Exploration Launch Office Scope

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January 22, 2009 Ares I-X Crew Module and Launch Abort System (CM/LAS) Jonathan Cruz Deputy Project Manager Jonathan Cruz Deputy Project Manager.
Advertisements

A GenCorp Company High Thrust In-Space Propulsion Technology Development R. Joseph Cassady Aerojet 22 March 2011.
Solid Rocket Booster Processing
Space Camp/Academy Huntsville, AL S.T.S. – The Space Shuttle –Orbiters –Space Shuttle Main Engines –External Tank –Solid Rocket Boosters.
Liquid Rocket Engine Cycles
Blue Origin AIAA Civil Space Symposium Huntsville, Alabama
Ares V RFI Point of Departure Information Package
Solid Rocket Boosters Overview Two solid rocket boosters provide the main thrust to lift the Space Shuttle off the pad. They are the largest solid- propellant.
Mission Design Requirements First priority is to deliver takeoff mass to aircraft team. Deliver 5kg item to ISS 24 hour launch lead time Vehicle must be.
Launch Vehicles. LAUNCH SYSTEM CONCEPTS SHROUD PROTECTS THE SPACECRAFT SHROUD PROTECTS THE SPACECRAFT MAIN VEHICLE PRIMARY LIQUID OR SOLID ROCKET PROPELLANT.
Architecture Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
Lessons from Apollo * Data from NASA Apollo 11 Press Kit Shows spacecraft weight delivered to LEO (Low Earth Orbit) Shows weights for each portion of Apollo.
Design Goals Saturn V Ariane 4 Pegasus Vanguard Bellerophon ? ? ?
Minimalist Human Mars Mission Surface infrastructure discussion July 26 th, 2008.
THE FUTURE PLANS OF NASA FOR HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT; MISSIONS, LAUNCH VEHICLES.
Earth-Moon Transport Doroteo Garcia Kazuya Suzuki Patrick Zeitouni.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration The Future of Space Exploration Orion, Ares and Beyond.... AIAA / NSC / JPL Town Hall Meeting 26 April 2007.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #18 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #18.
Propulsion Engineering Research Center NASA Technology Roadmap: Launch Propulsion Systems Robert J. Santoro The Propulsion Engineering Research Center.
Shuttle-Derived Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle Presented to the Review of U.S. Human Spaceflight Plans Committee June 17,
Launch System Launch Vehicle Launch Complex Orbit Insertion Orbit Maneuvers.
“Fly me to the Moon”. Few can argue there is a more exciting vehicle than the Saturn V One of the most successful craft ever built by NASA, no payload.
Launching to the Moon, Mars, and Beyond
The Return to Space Exploration Constellation. NASA Authorization Act of 2005 The Administrator shall establish a program to develop a sustained human.
Comprehend why the shuttle was developed Comprehend the space shuttle’s main features Comprehend the shuttle’s legacy The Space Shuttle Program.
November 30, 2006 Space Telescope Science Institute Conference Scott “Doc” Horowitz Associate Administrator NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate.
Chapter 24 Space Vehicular Systems. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Identify.
A3 Altitude Test Facility
Thortek Expander Cycle Engine Presentation - 15 Slides 1 Design of an Expander Cycle Engine with J-2 Equivalent Thrust AIAA th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE.
Oh, Thank Heaven for 7-Eleven: Fueling Up in Space with In-Situ Resource Utilization ASTE-527 Final Presentation Riley Garrett.
Ryan Mayes Duarte Ho Jason Laing Bryan Giglio. Requirements  Overall: Launch 10,000 mt of cargo (including crew vehicle) per year Work with a $5M fixed.
Constellation Program Overview Mark Geyer Constellation Program Office October 2006.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #14 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #14.
1 SpaceX proprietary data constituting “Confidential Information” under applicable agreements. Tim Hughes Vice President & Chief Counsel.
SCOR Convergence Forum October, 2006 Crowne Plaza Hotel Orlando- Airport USA Edgar Zapata Mike Galluzzi
AAE 450- Propulsion LV Stephen Hanna Critical Design Review 02/27/01.
Mars Today 1 An immediate and inexpensive program for manned Mars visitation.
HIAD Mission Infusion: Technology Development & Potential Utilization
Introduction to the Altair Project
NASA/Air Force Cost Model presented by Keith Smith Science Applications International Corporation 2002 SCEA National Conference June
The Shuttle Transportation System Produced by Loren Fletcher (click picture)
Structural Practices Principles of Space Systems Design U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND Structural Design Practices Payload interfaces to launch vehicles.
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
What Makes Up the Space Shuttle? The space shuttle is the most complex machine ever created by human beings. The first shuttle was launched on April 12,
11 Space Transportation Policy and Market Risks Panel 5 – International Customers, Competitors and Partners The George Washington University Elliot School.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
TESLA Rocket Project Lecture #3 10/28/15
SPACE SHUTTLE PROGRAM Space Shuttle Business Office NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas Presenter Date Page 1 Space Shuttle Program Flight and Ground.
LEO Propellant Depot: A Commercial Opportunity? LEAG Private Sector Involvement October 1 - 5, 2007 Houston, Texas LEAG Private Sector Involvement October.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #18 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #18 T-23.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #19 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #19.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #19 Gateway To Space ASEN / ASTR 2500 Class #19 T-18.
Launch Structure Challenge - Background Humans landed on the moon in 1969 – Apollo 11 space flight. In 2003, NASA started a new program (Ares) to send.
Dave McGrath ACM Chief Engineer February 18, 2010
Flight Hardware. Flight Profile - STS Flight Profile - SLS Earth Mars 34,600,000 mi International Space Station 220 mi Near-Earth Asteroid ~3,100,000.
An Earth – Moon Transportation System Patrick Zeitouni Space Technology.
How Astronauts Got Launched to the Moon Created by: Luke Sharman.
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
00:00:00 Standby 3.0L.
It Is Rocket Science: How Rockets Work
PROJECT PROPOSAL.
Space Travel Present & Future
Ares I System Requirements Review (SRR)
Introduction to the Altair Project
Section 5: Lecture 3 The Optimum Rocket Nozzle
Vice President, Business Development
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Section 5: Lecture 3 The Optimum Rocket Nozzle
Presentation transcript:

Exploration Launch Office Scope Crew Launch Vehicle Single 5 segment RSRB/M 1st stage Upper stage powered by a single engine derived from the Saturn J-2 Cargo Launch Vehicle Twin 5 segment RSRB/M 1st stage (from CLV) Core stage derived from the External Tank Powered by 5 low cost SSMEs CLV-derived avionics Earth Departure Stage Upper stage derived from the External Tank Powered by a single CLV upper stage engine - 2 burn capability CLV-derived main propulsion systems and avionics Future development

Current Launch Approach Attributes Reduces risk for the lunar program. Addressing critical systems sooner. Eliminates a top ESAS identified risk (SSME airstart) and addresses another earlier (J-2 development). Fewer launch vehicle development steps to lunar missions: Single upperstage engine development (J-2X). More robust upperstage engine cycle for altitude start / capable of restart - proven in Saturn. Single solid rocket booster development (RSRM). Single core engine development (SSME). More ‘balanced’ engine production rate requirement between J-2X and SSME.

Launch Vehicle Comparison Lander Crew Lander Earth Departure Stage (1 J-2X) 450 klb LOx/LH2 S-IVB (1 J-2) 240 klb LOx/LH2 Upper Stage (1 J-2X) 280 klb LOx/LH2 S-II (5 J-2) 1 Mlb LOx/LH2 Core Stage (5 SSME) 2.2 Mlb LOx/LH2 5 Segment RSRM S-IC (5 F-1) 3.9 Mlb LOx/RP Height: 309 ft Gross Liftoff Mass: 2.0Mlb Height: 358 ft Gross Liftoff Mass: 6.4Mlb Height: 364 ft Gross Liftoff Mass: 6.5Mlb 55 klbm to LEO 121 klbm to Trans-Lunar Injection 147 klbm to TLI in Dual Launch Mode with CLV 112kblm to Trans-Lunar Injection Crew Launch Vehicle Cargo Launch Vehicle Saturn V

Upper Stage Synergies CLV Upperstage Earth Departure Stage Manufacturing Common Practices / Techniques Al-Li Tanks TPS Systems CLV Upperstage Earth Departure Stage Avionics / Software Common Engine Controller / Sequencer Main Propulsion Systems Some Common Components Common Engine Interfaces / Inlet Conditions Thrust Vector Control Common TVC Development / Test Programs Engine Common Engine Development / Test Programs Common Test Facilities (MPTA/Battleship) Testing Common Engine Development / Test Programs Possible flight testbed of CFM and Restart

“1.5 Launch” Earth Orbit / Lunar Orbit Rendezvous MOON Ascent Stage Expended LSAM Performs LOI 100 km Low Lunar Orbit Vehicles Not to Scale Earth Departure Stage Expended Service Module Expended Low Earth Orbit CEV EDS, LSAM Direct Entry Land Landing EARTH

Overall Requirements and Design Philosophy Keep it simple. Minimize complexity and interactions. Simplify interfaces. Stop at “good enough”. Make it robust. Right size margins. Focus on the ‘-ilities. Focus on RM&S early. Apply validated engineering tools, models, and data to a new vehicle configuration. Look to Lessons Learned

Overall CLV System Element Description ~25-mT payload capacity 2-Mlb gross liftoff weight 309 ft in length First Stage Derived from current Shuttle Reusable Solid Rocket Motor/Booster (RSRM/B) Five segments/Polybutadiene Acrylonitride (PBAN) propellant Recoverable New forward adapter Upperstage 280-klb Liquid Oxygen/Liquid Hydrogen (LOX/LH2) stage 5.5-m diameter Aluminum-Lithium (Al-Li) structures Instrument unit and interstage RCS / roll control for 1st stage flight CLV avionics system Upperstage Engine Saturn J-2 derived engine (J-2X) Expendable

