Random-Matrix Approach to RPA Equations X. Barillier-Pertuisel, IPN, Orsay O. Bohigas, LPTMS, Orsay H. A. Weidenmüller, MPI für Kernphysik, Heidelberg.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Variable Types in Elasticity
Advertisements

Common Variable Types in Elasticity
3D Geometry for Computer Graphics
Particle acceleration in a turbulent electric field produced by 3D reconnection Marco Onofri University of Thessaloniki.
Sources of the Magnetic Field
Analysis of Human EEG Data
What is symmetry? Immunity (of aspects of a system) to a possible change.
OCE301 Part II: Linear Algebra lecture 4. Eigenvalue Problem Ax = y Ax = x occur frequently in engineering analysis (eigenvalue problem) Ax =  x [ A.
8 CHAPTER Linear Algebra: Matrix Eigenvalue Problems Chapter 8 p1.
Symmetric Matrices and Quadratic Forms
Chapter 5 Orthogonality
Computer Graphics Recitation 5.
Random Matrices Hieu D. Nguyen Rowan University Rowan Math Seminar
example: four masses on springs
Chapter 6 Eigenvalues.
Localized Perturbations of Integrable Billiards Saar Rahav Technion, Haifa, May 2004.
Chapter 3 Determinants and Matrices
1 A. Derivation of GL equations macroscopic magnetic field Several standard definitions: -Field of “external” currents -magnetization -free energy II.
Completeness of the Coulomb eigenfunctions Myles Akin Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas University of Georgia, Athens,
Section 1.1 The Distance and Midpoint Formulas. x axis y axis origin Rectangular or Cartesian Coordinate System.
Geometric characterization of nodal domains Y. Elon, C. Joas, S. Gnutzman and U. Smilansky Non-regular surfaces and random wave ensembles General scope.
Introduction to Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum
Ground State of the He Atom – 1s State First order perturbation theory Neglecting nuclear motion 1 - electron electron 2 r 1 - distance of 1 to nucleus.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring
CHAPTER SIX Eigenvalues
1 February 24 Matrices 3.2 Matrices; Row reduction Standard form of a set of linear equations: Chapter 3 Linear Algebra Matrix of coefficients: Augmented.
8.1 Vector spaces A set of vector is said to form a linear vector space V Chapter 8 Matrices and vector spaces.
CHAPTER FIVE Orthogonality Why orthogonal? Least square problem Accuracy of Numerical computation.
Physics.
MODULE 8 APPROXIMATION METHODS I Once we move past the two particle systems, the Schrödinger equation cannot be solved exactly. The electronic inter-repulsion.
Chap 3. Formalism Hilbert Space Observables
Section 3.6 – Solving Systems Using Matrices
Chapter 21 Gauss’s Law. Electric Field Lines Electric field lines (convenient for visualizing electric field patterns) – lines pointing in the direction.
Quantum One: Lecture Representation Independent Properties of Linear Operators 3.
Linear algebra: matrix Eigen-value Problems
The Two-Body Problem. The two-body problem The two-body problem: two point objects in 3D interacting with each other (closed system) Interaction between.
Mean-Field Description of Heavy Neutron-Rich Nuclei P. D. Stevenson University of Surrey NUSTAR Neutron-Rich Minischool Surrey, 2005.
Chapter 5 MATRIX ALGEBRA: DETEMINANT, REVERSE, EIGENVALUES.
1 MODELING MATTER AT NANOSCALES 4. Introduction to quantum treatments The variational method.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2008 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 560, A29 Lecture Notes 10.
MANYBODY PHYSICS Lab Effective Vortex Mass from Microscopic Theory June Seo Kim.
What is the determinant of What is the determinant of
Workshop on Optimization in Complex Networks, CNLS, LANL (19-22 June 2006) Application of replica method to scale-free networks: Spectral density and spin-glass.
Lecture3 Dr. lobna Mohamed Abou El-magd
F.F. Assaad. MPI-Stuttgart. Universität-Stuttgart Numerical approaches to the correlated electron problem: Quantum Monte Carlo.  The Monte.
Chapter 6 Eigenvalues. Example In a certain town, 30 percent of the married women get divorced each year and 20 percent of the single women get married.
Mathematical Tools of Quantum Mechanics
3.3 Separation of Variables 3.4 Multipole Expansion
Spectral and Wavefunction Statistics (I) V.E.Kravtsov, Abdus Salam ICTP.
Conductor, insulator and ground. Force between two point charges:
Random volumes from matrices Based on the work with Masafumi Fukuma and Sotaro Sugishita (Kyoto Univ.) Naoya Umeda (Kyoto Univ.) [arXiv: ][JHEP.
Chapter 61 Chapter 7 Review of Matrix Methods Including: Eigen Vectors, Eigen Values, Principle Components, Singular Value Decomposition.
Quantum Two 1. 2 Angular Momentum and Rotations 3.
2.2 Graphs of Equations.
Computation of Eigen-Emittances (and Optics Functions!)
Matrices and vector spaces
CH 5: Multivariate Methods
The k∙p Method Brad Malone Group Meeting 4/24/07.
Quantum One.
Quantum Two.
Numerical Ranges in Modern Times 14th WONRA at Man-Duen Choi
6-4 Symmetric Matrices By毛.
Symmetric Matrices and Quadratic Forms
Maths for Signals and Systems Linear Algebra in Engineering Lecture 18, Friday 18th November 2016 DR TANIA STATHAKI READER (ASSOCIATE PROFFESOR) IN SIGNAL.
Maths for Signals and Systems Linear Algebra in Engineering Lecture 6, Friday 21st October 2016 DR TANIA STATHAKI READER (ASSOCIATE PROFFESOR) IN SIGNAL.
Brownian gyrator : A Minimal heat engine on the nanoscale
Physics 319 Classical Mechanics
Chapter 6. STABILITY Good relationships nurture you. They help you find yourself and who you are. I don’t mean just relationships with boys or men. Relationships.
Symmetric Matrices and Quadratic Forms
FOR RANDOMLY PERTURBED Martin Dvořák, Pavel Cejnar
Presentation transcript:

