J U N E 2 0 0 8J U N E 2 0 0 8 T H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E ST H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E S.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carbon Dioxide Emissions Costs and Electricity Resource Planning New Mexico Public Regulation Commission Case No UT March 28, 2007 Presented.
Advertisements

Longevity & Mortality Risk Transfer via the Capital Markets Guy Coughlan, Managing Director PENSION ADVISORY GROUP S T R I C T L Y P R I V A T E A N D.
W Geneva December, 2007 World Meteorological Organization Basics of Catastrophe Reinsurance.
Antitrust/Competition Commercial Damages Environmental Litigation and Regulation Forensic Economics Intellectual Property International Arbitration International.
M A Y M A Y C A P I T A L M A R K E T T R A N S A C T I O N S U S I N G D E R I V A T I V E SC A P I T A L M A R K E T T R A N S A C T I.
SEPTEMBER S T R I C T L Y P R I V A T E A N D C O N F I D E N T I A LS T R I C T L Y P R I V A T E A N D C O N F I D E N T I A L Panel Session:
Hedge fund flows on pace to nearly double 2012
Irish recovery? Pär Magnusson
Venture Services Group Fund Admin – Inhouse vs Outsource: Solutions Addressed by a Global Custodian.
This presentation was prepared exclusively for the benefit and internal use of the J.P. Morgan client to whom it is directly addressed and delivered including.
Innovations in Structured Products October 25, 2010 An Innovator’s Dilemma?
Four tips to keep ACH fraud in the past. 2 ACH Fraud Prevention Steps Businesses Can Take to Minimize Fraud Risk 1 1 b b c c d d e e f f g g a a Monitor.
Confidential Date: June 2011 PRELIMINARY | SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND EVALUATION These materials may not be used or relied upon for any purpose other.
13 September 2007] Vurdering af grunnfondsbeviset og grunnfondsbevisbankerne set fra London.
ACBO FALL 2012 CONFERENCE PANEL OUTLINE Wednesday, October 24, 8:30 a.m. “THE STRUCTURE OF TODAY’S GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND DEALS”
S E P T E M B E R S E P T E M B E R A S I A B O N D T R E N D SA S I A B O N D T R E N D S S T R I C T L Y P R I V A T E A N D C O N F I.
The search for income in a low interest rate world J.P. Morgan Investment Academy Series Accessible investment education from a trusted source FOR INSTITUTIONAL.
Asset Allocation and the Efficient Frontier: Optimizing a portfolio’s risk/return profile J.P. Morgan Investment Academy SM FOR INSTITUTIONAL USE ONLY.
Economic Analyses of FPL’s New Nuclear Projects: An Overview Dr. Steven Sim Senior Manager, Resource Assessment & Planning Florida Power & Light Company.
Business Succession Planning Can your business survive without you?
Shanghai Free Trade Zone (SFTZ)
Fiduciary Standard Implications Regulatory Reform and Implications for the Municipal Bond Market Webinar Sponsored by the Regional Bond Dealers Association.
Life Insurance Strategies For Individuals with Special Needs Beneficiaries.
Four tips to mitigate Mobile fraud in the future.
An Equity Perspective Paul Malan Global Markets 21 January 2004.
Mike Zenker Barclays Capital Research (415) November 12, 2007
Corporate Overview September Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (the "Company") makes forward-looking statements in this.
Socially Innovative Investing Strategy (S2I) Executive Summary
FOR INSTITUTIONAL USE ONLY NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION An introduction to the capital markets J.P. Morgan Investment Academy.
Strictly Private and Confidential
Shanghai Free Trade Zone (SFTZ) Managing liquidity through a NEW two-way cross-border pooling arrangement.
The Carbon Principles Strictly Private and Confidential.
Equity income: a niche asset class Neil Margolis, Portfolio Manager May 2007.
RENEWABLE ENERY & BIOMASS COGENERATION TRAINING – KENYA BY LEWIS B. MHANGO.
Potential EESE Board GHG Emission Targets for the NH Climate Action Plan NH EESE Board Goal Team Sub-Committee Friday, October 16, 2009.
S E P T E M B E R W O R K S H O P O N D E V E L O P I N G C O R P O R A T E B O N D M A R K E TS H A N G H A I N A T I O N A L A C C O U N T I N.
PRODUCTIVITY – THE PICTURE FOR THE UK & THE WEST MIDLANDS SUSTAINING COMPETITIVENESS CONFERENCE – THE BELFRY RHYS HERBERT SENIOR ECONOMIST 6 JULY 2012.
Online banking security best practices Access via ‘transaction devices’
Madison Elementary School District Class B Bond Capacity Update May 2013.
APEC ENERGY WORKING GROUP FRAMEWORK PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTING ENERGY INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (November 2004).
Clean and Diversified Energy Initiative Rich Halvey Western Governors’ Association Legislative Forum Monterrey, N.L., Mexico.
W Geneva December, 2007 World Meteorological Organization Basics of Weather Risk Management.
The Economics of Climate Change Policy By: Dr. Margo Thorning, Ph.D. Senior Vice President and Chief Economist American Council for Capital Formation Washington,
January 25, 2007 The Role of Speculation in Energy Markets Kyle Dickard Managing Director, Global Commodity Analysis.
Program Dashboard [Enter Date] Strictly Private and Confidential.
ENERGY MARKETS DIVISION Factors Affecting Resource Investment Decisions in ERCOT June 30, 2011.
S T R I C T L Y P R I V A T E A N D C O N F I D E N T I A L 1 [ PRESENTED AT THE ASIAN BANKER SUMMIT 2011 ] April 7, 2011 LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT POST 2008.
Mortgage Financing Executions to Fit the Times September 28, 2015.
Generation Subcommittee, Day Two Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise, Idaho.
 Cap and Trade Application: Global Warming 6. 2.
February 2016 Outlook for Financial Markets Jack Ablin, CFA Chief Investment Officer (312) What to do Now? – Navigating Wall Street Volatility.
This confidential presentation has been prepared by CIBC Capital Markets, exclusively for the benefit and internal use of [the board of directors/special.
Trade Compliance Considerations April 13, © 2016 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and the U.S. member firm of the KPMG network.
Market Update ASLF 2016 Antonio Blázquez D. Securities Country Manager.
Investing in the green economy: GIB’s approach to ensuring positive green impact 15 th September 2014.
October 2012 Admission of professional participants – non-credit institutions to trading on the Moscow Exchange FX market.
DC Plan Investment Menu Best Practices Date Copyright T. Rowe Price. All rights reserved.
Integrity. Commitment. Performance.™ PMA Financial Planning Program Howard Crouse, Vice President PMA Financial Network, Inc. March 17, 2014 El Paso-Gridley.
Table of Contents_Product
Toronto Waterfront Scan and Environmental Improvement Strategy Project - Economic Opportunity in a Sustainable Waterfront Presentation to the Federation.
Account Maintenance for Program Administrators
Preparing for Negotiation & Drafting Business Contracts
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
ACBO FALL 2012 CONFERENCE PANEL OUTLINE
Solanco School District
Environmental Upgrade Finance
Wheaton Warrenville CUSD 200
Citi Advanced Reporting
Presentation transcript:

J U N E J U N E T H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E ST H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E S

English_General This presentation was prepared exclusively for the benefit and internal use of the JPMorgan client to whom it is directly addressed and delivered (including such client’s subsidiaries, the “Company”) in order to assist the Company in evaluating, on a preliminary basis, the feasibility of a possible transaction or transactions and does not carry any right of publication or disclosure, in whole or in part, to any other party. This presentation is for discussion purposes only and is incomplete without reference to, and should be viewed solely in conjunction with, the oral briefing provided by JPMorgan. Neither this presentation nor any of its contents may be disclosed or used for any other purpose without the prior written consent of JPMorgan. The information in this presentation is based upon any management forecasts supplied to us and reflects prevailing conditions and our views as of this date, all of which are accordingly subject to change. JPMorgan’s opinions and estimates constitute JPMorgan’s judgment and should be regarded as indicative, preliminary and for illustrative purposes only. In preparing this presentation, we have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness of all information available from public sources or which was provided to us by or on behalf of the Company or which was otherwise reviewed by us. In addition, our analyses are not and do not purport to be appraisals of the assets, stock, or business of the Company or any other entity. JPMorgan makes no representations as to the actual value which may be received in connection with a transaction nor the legal, tax or accounting effects of consummating a transaction. Unless expressly contemplated hereby, the information in this presentation does not take into account the effects of a possible transaction or transactions involving an actual or potential change of control, which may have significant valuation and other effects. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Company and each of its employees, representatives or other agents may disclose to any and all persons, without limitation of any kind, the U.S. federal and state income tax treatment and the U.S. federal and state income tax structure of the transactions contemplated hereby and all materials of any kind (including opinions or other tax analyses) that are provided to the Company relating to such tax treatment and tax structure insofar as such treatment and/or structure relates to a U.S. federal or state income tax strategy provided to the Company by JPMorgan. JPMorgan’s policies prohibit employees from offering, directly or indirectly, a favorable research rating or specific price target, or offering to change a rating or price target, to a subject company as consideration or inducement for the receipt of business or for compensation. JPMorgan also prohibits its research analysts from being compensated for involvement in investment banking transactions except to the extent that such participation is intended to benefit investors. IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates do not provide tax advice. Accordingly, any discussion of U.S. tax matters included herein (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, in connection with the promotion, marketing or recommendation by anyone not affiliated with JPMorgan Chase & Co. of any of the matters addressed herein or for the purpose of avoiding U.S. tax-related penalties. JPMorgan is a marketing name for investment banking businesses of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries worldwide. Securities, syndicated loan arranging, financial advisory and other investment banking activities are performed by a combination of J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., J.P. Morgan plc, J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd. and the appropriately licensed subsidiaries of JPMorgan Chase & Co. in Asia-Pacific, and lending, derivatives and other commercial banking activities are performed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. JPMorgan deal team members may be employees of any of the foregoing entities. This presentation does not constitute a commitment by any JPMorgan entity to underwrite, subscribe for or place any securities or to extend or arrange credit or to provide any other services. T H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E ST H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E S

