Legal Implications of Social Media e-NATOA January 12, 2015 Nancy Rodgers Ken Fellman

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Closed Captioning: Nancy C. Rodgers, Esq. Kissinger & Fellman, P.C. Denver, Colorado Twitter: Update.
Advertisements

2010 Revised ADA Regulations: Effective Communication 2010 Revised ADA Regulations Mid-Atlantic ADA Center Silver Spring, Maryland March 10, 2011.
Entitlement vs. Eligibility The Differences Between Public and Postsecondary Education for Individuals With Disabilities March 30, 2011 Gus Ekhardt, M.Ed.
Michael Seereiter Director of Planning, NYS Office of Mental Health and EO #38 Implementation Lead 1.
Salome Heyward & Associates Conference Services Program Accessibility And Emerging Technology April , 2014 Presented by Salome Heyward, JD Program.
Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act (CVAA) Public Law and Public Law October 8, 2010 Eliot Greenwald Eliot.
The FCC Does NOT Require This Session to be Closed Captioned and Video Described HPA Tech Retreat February 20, 2013 Ken Brady, SVP, Media Technology &
Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act Final Rule Joseph Baressi June 3, 2009.
1 Academic Adjustments & Auxiliary Aids & Documentation Office for Civil Rights US Department of Education This presentation is not to be reproduced in.
1 Academic Adjustments & Auxiliary Aids & Documentation Office for Civil Rights US Department of Education April 2011.
The District’s Legal Obligation to Provide Accommodations to Disabled Students Los Angeles Community College District Office of General Counsel Kevin D.
1. 2 Session Objectives  Familiarize participants with barriers to access commonly faced by individuals with disabilities; commonly faced by individuals.
WIA Section 188 Disability Checklist Training Element 2: Notice and Communication.
Requirements under Title II of the ADA November 18, 2010.
UW Web Council Thursday, January 9 Topics in Web Accessibility.
1 Civil Rights & Federal Financial Assistance General Overview  Various Federal civil rights laws apply to recipients of Federal financial assistance.
The State of Ohio is an Equal Opportunity Employer and Provider of ADA Services Engineering and Design Considerations for the Americans with Disabilities.
The Americans with Disabilities Act © The Americans with Disabilities Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Australian policy & practice in ICT accessibility Gunela Astbrink, Internet Society of Australia ASEAN-ITU Seminar, August 2014.
CALEA Discussion EDUCAUSE MARC Conference Wilson Dillaway, Tufts University Doug Carlson, New York University January 18th, 2007.
Changes Coming to the FLSA Overtime Rules: Are You Ready? August 5, 2015.
Presented By Cyn Ukoko,
Back up FCC: Closed Captioning over IP (IPCC) 2012/5/141Confidential.
Headquarters U. S. Air Force I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Mr. Wayman I. Braxton.
Betsy L. Sirk Section 508 Coordinator NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance Inspections Prepared for: Washington State Transit Insurance Pool December 8, 2010 Michael Miller Certified.
1 ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS RELATED TO INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES BILL LUTHER FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C.
Section 504 / ADA. Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) A civil rights law enacted in 1990; A civil rights law enacted in 1990; Prohibits discrimination.
Disability Rights Office: Update National Deaf-Blind Equipment Distribution Program and Telecommunications Relay Service Certification Renewal Rosaline.
1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.
Breakout Session #3C: Is there an App for it? 21st Century Communications Technology for People with Disabilities Technology has transformed the ability.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
National Instructional Materials Accessibility Standard (NIMAS) What Districts Need to Know Skip Stahl, Director, NIMAS Development Center.
Twenty-first Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 Rosaline Crawford National Association of the Deaf Coalition of Organizations for.
Reporting on the status of captioning in Spanish Reporting on the status of captioning in Spanish Ricardo López José Bertrán Dicapta –Advisory Group meeting.
FCC: Closed Captioning over IP (IPCC) 2012/5/141Confidential.
Titles II and III of the ADA Sherrie Brown CHID/LSJ 434 February 2009.
FCC IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY COMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO ACCESSIBILITY ACT Pub. L FCC Agenda Meeting November 30, 2010.
HEATHER KENNEDY ED 505 Assistive Technology. What is Assistive Technology? Assistive Technology is any product or piece of equipment that might aid an.
Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act & Higher Education: or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Wiretaps Terry Hartle American Council.
DOC Web Policies & Best Practices Jennifer Hammond NOAA Research WebShop 2002 August 7, 2002.
Brenda Dawes, AT Program Specialist and Marketing Coordinator State of Oklahoma Current Policy Issues 508 EITA Law and Standards Oklahoma ABLE Tech Assistive.
A Manager’s Guide To ADA Title II RICHARD RAY DONNA PLATT.
Emergency Access Advisory Committee (EAAC) Public Law Section 106.
The Americans with Disabilities Act. Introduction Protects people with disabilities from discrimination Public school- employment, general nondiscrimination,
New Jersey State League of Municipalities Annual Conference Local Government Communications in a Digital World Atlantic City November 19, 2014 Kenneth.
An Overview of the Americans with Disabilities Act “In one hour or less”
Assistive Technology Laws by: Family Center on Technology and Disability.
Grant County Zoning Ordinance Review Public Comment Forum Todd Kays:Executive Director – 1 st District Association of Local Governments.
National League of Cities Increasing Wireless Communications Services for Your Residents Congressional and FCC Action on Mandatory Wireless Facilities.
ADA Revised Regulations General Overview Trainer’s Name Trainer’s Title Phone Number /Website Here ADA Trainer Network Module 1c 1.
Isaiah McGee, Iowa Department of Education Equity Visit Training September 20, 2012.
Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010 (CVAA) Public Law and Public Law Wireless RERC and CTIA Accessibility.
ADA/504 Technical Assistance Tool Ken Woodruff, Civil Rights Program Manager, FHWA.
Section 504 / ADA.
The E-Rate Program CIPA Update Fall 2011 Applicant Trainings.
Module 1 Information on the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act can be found in this module. This includes: The actual.
Titles II and III of the ADA
Creating Accessible Web Pages
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Serving Veterans with Disabilities and ADA Compliance
ADA Revised Regulations General Overview
The Impact of the ADA on State and Local Governments
Introduction to Disability and IT: Policy Development
Title III Supplemental Resources
Assistive Technology Laws
Los Angeles Community College District Office of General Counsel
Assistive Technology Laws
Creating Accessible Web Pages
Presentation transcript:

Legal Implications of Social Media e-NATOA January 12, 2015 Nancy Rodgers Ken Fellman

e-NATOA, 1/12/2015 Captioning’s Regulatory History  1990 Television Decoder Circuitry Act (TDCA)  Required all TVs (>13”) to receive & display captions by 1993  FCC Regulations  FCC adopts technical standards for closed captioning to implement TDCA  The Video Programming Accessibility Act (part of the Telecommunications Act of 1996)  Required the FCC to set rules/implement schedules for TV captioning  FCC Regulations on Closed Captioning  By 2006, 100% of all new video programming, unless exempt, is required to be closed captioned on TV.  Exemptions: locally produced, educational, governmental, general financial exemption, undue burden.  2000 / 2008 – FCC Revised Regulations on Closed Captioning  Adopted and revised technical standards

e-NATOA, 1/12/2015 Captioning’s Regulatory History  2010 – Twenty-First Century Communication & Video Accessibility Act  Extends closed captioning requirements to Internet programming  2012 – FCC IP Closed Captioning Order  Interpreting closed captioning requirements of the CVAA  Set forth an implementation schedule Which brings us to…. the present:  Feb. 20, 2014 – FCC Report and Order; FNPRM  Revised, clarified, and expanded quality standards, tech. compliance rules  Set forth “best practices” for video programmers  Seeks comments on additional measures to ensure access  July 11, 2014 – FCC’s CVAA 2 nd Order (“Video Clips Order”)  Extends requirements to IP video clips