Vehicle Configuration – Expanded View Interstage Cylinder Frustum Conical Aeroshell Forward Skirt Extension (Recovery System) Short Forward Skirt (Avionics) Forward Segment 8 BSM 2 Roll Control Pods 3 Center Segments LAS CEV Aft Segment and Nozzle Forward Skirt Aft Skirt Systems Tunnel Intertank CEV Side Spacecraft Adapter 2 RCS Pods Thrust Structure Aft Skirt Thrust Cone CLV Side Instrument Unit Systems Tunnel LH2 Tank Frames and Baffles Skins Insulation J2X LOX Tank Frames and Baffles Skins Insulation

5 Segment RSRM 1st Stage 5 Segment Motor Pyro Separation Release Subsystem Upper Stage Release During Ascent 1st Stage deceleration at Release Frustum ejection from 1st stage at Apogee Range Safety Subsystem New Aft Motor Segment LSC Electrical and Instrumentation Subsystem New Structures Subsystems Frustum Forward Skirt Aero Shell Fwd Skirt Extension New or Modified Avionics for TVC System Control, Range Safety Destruct, Power Distribution, Batteries, Instrumentation, Video, Pyro Initiation, Recovery System and Nozzle Severance Modified Recovery Subsystems Altitude Sensing Hardware, Main Chutes, Reefing Line Cutters, Pyro Release LSC and Pyro Thrusters Pilot and Drogue Chutes Ground Power/ Control Cables T-0 Umbilical Up Systems Tunnel BSMs 5 Segment Motor

J-2X Engine Restart of the Saturn J-2/J-2S engine J-2 powered the S-II and S-IVB 270 Klbf LOx/LH2 engine Uncooled nozzle extension for increased Isp Modern manufacturing methods Mk 29 Turbomachinery successfully restarted to power the X-33 Aerospike engine in the late 90’s

CLV Configuration Vehicle Concept Characteristics Second Stage Propellants Ascent Propellant Dry Mass # Engines / Type Engine Thrust (100%) Engine Isp (100%) Mission Power Level Thrust/Weight @ ignition LOX/LH2 279,877 lbm 31,545 lbm 1/J-2X 273,750 lbf @ Vac 448 s @ Vac 100% 0.985 Gross Lift-Off Weight (GLOW) Payload Launch Escape System Length Delivery Orbit 2,006,839 lbm 5.5 m diameter, Block 1A CEV 13,288 lbm 309 ft -30 x 100 nmi @ 28.5°, 51.6° Booster Stage Propellants Useable Propellant Jettison Mass # Boosters / Type Thrust/Weight (@ 0.6 sec) Burn Rate PMBT PBAN 1,397,785 lbm 223,425 lbm 1/5-Segment SRM 1.729 0.368 inch/sec 60°F

Reference Missions (28.5°/ 51.6°) MECO Time 595.1 sec Burn Duration 463.54 sec Payload Separation Maximum Dynamic Pressure Time 48.9 sec Altitude 29,611 feet Mach 1.63/1.63 Dynamic Pressure 759/767 psf Main Engine Start Time 133 Maximum Axial Acceleration 3.2/3.22 g LAS Jettison Time 167.6 sec Altitude 280,763/283,734 feet Mach 7.54/7.58 SRB Separation Time 131.56 sec Altitude 195,607/197,324 feet Mach 6.13/6.17 Max Altitude 314,324/319,143 feet Liftoff Time 0.6 sec Thrust-to-Weight 1.72/1.73 GLOW 2,006,839/2,003,245 lbm Upperstage Impact Launch SRB Splashdown

CLV Size Comparison to Shuttle Representations to Scale

Preliminary CLV Manufacturing / Refurbishment Flow Stennis Space Center Kennedy Space Center RCS J-2X Assembly Single Engine Test Upper Stage Flight Michoud Assembly Facility Interstage Barge Aft Segment FWD & Center Segments Stacking RPSF Nozzle FWD Frustum First Stage Recovery FWD Frustum Assembly, Refurb & Test ARF/ASTF Aft Skirt FWD & Center Segments Aft Segment Disassembly Hangar AF PRF Parachute Rail Transport Utah Facility

Draft Summary Schedule (CY) Crew Launch Vehicle Draft Summary Schedule (CY) = Delivery to KSC

Moon, Mars, and Beyond Summary ATK THIOKOL NASA is making great progress in implementing Exploration Vision Crew Launch Vehicle (CLV) is scheduled for initial crew launch in 2012 Initial Cargo Launch Vehicle (CaLV) flight planned in 2015 timeframe Key elements of NASA and contractor teams in place and working toward SRR in Fall 2006 Moon, Mars, and Beyond