Financial viability check - new procedures

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Petr Cerveny Unit Administration and Finance 31/5/2010 Major FP7 Negotiation Issues.
Advertisements

URF/The Validation Process
Characteristics of projects in EU research programmes
FP7 Grant Agreement Amendments: basic principles and processing
The Negotiation Process:
1 Financial Procedures in FP7 Projects Reporting and Audits Karolina Lis Research Assistant DCU, Finance Office
H2020 Grant preparation and signature
HORIZON 2020: FINANCIAL ISSUES
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
Contractors’ Day, June 2008 to the Framework Partnership Agreement & the Specific Grant Agreement Financial Guidelines for co-ordinators and co-partners.
Not legally binding FP7 Rules for Participation and Grant agreement FP7 Helpdesk 
EHEROES EC Grant Agreement Negotiations June 1, 2011 K.U.Leuven Research & Development Myriam Witvrouw.
FP7 Regler för deltagande 18 december 2006 Monica Hjertman, Enheten för Europaprogrammen, VINNOVA
FINANCIAL REPORTING Rules and Regulations
Validation of legal entities and financial capacity check
Validation of legal entities and financial capacity check Dr Sebastiano FUMERO Head of Unit Participant Validation and Support September 26, 2014 Horizon.
EFP7 Communication Office RTD M2 Research and Innovation Participant Portal Identity and Access Management (IAM)
FP7 Grant Agreement and its parts Moldova – Research Horizon 30 January 2013 Kristin Kraav.
Validation of Participants
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on Calls and Partner Café Brussels, 10 May 2012 How to apply: Application Form and Eligibility A Decade of Territorial.
Call ref.: FP ACC-SSA-2 (10/2004) Contract Negotiation - Sofia - Bulgaria 10 February, Mrs Marina ZANCHI DG Research Directorate N International.
Katarina Lenova, 4 February 2014 H RULES FOR PARTICIPATION AND FINANCIAL RULES.
Negotiations Maria Habicht Estonian Research Council January 30, 2013 Chisinau.
RTD-A.3 Legal Unit – Myriam Gómez-Martelo 13/05/2005- University of Naples Not legally binding Sixth Framework Programme Rules and legal aspects FP6 CONTRACTS.
Ljubljana, Slovenia 2 March Rules for participation Carmen Madrigal Legal aspects European Commission - Research DG « FP7 Challenges to thirve the.
Basic principles of FP7 Grant Agreement Financial management and reporting.
Communication campaign Most common issues identified: analysis per cost category Antonio Requena Fernández FCH JU Financial Officer.
1 An introduction to Project Cycle Management PCM DAY 3 Gori, 31/3 – 3/4/2015.
Megan Richards RTD FP6 Kick Off Meeting Priority 7 and 8 11 November 2004 Sixth Framework Programme MANAGING FP6 CONTRACTS.
Validation of legal entities and financial capacity check
Name, Surname, Position Event, Date, Place Financial issues.
Provisional FP-ICT InfoDay, Torino, 11/12/ The ICT Theme in FP7 How to submit a proposal 1. The Rules of the Programme.
ADMINISTRATIVE & FINANCIAL ISSUES DG ECHO HUMANITARIAN AID AND CIVIL PROTECTION Finance, Legal Affairs and Partner Support unit-C3.
Financial reporting Linda Wormö, MA Per Dahlström, MA 1st October,2015 Kuopio, Finland.
1 Opportunities for SMEs Favourable conditions: lMedium/long term vision: 7-year programme lImproved conditions in FP7 èStrong support : up to 75% of R&D.
7th Framework Programme 2007 – 2013 How to register your organisation for FP7 in URF.
APPLICATION DOCUMENTS Second Call CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME Barbara Di Piazza JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME National Info Day Bologna, Italy 27.