e-NATOA, 1/12/2015 Other Laws and Regulations  Americans with Disabilities Act  The ADA does not specifically mandate closed captioning.  Exception: federally funded public service announcements  ADA passed  Title II applies to public entities.  Dept. of Justice Regulations  Prohibition on discrimination; reasonable modification mandate. 28 C.F.R. § (b)(7).  Local gov’ts must take steps to ensure effective communication, using auxiliary aids where necessary. 28 C.F.R. §§ (a) and (b).  “Auxiliary Aids” includes closed captioning. 28 C.F.R. §  Revised Dept. of Justice Regulations  No specific changes re closed captioning.  Late 2014?  NPRM re public entity websites and the ADA  RIN: 1190-AA65

e-NATOA, 1/12/2015 Other Laws and Regulations  Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973  Prohibits disability discrimination in federal agency programs, programs receiving federal financial assistance. 29 U.S.C. § 794.  Section 504 does not specifically mandate closed captioning.  Regulations  Each federal agency has its own set of Section 504 regulations.  E.g.: Department of Education. 34 C.F.R. § (d).  Typical regulatory requirements include:  Program accessibility;  Effective communication with people who have hearing or vision disabilities.  Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act of 1990  Mandate to provide children with disabilities with special education and related services (such as captions)

e-NATOA, 1/12/2015 Current FCC Regulatory Framework Television Video via Internet Protocol

e-NATOA, 1/12/2015 Televised Programming 47 C.F.R. § 79.1 “Video programming distributors must provide closed captioning for nonexempt video programming that is being distributed and exhibited on each channel...” 47 C.F.R. § 79.1(b).

e-NATOA, 1/12/2015 Televised Programming  What is a “Video Programming Distributor”?  Any television broadcast station licensed by the Commission; and  Any multichannel video programming distributor, and  Any other distributor of video programming for residential reception that delivers such programming directly to the home and is subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission.  49 C.F.R. § 79.1(a)(11)  PEG channels are not licensed by the FCC and are not subject to the FCC’s jurisdiction as a licensed channel.  Would not fall under the definition of video programming distributor with respect to closed captioning.

e-NATOA, 1/12/2015 Televised Programming Exemptions from Television Captioning Requirements:  Locally Produce Programming:  Locally produced and distributed non-news programming with no repeat value  47 C.F.R. § 79.1(d)(8)  Educational Programming:  Instructional programming that is locally produced by public TV stations for use in grades K–12 and post secondary schools.  47 C.F.R. § 79.1(d)(13)  Note – check Dept. of Education Regulations  Governmental Programming:  No specific exemption for governmental programming. However, depending upon content, some governmental programming may qualify for the exemptions stated above.

e-NATOA, 1/12/2015 Televised Programming Exemptions cont.:  General Financial Exemption:  Channels that generate less than $3 million in revenues in the previous year are exempt.  47 C.F.R. § 79.1(d)(12)  See also 47 C.F.R. § 79.1(d)(11)  No requirement to caption if the cost to do so would exceed 2% of the channel’s gross revenue during the previous calendar year.  Undue Burden Exemption:  Allows a station to petition the FCC if providing closed captioning would be a significant difficulty or expense.  49 C.F.R. § 79.1(d)(2)

e-NATOA, 1/12/2015 Televised Programming Impact of the Feb Report and Order  Captioning is still a Video Program Distributor (VPD) requirement  FCC declined to shift compliance from VPDs to programmers (for now)  VPDs are required to request, in writing, that each programmer either:  Complies with the FCC’s captioning quality standards, or  Is exempt from the closed captioning rules.  Application of Best Practices  VPDs, programmers, and vendors expected to adhere to established “Best Practices”  $3 Million Revenue exemption applies separately to each programming stream on a multicast broadcast signal Effective Date: ~Jan. 15, 2015

e-NATOA, 1/12/2015 Televised Programming Feb FNPRM  Possible shift of some captioning regulatory compliance to programmers directly  Elimination of exemptions from closed captioning requirements, including:  Locally produced and distributed non-news programming with no repeat value  Channels producing less than $3 million in annual gross revenue  Comment period closed August 8, 2014 (extended)

e-NATOA, 1/12/2015 Video via Internet Protocol 47 C.F.R. § 79.4 “All nonexempt full-length video programming delivered using Internet protocol must be provided with closed captions if the programming is published or exhibited on television in the United States with captions.” If it is captioned on TV, it should be captioned on the Internet.

