Apologetics Cheat Sheet

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
It Takes More Faith to be an Atheist.
Advertisements

Register? If you would like to receive notes, updates, evaluation forms, etc. (no requests for money or time!) Link: tinyurl.com/gnr-sfu.
The Case for God: Knowing God Exists Kedron E. Jones Apologetics Research Society
A2 Ethics How to assess arguments and theories. Aims  To discuss various methods of assessing arguments and theories  To apply these methods to some.
Kevin Michael Vandergriff Opening Statement. Generic NaturalismSupernaturalism Theism Christian Theism Degree of Modesty + Degree of Coherence = Degree.
The Cosmological Argument by: Reid Goldsmith and Ben McAtee.
ANNOUNCEMENTS Dr. Tim McGrew Historicity of the Gospels Nov 11 th Leadership Positions Available MSC Tabling Positions Available.
The Resurrection of Jesus Christ. 1 Corinthians 15: If there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. 14 And if Christ.
“Bumper Sticker Theology” video
GOD TELLS US ABOUT HIMSELF The Natural & Revealed Knowledge of God Christianity 101 – Lesson 1 Immanuel Lutheran Church Clayton Township, Neenah, Wisconsin.
Cosmological arguments for God’s existence.  Derived from the Greek terms cosmos (world or universe) and logos (reason or rational account).  First.
CHRISTIANITY IN POSTMODERN AMERICA. WHAT IS POSTMODERNISM? A reaction to the assumed certainty of scientific, or objective, efforts to explain reality.
The Cosmological Argument St. Thomas Aquinas ( AD) Italian priest, philosopher.
Cosmological arguments from causation Michael Lacewing
Independent Baptist Church Defense of the Death and Resurrection of Christ “He is Risen!”
The Cosmological and Teleological Arguments for God.
Design Arguments. Arguments for theism Ontological arguments Cosmological arguments Design arguments.
A Questions AO1 – Knowledge and Understanding – one side. Explain in lots of detail 20 mins Approx 2 sides Link back to the question Make links between.
Philosophy of Religion Michael Lacewing
The Evidence Explained. Learning Intentions: By the end of the lesson you will be able to… 1.Explain in detail at least two piece of evidence to support.
Science and Christianity: friends or foes? Steve Taylor.
Is goodness without God good enough?
ANNOUNCEMENTS Dr. Tim McGrew Historicity of the Gospels Nov 11 th Leadership Positions Available MSC Tabling Positions Available.
The Cosmological Argument (Causation or ‘first cause’ theory)
EXISTENCE OF GOD You need to be able to…
Defending The Faith Series
Ratio Christi. ● Roadmap ● Background/Assumptions ● Math preliminary ● Claim 1: Women’s testimony(W) ● Claim 2: Disciples’ testimony(D) ● Claim 3: Paul’s.
Ross Arnold, Winter 2015 Lakeside institute of Theology
What Christianity explains that Naturalism cannot Naturalism (materialism) and Christianity (theism) are considered the two possible positions or worldviews.
Supra-Intellectual Faith Believing God in an Intellectualized Culture Part 3.
Why Does Anything at all Exist? Why is there something rather than nothing? Leibniz - the principle of sufficient reason.
Welcome Lesson # You were baptized into the family of God. 2. Now it is the time to grow in the grace and knowledge of Jesus Christ. 3. Now is the.
Divine 1. He was the “Son of God.” 10 ways Jesus said he was God risen Copyright © Simon G. Harris Scripture quotations taken from the HOLY BIBLE, NEW.
“Does God Exist?” Think with me for a moment: What is the most important question of anyone’s life? “From where did I come?” “Where am I going?” “Who am.
Jeopardy Hard ?sReally Hard ?s Super Hard ?s Extremely hard ?s Outrageously Hard ?s Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500.
Answering Objections: “The Resurrection of Jesus did not happen” Help students use the critical thinking questioning technique to answer common objections.
World Views. How Consistent is Your World View? ( All your presuppositions together) Creation by God & Bible is True (belief in the Bible, and science)
A Conversation Between an Agnostic and a Christian.
Hebrews 11: 6 "But without faith it is impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of those who.
What we can know about God even before opening up the Bible.
1 APOLOGETICS MIRACLES. Miracles Matthew 14: Kings 6:1-7 Exodus 3:1-4 I Kings 17:
Why Does Anything at all Exist? Why is there something rather than nothing? Leibniz - the principle of sufficient reason.
Every word of God is tested… Proverbs 30:5.  Christianity is the only major world religion that claims resurrection for her founder.  Jesus claimed.
The Cosmological Argument What is it about? Many religions in today’s society make claims, such as: Many religions in today’s society make claims, such.
“That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God” 1 Corinthians 2:5.
The Resurrection of Christ Acts 17:31
Resurrection Detectives The Court Case! Learning Objective: To evaluate whether the resurrection of Jesus took place.
Communion Message Historical case for the resurrection.
WHO WAS JESUS? WHY IS CHRISTIANITY THE ONLY WAY? WHY SHOULD I BELIEVE THAT JESUS ROSE FROM THE DEAD?
“Is God Real?” Psalm 19.1 The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. ~ Psalm 19:1.
Can We Know That God Exists? Learning Set 3 Reasons For Christian Hope Chapters 5 & 6.
Chapter 1: The cosmological argument AQA Religious Studies: Philosophy of Religion AS Level © Nelson Thornes Ltd 2008 Revision.
 In 1917, Albert Einstein realized that his General Theory of Relativity pointed to a universe with a beginning at some point in the past. Instead of.
Two central questions What does it mean to talk of, or believe in, God? –Is talk about God talk about something that exists independently of us? Or a way.
The Witnesses of Jesus and their testimony. The Importance of Witnesses: Eye witness testimony is irreplaceable and strong evidence. Aids in the conviction.
The Cosmological Argument for God’s Existence
Week 2 Review.
Anselm & Aquinas December 23, 2005.
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Kalam Cosmological Argument
Or Can you?.
Existence of God: Ontological and Cosmological Arguments
THE COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Philosophy of Religion Arguments for the existence of God
A Case for Christianity
Did Jesus Rise from the Dead?
4 Proofs for the existence of God
Responding to Religious Apologetics
Introduction to Counter-Apologetics
Russell: Why I Am Not a Theist
Presentation transcript:

Apologetics Cheat Sheet Add a slide that gives an outline of whole presentation. Switch widescreen to standard size.

Roadmap KALAM COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT MORAL ARGUMENT MINIMAL FACTS ARGUMENT 2

KALAM COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENT 3

Kalam Cosmological Argument Purpose: Establishes the existence of a First Cause of the universe. Importance: If successful, makes atheism very difficult. Additionally, eliminates religions dependent on an eternal universe, e.g. some forms of Hinduism and Buddhism. Make slides more concise (gist at a glance). Split some of the slides up and have more descriptive titles. Make sure it’s clear how it all ties into the argument.

Kalam Cosmological Argument Premise: Everything that begins to exist has a cause. Premise: The universe began to exist. Conclusion: Therefore, the universe has a cause. Label premise, premise, premise 3

Defending the first premise Premise 1: “Everything that begins to exist has a cause.” Being comes from being; never from non-being. Literally, worse than magic to say otherwise! Science is dedicated to find explanations and causes of effects. Denying this premise would be rather anti-intellectual 4

Defending the second premise Premise 2: “The universe began to exist” Philosophical Reasoning Empirical Confirmation 5

Philosophical Defense of Premise 2 Premise 2: “The universe began to exist” Arguments against an actual infinite Hilbert’s Hotel Infinity Library 5

Empirical Confirmation of Premise 2 Premise 2: “The universe began to exist.” Second Law of Thermodynamics The entropy of the universe would never decrease. An eternal universe would have already expended all usable energy This holds for oscillatory models of the universe as well. 6

