CRF Harmonization and Standardization Preparation for a Round 5 CRF Review Dianne M. Reeves, RN, MSN, National Cancer Informatics Program Neesha Desai,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
Advertisements

NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholde r to insert your own image. Cybersecurity.
Eastern cooperative oncology group ECOG ITrack Initiative Integrated Trial Development Process March 23, 2010 Donna Marinucci March 23, 2010 Donna Marinucci.
Guideline for Monitoring of Clinical Trials for Cooperative Groups, CCOP Research Bases, and the Clinical Trials Support Unit (CTSU) Lore Lagrone Program.
Kendle Implementation of Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonization Dr Elke Sennewald Kendle 9th German CDISC User Group Meeting Berlin, 28 September.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program CTRP User Meeting November 2, 2011 Gene Kraus CTRP Program Director.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
Electronic EDI e-EDI. The EDI has been in use since 1999 using a paper-based system and computerized spreadsheets to collect and manage EDI data. Over.
Query Health Business Working Group Kick-Off September 8, 2011.
CALGB Informational Session June 22, 2007 David Hurd, MD Interim Chair Data Audit Committee.
Biostatistics Analysis Center Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Minimum Documentation Requirements.
Yesterday, today, and tomorrow
OSF/ISD Project Portfolio Management Framework January 17, 2011.
NCI Review of the Clinical Trials Process 6 th Annual National Forum on Biomedical Imaging in Oncology James H. Doroshow M.D. April 7, 2005 Bethesda, Maryland.
CTEP, NCI Adverse Event Reporting Programmatic & Workflow Processes Prepared by: Ann Setser May 24, 2010.
STUDENT ASSISTANCE LIAISON ONLINE QUARTERLY REPORTING Guidance On Understanding and Completing the Quarterly Reporting Form.
RESCUE: ACRIN 4701 Protocol Development & Regulatory Compliance (PDRC) Josephine Schloesser, ACRIN Monitor Chris Steward, ACRIN QC Auditor.
Evelyn Gonzalez Program Evaluation. AR Cancer Coalition Summit XIV March 12, 2013 MAKING A DIFFERENCE Evaluating Programmatic Efforts.
MODULE B: Case Report Forms Jane Fendl & Denise Thwing April 7, Version: Final 07-Apr-2010.
Welcome to The C.R.I.E.R. Project (Clinical Research Investigators’ Electronic Record) A cooperative project to assist in development and execution of.
Discovery Phase: where do we go from here? Co-directors contact information: Dr. Maureen Powers, Department of Cell Biology,
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program CTRP User Meeting July 6, 2011 Gene Kraus CTRP Program Director.
SARC: Participation and Protocol / Concept Review Robert Maki, MD PhD Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
Welcome To INSPIR Training Please be sure Please be sure to sign- in to sign- in Please be sure you try to log – on to INSPIR before you leave Please be.
1 Status of PSC recommendations (January December 2007) Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration 14 March 2008.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
Investigator’s Meeting
Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.
Scarlett Gibb NIH Office of Extramural Research Office of Electronic Research and Reports Management Interim Chief, eRA User Support, Training & Documentation.
The HMO Research Network (HMORN) is a well established alliance of 18 research departments in the United States and Israel. Since 1994, the HMORN has conducted.
Public Health Reporting Initiative Stage 3 Sprint: Implementation Guide Development 1.
NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program CTRP User Meeting October 6, 2010.
What are those 3 Cs??. C3D Status (as of 2/24/05 12:12 pm)  5 Centers – NCI Center for Cancer Research – National Naval Medical Center – University of.
CaDSR O&M Draft Scope September 2010 Denise Warzel National Cancer Institute Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology.
CTRP User Call November 13, 2013 Gene Kraus CTRP Program Director.
Evaluation Plan Steven Clauser, PhD Chief, Outcomes Research Branch Applied Research Program Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences NCCCP Launch.
The NCI Central IRB Initiative Jacquelyn L. Goldberg, J.D. VA IRB Chair Training April 8, 2004.
May 2007 Registration Status Small Group Meeting 1: August 24, 2009.
Environmental Protection Agency 1 The High Production Volume Information System (HPVIS) Demonstration and Status National Environmental Partnership Summit.
1 Dianne Reeves VCDE Presentation December 15, 2011 NCI caBIG® CRF Standards use in NCI CDMS MediData Rave.
Electronic Clinical Quality Measures – Session #1 ONC Resource Center.
How to Submit a New Human Ethics Clinical Application.
PRIMA Investigator Meeting Friday, June 16, 2006 Grand Sofitel Demeure, Amsterdam Stéphanie Baulu, Delphine Germain & Gilles Salles.
07/16/2007 C&G Officer User Guide for eCAFSlide 1 C&G Officer User Guide for eCAF.
How to Submit a New Human Ethics Behavioral Application.
CRIX – A Public Private-Partnership in the US: Structure, Benefits and Lessons Learned Jim Bland Executive Director, CRIX International.
Public Health Reporting Initiative July 25, 2012.
May 2007 CTMS / Imaging Interoperability Scenarios March 2009.
Welcome to the caBIG Community! The cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG ® ) offers more than 120 open source tools, technologies and infrastructure.
Uses of the NIH Collaboratory Distributed Research Network Jeffrey Brown, PhD for the DRN Team Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute and Harvard Medical.
Outcome Measures WG October 16, Agenda Brief introductions Meeting Mechanics Methodology/Process Meeting Schedule Definitions Discussion: Scope.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
C3PR: An Introduction for Users A Tool Demonstration from caBIG™ Vijaya Chadaram Duke Cancer Center April 29, 2008.
Sponsor Visits and Monitoring Barbara Gallagher, RN Clinical Research Nurse Jefferson Clinical Research Institute.
Design of Case Report Forms
Jim Bland Executive Director, CRIX International
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
CCP: Monitoring and Evaluation
IFSP Aligned with the Early Intervention Data System
COMMUNITY ACCOUNTABILITY PLANNING SUBMISSIONS (CAPS) & MULTI-SECTOR SERVICE ACCOUNTABILITY AGREEMENTS (MSAA) CAPS And Schedule Refresh.
How to Submit a New Human Ethics Clinical Application
Broadening Eligibility Criteria to Make Clinical Trials More Representative Joint Recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and Friends.
How to Submit a New Human Ethics Behavioral Application
ClinicalTrials.gov PRS – How to Register and Maintain a Record
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff:
Assessment components
Serious Adverse Event Reconciliation
Presentation transcript:

CRF Harmonization and Standardization Preparation for a Round 5 CRF Review Dianne M. Reeves, RN, MSN, National Cancer Informatics Program Neesha Desai, Essex Management June 12, 2012

Background CTWG Vision Statement Enhance the best of all the components of the NCI- supported clinical trials system to develop a cooperative enterprise built on a strong scientific infrastructure and a broadly engaged coalition of critical stakeholders

Background Establish a Comprehensive Community-Accessible NCI Clinical Trial Database Promote System Harmonization & Interoperability between NCI’s Clinical Trials systems Establish Core Library of Standardized Case Report Forms (CRFs) through Stakeholder Consensus (called out in red font) Develop a Credentialing System for Investigators and Sites

Workgroup Process 1NCI CBIIT staff collects existing CRFs and creates an inventory of content 2Working group, NCI Cooperative Groups and NCI divisions aggregate and identify common content to retain, resolves discrepancies, and achieves harmonization 3Working group reviews and partitions content as Mandatory, Conditional, Optional, or non-harmonized 4Working group, with CBIIT curator matches data elements to all questions and achieves consensus on final list of elements 5Module is distributed for community review. 6Working group reviews and responds to changes from community review and CBIIT staff review content to insure the use of standards. 7A participant for each of the NCI cooperative groups approves any content that has changed since the initial review. 8Biostatistician reviews and approves for Cooperative Groups 9CTROC reviews and approves module 10Pilot