Random-Matrix Approach to RPA Equations X. Barillier-Pertuisel, IPN, Orsay O. Bohigas, LPTMS, Orsay H. A. Weidenmüller, MPI für Kernphysik, Heidelberg Workshop on “Random-Matrix Theory and Applications: From Number Theory to Mesoscopic Physics”, June 25 – 27, Orsay.

Contents: 1. Motivation 2. RPA Equations 3. Random-Matrix Approach 4. Pastur Equation 5. Solutions. Numerical Results 6. Critical Strength 7. Summary

1. Motivation Random-phase approximation (RPA) is a standard tool of many-body physics. First used in condensed-matter physics but later also in other areas and especially in nuclear-structure physics. Study RPA equations in most general form by taking matrix elements as random. Yields unitarily invariant random-matrix model. Study spectrum using (generalized) Pastur equation as a function of coupling between states at positive and at negative energies. When does the spectrum become instable (i.e., when do eigenvalues become complex)? Distribution of eigenvalues in complex energy plane?

2. RPA Equations N-dimensional space for particle-hole pairs. RPA equations have dimension 2N : Matrix A is Hermitean. Matrix C is symmetric. Total matrix not Hermitean. Eigenvalues not necessarily real. Non-real eigenvalues: Instability. If is eigenvalue then also (- * ) is an eigenvalue. Two symmetries:

If is an eigenvalue then also * is an eigenvalue. Result: Real and purely imaginary eigenvalues come in pairs with opposite signs. Complex eigenvalues with non-vanishing real and imaginary parts come in quartets arranged symmetrically with respect to the real and to the imaginary energy axis.

Hermitean matrix A 0 causes repulsion amongst positive eigenvalues, matrix – (A 0 ) * causes repulsion amongst negative eigenvalues. For C = 0 all eigenvalues real. Role of C: Eliminate negative-energy subspace and obtain Hermitean effective operator - C (E + (A (0)* ) -1 C * in positive-energy subspace. Causes additional level repulsion amongst positive and amongst negative eigenvalues and level attraction between positive and negative eigenvalues (Trace of that operator is negative). With increasing strength of C, pairs of real eigenvalues with opposite signs coalesce at E = 0 and then move along the imaginary axis in opposite directions. Instability of the RPA equations.