e-NATOA, 1/12/2015 Video via Internet Protocol  Different from TV captioning requirements, IP captioning requirements fall upon the video programming owners  “Video programming owner” is any person or entity that licenses video programming to a video programming distributor or video programming provider, or acts as the distributor or provider.  47 C.F.R. § 79.4(a)(4).  The TV captioning exemptions do not apply to IP closed captioning rules.  “Caption on TV = Caption on the Internet” is the rule even if the program or the channel was exempt from the television closed captioning rules but nevertheless captioned the program.

e-NATOA, 1/12/2015 Video via Internet Protocol  Timeline  New pre-recorded, live and near-live programming must be captioned immediately when added to an Internet library if shown on TV with captions.  Existing programs in a Internet library?  Within 45 days after program is shown on TV with captions if shown between March 30, 2014 – March 30, 2015  Within 30 days after program is shown on TV with captions if shown between March 30, 2014 – March 30, 2016  Within 15 days after program is shown on TV with captions if shown after March 30, 2016

e-NATOA, 1/12/2015 Video via Internet Protocol Impact of the July 2014 Video Clip Order  IP captioning requirements apply to video clips of any duration that are posted to a programming provider or distributor website or app if that content previously shown on TV with captions.  “If it is captioned on TV, it should be captioned on the Internet.”  Does not apply to clips posted on third-party websites / apps (a subject of the FNPRM) or to archived programming.  Compliance deadlines:  January 1, 2016: “straight lift” IP video clips  January 1, 2017: all newly posted IP video clip “montages,” or compilations of “straight lift” clips with previously televised and captioned content  July 1, 2017: clips of a time-sensitive nature – including live or near-live programming (such clips receive an 8- or 12-hour grace period).  Compliance deadlines might be extended if captioning technology does not develop as expected.

e-NATOA, 9/8/2014 Which Law Governs? Which Agency Governs? ADA*Section 504 FCC Regs. TV FCC Regs. Internet FCC Regs. Video Clips Local government programming YesYes – if a federally funded program No – but it may (depends on the FNPRM) Yes – if the program was captioned for TV Yes – if the clip was captioned for TV *ADA applies to “any department, agency, special purpose district, or other instrumentality of a State or local government.” Title II Tech. Asst. Manual II If your operation has both public and private (e.g. non-profit) features, consider these factors: 1)Are the operational funds public funds? 2)Are the employees considered govt. employees? 3)Does a govt. assist with property or equipment? 4)Is it governed by elected officials or a private board?

e-NATOA, 9/8/2014 Which Law Governs? Which Agency Governs? ADASection 504 FCC Regs. TV FCC Regs. Internet FCC Regs. Video Clips Program on TVYesYes (federally funded programs) Not right now (depends on the FNPRM) Program on Local Govt. Website YesYes (federally funded programs) Yes (if captioned on TV) Video clips on Local Govt. Website YesYes (federally funded programs) Yes (if captioned on TV) Videos (full length or clips) on third-party sites YesYes (federally funded programs) Yes (if full length and captioned on TV)

Getting captioning right… Quality Control Matters New Regulations Public Opinion The good ones go viral Entire Tumblr Page on “Caption Fails” #captionfail is a hash tag on Twitter Quality service to deaf, hard of hearing, and caption users.

Questions? Nancy Rodgers, Esq. Kissinger & Fellman, P.C. Denver, Colorado