David Fuller Dept. of Physical Therapy McKnight Brain Institute University of Florida R03 and R21: When Are They Appropriate? GMS 6096:

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Choosing a Journal APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.

Advertisements

Peer Review Process and Responding to Reviewers APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.

ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.

The Art of Publishing Aka “just the facts ma’am”.

An Applicant’s Perspectives on the New NIH Changes Grover C. Gilmore.

Specific Aims or Selling your Science in One Page Pedro Fernandez-Funez Assistant Professor of Neurology and Neuroscience

Submission Process. Overview Preparing for submission The submission process The review process.

Preparing and Submitting an External Grant Proposal: Tips for Navigating the Intersection of Science, Schools and SPA Moderator: Joanne Sobeck, Ph.D.,

Grant Writing 101 “ There is no grantsmanship that will turn a bad idea into a good one, but there are many ways to disguise a good idea.” - Norm Braverman,

Grant Writing: Specific Aims and Study Design Zuo-Feng Zhang, MD, PhD EPIDEMIOLOGY

Lecture 2 Psyc 300A. Where Do Research Ideas Come From? Curiosity In mature areas, there are usually competing theories Theory-based research will usually.

Chapter 12 – Strategies for Effective Written Reports

How to write successful proposals a personal perspective by Moti Segev.

Writing a Research Paper

Grants for Lunch: Recycling your Grant Proposal William J Calhoun MD FACP FCCP FAAAAI Sealy and Smith Distinguished Professor of Internal Medicine Director:

Writing a Grant: Focus on Mentored Awards J. Randall Curtis, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine University of Washington, Seattle,

PRESENTER: DR. ROBERT KLESGES PROFESSOR OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AND MEMBER, DEPARTMENT OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND.

How to present your project?. A simple 3-part template A.Introduction B.Body C.Conclusion.

Final Year Dissertation Advice Daniel Bryant Software Systems Group Dept. of Computing.

Presentation  Publication A few random thoughts.

Senior Seminar - Intro. message from a former Env. Sci. BC major I guess, I just wanted to see what you are up to, and also to thank you because as I.

Getting Funded: How to write a good grant

Grant Writing/Comprehensive Workshop Paul R. Albert, Ph. D

David Lodowski APPLYING FOR A K99. K99/R00 PROVIDES 2 PHASES OF SUPPORT 1 st Phase: mentored support 90,000/year for up to 2 years* with at least 1 year.

How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.

FISH 521 Peer review. Peer review Mechanics Advantages Challenges Solutions.

Publishing Your Work Jennifer L. West, Ph.D. Cameron Professor of Bioengineering and Director, Institute of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Rice University.

Lecture 2: Project Concept Document

THE NIH REVIEW PROCESS David Armstrong, Ph.D.

Writing a Grant: Some Basics Landon S. King, M.D..

Pearls to get your grants funded Steven Kornblau.

NIH – CSR and ICs. The Academic Gerontocracy Response to the Crisis Early investigator status: first real grant application. K awards, R13s etc don’t.

Strategies for Effective Grantwriting Katherine (Katie) McGraw Howard University Graduate School Responsible Conduct of Research Workshop October 25, 2011.

So, how do I make 10/10 on my lab report?

The Art of Scientific Writing. Goals of Scientific Writing  Making a clear presentation of a complex scientific problem/accomplishment  Addressing a.

Writing Successful Research Grant Proposals

Contact information Dan Lessner Assistant Professor Department of Biological Sciences Arkansas Center for Space and Planetary Sciences Cell and Molecular.

Dr. Dinesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of ENT, GMC Amritsar.

How to do Quality Research for Your Research Paper

ENHANCING PEER REVIEW Changes to Application Forms and Instructions October 6, 2009.

What is research and how should it be displayed? What do I need to do research? How do I present what I am doing?

ABSTRACT Function: An abstract is a summary of the entire work that helps readers to decide whether they want to read the rest of the paper. (HINT…write.

Submitting Medical Papers for Publication (How to avoid getting kicked in the stomach) and Reviewing Medical Papers (How to kick others in the stomach.

STRATEGIES FOR SUCCESS 1. Build and Sustain a Vital Research Environment Understand the NIH extramural research program –Know the guidelines, deadlines,

Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.

Submitting Manuscripts to Journals: An Editor’s Perspective Michael K. Lindell Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center Texas A&M University.

