous expression: loss of expression in the lower part of the field contrasts with marked expression in the upper part.

SMAD4: Preliminary results (stage III)

MSI: Preliminary results (stage III)

Discussion The high success rate of the analysis (>80%) shows for most biomarkers that it is possible to conduct large translational studies on routine FFPE material The confirmed correlation between the biomarker alteration rates found with those published confirm the methodological reliability of our study Preliminary results show an improved prognosis in MSI high tumours and an impaired prognosis for tumours not expressing SMAD4 (a marker associated with 18q deletion), results which are in accordance with the literature Because of statistical constraints final analysis cannot be performed before additional follow up data are available

Conclusions Preliminary results show that this translational study which is so far the largest conducted prospectively in stage II-III colon cancer will be able to add significant information regarding the prognostic and predictive strength of the biomarkers tested A complete analysis including a multivariate analysis shall be conducted when updated data on DFS and OS shall be available from the clinical study