3. Random-Matrix Approach Degenerate particle-hole energies at r, A 0 = 1 N r + A where matrix A contains particle-hole interaction matrix elements, belongs to GUE with and is invariant under A → U A (U * ) T. Matrix C obeys C is invariant under C → U C U T. The RPA matrix becomes

Generalized unitary invariance: Ensemble is invariant under The matrices are not Hermitian. Ensemble does not belong to ten generic random-matrix ensembles listed by Altland and Zirnbauer. We have also looked at the orthogonal case. Aim: To study average spectrum for N → 1. Model depends on two dimensionless parameters:  =  2 / 2 measures relative strength of C versus A. For  = 0, spectrum consists of two semicircles. And x = r / (2  gives distance of centers of semicircles from origin at E = 0. Spectral fluctuations not studied; are very likely to be same as for GUE in each branch. Two limiting cases: C = 0 and A = 0. Find value of  for which RPA equations become instable.

Distribution of eigenvalues in the complex energy plane N = 20, x = 4

4. Pastur Equation Do this by calculating Imaginary part of average Green’s function yields level density. Expand in powers of H. where Average each term in sum separately. For N large, keep only nested contributions. Yields Pastur equation

Define for i = 1,2 the spectral density of subspace i in total spectrum (projection operators Q i onto the two subspaces) and take trace of Pastur equation. Yields two coupled equations for  1 and  2,  1 = / (E – r - (  1 -   2 )),  2 = / (E + r - (  2 -   1 )). For  = 0 these are two separate equations. Imaginary parts of solutions yield two semicircles of radius 2 centered at r and at – r. Two dimensionless variables  =  2 / 2, x = r / (2 ). Study spectrum as function of  for fixed x.

5. Solutions. Numerical Results To gain understanding of solutions, consider first  = 0. With  i = (E – (-) i r) / (2 ), spectrum given by Im(  i ) = {1 -  2 i } 1/2. Usual semicircle law. Two branch points at  = § 1. Each  i defined on Riemann surface with two sheets. For   0, solution defined on Riemann surface with four sheets. But which sheet to choose for physically relevant solution? Take  very small, use perturbation theory, find that we need pair (  1,  2 ) of solutions for which imaginary parts have opposite signs and Im(  1 ) > 0. Then total level density  (E) given by  (E) = (N / (  )) Im (  1 +  2 ).

Eliminate  2 and obtain fourth-order equation for  1. Then  2 obtained from solution  1 via linear equation. Pairs of solutions: ● Four pairs of complex solutions: Domain (I) ● Two pairs of real and two pairs of complex solutions with equal signs for Im(  1 ) and Im(  2 ): Domain (II) ● Two pairs of real and two pairs of complex solutions with opposite signs for Im(  1) and Im(  2): Domain (III) ● Four pairs of real solutions: Domain (IV) Physically interesting solutions only in domains (I) and (III).

Case (a): x = 1.2 Case (b): x = 2.0 Case (c): x = 4.0

N = 50, 100 realizations Comparison of results for Pastur equation with those of matrix diagonalization.

Evolution of two spectra with increasing . Upper panels: x = 1.2 Lower panels: x = 4

Normalization integral of total level density taken over real energies versus . For  = 0, integral is normalized to unity. X = 1.2

6. Critical Strength Find smallest value of  for which average spectra touch: Imaginary parts of a pair of physically acceptable solutions (  1,  2 ) have non-vanishing values at E = 0. Determine  crit analytically from solutions of fourth-order equation for  1 at E = 0. Find  crit = x 2 – 1.

7. Summary Random-Matrix model for RPA equations with “Generalized unitary invariance”. Level repulsion between levels of same sign, level attraction between levels with opposite sign. Latter causes coalescence of pairs of eigenvalues with opposite signs at E = 0 and instability of RPA equations. Use Pastur equation to derive two coupled equations for  1,  2. Surprisingly simple structure. Criterion for physically relevant solutions. Get average level density from (  1,  2 ). Two parameters: x and . With increasing , semicircles are deformed and move toward each other. RPA instability for average spectrum: The deformed spectra touch. Critical strength  cri t = x 2 – 1.