THE CROSS-BORDER JUSTICE SCHEME DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ARREST.
Advertisements

HIPAA Privacy Practices. Notice A copy of the current DMH Notice must be posted at each service site where persons seeking DMH services will be able to.
Rev. 2/05. For Use in Law Enforcement Training Only This training program was developed by the New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice This training program.
Our role Guardianship Board. Presentation will consist of: Overview of the Guardianship Board Key activities Challenges into the future The process Applications.
Towards a framework for integrated cross-border law enforcement initiatives Based on the Consultation Paper circulated to CACOLE in July 2008 by Public.
Bali Process Technical Expert Workshop on Mutual Legal Assistance and Law Enforcement Bangkok, Thailand, June 2011 Celia Maunder International Crime Cooperation.
Intro to the courts & Magistrates’ Court Jurisdiction
Donna Monk MAPPA Co-ordinator.  Understand the purpose and function of MAPPA  Understand the language and terminology of MAPPA  Explore the framework.
Neglected Adults Eastern Health Community Supports Program.
 "Judicial agency" means the district court and officers thereof, including the judge, the prosecutor, and the clerk of court, the Crime Victims Reparations.
1 ICAOS 2011 Rule Amendment Presentation for Deputy Compact Administrators & Compact Office Staff Presented by:
April 2006 South Pacific Council of Youth and Children’s Courts 2006 Tasmanian Conference “ The Child Protection System and Magistrates Courts - A Focus.
Cooperating Teacher Orientation
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 3/1/2014]
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 5/18/2012]
The Criminal Courts: Procedure and Sentencing
Misspent Youth - Opportunities for Juvenile Justice Address by The Hon Wayne Martin Chief Justice of Western Australia JOHN CURTIN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC.
ICAOS Training 102-Transferring Supervision [Revision 4/24/2015] Be Ready for a Test at the End.
Chapter 2 The criminal investigation process. In this chapter, you will look at the role of police and the courts in the criminal investigation process.
NSW Interagency Guidelines for Child Protection Intervention 2006 Briefing Information Session Child Protection Senior Officers Group.
UNITS 1 and 2: THE EUROPEAN JUDICIAL AREA IN CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL MATTERS. THE JUDGE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE EUROPEAN JUDICIAL AREA Joaquín Delgado.
Legal Studies 3C.  The criminal justice system is a system of laws and rulings which protect community members and their property. It determines which.
LtCol Schotemeyer HQMC, VWAP Parties involved in the VWAP  Component Responsible Official (SJA to CMC)  Local Responsible Official (Installation.
National Electronic Conveyancing Legal Framework First Stakeholder Meeting SYDNEY 16 May 2011.
Canadian Criminal Justice Association Congress October, 2011 COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES A PARTNERSHIP APPROACH TO PUBLIC SAFETY David Pisapio, Correctional.
VICTIMS’ RIGHTS New EU Directive establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime 20 September 2012 CABVIS Conference.
Moving Forward With the African Dialogue Cross-Border Principles By Mary Gurure Manager, Legal Services and Compliance COMESA Competition Commission Lilongwe,
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Privacy and the Civil Commitment Process Allyson K. Tysinger Assistant Attorney General June 4-5, 2008.
Lecture 4. OUTCOMES What must the equity plan include?. What must affirmative action measures include? Which factors are taken into account in determining.
ICAOS Training 103-Supervision in the Receiving State [Revision 12/1/2014] Be Ready for a Test at the End.
Data Protection Act & Freedom of Information Simon Mansell Corporate Governance and Information Team.
1 ICAOS 2008 Rule Amendment Presentation for Deputy Compact Administrators & Compact Office Staff Presented by:
NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Child Sex Offender Disclosure Scheme Detective Sergeant Louise Wall National Coordinator for the Child Sex Offender Disclosure.
Child Justice Act 75 of 2008 The Preliminary Inquiry 2010 Presentation courtesy Mr. P I Singh, KZNJetCom.
Washington – Oregon ICPC Border Agreement Training.
HIPAA PRACTICAL APPLICATION WORKSHOP Orientation Module 1B Anderson Health Information Systems, Inc.
Early Release Schemes in Hong Kong Mr. Kenneth LEUNG Principal Officer Hong Kong Correctional Services Department.
Changes to the Youth Re-offending Measure. YJB position statement The YJB supports the concept of the new measure and the advantages it presents for aligning.
Chapter 5 Young offenders. In this chapter, you will look at how the law deals with young offenders. You will study the age of criminal responsibility.
1 Alberta Association of Police Governance Calgary, Alberta May 1, 2010 Rev
IM NETWORK MEETING 20 TH JULY, 2010 CONSULTATION WITH 3 RD PARTIES.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
11 CHANGES IN ARREST POWERS IN HB NOTE: Officers should have a copy of DOCJT handout entitled: “House Bill 463 Training Letter” “House Bill 463.
Reportable Assaults: Managing “the discretion” Rueben Sakey Quality and Systems Review Advisor Presentation to the Operational Leadership Committee 1 September.
Detention and Questioning under PACE When a suspect is arrested the basic procedure is that they should be taken as soon as practicable to a designated*
1 ICAOS Mini Training Rule Mandatory Retaking Violent Offenders and Violent Crimes & Rules & Absconders Presented by: Training.
SEARCH POWERS PILOT S44-47 UK BORDERS ACT 2007 Police Training Presentation Central Policy Unit.
1 ASSESSING YOUR CHILD’S NEEDS DISABILITY ACT 2005 PART 2.
DATA AND CRIMINAL RECORDS KEEPING UNDER THE ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 2015 A PAPER PRESENTED TO THE COMMISSION BY E. C. OTTI ESQ. PROSECUTION.
Navigating the Justice System. 4-1  Describe the seven phases of the criminal justice process.  Identify at least two key victims’ rights in each phase.
Advocacy and Legal Advice Centre - Internal procedures -
The National Quality Standard The National Quality Standard (NQS) is a key aspect of the NQF and sets a national benchmark for early childhood education.
Transforming prisons into correctional centres - places of new beginnings Monitoring of offenders placed under Section 62(f) – Criminal Procedure Act (No.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
GCSE ICT Data and you: The Data Protection Act. Loyalty cards Many companies use loyalty cards to encourage consumers to use their shops and services.
LONDON’S COMPULSORY SOBRIETY PILOT CEP Conference on Electronic Monitoring in Europe “An innovative response to the London Alcohol Challenge” April 2016.
Non-refoulement and asylum procedures at the border The role of Border Guard in ensuring unhindered access to asylum procedures MAJ IWONA PRZYBYŁOWICZ.
CRIMINAL PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES. WHAT EXACTLY ARE CRIMINAL PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES?  Processes and procedures that occur before a trial or hearing commences.
1 Rule Amendments Effective March 1, Summary of Amendments Rule (East Region) Rule (West Region & Rules Committee) Rule (East.
Article III: The Judicial Branch Chapters: 11,12
Enforcing Firearms Surrender
Learning Objectives Describe the seven phases of the criminal justice process. Identify at least two key victims’ rights in each phase of the criminal.
Portfolio Committee on Police DNA National Forensics Oversight and Ethics Board 23 November 2016.
New Legislation: Infringements
Probation Conditions for the WELLS CIRCUIT COURT
Data Protection What’s new about The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) May 2018? Call Kerry on Or .
Navigating the Justice System
Portfolio Committee on Police DNA National Forensics Oversight and Ethics Board 23 November 2016.
Adult Support and Protection in Prison Settings
Presentation transcript:

THE CROSS-BORDER JUSTICE SCHEME DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

The Cross-border Justice Scheme is a historical partnership between: Western Australia Northern Territory, and South Australia. It effectively removes the borders in the outback region where they meet. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE HISTORIC PARTNERSHIP

THE REGION WE ARE TALKING ABOUT / NPY SERVICES DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

OBJECTIVES OF THE SCHEME In an Australian first, there is effectively no legal state boundaries in this region for offenders to cross and escape justice. Police, magistrates, prisons, community corrections and juvenile justice officers of one jurisdiction are now able deal with offences that may have occurred in another of the participating jurisdictions. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

REASON FOR THE SCHEME Offenders, particularly those charged with an assault and in particular involving family violence, frequently have eluded apprehension by crossing jurisdictional borders where Police have had no power of arrest without an Interstate Warrant of Extradition. The Cross-border Justice Scheme provides a safer environment for women and children in the Cross-border Justice region and gives communities the confidence to report crimes knowing that the justice system can now follow offenders across the border. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

MAKING IT LAW Inter-Governmental Agreement: signed in 2007 by Attorney’s-General of each jurisdiction is the overarching Agreement for the project. Cross-border Justice Act: came into affect in 2008 in WA And 2009 in NT and SA. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE Service Level Agreements (SLAs) /MOUs exist between: police corrections (custodial, community corrections, juvenile justice), and courts. SLAs/MOUs sit underneath the Inter-Governmental Agreement and comply with the Cross-border Justice Act. A set of protocols also exist for each portfolio detailing day to day procedures.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE To use the scheme any one of the following three triggers must exist: 1. An offender must have committed the offence in the prescribed region; OR 2.An offender must normally reside in the prescribed region; OR 3.The offender is arrested in the prescribed region for an offence committed inside or even outside of the region. TRIGGERS TO ACTIVATE THE SCHEME

DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE Police have a Memorandum of Understanding that addresses how they work together across the Prescribed Region. Their powers are unique and they already do work together on major policing matters. This law allows the three Police forces to work much closer together and to arrest offenders in each other’s jurisdiction without the need for expensive and complicated extradition processes. On line training resources have been developed for each police jurisdiction and those resources are available from their respective training and development areas. POLICE

IMPACTS FOR COURTS DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE Magistrates of a participating jurisdiction are appointed as a magistrate of each of the other participating jurisdictions under that other jurisdiction’s Magistrates Act. Courts follow the laws of the jurisdiction where the offence took place and apply the rules of evidence from that place.