Validation of legal entities and financial capacity check Peter Härtwich European Commission Directorate-General Research & Innovation.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Grégory CAVALLO CERN – EU Projects Financial Management 1 TALENT Kick-off meeting –
Participation and dissemination Rules and Contracts FP6.
Proposals and projects in FP7 On-line Information Day Brussels/Budapest 22nd January 2007.
Megan Richards 6FP - Contract 18 March 2003 Sixth Framework Programme CONTRACTS.
Financial Guidelines FP6 – IST Directorate C 1 st Evaluation proposals co-ordinators Briefing 17 July 2003.
Negotiation of Proposals Dr. Evangelos Ouzounis Directorate C DG Information Society European Commission.
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Grégory CAVALLO CERN – EU Projects Financial Management 1 Picosec Kick-off meeting –
Mobility Tool+ 1. EU Survey Mobility Tool EPlusLink Beneficiary User Sign Grant Agreement Participant Manage Project Generation Participant Report Request.
Research Executive Agency Katrien Steijleman REA.A1 « FP7 Support Unit » URF – PDM Presentation Coordinators Information day 7 May 2012.
Vienna 14 March 2006 Andrew J. Popham Vice-President of FEE Partner, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP The New Directive on Statutory Audit in the EU.
Research and Innovation REPORTING and PAYMENT (in practice) v
HORIZON 2020 Amendments to the Grant Agreement. Consequences The amended provisions become an integral part of the GA All other provisions remain unchanged.
AUDIT CERTIFICATES Jacques Van Oost 12 April 2002 Jacques Van Oost 12 April 2002.
Policy Research and Innovation Research and Innovation European Commission Research DG-B7 FP7 Negotiation Process Not legally binding Diana TILOUCHE -
Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency 3rd Health Programme The Electronic Submission System (JA 2015) Georgios MARGETIDIS.
Validation of beneficiaries REA.A1 - FP7 Support Katrien Steijleman 28 May 2013.
Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency 3rd Health Programme Joint Actions (JA) 2016 Anne-Marie YAZBECK, Ph.D. Scientific Project.
MATcHES Project Ruse, February 26, 2014 Nohelia Morales Martínez Project number: TEMPUS BG-TEMPUS-JPHES This project has been funded with.
Jean Monnet Activities in Erasmus+ Programme APPLICATION PROCEDURE Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency November 2015 Erasmus+ 1.
EU - China 11 Guidelines for Applicants rules for applications European Union Delegation to China & Mongolia Beijing Information Session 14 th November.
Coordinators' day on FP7 Project Negotiation Description Of Work Annex I Griet Van Caenegem DG CNECT R5 Programme Operations May 28, 2013.
Electronic – Statutory Financial Return (E-SFR) Timae Flood Bermuda Monetary Authority.
Validation of legal entities and financial capacity check
Léargas PIC Guide 2016 Your organisation must have a Participant Identification Code (PIC) to apply for any EU grant programme, including Erasmus+. PICs.
Participation and dissemination Rules
H2020 – Registration & Validation of organisations
Coordinators Information day
The Research and Innovation Participant Portal
NEF Negotiation forms IT tool to support Negotiation (Participant Portal) Call FP7-ENV-2013-WATER-INNO-DEMO.
Financial and Administrative presentation on PARTICULATES project
Validation of legal entities and financial viability check
Presentation transcript:

Financial viability check - new procedures

Financial viability check Initiated during negotiations if required on the basis of the Rules on verification of existence, legal status, operational and financial capacity (C (2007)/2466-13/06/2007) Only for three categories of participants: Coordinators (if not public bodies, international organisation, secondary or higher education establishment or guaranteed) Beneficiaries requesting more than € 500 000 EU contribution (if not public bodies, international organisations, secondary or higher education establishment or guaranteed) Others: exceptionally, if there are justified grounds of doubt (EWS (W2, W3, W4 codes), substantial findings of audits) Self-check Excel tool for participants is available on CORDIS (soon to be replaced by “playground” on the portal)

Financial viability check Supported by NEF, Portal, PDM-URF Pilot process for 3 RTD Directorates, standard process from 2011 1. Automatic check provided by NEF 2. REA informs the LEAR/available contact person: The e-mail specifies the way how the documents have to be provided: uploaded via the Portal (or sent to the negotiating officer in copy in INFSO projects). 3. Communication with the beneficiaries via the Portal: - The LEAR receives the request in an e-mail, request seen on the Portal - The LEAR has to upload supporting documents and fill in the simplified balance sheet data on the Portal. 4. Validation of data by REA Validated data can be seen from the Portal, available for internal COM staff. 5. Decision by the Authorizing Officer by Sub-delegation (AOSD) on the basis of all evidence

Financial viability check Quick overview NEF LFV Lite: Automatic check for validated entitites; Step 1. PO/FO acts E-mail to REA; reasons stated PDM Step 2. REA acts Flag in PDM-URF E-mail to LEAR from REA URF Step 3. LEAR acts LEAR uploads information REA validates information PDM displays ratios PDM Step 4. REA acts NEF produces LFV reports, displays validated PDM info; checks ABAC for EWS; calculates co-financing; NEF Step 5. PO acts

Financial viability check - NEF Legal and Financial Verification LFV LITE - NEF

Participant Portal - Organisation data Organisation data tab managed by the LEAR of the entity on the Portal

Organisation data - Balance sheet tab

Organisation data - Balance sheet tab Enter the Simplified Balance Sheet information Same view for the ‘LFV Simulation’ under the Portal

Calculating the ratios

Participant Portal – Organisation data

Documents to be submitted Supporting documents of the last financial year for which the accounts were closed: - balance sheet, - profit and loss account and the related notes of the financial statements - statutory audit report (Exception: if the entity is exempt from audit under the national legislation, the COM accepts unaudited statements provided they are recognised in the accounting system of the entity and are established according to the national legislation.) - audit report certifying the accounts, if above 500.000 € Simplified balance sheet data to be filled in: available via the Portal as seen in the Negotiation Guidance Notes Official documents: signed by the authorized representative of the entity, stamped, dated Documents to be submitted in any budgetary year once. Linked enterprises : Non-consolidated data should be provided, meaning the financial information per PICs - Exception: Start-up companies (provisional data is not part of the validated data of the entity)

Financial capacity check - elements 1. Financial viability check, Concise analysis Liquidity: capable of covering short-term commitments Solvency: capable of covering medium and long-term commitments Profitability 1: generates profit/able to self-finance its activities More in depth analysis (if necessary) Financial autonomy Profitability 2 Equity flag (comparing total debt to equity) 2. Co-financing capacity (if serious qualifications were raised in the audit report on the entity’s co-financing capacity) + financial exposure flag (if the co-financing check is performed and only for coordinators) 3. Early Warning System check 4. Checking whether there are serious audit findings or substantial findings relating to the financial capacity in the audit certifying the account for the past 2 years

Results of the FVC concise analysis Weak if The result of the concise analysis is 0-2 points Consequence: more in-depth analysis Weak, even if the concise analysis is acceptable/good, but An audit report of the accounts has been issued with serious qualifications, or Weak equity flag result, or Weak co-financing capacity or financial exposure flag result, or The entity has been subject to substantial financial findings relating to its financial capacity (last 2 years) protection measures If the entity is subject to an EWS warning (EWS 2,3,4): Protection measures have to be considered regardless the positive result of the FVC.

Results – actions taken If the result of the more in-depth analysis is Acceptable/good: no action if the co-financing, equity flag results are not weak, if there are no substantial audit findings or serious audit qualifications; otherwise protection measures by the AOSD Weak: protection measures by the AOSD Insufficient: cannot participate unless duly justified reasons are provided by the AOSD according to his/her own risk assessment.

Assessment – Protections measures Protective measures for weak participants: limited (no bank guarantees, no reduction of pre-financing, no blocked accounts etc.), but reinforcement of sanctions and penalties Weak entities (following a more in-depth analysis) cannot be coordinators but can participate as “normal” partners Exception: voluntary bank guarantee to allow weak entities to stay coordinators. For any weak entities the COM may initiate a financial audit during the implementation of an FP7 indirect action, which may be accompanied by a technical audit Subject to reinforced monitoring (additional reviews, on-spot checks, etc.)