Empirical Confirmation of Premise 2 Premise 2: “The universe began to exist” Standard Big Bang Model Equations of general relativity predicted expanding universe. Red Shift provides empirical evidence of expansion + single point origin. Alternative models have failed leaving the Standard Big Bang model. 6

Empirical Confirmation of Premise 2 Premise 2: “The universe began to exist.” BVG Theorem Any universe which has been, on average, expanding throughout its history cannot be eternal in the past This holds for multiverse scenarios as well. Any model of the universe must have an absolute beginning. 6

Conclusion Conclusion: “Therefore, the universe has a cause.” Since the universe cannot cause itself, the cause of the universe must be beyond the universe which entails that the cause is Spaceless Timeless Immaterial Uncaused Powerful These properties sound an awful lot like… 7

“In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.” Genesis 1:1

Teleological Argument The fine-tuning of the universe is due to either physical necessity, chance or design. The fine-tuning of the universe is not due to physical necessity or chance. Therefore, it is due to design. Trim down the words. Start off with the definition of fine-tuning (this slide).

Fine-tuning Fine-tuning does not equal design. It simply refers to the fact that many constants and initial conditions of the universe have an extremely narrow range to fall into. Start with definition. “fine-tuning does not equal design.” three reasons on next (other) slide

Fine-tuning Only three possible reasons for this exist: Physical necessity Chance Design

Physical Necessity This means that the constants and conditions that we see are based on the laws of nature. A higher natural law Infinite regress. Trim the text. Clear definition

Chance Highly impossible. What if there are multiple universes? Lottery analogy What if there are multiple universes? Poker game Without causes, how does science operate? “Nothing comes from nothing. Nothing ever could.” Infinite, therefore we don’t need an explanation for ours because any possible thing will happen in any one of the universes. Steer away from mechanisms.

Anthropic principle This is the idea that we can detect only the constants and conditions of our own universe. Basically, if the universe wasn’t life-permitting, we wouldn’t know about it so an explanation isn’t really needed (the Weak AP). The Strong AP goes further and claims that only life-permitting universes are possible. The firing squad analogy indicates that there must be some kind of explanation. “If the universe wasn’t life-permitting, we wouldn’t be here to know it.”

Design Therefore, the only option left is design. Psalm 19:1, “The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of His hands.” Define design (distinguish from evolution?).

MORAL ARGUMENT 21

Moral Argument Premise: If God does not exist, objective moral values and duties do not exist. Premise: Objective moral values and duties do exist. Conclusion: Therefore, God exists.

Definitions Moral values = principles. Moral duties = action. Love and hate Moral duties = action. Obligations Objectivity is independent of people. True for all people, at all times, and all places

Premise 1 Can there be objective morality without God? If God does not exist, objective moral values and duties do not exist. Can there be objective morality without God? Presence of God, not belief in God. Evolution and sociobiological pressures have created morality. This morality, however, is not objective. C.S. Lewis: is vs ought (mere Christianity)- put somewhere “There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the one who is able to save and destroy.” –James 4:12a

Premise 2 Is there anything that’s objectively wrong? Objective moral values and duties do exist. Is there anything that’s objectively wrong? Or is it just social construction? Is there any actual things that are actually wrong that are wrong for all places all times all people (have example in notes). If I punch you in the face? Shy away from the word “absolute”

Conclusion Therefore, God exists. Thus, we can determine that a lawgiver, one that is beyond humans, exists. “Indeed, when gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature things required by the law, they are a law for themselves, even though they do not have the law. They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts now accusing, now even defending them.” Romans 2:14-15

MINIMAL FACTS ARGUMENT 27

Minimal Facts Argument Purpose: Argument from historical data in favor of the resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth Importance: Functions as the capstone of a cumulative case for specifically Christian theism. Now, the Minimal Facts argument. The main point of this argument is to demonstrate the resurrection of Jesus through a set of historical facts garnered by historical study of the New Testament. Up until now, we have been surveying arguments that, if successful, demonstrate the truth of theism, namely, there is some kind of God. What makes this argument special is that it provides an identification of this God. If the Resurrection is true, then, no other theistic religion has a chance. The previous arguments leave the door open for Judaism, Islam, etc. This argument serves as a razor that slices off all competitors to leave Christian theism as the last one standing. Matthew 27:33-28:15; Mark 15:22-16:8; Luke 23:33-24:43; John 19:16-20:23

