MOSS ADAMS LLP | 1 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 Rural Telecom Revenues FCC Reform Spring 2012 Presented to ABC Communications.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Universal Service Funding An Overview of the Connect America Fund Marsha Spellman, JD Oregon Connections Conference October 25,
Advertisements

- Telecom Services Equity Research Broadband, Economic Growth and the Financial Crisis January 30 th, 2009 Christopher C. King
MOBILITY FUND OVERVIEW 18 th Annual Oregon Connections Telecommunications Conference Hood River, Oregon Mark P. Trinchero Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Feb , ETC DESIGNATION Feb , ETC Designation  What is an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier (ETC)?  Carrier designated.
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act Before Telecom Act –Implicit cross subsidies –Based on rate of return approach –ILECs only receivers/IXCs.
TELECOM POLICY UPDATE: Impact of the FCC USF NPRM MTIA Industry Affairs Conference May 17, 2011 Steve Kraskin
1 of 27 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall · Economics · R. Glenn Hubbard, Anthony Patrick O’Brien, 3e. Chapter 12: Monopolistic.
Wireline Competition Bureau 2004 Promoting Real Consumer Choice and Investment in Broadband Facilities.
The Old Rules Just Don’t Fit Anymore: A Panel Discussion on the Proposed Revision of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 John Windhausen, Jr., Past President,
An analysis of the FCC’s USF and ICC Broadband Reform Proposals.
Broadband ? Bob Loube NASUCA 2011 Thanksgiving Loube NASUCA
February 19, 2008 How Should We Think About IP-PSTN Interconnection? NARUC Committee on Telecommunications.
MOSS ADAMS LLP | 1 Tribal Telecom 2013 Federal Telecommunications Regulatory Updates.
MOSS ADAMS LLP | 1 The New Reality: How the FCC’s Regulations Will Fundamentally Change Your Business Chad Duval, Principal Moss Adams LLP.
DO AMERICANS CONSUME TOO LITTLE NATURAL GAS?An Empirical Test of Marginal Cost Pricing. By Lucas W. Davis and Erich Muehlegger. Key words :Efficient pricing,
Intercarrier Compensation. Nextel calls to BellSouth BellSouth pays to terminate Nextel calls In aggregate, it may cause BellSouth to increase capacity.
1 Keeping Consumers Connected Washington State and Universal Service WUTC Workshop May 5, 2010 John F. Jones CenturyLink Vice President State Government.
Accounting Standard - 22 Accounting for Taxes on Income - By Pratap Karmokar, ACA.
Development of the Telecommunications Industry. Early History initial telephone service Alexander Graham Bell.
NMECG PRESENTATION TO THE NEW MEXICO PUBLIC REGULATION COMMISSION APRIL 3, 2012 THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION’S ORDERS TO IMPLEMENT REFORM AND.
Voice Over Internet Protocol Finance & Investment Club Telecommunications Sector Arlind Hoxha Summer 2012.
Support For Rural America William Maher Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau July 2, 2003 Universal Service and The FCC.
Creative Destruction of Regulation: Principles for State Communications Law Raymond L. Gifford President The Progress & Freedom Foundation.
Carriers Carriers carry traffic for a fee Must have rights of way to lay wire Given some monopoly protection Regulated but being deregulated.
1 The Rural Alliance January 25, – A Critical Year 2006 will be a critical year for the RLEC industry Multiple events with significant impact.
THE FEDERAL LIFELINE PROGRAM. Overview Low-income consumers apply for discounts for local telephone service through the telephone company. Low Income.
U.S. Telecommunications Regulation and Market Developments September 2008.
Pricing Services in Telecom Egypt – The Case of Wholesale Resellers Ahmed K. Omar Manager of Economic Department for Regulatory Affairs and Interconnect.
23 April 2009 African Economic Outlook 2008/2009 UNECA A review of the ICT sector 2008/09 David Ogong, Director, Competition and Corporate Affairs Uganda.
