Training session File Note and Registration Report, 23 rd October 2006 1 Registration report : Partim Fate and Behavior in the environment 23 rd October.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 10 Water-Sediment Studies Jeremy Dyson Basel, Switzerland.
Advertisements

Data handling Sabine Beulke, CSL, York, UK FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics Estimating Persistence and Degradation Kinetics from Environmental.
Theory Metabolites Karin Aden (BVL, Germany)
Outline Introduction Kinetic endpoints General fitting recommendations
Introduction and Project Definition Russell L. Jones January 26, 2005.
1 FOCUS Degradation Kinetics Training course January 2005 Regulatory use of degradation endpoints Sylvia Karlsson Swedish Chemicals Inspectorate.
Overview on the GHS REINER ARNDT, GERMANY Implementation of the GHS Stockholm Convention Side Event 3 May 2005.
Workshop on Good Agricultural Practices, Rome October 2004 Good Agricultural Practices in Codex Jeronimas Maskeliunas MD, PhD Food Standards Officer.
Exposure model for risk assessment and registration of amateur products in France 2013 Conference on Safe and Sustainable Use of Pesticides Bratislava–
Introduction and Project Definition Russell L. Jones January 30, 2006.
Francesca Arena European Commission Health and Consumers Directorate General Future data requirements related to bees for the authorisation of plant protection.
Chemicals in the context of the Water Information System for Europe (WISE) Bo N Jacobsen EEA Chemicals and Water workshop 6-7 December 2010, EEA, Copenhagen.
Workshop on Climatic Analysis and Mapping for Agriculture
PROTECTFP Work Package 1:- results from questionnaire and overview of tools for chemical assessment.
Industry View on EFSA Environmental Guidance Document Development and Recent Experiences with Opinions & Guidance Dr Peter Campbell.
The GSBL-Data Pool Common Data Pool for Chemicals BEF Workshop - Riga / / 1Jahnke / Menger [German Federal Environmental Agency]
European Commission, DG Environment Unit B.1: Water, Marine and Soil EU Substitution Conference - Hamburg, 13/14 June 2002 Slide 1 EU Conference on Substitution.
Decision making for AIR active substances
Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with a Focus on Paediatric Medicines / October |1 | Regulatory Requirement on Dossier of Medicinal.
Introduction to Ecotoxicology Francesca Tencalla Beltox Seminar, Part 6.1.
Training Session Product File Notes and Registration Reports, 23 October Product File Note Part Ecotoxicology Ilse Pittomvils Federal Public Service.
The Biocidal Products Directive Presentation to the European Aerosol Federation 28 September 2005 Athens Greece Steve Smith, SC Johnson.
Water Seminar – 14 April 2010, Athlone European Communities environmental objectives (Groundwater) Regulations 2010 S.I. 9. of 2010 Colin Byrne Water Inspector.
EcoS Consultancy Evaluating Inputs - a new system Brussels - Oct 2005 Putting the Criteria into Practice A Description of the Criteria & Evaluation Matrix.
Training Session Product File Notes and Registration Reports, 23 October Registration Report: General aspects M. Trybou Federal Public Service of.
Training Session Product File Notes and Registration Reports, 23 October Product File Note Part Residues Frédéric Joris and Bruno Dujardin Federal.
Office of Research and Development Photo image area measures 1.5” H x 7” and can be masked by a collage strip of one, two or three images. The photo image.
Exposure Assessment by Multi-media modelling. Cause-effect chain for ecosystem and human health as basis for exposure assessment by multi-media modelling.
DMF Procedures and Communication between API, FP Manufacturers and Regulatory Authorities Jean-Louis ROBERT National Health Laboratory L – 1011 LUXEMBOURG.
EC Bathing Waters and Bathing Water quality management Calum McPhail Environmental Quality Unit manager Caroline Dilks Senior Scientist.
Training Session Product File Note and Registration Reports, 23 October Product File Note (PFN) Maarten Derudder - Olivier Guelton Federal Public.
Communication in the Supply Chain
Checking the Exposure Scenario. Purpose of this presentation 2 This presentation, with notes, was prepared by ECHA, the European Chemicals Agency, to.
Training Session Product File Notes and Registration Reports, 23 October Registration Report: Physical and chemical Properties Alain DUBOIS Federal.
SynTech Research Spain SynTech Research Spain Regulatory Affairs.
A Comparison of Pesticide Environmental Risk Indicators for Agriculture Thomas Greitens Esther Day.
Pesticide Spray Drift Conference September 5 and 6, 2001 AgDRIFT® Dave Esterly Environmental Focus, Inc
Training Session Product File Notes and Registration Reports, 23 October Welcome ! Federal Public Service of Public Health, Food Chain Safety and.
Dutch plan for finalising Hair software package Alterra – Wageningen University and Research Centre Roel Kruijne Working Group Meeting on Pesticide Statistics,
ComET™ Farfield Modelling Dr. Don Mackay Mr. Jon Arnot Canadian Environmental Modelling Centre Trent University Peterborough, ON Slides.
PPCPs: An Emerging Source of Chemical Pollution By: Arienne Barnes Nicolette Foster Aaron Stover Ingrid Tobar Sara Vogt Jennifer Wolfe.
Training session File Note and Registration Report, 23 rd October File Note : Partim Fate and Behavior in the environment 23 rd October 2006S. Vanhiesbecq.
A Global Review of Methodologies for Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessment.
Ukraine Petro Nakhaba All-Ukrainian Public Organization “ Chysta Khvylya ” Deputy Head Kyiv, Ukraine Contaminated Sites Management Joint UMOE-DEPA Project.
Air Quality Governance in the ENPI East Countries EMISSION INVENTORY September 2012 Chisinau, MOLDOVA.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
ECB INFODAYS, Zagreb, Croatia, December 2006 EU Notification Scheme (New Substances) and New Chemicals Database ECB INFODAYS, Zagreb, December.
Outcome of the Workshop on PFOA organised by the Commission 4 th of May 2010 Christine Wistuba, DG ENV, D3.
Training Session Product File Notes and Registration Reports, 23 October Registration Report Part Residues Frédéric Joris and Bruno Dujardin Federal.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
1. Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency Risk assessment with regard to food and feed safety Risk analysis Why risk assessment in the.
Georgia, April 2016Mr. Christian Angerbauer, Mr. Roland Oberwimmer Hazard communication The Globally Harmonized System of Classification.
Abstract A step-wise or ‘tiered’ approach has been used as a rational procedure to conduct environmental risk assessments in many disciplines. The Technical.
Key elements of the concepts and approaches within the EU in the chemical sector Dr. Marcus Moreno-Horn TAIEX: Workshop, Yerevan 2-3 May 2011 Federal Office.
MONITORING Mr. Jan Prášek IPPC Agency.
Communication: Safety Summary
Fraunhofer IME InversePELMO - a specific software to perform inverse modelling simulations with FOCUSPELMO Peter Gallien*, Romeo Herr* and Michael Klein**
OECD Principles of GLP and Test Guidelines
28/06/2018 Public Hearing EU Parliament, Brussels
Chemical substances self – classification issues Lithuanian approach
InfoCards – making informaiton on chemicals more accessible
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
WGC-2 Status Compliance and Trends
Harmonisation of exposure and risk assessment models for the BeNeKempen project Griet Van Gestel OVAM.
Balázs Horváth DG ENV C.1 Water Unit
- Priority Substances - Strategic Coordination Group
Rail transport developments Agenda point 7.2
Data specifications for IED Annex II Module 4
EAF (9) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 02/10/2006
Presentation transcript:

Training session File Note and Registration Report, 23 rd October Registration report : Partim Fate and Behavior in the environment 23 rd October 2006S. Vanhiesbecq FPS Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment DG Animals, Plants and Food Service Pesticides and Fertilizers

2 Overview Registration Report 2 parts to be completed : PART A : RISK MANAGEMENT PART B : DETAILED SUMMARY OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT

3 Part A : Risk Management 1.Details of the application 2.Details of the authorization 2.2 Classification and labelling 3.Risk Management 3.1 Reasoned statement of the overal conclusions taken in accordance with the Uniform Principles 3.2Conclusions 3.3Further information to permit a decision to be made or to support a review of conditions and restrictions associated with the authorisation

4 Part A - Example of reasoned statetment for F&B

5 Part B of the Registration Report – General structure 6. Environmental fate and behavior 6.0 List of Endpoints from the Review Report 6.1.Fate and Behavior in Soil a) New studies/synthesis b) Risk Assessment c) Conclusion 6.2.Fate and Behavior in Water a) New studies/synthesis b) Risk Assessment c) Conclusion 6.3. Fate and Behavior in Air New studies/synthesis + Conclusion Note : table with identity of the a.s and its metabolites required

6 Part B of the Registration Report – General structure 6. Environmental fate and behavior 6.0 List of Endpoints from the Review Report 6.1.Fate and Behavior in Soil a) New studies/synthesis b) Risk Assessment c) Conclusion 6.2.Fate and Behavior in Water a) New studies/synthesis b) Risk Assessment c) Conclusion 6.3. Fate and Behavior in Air New studies/synthesis + Conclusion Note : table with identity of the a.s and its metabolites required

7 6.0 List of Endpoints : extract from Review Report Source : Reference of the Review Report !