Why?—allowing banks to finance power responsibly Government policy and proposed legislation in the United States is creating significant uncertainty around potential carbon costs This uncertainty is increasingly affecting the ability of power developers and utilities to advance coal-based power projects beyond the regulatory approval stage As a result, project sponsors are losing the coal option, potentially increasing the industry’s dependence on natural gas which is subject to volatile price swings and growing dependence on imported LNG In this environment of tension between carbon uncertainty and the need for a balanced supply portfolio, several leading financial institutions have developed an approach to assessing carbon risk that is both responsible and responsive to the concerns of investors, regulators and other stakeholders As lenders, our goal is to help our clients provide reliable, low cost power to their customers As financial institutions we have a duty to indicate potential risks to investors, including carbon risks We have developed the Carbon Principles as a set of common beliefs among leading banks, environmental groups and power companies that stresses the need for a balanced portfolio of investment options The adopting banks are committed to applying the Enhanced Diligence Process to applicable transactions to include a review of carbon risks as part of our overall diligence The Principles and Enhanced Diligence creates a robust process to provide greater comfort that project sponsors and their lenders are addressing a wide range of issues around proposed coal plants, including carbon risks The Carbon Principles were developed to allow for the financing of new electric power generation through a responsible and robust process, addressing lender and investor concerns around carbon risk while working with sponsors to meet the future power needs of their customers 1 T H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E ST H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E S

Current environment is a legislative patchwork There is growing expectation of a national climate change policy in the next five years that will limit or tax the release of carbon dioxide by power generators. However, in the interim some regions and state have already advanced their own initiatives to limit CO 2 in what could become a patchwork of localized programs Climate Stewardship Act of 2003 (McCain-Lieberman) 2000 levels by 2010 Climate and Economy Insurance Act of 2005 (Bingaman) 2.4% yearly reduction in intensity during 2010—2019; 2.8% yearly reduction in intensity during 2020—2024 Strong Economy and Climate Protection Act of 2006 (Feinstein) discussion draft (03/06) 2006 levels through 2010; 5% yearly reduction during 2011—2015; 1% yearly reduction during 2016— 2020; 7.25% below current levels in 2020 Clean Air Planning Act of 2006 (Carper) S levels in 2010—2014; 2001 levels in 2015 CO 2 from electric generation sector. (05/06) Safe Climate Act of 2006 (Waxman) H.R levels in 2010; 1990 levels in 2020; 80% below 1990 levels in (07/06) Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act (Jeffords) S levels in 2020; 27% below 1990 by 2030; 53% below 1990 by 2040; 80% below 1990 levels in (07/06) America’s Climate Security Act (Lieberman, Warner) S % below 2005 levels in 2020; 30% below 2005 by 2030; 50% below 2005 by 2040; 70% below 2005 levels in (10/07) Proposed national legislation West Coast Governors initiative/WGA Powering the plains Powering the plains/WGA NEG_ECP/RGGI Southwest climate change initiative/RGGI WGA RGGI NEG_ECP Numerous states have adopted Renewable Portfolio Standards or Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets, independent of National and Regional initiatives Regional initiatives 2 T H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E ST H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E S