CRF Question Partition Categories Mandatory: A data collection variable that must be on the CRF (e.g., a regulatory requirement (if applicable)). Must be used. Conditional: A data collection variable that must be collected on the CRF for specific cases that may be dictated by local or sponsor defined business rules. Optional: A data collection variable that is available for use if needed. Usually collected due to the design of the protocol, like in instances where marital status or educational level are important indicators in a study. Non-harmonized: A data collection variable that is, by consensus, to primarily belong to a different CRF module or is not belonging to any defined module. NCIP CRF Standardization Process

Hypothetical Assembly of a Disease History and Prior Therapies CRF (for electronic) using caBIG® standardized CRF Modules Header module Outcomes Insert Mandatory, Conditional CDEs (if applicable), select Optional CDEs as desired. Staging/Extent of Disease Agents (Prior/Post Therapies) Agents (Prior/Post Therapies) Sign Off/Footer ~~NOTE: fields may be collected automatically by system through user login/authentication and e-signatures ~~ Insert Mandatory, Conditional CDEs (if applicable), select Optional CDEs as desired. Disease History and Prior Therapies {Study ID}, {PI), {Course#},{Patient ID}, {Institution ID} ~~NOTE: fields may be collected automatically by system ~~ *Prior Agent Name {*date type}Therapy Start Date {*date type}Therapy Stop Date {*dose type}Total Dose *Unit Disease status Stage TNM Primary Site Metastatic Sites *Disease response Date of response assessment Created by Lara Fournier, OHSU, March 2009

Hypothetical Assembly of a Disease History and Prior Therapies CRF (for paper) using caBIG® standardized CRF Modules

CRF Roadmap 8

CRF Round 5 Modules Diagnosis Microscopic Histology Response Survival Lost to Follow-up Follow-up Progression CT Image Acquisition CT Imaging Agent Image Administration RECISTv1.1 Diagnosis Diagnosis Gross Tumor Diagnosis Metastasis

Goals of the CRF Review Evaluate the content for appropriate inclusion in the module Evaluate the content for correct definitions of variables Analyze the content for missing variables Evaluate the proposed content partition for correctness Evaluate if conditionality rules are complete/clear Evaluate the permissible values (when present) for accuracy and completeness Editorial changes – spelling, wording of a definition

Reviewer Responsibility Each Reviewer represents an organization Your feedback must be aligned with your organizational requirements Each organization is a stakeholder in this initiative Items that challenge harmonization require sufficient detail to achieve resolution

Review Process Open the CRF Round 5 multi tab spreadsheet. * Each module is on a separate tab Reference the following materials while reviewing: –CRF Review Goals –CRF Review Process –CRF Roadmap –CRF Wiki: –CRF Round 5 Community Review Page Enter in your comments in the CRF Round 5 spreadsheet Reviewer Comments Column. Comments can be captured at the element level, and/or for a single permissible value. Send the completed spreadsheet to your Neesha Desai

Consideration : Partition rules Mandatory –The element must be included on the CRF. There is an expectation that if the data exists or can be recovered, it will be entered. There may be skip patterns or dependencies that make the completion of an element unnecessary. Conditional –The element is needed on the form based on certain protocol level rules. These may include: Disease rules – staging systems for different types of cancer Phase of study or multi-trial study needs Requirements like stratification and randomization Ask yourself ‘When would I not use this variable?’ When is something NOT conditional – items like Male/Female, or ‘Date of Death’

Consideration : Partition rules Optional –Needed usually for study-specific design requirements. ‘If you need it, this is the best one to use’. Not Harmonized –Variables that do not fit into the module, or don’t belong in ANY module.

Next Steps Review of Round 5 content begins week of December 2 Review sheets to be posted on CRF wiki Posting will be announced to all reviewers Please respond to the review by mid-December if at all possible -Comments through the first week of January acceptable Typically three rounds of reviews have been needed 15

Reference Material Contact Dianne Reeves, Associate Director, Biomedical Data Standards, NCIP Contact Neesha Desai, Project Manager, NCIP, Essex Management NCI CRF Harmonization and Standardization Wiki – andardizationhttps://wiki.nci.nih.gov/display/CRF/CRF+Harmonization+and+St andardization