Background Four historical facts Consensus among scholars (95%) Resurrection is the best explanation The Resurrection is the basis for the Christian faith. 1 Corinthians 15:14 Need more background on what we’re doing. 22

Fact #1 Jesus of Nazareth died by Roman crucifixion. Found in both Christian and secular sources

Fact #2 On the morning following the burial of Jesus, his tomb was found empty by a group of his female followers. Only about 75% of scholars agree with this. Most contested

Fact #3 Disciples of Jesus had experiences they interpreted to be the risen Christ.

Fact #4 Several specific enemies of Jesus had experiences they also interpreted to be the risen Christ. Paul and James, for example.

Evaluating Theories Explanatory Scope How many data does the theory explain? Explanatory Power How well does the theory explain these data? Plausibility Given prior information, does the theory make sense? Ad-hoc Is the theory arbitrarily and meaninglessly contrived to fit the data? TRANSITION! These are the methods by which a particular theory is evaluated. This argument will contend that the Resurrection hypothesis meets all of these criteria and the remaining theories do not. Let’s look at a few of the popular theories and test them against this rubric. 27

Hallucination Theory Make interactive (if time) Fact 1: Crucifixion YES Fact 2: Empty Tomb NO Fact 3: Disciples YES/STRAIN Fact 4: Enemies NO This theory is unsuccessful Narrow Scope - Facts 2&4 are untouched. Low Power - The body could’ve easily been produced from the tomb Implausible - Hallucinations on this scale have never been reported, ever. Make interactive (if time) 28

Disciples Stole the Body and Lied Fact 1: Crucifixion YES Fact 2: Empty Tomb YES Fact 3: Disciples YES/STRAIN Fact 4: Enemies NO This theory is unsuccessful Limited Scope: The conversion of enemies is left unexplained. Implausible: The martyrdom of the disciples makes no sense on this view. 29

Swoon Theory Fact 1: Crucifixion NO Fact 2: Empty Tomb YES Fact 3: Disciples YES/STRAIN Fact 4: Enemies YES/STRAIN This theory is unsuccessful Low Power - Disciples thought Jesus conquered death. Highly Implausible - Only 1 known crucifixion survivor, distance traveled is too far. Ad hoc - nothing like this ever happened and no reason to think it would. 30

Probably Some Dude Named Jesus Theory Fact 1: Crucifixion NO Fact 2: Empty Tomb NO Fact 3: Disciples NO Fact 4: Enemies NO This theory is unsuccessful No Scope - All facts are discounted No Power - All facts are discounted Implausible - The historical documentation makes no sense on this view Contrived - No honest examination of history would come to this view Jesus was most likely a man who led a small religious cult in first century Palestine, but legend about him developed over the years after his death in an effort to convert people to Christianity. 31

Jesus is Just a Rehash of Horus Theory Fact 1: Crucifixion NO Fact 2: Empty Tomb NO Fact 3: Disciples NO Fact 4: Enemies NO This theory is unsuccessful No Scope - All facts are discounted No Power - All facts are discounted Implausible - This is anachronistic given the religio-historical backdrop. Contrived - No honest examination of history would come to this view The story of Jesus Christ is a myth that developed much like the myths of other ancient near east religions

The Resurrection Hypothesis Fact 1: Crucifixion YES Fact 2: Empty Tomb YES Fact 3: Disciples YES Fact 4: Enemies YES This theory successfully accounts for all of the data The only objection would be the implausibility of theism. However, the purpose of the previous arguments is to uproot such an objection. 33

Euthyphro Dilemma Are moral acts willed by God because they are good? Or are they good because they are willed by God? This is a false dichotomy since there is a third option: good is based on God’s nature. The Euthyphro Dilemma assumes that good is independent of God, but this is actually false. Stick slide at end