Note: The 450—550 ppm CO 2 eq stabilization target is similar to the one used in the Stern Review. Stabilization lines for atmospheric CO 2 equivalent concentrations of 450 and 550 pp represent reductions the US would need to achieve in tandem with immediate and significant commitments from all industrialized countries and the eventual cooperation of all major developing country emitters to prevent atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations from exceeding 450ppm or 550 ppm based on the multi-stage scenario used in this study The Union of Concerned Scientists have prepared a similar analysis, but it targets the lower 450 ppm target. See Figure 3a in ucsusa.org/global_warming/science/emissionstarget.html Carbon policy uncertainty raises cost concerns Uncertainty around the nature and form of a national program creates concerns about the future level of reductions required and the resulting costs to meet those reductions. Banks can no longer assume a business as usual approach to long term financings in the power industry Source: World resources institute. For a full discussion of underlying methodology, assumptions and references, please see wri.org/usclimatetargets. WRI does not endorse any of these bills. This analysis is for comparative purposes only. Data post–2030 may be derived from extrapolation of EIA projections Comparison of legislative climate change targets in the 110th Congress, 1990—2020—September 17, 2007 (million metric tons CO 2e ) Business as actual Historical emissions Bingaman–Specter no price cap Lieberman–McCainOlver–Gilchrest Lieberman–Warner draft outline Bingaman–Specter conditional targetKerry–SnoweSanders–Boxer, Waxman Bingaman–Specter rnge with price cap (projected only through 2030) Stabilize at 45—550ppm 3 T H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E ST H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E S

A groundbreaking collaborative effort Current adopters Environmental advisors The Carbon Principles are the culmination of a year-long collaborative effort by several leading financial institutions in the power space, in conjunction with their industry clients and leading environmental groups to create a responsible and responsive approach to examining carbon risk Industry advisors 4 T H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E ST H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E S

What are the carbon principles? The Carbon Principles are a common set of beliefs that a balanced portfolio approach is needed in the power industry to meet future needs. This balanced portfolio includes Energy efficiency The best way to limit CO 2 emissions is to not produce them Renewable and low-carbon energy technologies Renewable energy and low carbon help meet electricity needs while also leveraging American technology and creating jobs Conventional and advanced generation Conventional or advanced generating facilities will be needed to meet demand, including power from natural gas, coal and nuclear technologies When a client has selected a coal-fired power plant as the best supply option for its customers, the Carbon Principles banks will apply the Enhanced Diligence Process to assess the potential carbon related risks of that investment as part of our overall diligence procedures 5 T H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E ST H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E S

When do the Principles apply? All new construction or expansions of coal-fired power plants with a net increase greater than 200MW Built by investor-owned entities, public or private Located in the United States It does not apply to non-coal plants, municipal or co-op owned plants, or plants less than 200MW This would cover approximately 70% of planned new MWs of coal generation in the United States What plants will be covered by the Carbon Principles? When leading a Project Financing with known use of proceeds When leading a Corporate Financing where the borrower has represented that they have a coal plant under construction or scheduled to begin construction within the next six months In which situations will the adopting financial institutions apply the Enhanced Diligence? Within six months of adopting the Carbon Principles When will the adopting financial institutions start implementing this process? Construction of new coal power plant in Illinois, 6 T H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E ST H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E S

What is the enhanced diligence process? The Enhanced Diligence Process is meant to supplement the due diligence a financial institution would normally engage in during a financing. It is meant to probe deeper into the risks surrounding future carbon policy and evaluate the extent to which these risks have been considered and/or mitigated during the planning stage The Enhanced Due Diligence Process does NOT Pre-suppose an outcome Judge a power company’s supply choice Mandate specific carbon price hurdles, policy assumptions, or technology choices Each financial institution will make its own diligence judgments on any financing in which the Enhanced Diligence Process is employed The Enhanced Due Diligence Process does Provide lenders with a process by which to evaluate a proposed financing against a range of potential carbon emissions policy assumptions and expected costs Assess the economic viability of proposed financings under a range of carbon price scenarios Encourage consideration of assumptions that err on the side of caution until more clarity around anticipated carbon policies becomes available Examine the strategies of the project sponsor to mitigate these carbon related risks Promote a discussion around a company’s overall strategy supply strategy, including energy efficiency and renewable efforts where applicable 7 T H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E ST H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E S

All documents are available at carbonprinciples.org 8 T H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E ST H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E S

The future of the Carbon Principles The Next Steps for the Carbon Principles include Recruiting additional financial institutions to adopt the Principles Educating our power industry clients on the intent and implications of the principles Working with our municipal clients to lay the groundwork for expanding the Principles to the municipal finance market Ensuring that implementation deadlines are met and sharing best-practices among adoptees Maintaining an ongoing dialogue among the adoptees and the industry and environmental advisors 9 T H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E ST H E C A R B O N P R I N C I P L E S