8 Table with identity of the a.s. and metabolites Code numberIUPAC nameMetabolite found Chemical Structure ZZ 142Dummy X (active substance) - ZZ 1421Dummy XY (met 1) Sediment (21%)

9 Part B of the Registration Report – General structure 6. Environmental fate and behavior 6.0 List of Endpoints from the Review Report 6.1.Fate and Behavior in Soil a) New studies/synthesis b) Risk Assessment c) Conclusion 6.2.Fate and Behavior in Water a) New studies/synthesis b) Risk Assessment c) Conclusion 6.3. Fate and Behavior in Air New studies/synthesis + Conclusion Note : table with identity of the a.s and its metabolites required

10 a) Studies/synthesis (for each compartment) 1) New submitted studies What kind of new data ? New annex II studies required for a national registration Recalculation of the endpoints following recent guidelines Detailed description and assessment are required. What kind of template to be used ? Name/reference/author of the study Author Guideline GLP status Materials and methods Findings Conclusions & Assessment

11 a) Studies/synthesis (2) 2) Synthesis - summary on the Endpoints characterising the behavior of the a.s. and its metabolites in the Environment - requirement for new data (Annex II studies, recalculation of endpoints) - DT50/DT90 trigger values for higher tier studies  AIM : Identification of Endpoints used in the Risk Assessment

12 Part B of the Registration Report – General structure 6. Environmental fate and behavior 6.0 List of Endpoints from the Review Report 6.1.Fate and Behavior in Soil a) New studies/synthesis b) Risk Assessment c) Conclusion 6.2.Fate and Behavior in Water a) New studies/synthesis b) Risk Assessment c) Conclusion 6.3. Fate and Behavior in Air New studies/synthesis + Conclusion Note : table with identity of the a.s and its metabolites required PECsoil and PECgw

13 Estimation of PECsoil a) Formulation Initial PEC values (excelsheets b) Active substance/metabolites (if needed) - Initial, short and long term PECsoil (actual and time weighted average values) - Accumulation (plateau concentration determined by soil accumulation studies or modelling «Soil persistence models and EU registration» 7617/VI/96

14 Estimation of PECsoil - initial, short and long term Which kinetic has been used to derive degradation parameter ? (SFO,…)

15 Estimation of PECsoil - initial, short and long term(2)

16 Estimation of PECsoil - accumulation Plateau average concentration Plateau maximum concentration

17 Estimation of PECgw PECgw calulated with : - FOCUS Models (like PEARL or PELMO) with the most relevant European FOCUS scenarii for Belgium (Châteaudun, Hamburg, Okehampton, Kremsmünster) - FOCUS Model PEARL with the Belgian scenarii - PELEP (actually : revision of soils parameters) Note : Input parameters in line with the FOCUS recommendations Metabolites with PECgw exceeding 0,1 µg/L : evaluation of their relevance with guideline Sanco/221/2000 (limit : 10 µg/L)

18 Estimation of PECgw - Example of presentation for study

19 Estimation of PECgw - Example of presentation for study

20 Conclusion for the Compartment Soil Does the product comply with the Uniform Principles ? especially for - persistence - leaching to groundwater

21 Part B of the Registration Report – General structure 6. Environmental fate and behavior 6.0 List of Endpoints from the Review Report 6.1.Fate and Behavior in Soil a) New studies/synthesis b) Risk Assessment c) Conclusion 6.2.Fate and Behavior in Water a) New studies/synthesis b) Risk Assessment c) Conclusion 6.3. Fate and Behavior in Air New studies/synthesis + Conclusion Note : table with identity of the a.s and its metabolites required PECsw and PECsed

22 Estimation of PECsw and PECsed a) Formulation (drift) PECsw calculated with excel sheets avalaible on in accordance with ‘ordinary’ national registration anti-drift measure (list of drift reducing equipments) initial PECvalues b) Active substance/metabolites (drift + drainage/run-off) PECsw calculated with FOCUS Models STEP 1 – 4 (D3, D4 and R1) European models are needed for a mutual recognition. initial, short and long term values needed if not present in the DAR

23 The tiered FOCUS surface water system Step 1 : single application, single fixed scenario FOCUS STEP 1-2 Calculator Step 2 : multiple applications, regional scenarios FOCUS STEP 1-2 Calculator Step 3 : Advanced modelling, multiple regional scenarios SWASH, MACRO, PRZM, TOXSWA Step 4 : Refined modelling field scale : SWASH, MACRO, PRZM, TOXSWA Only the most suitable Step is required to assess the risk for water organisms

Training session File Note and Registration Report, 23 rd October Estimation of PECsw/sed- Example of presented results

Training session File Note and Registration Report, 23 rd October Estimation of PECsw/sed- Example of presented results

26 Conclusion for the Compartment Water Does the product comply with the Uniform Principles ? especially for - water organisms See Ecotox for TERvalues

27 Part B of the Registration Report – General structure 6. Environmental fate and behavior 6.0 List of Endpoints from the Review Report 6.1.Fate and Behavior in Soil a) New studies/synthesis b) Risk Assessment c) Conclusion 6.2.Fate and Behavior in Water a) New studies/synthesis b) Risk Assessment c) Conclusion 6.3. Fate and Behavior in Air New studies/synthesis + Conclusion Note : table with identity of the a.s and its metabolites required

fate & behavior in Air Details of the evaluation : - Concise summary on the Endpoints (behavior in the Environment) Conclusion : Summary

Training session File Note and Registration Report, 23 rd October Thank you for your attention