Evaluation Gaye Manwaring University of Dundee. Evaluation When the cook tastes the food it is formative. When the guest tastes the food it is summative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Normative-narrative scenarios as a tool to support strategic R&D processes: benefits and limits Hannah Kosow, Dr. Robert Gaßner IZT – Institute for Futures.
Advertisements

Market Research Ms. Roberts 10/12. Definition: The process of obtaining the information needed to make sound marketing decisions.
Growing Leadership Capacity in the face of continuous and complex #rethinkingleadership.
References Prof. Saul Greenberg, University of Calgary, notes and articles INUSE 6.2 and RESPECT 5.3 Handbook Prof. , University of , Notes and articles.
DATA TRACKING AND EVALUATION 1. Goal of the STEP program: To increase the number of STEM graduates within the five-year period of the grant. You have.
5.1.2 Situative Planning 1 Situative Planning - A Strategic Approach to Urban Planning UPA Package 5, Module 1.
© Copyright Custell Pty Ltd The Relationship Lifeblood: Leverage the Relationship Improve Intimacy Create Value Reduce cost Partnering for.
Adult learning principles Planning a successful workshop.
Group Genius Chapter 4 : From Groupthink to Group Genius Bo Bonning Aaron Frederick.
Adapted by: Kim Scott (From Vicki Nicolson & Jane Nicholls)
Mission Possible The Club Coach Program
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Qualitative Methods to Assess Community Issues.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Communication! Facilitation!. What is a Facilitator?  A facilitator/Leader must know how to build consensus and productively manage conflict within the.
Usability Evaluation Evaluation should occur continually through the design and implementation process. Evaluation methods are applied as the interface.
0 Understanding Diversity ©2008, University of Vermont and PACER Center Understanding Diversity PCL Module 10.
Project evaluations a framework for your own project.
Strategic Management Process Lecture 2 COMT 492/592.
Chapter 3 Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan Gay and Airasian
Effective Facilitators Attributes, Methods & Behaviours.
Sierra Leone Consortium for Relief and Development (CORAD) CARE Int., AFRICARE, Catholic Relief Services, World Vision Int. Action Plan for Making Monitoring.
Pestalozzi Children‘s Foundation emPower 2012 Monitoring & Evaluation Lecturers: Beatrice Schulter.
Session Five: Evaluating learning and teaching in the classroom Short Course in Learning and Teaching in the Classroom Janet Holmshaw and Jeff Sapiro Middlesex.
Republic of Yemen Social Fund Zeid Al-Mushki School Douroub Program Douroub Environmental Project Noise Pollution in Taiz city.
RCOG International Office Consultancy Skills and Tools Angela Brown, Technical Assistance Manager, RCOG International Office.
Ind ENTREPRENEURS MUST BE ABLE TO THINK CREATIVELY!  Solve problems  Generate, develop, and communicate new ideas.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Choosing Questions and Planning the Evaluation.
Nature and Scope of Marketing Research
Needs Analysis Session Scottish Community Development Centre November 2007.
‘ the 6 thinking styles’ by Dr. Edward de Bono (Ch. 8, the team handbook, p 6-7) Pooja Kishore Emily Team: Fo’Sho!
KT-EQUAL/ CARDI Workshop: ‘Lost in Translation’ 23 June 2011 Communicating research results to policy makers: A practitioner’s perspective.
Qualitative Methods to Assess Community Issues. What are qualitative methods of assessment? Qualitative methods of assessment are those whose results.
Copyright © 2008 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey All rights reserved. John W. Creswell Educational Research: Planning,
Participatory Action Research An Introduction to a Research Approach Rachel Casey 19 June 2015.
Prenatal Pilot Study  Sharon M. Thompson  R.N. BSCN, MPH (cand)  Hastings & Prince Edward Health Unit.
UNDP-GEF Community-Based Adaptation Programme Anne-France WITTMANN CBA-Morocco Programme Manager (UNV) Tools & Tips to foster Gender Mainstreaming & Inclusion.
Prepared by: Omar almegbel. ahmad ayasrah Ammar alirr. Ahmad aljarrah. Amjad aljarrah..
Identify a Health Problem Qualitative Quantitative Develop Program -theory -objectives -format -content Determine Evaluation -design -sampling -measures.
Concern Universal Vacancy Director of Income Generation and Communications.
Implementation Community Meeting 5/20/09 Long-Term Plan Discussion and Brainstorm.
Introducing 1 David Mitchko NE-II-108 Eagle Patrol.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Module 2 Day 2 Transforming teaching, training and learning: focus on subject pedagogy.
Training & Development. Brainstorming Curriculum Evaluation Vocabulary Agenda Checklist Simulation.
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
Evaluating your EQUIP Initiative Helen King. Objectives To enable teams to develop a shared understanding of the purpose, use and stakeholders for evaluation;
What is Facilitation? Facilitation is the process of taking a group through learning or change in a way that encourages all members of the group to participate.
How do you feel about change? Why do we need to change? Recession Global competition New strategy Changes in technology Customer tastes Personal development.
GNET BRAINSTORMING. GNET INTRODUCTION.
International engagement: m & e meeting Monitoring & Evaluation: an introduction for practitioners Liz Allen.
What is the PAR process? Dr. Marina Stock McIsaac - Arizona State University.
DEFER JUDGEMENT ENCOURAGE WILD IDEAS BUILD ON OTHERS’ IDEAS GO FOR VOLUME.
Learning Styles We are not all the same.. Learning Cycle – Booklet page 5 Image retrieved on May 10/15 from
KPCF Learning Collaborative: Catapult for creating more impactful social change.
Understanding the theory and practice of Music in the Community.
Choosing Questions and Planning the Evaluation. What do we mean by choosing questions? Evaluation questions are the questions your evaluation is meant.
Think & Learning Not what to think, How to think!.
 PDP & e-portfolios How does it all hold together? Daniel Clark | University Learning Technologist University of Kent
Can Participatory Evaluation Approach Trigger an Increased Demand For Results of Relevant Stakeholders in Programming Period? Krunoslav Karlovcec,
Making Decisions and Solving Problems. Learning Outcomes 1. Terms 2. Describe differences between decision making and problem solving. 3. Identify decision.
Transition Support Program Primary to Secondary School Brenda Carmen – Coordinator Western Education Service Louise Waycott - Education Support Worker,
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning
MODULE 11 – SCENARIO PLANNING
Action Research Designs
Values This programme is about values-based management. This means a style of management, particular to Canterbury College, which turns the values into.
ACTION RESEARCH.
Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning
Why every Library needs Lego
EVIDENCE COLLECTION TECHNIQUES (Focus Group)
Multimedia Training Kit
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Gaye Manwaring University of Dundee

