1 Numerical and Wind-Tunnel Simulation of Wind Loads on Smooth and Rough Domes R.N. Meroney C.W. Letchford P.P. Sarkar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SECOND ORDER MODELLING OF COMPOUND OPEN CHANNEL-FLOWS Laboratoire de Modélisation en Hydraulique et Environnement Prepared by : Olfa DABOUSSI Presened.
Advertisements

Turbulent flow over groups of urban-like obstacles
NATO ASI Conference, Kyiv Pollutant Dispersion Investigation of buoyancy effects on distribution of mean concentration field in the turbulent circulation.
Space and shell structures
Extra Large Telescope Wind Engineering. Wind and Large Optical Telescopes Wind is a key factor in the design of large telescopes: larger wind-induced.
School of Mechanical, Aerospace & Civil Engineering Postgraduate Research Conference, PGR-MACE10 Performance of two k T -k L -ω models in a separation-induced.
Outline Overview of Pipe Flow CFD Process ANSYS Workbench
University of Western Ontario
Gaseous And Particulate Dispersion In Street Canyons
Computer Simulation of Vehicle Aerodynamic Forces and Moments Using Fluent 6.2 MSC VisualNastran 4D WorkingModel 2D Zerguy Maazouddin California State.
OpenFOAM for Air Quality Ernst Meijer and Ivo Kalkman First Dutch OpenFOAM Seminar Delft, 4 november 2010.
Basic bluff-body aerodynamics I
Greg Hyde Raymond Zheng Joseph Rojano Katie Bentley Lori Liebman P14414 P3 ARBORLOO WIND RESISTANCE TEST STAND DETAILED DESIGN REVIEW 1.
Flow Over Immersed Bodies
Simulation of Air-Cooling for the Gear Unit in Pump and Turbine Generator Systems M. Fujino* and T. Sakamoto** *Information Technology Center, Nippon Institute.
Experimental Verification of Gas- Cooled T-Tube Divertor Performance L. Crosatti, D. Sadowski, S. Abdel-Khalik, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting, UCSD (June 14-15,
University of South Carolina FCR Laboratory Dept. of Chemical Engineering By W. K. Lee, S. Shimpalee, J. Glandt and J. W. Van Zee Fuel Cell Research Laboratory.
DETAILED TURBULENCE CALCULATIONS FOR OPEN CHANNEL FLOW
The effect of ship shape and anemometer location on wind speed measurements obtained from ships B I Moat 1, M J Yelland 1, A F Molland 2 and R W Pascal.
8 th Conference on Air Quality Modeling – A&WMA AB3 Comments on Nonstandard Modeling Approaches By Ron Petersen, CPP Inc Blue Spruce Drive Fort Collins.
Wind loading and structural response Lecture 18 Dr. J.D. Holmes
From Left to Right: Katie Bentley(ME), Greg Hyde(IE), Lori Liebman(ME), Joe Rojano(ME), Ray Zheng(ME) What is an Arborloo? An arborloo is a simple and.
Computational Modelling of Unsteady Rotor Effects Duncan McNae – PhD candidate Professor J Michael R Graham.
School of Aeronautical Engineering, Queen’s University Belfast Turbulent Wind Flow over a High Speed Train R K Cooper School of Aeronautical Engineering.
How to use CFD (RANS or LES) models for urban parameterizations – and the problem of averages Alberto Martilli CIEMAT Madrid, Spain Martilli, Exeter, 3-4.
The 2 nd Cross-Strait Symposium on Dynamical Systems and Vibration December 2012 Spectrum Characteristics of Fluctuating Wind Pressures on Hemispherical.
A. Spentzos 1, G. Barakos 1, K. Badcock 1 P. Wernert 2, S. Schreck 3 & M. Raffel 4 1 CFD Laboratory, University of Glasgow, UK 2 Institute de Recherche.
URANS A PPROACH FOR O PEN - C HANNEL B IFURCATION F LOWS M ODELLING Adrien Momplot, Gislain Lipeme Kouyi, Emmanuel Mignot, Nicolas Rivière and Jean-Luc.
Introduction Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of A Non Planar C Wing using Experimental and Numerical Tools Mano Prakash R., Manoj Kumar B., Lakshmi Narayanan.
Lecture Objectives Discuss specific class of problems
Wei Li, Fan Wang, Simon Bell Speaker :古緯中.  Introduction  Wind tunnel experiment  Numerical  Result and analyses.
Prediction of wind load acting on telecommunication masts Márton BALCZÓ Ph.D. Student, István GORICSÁN Ph.D., Ass. Professor Tamás LAJOS Ph.D., Dr.Sc.
Wind Energy Program School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Computational Studies of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:
Basic bluff-body aerodynamics II
In-term project presentation by Kanish Jindal Modeling of chlorine contact chamber at West Lafayette treatment plant.
Global Analysis of Floating Structures – M.H. Kim
Aerodynamic Ground Effect: a case-study of the integration of CFD and experiments Tracie Barber & Stephen Hall University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
3 th International Symposium on Integrating CFD and Experiments in Aerodynamics U.S. Air Force Academy, CO, USA June 20-21, 2007 Integration of CFD and.
2D Airfoil Aerodynamics
A canopy model of mean winds through urban areas O. COCEAL and S. E. BELCHER University of Reading, UK.
Drag and Lift E80 Fluid Measurements Spring 2009.
Aerodynamic Forces Lift and Drag.
MODELLING OF MULTIPHASE FLOWS OVER SURFACE WITH PENETRABLE ROUGH RELIEF Yevgeniy A. Shkvar National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine
Compressor Cascade Pressure Rise Prediction
Goal: Numerically study the fluid flow in a deep open channel Objectives : a)Determine boundary conditions and geometry Porous plate verification case.
CE 1501 Flow Over Immersed Bodies Reading: Munson, et al., Chapter 9.
CFD Study of the Development of Vortices on a Ring Wing
CFD Lab 1 Simulation of Turbulent Pipe Flow Seong Mo Yeon, Timur Dogan, and Michael Conger 10/07/2015.
Tokyo 2015 A Workshop on CFD in Ship Hydrodynamics URANS Simulation of Surface Combatant using CFDShip-Iowa V.4 S. Bhushan and F. Stern IIHR-Hydroscience.
DLR Institute of Aerodynamics and Flow Technology 1 Simulation of Missiles with Grid Fins using an Unstructured Navier-Stokes solver coupled to a Semi-Experimental.
Turbulence Models Validation in a Ventilated Room by a Wall Jet Guangyu Cao Laboratory of Heating, Ventilating and Air-Conditioning,
Wind Energy Program School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Computational Studies of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:
CHAPTER 9 Velocity Profiles for Circular Sections and Flow in Noncircular Sections.
McNeese State University Department of Engineering.
Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology STUDY OF EFFECT OF GAS INJECTION OVER A TORPEDO ON FLOW-FIELD USING CFD.
CFD Simulation Investigation of Natural Gas Components through a Drilling Pipe RASEL A SULTAN HOUSSEMEDDINE LEULMI.
Computational Fluid Dynamics P AVEL P ETRUNEAC B ACHELOR OF S CIENCE D ISSERTATION R ENEWABLE E NERGY OF TURBULENCE EFFECTS ON THE SEABED Supervisor(s):
A V&V Overview of the 31st Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics
International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics
WATER AND LEAD-BISMUTH EXPERIMENTS: FLUENT AND STAR-CD SIMULATION
Prediction of wind load acting on telecommunication masts
Lecture Objectives Learn about particle dynamics modeling
The application of an atmospheric boundary layer to evaluate truck aerodynamics in CFD “A solution for a real-world engineering problem” Ir. Niek van.
Summary of Gemini Technical Report No. 1
AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINITIES
AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINTIES
COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF PARTICLE TRANSPORT IN TURBULENT AIRFLOW
AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINTIES
R.N. Meroney C.W. Letchford P.P. Sarkar
Fundamentals of TRANSPORT MECHANISMs
Presentation transcript:

1 Numerical and Wind-Tunnel Simulation of Wind Loads on Smooth and Rough Domes R.N. Meroney C.W. Letchford P.P. Sarkar

2 Powerpoint Presentations!

3 Structural Domes Domes are commonly used to enclose large spaces because of their structural efficiency and economic benefit. Domes are excellent at resisting symmetric loading, but Asymmetric loading may cause structural distress and failure.

4 Ancient Domed Temples ^ Pantheon Rome AD Dome of the Rock > Jerusalem, 684 AD ^ Taj Mahal, Agra India

5 Domed Churches < St. Paul’s London St. Peter’s > Rome < “Spider” Church, Denver 199?

6 Domed Architecture ^ Nappa Center for Performing Arts California, USA ^ Convention Center Hobart, Tasmania Convention Center Hobart, Tasmania Commercial Center Cuerneveca, Mexico ^ ^

7 Domed Sports Halls & Stadiums Houston Astrodome Hubert H. Humphrey Metro-Dome, Min Little Sports Palace, Rome Pepsi Center, Denver Sun Dome, Fukui, Japan

8 Assembly Hall Dome Assembly Hall, U. of Illinois Urbana/Champ

9 Domed Public Buildings ^ Public Exhibition Halls Millennium Dome, London, 320 m diameter, 80,000 sq m floor space Museums and Halls, Barlow Planetarium, CA ^

10 Inflated Domes US Pavilion, Osaka Exposition 1970 Carrier Stadium, Syracuse University Georgia Dome, Atlanta Silverdome, Pontiac, MI RCA (Hoosier) Dome Indianapolis, IN

11 Inflated Domes (contd) Tokyo Dome “Big Egg” Stadium, Tokyo, Japan

12 Industrial and Engineering Domes Nuclear SafetyManure Odor ControlDrinking Water Petrochemical StorageBulk Storage

13 Bulk Storage: Dust Supression, Water and Wastewater Treatment Covers Temcor Aluminum Domes Triangulated space truss system with triangulated panels