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act Before Telecom Act –Implicit cross subsidies –Based on rate of return approach –ILECs only receivers/IXCs.
Better Thinking. Better Results. Where does my Recovery Come from? Presented by: Bob Schoonmaker MTIA/ATA Annual Meeting August 9,
October 10-13, 2006 San Diego Convention Center, San Diego California Regulation for VoIP Providers What’s the impact on your business.
NASUCA 2012 mid-year meeting
Missoula Plan Plan reflects themes that always seem to appear – Different treatment for different ILECs by size and by type of regulation (price cap versus.
Access Charges The major questions –What services did IXC’s require in order to provide their interLATA toll and private line services? –What to do about.
Proposal for Reforming the Intercarrier Compensation and Universal Service Systems CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005.
Financial Considerations in the New World!! GTA Annual Meeting Hilton Head, SC June 19, 2012 Leo Staurulakis – Executive Vice President.
Comptel/ASCENT February 17, Tom Sugrue Vice President Government Affairs T-Mobile.
THE NEW FCC NPRM THE CHALLENGES, THE RESPONSES AND THE PLAN OF ATTACK A Briefing Provided By The Rural Broadband Alliance STEPHEN G. KRASKIN and DIANE.
The Nation Broadband Plan & Its Effects on USF and ICC Reform Krista K. Tanner Iowa Utilities Board June 7, 2010.
How Telephone Companies Make Money Doug Kitch Vince Wiemer Vince Wiemer.
Summary and State Implications FCC Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking CenturyLink February 28, 2012.
1 Intercarrier Compensation May 27, 2004 Glenn Brown
Better Thinking. Better Results. Beyond “The Order” – The New Regulatory Horizon for Rural Carriers Bob Schoonmaker, President GVNW Consulting,
Cost Recovery Mechanisms MATI Tribal Telecommunications Conference June 7-9, 2004 Presented by Doug Kitch & Vince Wiemer Alexicon, Inc.
The Regulation of Network Industries Simon Wilkie. Caltech Lecture for May 7, 2004.
Intercarrier Compensation: Rate of Return Carrier Impacts Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission – Workshop February 28, 2012 Jeff Dupree NECA.
Competitive Universal Service TC 310 June 5, 2008.
Comparative Telecommunications Law Spring, 2007 Prof. Karl Manheim 10: Universal Service Copyright © 2007.
Industry Overview AT&T and the Bell System Post Divestiture Factors in the Emergence of Competition to the Bells The Vision of the Telecommunications Act.
© 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property. Intercarrier Compensation.
1 What Drives Corporate Value? Michael Massey, CFA, CPA/ABV January 21, 2014.
FCC USF REFORM Presented by: Gordon Dauchy Vice President - JSI May 11, 2016.
Disparity in Operations: Comparative Analysis of Small ILEC CHCF-A Carriers to Non-CHCF-A Carriers Communications DivisionJanuary 2010* * Revised as of.
The Potential Effects of the National Broadband Plan
Overview of the FCC’s Rate-of-Return Reforms
Rural Communities Broadband Roundtable October 24, 2013 Tupper Lake NY
Agenda Model Accuracy Sufficiency of support and reasonable comparability of rates Standards for Unsubsidized Competitors Disaggregation Caps in the Presence.
Critical Issues.
Development of the Telecommunications Industry
Different approaches before and after Telecom Act
Prepared by Doug Kitch, CPA, Principal
Discussion of Operating Expense Caps and Other Expense Considerations Resulting From the FCC’s Universal Service Fund Reform Order Prepared by Doug Kitch,
DEPRECIATION & CAPITAL RECOVERY UNDER LIBERALIZATION ITU/BDT ARAB REGIONAL WORKSHOP ON “SECTOR REFORM & LIBERALIZATION” MARCH 9-11, 2004 DR. ALY ELFAR,
FCC National Broadband Plan (NBP) and Rural Universal Service Reform
Chapter 25 Price Planning.
Reciprocal Compensation
CTIA – The Wireless Association™ May 18, 2005
TEXAS STATEWIDE TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC.
The New Mexico Rural Universal Service Fund
Presentation transcript:

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 1 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 Rural Telecom Revenues FCC Reform Spring 2012 Presented to ABC Communications

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 2 THE BASICS

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 3 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 ACCESS What other carriers pay to use our network Most companies pool access with NECA using cost studies

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 4 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 RATE OF RETURN REGULATION Expenses & Operating Taxes, plus Profit (Return on Rate Base), equals Revenue Requirement Rates = Revenue Requirement / Demand

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 5 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 COMPETITION When there is no monopoly, companies compete to: o Maximize revenues o Minimize costs

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 6 KEY ELEMENTS OF FCC REFORM INTENDED PURPOSE OF REFORM

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 7 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 I. LOCAL VOICE SERVICE RATES Key elementsPurpose Minimum customer monthly rate (if HCLS recipient) 3-year phase-in with benchmarks ($10, $14, national average) ARC charge if local service rates are <$30/month Rural companies must charge end users a minimum rate for local service, reasonably comparable to urban rates, to justify cost recovery through USF.

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 8 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 II. CARRIER ACCESS RATES Key elementsPurpose All terminating switched access transitions to $0.000 over 9 years Originating interstate rates frozen at Switched access rates are problematic. The number of minutes is declining due to wireless calls, VoIP traffic that is not measured and problems billing carriers that terminate traffic. Differences between state and interstate rates don’t make sense. Switching costs are lower in an IP environment - Reform to provide an orderly transition away from carriers paying for switching.

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 9 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUNDING III. FEDERAL SUPPORT FOR LOOP COSTS ASSIGNED TO INTRASTATE AND LOCAL (HCLS) Key elementsPurpose Revised corporate operations expense limitation calculation (more support if < 3,500) (less support if > 3,500) Regression based limitations on capital expenditures and operating expenses Current mechanism allows carriers to spend whatever they deem appropriate and receive support. Reform sets limits to provide incentive to companies to limit spending.

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 10 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUNDING IV. SUPPORT FOR HIGH LOOP COST GROWTH (SNA) Key elementsPurpose Phased out depending on qualification factor (plant versus lines) Original intent was to support significant cost growth in an environment where access lines were flat or growing. With access line losses, many carriers are growing cost per line only as a result of line loss. No longer consistent with original intent.

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 11 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUNDING V. SUPPORT FOR LOOP COSTS ASSIGNED TO INTERSTATE (ICLS) Key elementsPurpose New limitation on corporate operations expense Regression based limitations on capital expenditures and operating expenses Current mechanism allows carriers to spend whatever they deem appropriate and receive support. Reform sets limits to provide incentive to companies to limit spending.

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 12 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUNDING VI. SUPPORT FOR LOCAL SWITCHING COSTS (LSS) Key elementsPurpose Eliminated and cost recovery shifted to CAF Local switching costs are declining and can be absorbed by the end user. Cost recovery is locked in at a 5% annual reduction to provide stability during the transition period.

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 13 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUNDING VII. OTHER SUPPORT LIMITATIONS Key elementsPurpose Identical support for cellular & wireline competitors (CLEC) 5-year phase out of identical support Mobility Fund created for wireless providers for underserved areas Total support limited to $250 per line per month Difficult to justify supporting more than one carrier via identical support. Providing support equal to the incumbent means other carriers not required to cost justify support. Overall $250/line/month cap on support forces use of an alternate provider (i.e. satellite) when traditional wireline service is extremely costly – applies to very few companies/end users.

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 14 HOW THE CONNECT AMERICA FUND (CAF) WORKS

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 15 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 PURPOSE OF THE CAF Designed to compensate companies for intercarrier switching costs with 2011 as a baseline, revenues are then reduced 5% per year.

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 16 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 SWITCHED ACCESS REVENUE BASELINE Baseline Equals IS Switched Access Revenue Requirement, plus ST Terminating Switched Access Revenue, plus Net Reciprocal Compensation The baseline includes intercarrier and support revenues

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 17 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 ANNUAL CAF CALCULATION Annual CAF revenue equals o Prior year switched access revenue baseline less 5% o Less actual revenues earned in the current year for:  All interstate switched access  State terminating switched access  Net reciprocal compensation  ARC revenues

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 18 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 ACCESS RECOVERY CHARGE (ARC) ARC customer charges phase-in to $3/line/month Residential = $0.50 increments for 6 years Single Line Bus = $0.50 increments for 6 years Multi-Line Bus = $1.00 increments for 3 years ARC revenues reduce CAF revenues

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 19 REFORM YET TO COME?

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 20 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 REFORM YET TO COME I. ORIGINATING SWITCHED ACCESS The FCC is phasing out terminating, and will likely also eliminate originating in favor of end users and USF paying all switching costs (bill and keep). When this will happen, the specifics of transition and the means for providing USF to offset lost revenues are currently being reviewed.

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 21 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 REFORM YET TO COME II. BROADBAND SUPPORT Existing USF mechanisms cover portions of loop related broadband costs, but not all. The FCC is yet to establish the means for rural companies to recover costs for broadband connections from the customer premises to the connection with the backbone provider.

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 22 © Moss Adams LLP | April 2012 V2 REFORM YET TO COME III. USF CONTRIBUTIONS USF is funded through charges to consumers based on a percentage of purchased telephone services. This system is out dated and the contribution base is declining, which results in an increasing contribution factor (FUSC). Reform is expected to implement a line/connection based contribution, which would expand the base to include more carriers and services.

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 23

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 24

MOSS ADAMS LLP | 25 The material appearing in this presentation is for informational purposes only and is not legal or accounting advice. Communication of this information is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, a legal relationship, including, but not limited to, an accountant-client relationship. Although these materials may have been prepared by professionals, they should not be used as a substitute for professional services. If legal, accounting, or other professional advice is required, the services of a professional should be sought.