Evaluation When the cook tastes the food it is formative. When the guest tastes the food it is summative.

Evaluation Cycle

Methods of data collection Observation Interview Self-report forms Documentary analysis Participatory approaches quantitative and qualitative

Participatory approaches involve stakeholders empower individuals are creative, responsive and flexible let participants choose topics, make recommendations and plan changes need time, commitment and open minds encourage collaboration, learning and organisational growth

Participatory approaches nominal group technique round robin traffic lights aeroplane head, heart, dustbin, carrier bag quality/importance grids what why plan

Features Nominal Group Technique participants generate the issues identifies low level issues that concern many people can be anonymous may enhance negative feelings

Features Round Robin individual views a measure of how representative they are the lecturer could also join the group as a participant

Features Traffic Lights individual views can track changes over time visually attractive can be used as a starting point for deeper discussions

Features Aeroplane very quick anonymous fun snapshot view

Features Head, Heart, Dustbin, Carrier Bag cognitive and affective positive and negative very personal looks forward for individual plans

Features Quality Importance Grid includes topics from participants and facilitators identifies where to focus resources participants discuss possible improvements and solutions

Features What Why Plan allows negatives to be turned round with ideas for improvement uses group discussion uses & values the experiences & expertise of the participants

References Office of Evaluation and Strategic Planning (1997) Who Are the Question makers? A Participatory Evaluation Handbook. New York: United Nations Development Programme Zukoski, A. and Luluquisen, M. (2002) Participatory Evaluation The Evaluation Trust, Reading Harvey, J. (1999) Evaluation Cookbook. Edinburgh: Learning Technology Dissemination Initiative

References