NIH Challenge Grants in Health and Science Research RFA OD

Writing a Research Manuscript GradWRITE! Presentation Student Development Services Writing Support Centre University of Western Ontario.

NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 5 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.

© A. Kwasinski, 2014 ECE 2795 Microgrid Concepts and Distributed Generation Technologies Spring 2015 Week #7.

Components of a Successful AREA (R15) Grant Rebecca J. Sommer Bates College.

Diego E. Rincon-Limas. Ph.D. GMS 6096: Introduction to NIH Grant Writing for Biomedical Sciences University of Florida Departments of Neurology and Neuroscience.

Donna Johnson 2721 Oregon Street Lawrence, KS (785) Preparing Your Grant Application Tips to Keep.

Science Fair By Kimberly Albertson.

Grant Basics Traci Merrill Assistant Director, Sponsored Programs October 6, 2011.

Thoughts on grant writing David Fuller Dept. of Physical Therapy McKnight Brain Institute University of Florida GMS 6096: Introduction.

FEMS Microbiology Ecology Getting Your Work Published Telling a Compelling Story Working with Editors and Reviewers Jim Prosser Chief Editor FEMS Microbiology.

Medical Writing How to get funded and published November 2003.

Diego E. Rincon-Limas. Ph.D. GMS 6096: Introduction to NIH Grant Writing for Biomedical Sciences University of Florida Departments of Neurology and Neuroscience.

Preparing a Written Report Prepared by: R Bortolussi MD FRCPC and Noni MacDonald MD FRCPC.

Insider Guide to Peer Review for Applicants Dr. Valerie Durrant Acting Director CSR Division of Neuroscience, Development and Aging.

How Research Gets Funded A report by Wayne Wakeland from a workshop given at PSU in late Sept. ’06 by The Grant Institute.

Maybe there’s a grant for that… PowerPoint Adapted From: Teresa Evans, Ph.D. Career Development Coordinator Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences UTHSCSA.

Response to Prior Review and Resubmission Strategies Yuqing Li, Ph.D Division of Movement Disorders Department of Neurology Center for Movement Disorders.

Making Grant Writing Successful Dara O’Neil Georgia Institute of Technology 26 October 2000.

Research Strategy: Approach Frank Sellke, MD Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery Brown Medical School Providence RI AATS Grant Course 2011.

Presenter: dr. Robert Klesges Professor of Preventive Medicine

Do you see what I see? You may want to ask the students to share their ideas about what they think this EN lesson will be about.

The Process of Getting Published: Reviews and Rejection

K R Investigator Research Question

Presentation transcript:

David Fuller Dept. of Physical Therapy McKnight Brain Institute University of Florida R03 and R21: When Are They Appropriate? GMS 6096: Introduction to NIH Grant writing for biomedical sciences Jan 30, 2013

*My thoughts on grant writing, and some comments about RO3 vs. R21 *, just my opinions David Fuller Dept. of Physical Therapy McKnight Brain Institute University of Florida

How do grants get funded? My view: 3 key considerations

How do grants get funded? Good idea VERY clearly presented Luck / Good planning

The next series of slides will provide an overview of what I think are some of the most important aspects of a successful grant application *, just my opinions

Assume nothing except that the reader will be intelligent

Read successful grants. Lots of them.

Templates usually don’t work What is great art?

Use all available resources People: Equipment:

A unifying central hypothesis A good idea when possible. It often makes the grant easier to read.

The Aims page should read like a (good) novel Tell a story. Help the reader. Write the review for the reviewer.

Choose your study section carefully Use the cover letter. Do NOT suggest specific names of reviewers.

Preliminary data New vs. Senior Investigator New vs. established method Central vs. peripheral hypothesis Often new investigators have more preliminary data than they think…

Never, ever “just submit and see what happens”

Do not wait until the last minute for: Abstract Rebuttal Vertebrate animals Personal statements Etc.

Acronyms are almost always a terrible idea

Figures & tables need to be very easy to read

Revise, Tweak, Proofread …. at least 100x

Resubmissions Should I resubmit? Address all concerns The rebuttal is perhaps the most important part of the document

Be prepared to admit that aspects of your initial idea (or maybe the entire idea) is/are bad Be prepared to admit that your initial writing is bad and needs to be completely “blown up” Resubmissions

R21 vs. RO3

R21

Consider carefully if the submission should be an RO1

R21: my experience 2 grants:

RO3

RO3: my experience

Thank You