14 Bulk Storage: Coke Piles Pittsburgh, CA Marine Terminal Coke Storage Domes Three 55 m (180 ft) diameter hemispheres Los Angeles, CA Export Terminal Coke Storage Domes Construction Two 73 m (240 ft) diameter hemispheres, Shotcrete applied to interior of inflated airform mounted on footer and stem wall

15 Rough Surface Hemispheres Sometimes construction technique leaves surface texture rough!

16 Geodesic Dome Construction Demonstration of the construction of an Aluminum Skin Geodesic Dome…. Conservatek Co. (one cycle takes 48 hours)

WIND RESEARCH & DESIGN

19 CFD Validation Using Physical Modeling VERIFICATION BEFORE PROGNOSTICATION

20 CFD Validation Using Physical Modeling: Past Studies StudyCasesProgramFLOWResults Robins et al. (1995) L-shaped bldg 0 0 L-shaped bldg 45 0 L-shaped bldg & slab bldg, 225 o Industrial site, N FLUENT run by 4 inde- pendent partners Turbulent boundary layers Poor scalar transport factors 2-3 too high Meroney et al. (1998) 2d street canyon 3d 3:1:1.26 prism 3d 2:2:1 prism 3d 1:1:1 cube FLUENT K-E model Rey model RNG model Uniform & turbulent boundary layers Poor wake & cavity shapes, Poor scalar transport factors too high, Good mean pressure distributions

21 Wind Effects on Rectangular Structures

22 AIJ Rectangular Prism Experiments: Numerical and Physical Modeling AIJ study included 65 sets of laboratory data and 51 CFD simulations. Model dimensions were B:D:H=1:1:0.5 Meroney et al. (1998) simulated with FLUENT code, Rey model, 92,000 cells. Surface pressure distributions were quantitatively similar.

23 Meso-scale Modeling of Downbursts Grid 3 Grid T & F1 LES using CSU RAMS 5 nested grids down to 1 m scale of flow from a thunderstorm downburst.

24 Wind Effects on Hemispherical Domes Inflated domes require internal pressures exceeding external pressures to avoid buckling. Internal pressures must not be too large or excessive membrane or tensile forces occur, and membrane tears.

25 Wind-tunnel Study of Inflated Domes Newman, Ganguli and Shrivastava (1984) studied pressure distributions on three inflatable domes in a boundary layer. H/D = 0.5, 0.37 & 0.25, H/  = , U=7.5 m/s, Re=UD/  =226,000 FEM calculations show buckling occurs on plane of symmetry and upwind when the internal inflation pressures < of the dynamic pressure at the dome top.

26 CSU WEFL Wind Tunnel Experiment Pressure Scanner Pressure Transducer CSU WEFL Industrial Aerodynamics Wind Tunnel PC-NT Computer Postprocess Software Hot Film Anemometer

27 Wind-Tunnel Initial Conditions 20 m 2 m 1.8 m Grid: 86,000 cells Velocity Contours: U max = 15 m/s Z = 1m Z = 0.8 m ASCE 7-98C Windtunnel

28 Grid Systems: One and Two Domes 18,000 Cells 33,000 Cells 16,400 Cells 43,000 Cells

29 12,800 cells Grid Systems: One and Two Domes

30 Hemisphere Grids Boundary layer & Hex Grid Boundary layer & Tet Grid

31 Velocity & Turbulence Profiles: Single Dome Comparisons

32 Single Dome Comparisons: Pressure Profiles

33 Single Dome Comparisons: Reynolds Number Variation Reynolds Number = (U H/  ) = 185,000 Reynolds Number = (U H/  ) = 1,440,000 Conclusion: No significant difference

34 Single Dome Comparisons: Turbulence Models Standard kappa- epsilon model (2 equations) Reynolds stress model (7 equations) Spalart Allmaras model (1 equation) Conclusion: No significant difference

35 Single Dome Comparisons: Pressure Profiles

36 Single Dome Comparisons: Smooth vs Rough

37 Double Dome Comparisons Approach wind at 90 o

38 Double Dome Comparisons Approach wind at 90 o

39 Surface Pressures: Angles 0 o, 45 o & 90 o

40 Pressure Coefficient Contours: Experimental vs Numerical: Approach wind at 0 o Cp Contours: numerical Cp Contours: experimental 39

41 Double Dome Comparisons Approach wind at 0 o

42 Double Dome Comparisons Approach wind at 45 o

43 Double Dome Comparisons Approach wind at 45 o

44 Pressure Coefficient Contours: Experimental vs Numerical: Approach wind at 90 o Cp Contours: numerical Cp Contours: experimental

45 Double Dome Comparisons Approach wind at 90 o

46 Pressure Coefficient Contours: Experimental vs Numerical: Approach wind at 90 o Cp Contours: numerical Cp Contours: experimental

47 Double Dome Comparisons Approach wind at 90 o

48 Conclusions CFD calculations reproduced mean Cp behavior over smooth, rough and paired domes. CFD calculations using k- , RNG, and Rey turbulence models gave similar results. CFD calculations at high and low Reynolds numbers gave similar results.

49 WHALE WATCHING IS NOT AN EMERGENCY KEEP DRIVING GOOD LUCK Approaching the End

50 The End