Program Learning Outcomes at the Graduate Level Susan Bibler Coutin, Associate Dean of the Graduate Division and Professor of Criminology, Law and Society.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Selected Items from a Report of the Higher Learning Commission Comprehensive Evaluation Visit to OSU Pam Bowers Director, University Assessment & Testing.
Advertisements

Arkansas Tech University Continuous Improvement Plan Office of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness Needs Assessment Prioritize Goals &
All-Campus Meeting of Faculty & Staff Monday, August 19, 2013 G. Michael Pratt, Ph.D Associate Provost, Miami University Dean, College of Professional.
Open Forum International Education Task Force October 30, 2012.
An Outcomes-based Assessment Model for General Education Amy Driscoll WASC EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR February 1, 2008.
System Office Performance Management
Developing an Institutional Assessment Plan: Product and Process Bruce P. Szelest Winter Workshop - January 20-21, 2005 Saratoga Springs, NY Association.
First in 2009 Advancing the Vision April 19, 2002 Report of the First in 2009 Coordinating Council.
Report on CCHE Performance Contract Negotiations Jack O. Burns, Ph.D. Vice President for Academic Affairs & Research January 25, 2005.
Writing the Honors Thesis A Quick Guide to Long-term Success.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
Effective Outreach Strategies to IT Students Lessons Learned by BATEC National Career Pathways Network Louisville, Kentucky October 10 –
LEADERSHIP LEADERSHIP Rock Solid Leadership, Simple Truths, 2006 Long Term Vision Excellence Advance Planning Discipline, Drive & Determination Enthusiasm.
Notes by Juan Manfredi February 11,  Passed by Arts and Sciences faculty in April 2002 and published in the A & S Gazette on April 15, 2003 (Vol.
UBC Senate: Supporting an integrated approach to enhancing the mental health and wellbeing of students in the academic environment Lindsey Kovacevic Academic.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
Foundations of Educating Healthcare Providers
Implementing the ePortfolio
Idaho State University TECHNOLOGY IN THE CLASSROOM: STUDENT LEADERS TODAY, TOMORROW, AND BEYOND.
Academic Assessment Task Force Report August 15, 2013 Lori Escallier, Co-Chair Keith Sheppard, Co-Chair Chuck Taber, Co-Chair.
Centre for Teaching and Learning c o l l a b o r a t i v e r e s p o n s i v e p r a g m a t i c The CTL Experience for a New Faculty Member Dr Joy Mighty.
1.Brought together expert faculty from diverse academic disciplines: Health and Sports Sciences Patricia Benson M.Ed. Paula Kommor M.Ed. Psychology Paul.
Accreditation Briefing August NWCCU Full Scale Accreditation: Introduction Planning has begun for the 2010 Full Scale Accreditation Self Study and.
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
MIDDLE STATES COMMISSION ON HIGHER EDUCATION: REACCREDITATION D ECENNIAL S ELF -S TUDY P ROCESS A CADEMIC S ENATE S EPTEMBER 17, 2015 Anne Wahl Michael.
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH. Outcomes assessment can tell us if our students are really learning what we think they should be able to do.
University Assessment Council Presented by co-chairs of UAC: Linda Shaw, CHABSS faculty Regina Eisenbach, Dean of Academic Programs May 6, 2015.
Assessment The Student Affairs Mission To support a student-centered learning environment that encourages student development and inspires.
From Cyclical to Continuous Improvement: Assessment Feedback and Program Metrics Derek J. Herrmann, Coordinator of University Assessment Services Kristen.
Focus on the First-Year “ The First Year Matters” Presentation for the Academic Affairs Town Hall October 2, 2007.
DIVISION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS Academic Accommodation Procedures for Graduate Students Joel Lynn, Executive Director, Student Services | Jonathan Derry, Manager,
Aligning Institutional Strategic and SEM Plans: Indiana State University November 12, 2012 Tom Green, Ph.D. Senior Consultant.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Susanne Hambrusch Department of Computer Science Department Head Increase diversity of faculty, students, and staff Division Director in CISE at NSF The.
Institutionalizing Undergraduate Research at CSUSM Academic Affairs Town Hall September 18, 2008.
Model for Sustaining Departmental Student Outcomes Assessment Russ E. Mullen, Mary H. Wiedenhoeft, Thomas A. Polito, Sherry L. Pogranichniy, and Michelle.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
Re-visioning: Re-visioning: The current Committee on Student Learning Mission : “The primary purpose of the Committee on Student Learning is to promote.
A Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Process at the Academic Program Level Christina Horne, Nita Paris, & Valerie Whittlesey Kennesaw State University-
PRESENTATION TO ASSOCIATION OF INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH AND PLANNING OFFICERS BUFFALO, NEW YORK JUNE 11, 2009 How Campuses are Closing the GE Assessment.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Collective Impact: How Can a University Contribute? Northwest Regional Meeting Wisconsin Campus Compact October 23, 2015 Vanessa Laird Executive Director,
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Campus Response to the Visiting Team Report January 2009 WASC Accreditation.
Assessment 101: What do you (really) need to know? Melinda Jackson, SJSU Assessment Director October
Headwaters Health Care Centre Health Equity Plan 2014 – 2017 Our Journey Exceptional Experience Every Time 1.
Student Affairs Division Meeting September 19, 2012.
Creating Meaningful Experiences for Graduate Students Using the ACPA & NASPA Professional Competencies Brett Bruner Director of Persistence & Retention.
J OINT C HAIRS M ARCH 21, 2016 S TUDENT L EARNING O UTCOMES A SSESSMENT o Enhancing Program Assessment o Requests for Assessment Processes o Timeline and.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
Updates on AASCU & APLU Data Projects Christine M. Keller, PhD Executive Director, Voluntary System of Accountability APLU Associate Vice President, Academic.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Forward Together: UW Madison’s Framework for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence Ad Hoc Diversity Planning Committee Shared Governance (Faculty, staff,
University Assessment Council Presented by: Linda Shaw, CHABSS faculty Regina Eisenbach, Dean of Academic Programs May 6, 2015.
Support for Program Review
UC Transfer Pathways & C-ID Participation
Campus Response to the Visiting Team Report
Dr. Mary Ann Coughlin Associate Vice-President for Academic Affairs
Performance and Development Cycle
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
CORE General Education Assessment:
RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATIONS at KUMC August 2017.
Rebecca Jackson Iowa State University June 17, 2005
Focus on the First-Year “The First Year Matters”
Presented To: College Planning Council
University Assessment Council
Presented To: College Planning Council
Presentation transcript:

Program Learning Outcomes at the Graduate Level Susan Bibler Coutin, Associate Dean of the Graduate Division and Professor of Criminology, Law and Society and Anthropology Mark Warschauer, Associate Dean and Professor, School of Education Ann Van Sant, Associate Professor of English Ruth Quinnan, Director of Academic Affairs, Graduate Division January 2013

Why Graduate Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)? o UCI underwent WASC Reaccreditation review in 2012: o o WASC has been focused on Learning Outcomes at the undergraduate level. New focus on Graduate Outcomes and Assessment in the WASC review process. o Campus Response:  In May 2011 Graduate Council developed guidelines to provide a framework for graduate programs as they develop PLOs and assessment mechanisms for programs to use for PLO development.  These guidelines recognize that each program requires flexibility in this process, as individual disciplinary objectives differ.

Campus Response (continued)  In Fall 2011 Graduate Council and Graduate Division initiated PLO Pilot with five academic units: Anthropology; Criminology, Law and Society; Education; English/ and Mathematics.  Diverse program workgroup chosen intentionally to address differing academic needs and directions in order to help guide the broader campus with this effort.  Workgroup involved students and provided participants with an opportunity to discuss how to approach PLO development related to their discipline.  Participants consulted with faculty in their respective programs; some variation in program-level involvement; some convened a faculty subcommittee while others worked with an existing subcommittee or brought materials to faculty meetings for discussion.

Challenges for Workgroup:  Lack of models to follow: although programs assess students in many ways, there were very few examples available. This is truly a new approach.  Undergraduate examples were not relevant as they are very course-focused. At the graduate level coursework does not map to desired outcomes and success.  Should PLOs measure students or programs? Ideally, they should measure both but focus on program success in helping students achieve program goals.  Assessment: How to assess in meaningful ways?

Results Participants found the process to be rewarding Graduate student participation was also very useful All five programs successfully developed PLOs and assessment mechanisms and plans The PLOs are intended to be “living documents” that will undergo revisions and adjustments The campus is committed to the sustainability of program learning outcomes and assessment, and these will ultimately be incorporated into the formal Program Review process.

Going Forward o Graduate Council notified Deans in S2012 that all graduate programs (Ph.D. and Master’s) must develop PLOs and assessment goals over the next two academic years. o Schools submitted plans for PLO development to Graduate Council in October All programs must have PLOs and assessment mechanisms by June o During the pilot programs chose 2 or 3 PLOs that they will be assessing. Not advisable or feasible to assess all PLOs at one time; be realistic with plans and goals. o Assessment results will identify which program aspects to improve or change. o Goal: Translate results into sustainable way to enhance student success. Develop a structure for ongoing assessment, informed and targeted resource allocations, and future improvements.

Pilot Participant Experiences How have your colleagues been involved and what attitudes did they have? How have your students been involved? How was it helpful to be part of a working group and to collaborate with other departments? How did you develop the PLOs? What are your current plans to assess PLOs? Describe where you are in the process Do you have tips and suggestions for others? What challenges were encountered?

Questions/Discussion  How should we move forward?  What resources are needed/desired for this effort? Helpful links: GraduateLearningOutcomes.pdf Website? Other?