EEMC Calibration in 2004 MIP signature w/ SMD Absolute gains for SMD, pre/post-shower, towers HV setup scheme for 2005 running Jan Balewski, IUCF Joint.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Advertisements

Progress on ERT  0 efficiency study Spin PWG June 6,2002 LVL-1 meeting June 14,2002 Analysis meeting June 14,2002 Kensuke Okada.
 Trigger for Run 8 Rates, Yields, Backgrounds… Debasish Das Pibero Djawotho Manuel Calderon de la Barca Analysis Meeting BNL October 16, 2007.
JNM Dec Annecy, France The High Resolution Fly’s Eye John Matthews University of Utah Department of Physics and High Energy Astrophysics Institute.
Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in p+p collisions at E CM =200 GeV Mike Miller (MIT) For the STAR collaboration.
Preshower 15/03/2005 P.Kokkas Preshower September Run Data Analysis P. Kokkas.
Measurement of charmonia at mid-rapidity at RHIC-PHENIX  c  J/   e + e -  in p+p collisions at √s=200GeV Susumu Oda CNS, University of Tokyo For.
1 HLT – a source of calibration data One of the main tasks of HLT (especially in the first years) –Monitoring of the detector performance –Analysing calibration.
Search for Thermal Photons in PHENIX - Torsten Dahms - Stony Brook University 23 rd Winter Workshop On Nuclear Dynamics February 13, 2007.
M.Gallinaro, ``Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors’’, Siena, October slide 1 The CDF MiniPlug Calorimeter Forward Physics Conceptual.
Jan Balewski, MIT FGT Project Review January 7-8, 2008 Detector requirements Disk layout e+/e- separation e/h discrimination Simu GEM response Strip layout,
ACD calibrations Pedestals Measured from online script Measure PHA w/ HV off, no charge injection Use cyclic triggers ~ ADC counts, very narrow.
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
Cosmic Rays Data Analysis with CMS-ECAL Mattia Fumagalli (Università di Milano Bicocca) CIAO!
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Tracking System in Run-2 Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab (for the PHENIX Collaboration) –Detector Commissioning –Detector.
ICD Energy Calibration Andy White January 16, 2002.
1 Shower maximum detector (SMD) is a wire proportional counter – strip readout detector using gas amplification. SMD is used to provide a spatial resolution.
1 Alessandra Casale Università degli Studi di Genova INFN Sezione Genova FT-Cal Prototype Simulations.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Some notes on ezTree and EMC data in MuDst Marco van Leeuwen, LBNL.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
Photon-jet reconstruction with the EEMC – Deuxième Partie Pibero Djawotho Indiana University Cyclotron Facility June 18, 2008 STAR.
Photon and  -Jet Reconstruction in the STAR Endcap EMC; Towards  -Jet Constraints on  G W. W. Jacobs Indiana University for the CollaborationSTAR 
A N DY Status Commissioning with colliding beams (p  +p  at  s=500 GeV) L.C.Bland, for AnDY 8 March 2011 Time Meeting, BNL.
The status of high p T Non-photonic electron-hadron correlations in AuAu 200GeV collisions Wenqin Xu University of California, Los Angeles For the STAR.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL, Feb 2005 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software update L3 display 200 GeV February.
UC Davis June st Rosi Reed Low Energy Test Run Results Rosi Reed University of California at Davis.
PHOS offline status report Dmitri Peressounko ALICE offline week,
The Electromagnetic Calorimeter – 2005 Operation J. Sowinski for the Collaboration and the Builders Indiana Univ. Michigan State Univ. ANL MIT BNL Penn.
LHCf Report Takashi SAKO for the LHCf Collaboration 18-Dec-2009 CERN Main Auditorium.
R&D Studies of a Lead-Scintillating Fiber Calorimeter as a STAR Forward Detector Prashanth Shanmuganathan (for FCal group at STAR)  Physics and R&D goals.
 -bin Number Tower Calibration (ch/GeV) Desired E T matched gain s  =1.0  =2.0 from electrons slopesMIPs EEMC Towers Calibration Run 3 p+p Used 4 methods.
Non-photonic electron production in p+p collisions at √s=200 GeV Xiaozhi Bai for the STAR collaboration Central China Normal University University of Illinois.
STAR J/  Trigger in dA Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Trigger Workshop at BNL October 21, 2002.
FNAL Beam test results A. Zhang, V. Bhopatkar, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, M. Hohlmann HEP Group A, Florida Tech 2013/11/18.
Mike Miller First measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in p+p collisions at E CM =200 GeV M.L. Miller (MIT) Motivations: 1.Baseline for inclusive.
(s)T3B Update – Calibration and Temperature Corrections AHCAL meeting– December 13 th 2011 – Hamburg Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
STAR Collaboration meeting, Nantes Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC analysis update Just to remember … What we have done.
E-EMC developments and plan Jan Balewski IUCF, Indiana Detector status Run 3 goals Calibration Software status STAR Analysis Meeting BNL, October
Reconstructing energy from HERD beam test data Zheng QUAN IHEP 3 rd HERD work shop Xi’an, 20 Jan
2000/9/23 JPS meeting in Niigata1 Measurement of single gamma and  0 with PHENIX EMCal (I) H.Torii Kyoto Univ./RIKEN for the PHENIX Collaboration. Sep/23/2000,
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
1 NCC Task Force Richard Seto NCC Task Force Meeting Jan 8, 2007 BNL.
LHCf Detectors Sampling Calorimeter W 44 r.l, 1.6λ I Scintilator x 16 Layers Position Detector Scifi x 4 (Arm#1) Scilicon Tracker x 4(Arm#2) Detector size.
Abstract Abdul-Salam 5, D. Arkhipkin 2, S. Chatopadhyay 4, T.M. Cormier 5, W. Dong 1, S. Guertin 1, M.M. de Moura 3, A. Pavlinov 5, A. Stolpovsky 5, A.
Outline Motivation The STAR/EMC detector Analysis procedure Results Final remarks.
Vertex Reconstruction for High Luminosity pp Running at STAR STAR-Spin luminosity requirements Method of the vertex reconstruction Application to the pileup.
Inclusive  0 Production in Polarized pp Collisions Using the STAR Endcap and Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeters Jason C. Webb for the STAR Collaboration.
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
EEMC STAR Jan Balewski, IUCF, Indiana STAR Collaboration Meeting MSU, August 2003 Upper Structure Mounted 8/1/2003 Run 3 hardware calibration.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
0 Characterization studies of the detector modules for the CBM Silicon Tracking System J.Heuser 1, V.Kyva 2, H.Malygina 2,3, I.Panasenko 2 V.Pugatch 2,
eTOF - status and plan CBM-STAR joint Workshop Outline Introduction
Elena Bruna Yale University
Shower detector status report
Approved Plots from CMS Cosmic Runs (mostly CRUZET, some earlier)
GLAST LAT tracker signal simulation and trigger timing study
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
Takafumi Niida from Univ. of Tsukuba for the PHENIX Collaborations
First physics from the ALICE electromagnetic calorimeters
Takafumi Niida from Univ. of Tsukuba for the PHENIX Collaborations
Status report Minjung Kim
Gluon Gluon to jpsi jpsi
Inclusive p0 Production in Polarized pp Collisions using the STAR Endcap Calorimeter Jason C. Webb, Valparaiso University, for the STAR Collaboration Outline.
Presentation transcript:

EEMC Calibration in 2004 MIP signature w/ SMD Absolute gains for SMD, pre/post-shower, towers HV setup scheme for 2005 running Jan Balewski, IUCF Joint EMC Meeting December 3, 2004

2 6-Fold Response of EEMC  =2.0 bin=1  =1.08 bin=12 STAR IP Endcap PROJECTIVE TOWER ( T ) Pre Shower P Q Post Shower R Shower Max U V No tracking No tracking Why calibration with fast detectors only ? Endcap

3 METHOD: MIPs from Isolated Pairs of SMD Strips Murad Sarsour +JB, IUCF SMD cross section U & V planes are orthogonal in each sector vertex Slopes used to relative gain match of strips U-plane Strip ID V-plane Strip ID N N Sector 5 MIP’s from UxV

4 Units are average energy deposit of MIP going perpendicular through the SMD plain constrain on gains: Absolute SMD Calibration   0 = 1.3 MeV MIP z y vertex Pair energy E 1+2 MIP spectrum for 20 strip pairs MPV of Landau fit 1.3 MeV Strip ID Gain Correction (slopes used as input)

5 Distribution of SMD gains HV change will reduce spread to some extent

6 Units are energy deposit of MIP going perpendicular through tile Formula for gains from Landau fit to MIP peak reco of actual energy deposit in a tile reco of energy equivalent to MIP perp to tile Absolute Pre/Post-shower Calibration     0 = a *d  /dx MIP a  E(  )=  0 / tgh(  ) MIP spectrum for tile 05PA06 MPV of Landau fit only charge track vertex z y any particle: charge track, ,  

7 Pre/Post-shower absolute gains Gains from slopes (a.u.) M P V of MIP Preshower 2 Sector 5

8 Absolute Calibration of Towers (sectors 5-8) use 6 ‘o’ in ooxxoo or ooxoo in UxV patterns (veto ~2 x 4cm ) require pres1, pres2, post > thres= ped+5chan Tower 07TD7 Raw spectrum (1.5 M eve) MIP spectrum (280 eve) Gains from MIPs w/ TPC (P. Zolnierczuk) Gains from MIPs w/ SMD Eta bin 5 Eta bin 8 Eta bin 11 Eta bin 6 Eta bin 9 Eta bin 12

9 Tower gains summary sectors 5-8 Goal +/- 10% ET=60 ADC=4095

10 Tower gains for sectors 1-4 and 9-12 No SMD installed in 2004 use slopes absolute (eta dependent) scale from calibrated sect. 5-8 use only runs with slow detectors (less corruption)

11 Murad & Jan want to thank: Dave – produce ezTree for bulk of pp200 data Iwona, Ernst – disk LBL & assistance

12 Summary for 2004 data EEMC is calibrated for 2004 data MIP’s define gains for individual towers in sectors 5-8 and all pre/post-shower tiles Slopes define relative gains for individual towers in sectors 1-4, 9-12 and all SMD strips. Absolute scale for all EEMC set by MIP’s pi0’s will be used to set the final energy scale for towers, once available, perhaps 10-20% change

13 HV setup scheme for 2005 running Towers: -Find average gain per eta bin -Change HV for outliers above 10% -Use slopes to confirm relative gains SMD, Pre, Post-shower: - Equalize MAPMT’s 2-3M minB (fast detector only) events is enough to repeat MIP calib for all elements Perhaps not needed?

14 Backup

15 MIP gains vs. AuAu62 slops, SMD