COURTS DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE A Cross-border magistrate’s circuit includes locations in all three Cross-border jurisdictions. Court registrars co-ordinate the movement of Cross- border magistrates and support staff through the circuits of participating jurisdictions. Sittings of Cross-border magistrates are supported by the staff of the jurisdiction in which the cross-border magistrate ordinarily sits. Cross-border registrars also play a role in distributing relevant forms and notifying interstate counterparts of changes to Court rules or legislation that could affect court procedures.

COURTS DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE In the case where a Cross-border magistrate is required to hear an interstate matter the following processes are followed: –The local prosecuting authority will arrange to have an interstate matter listed before a cross-border magistrate and will advise the Home State registry of the arrangement. -A copy of the complaint to be heard by the cross- border magistrate must then be sent by the Home State registry to the cross-border magistrate who will hear the proceedings

COURTS Cross-border registrars also play a role in distributing relevant forms and notifying interstate counterparts of changes to Court rules or legislation that could affect court procedures. At the conclusion of the hearing, registrars co-ordinate the transfer of relevant court files and other documents to the "Home State" registry. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

HOME AND HOLDING (LOCATION) JURISDICTION The rules that affect a prisoner’s custody are dictated by the Home and Location Jurisdiction. The Home Jurisdiction is where the offence took place and it is the laws of that jurisdiction under which the Court process and sentencing takes place. The Holding or Location Jurisdiction is where the offender is being held or supervised. The laws allow for equally reciprocal arrangements. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

CUSTODIAL SERVICES No change has occurred to actual laws and each jurisdiction retains the laws it makes. The scheme simply allows the law of one jurisdiction to be applied in another as though it was applied by a court in the Home Jurisdiction. The rules of custody are no different for an interstate prisoner than a NT prisoner – they are subject to EXACTLY the same management rules including the complaints mechanisms, but there may be different releasing laws. NB: Holding Cross-border prisoners is not part of the Interstate Transfer of Prisoners legislation. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

PRISONER PLACEMENT - REMAND Factors to be considered are largely the personal circumstances of the prisoner and the capacity of the Holding Jurisdiction. The Location Authority Liaison Officer is responsible for determining suitability for holding a prisoner in the NT. The prisoner’s view is to be obtained irrespective of the Court’s view. The final decision is with the intended Holding Jurisdiction and NOT the prisoner or the Court. Community Corrections can assist with this process. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

INFORMATION EXCHANGE - JURISDICTIONS Original Remand Warrants must accompany prisoners. A Prisoner Placement Agreement is to accompany the prisoner. Copies of Warrants of Commitment are to be faxed or ed to the Superintendent of the Receiving Jurisdiction. Acknowledgement is required. Original Warrants of Commitment are to be kept by Home Jurisdiction (Sending Jurisdiction). Medical information is to be provided prior to receipt. Sending Jurisdiction is to provide full medical history, pre-sentence report and reception prison history. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

MANAGEMENT OF PRISONERS The management of the prisoner after a transfer becomes the responsibility of the Holding Jurisdiction, including any coronial involvement, discipline etc, as though the prisoner was sentenced in the NT. The only exception is the releasing mechanism that must comply with the laws of the sentencing jurisdiction. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

PRISONER TO APPEAR IN COURT When a Home Jurisdiction knows a Cross-border prisoner is to appear in a Court, that jurisdiction will contact the Holding Jurisdiction to make the arrangements. Video links should be utilised as much as possible. If a video link is not possible the Home Authority (at their full cost) will liaise with the Holding Jurisdiction to transport a prisoner to the Court. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

RELEASE OF PRISONERS It is the responsibility of the Location ( Holding) Authority to arrange and bear the cost of transport arrangements to the Home Jurisdiction (community) of the prisoner (not just to the border). The Location Authority will liaise with the Home Jurisdiction with respect to the release of a prisoner. It is the responsibility of the Home Authority to calculate and advise on sentence length and release dates. Any Community Corrections supervision is to be arranged with Community Corrections in the Location Jurisdiction, who will advise the Home Jurisdiction. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

PAROLE ISSUES (1) The Parole Notification Reports requested by a Home Jurisdiction will be provided within 8 weeks of a hearing. This is the same for all three jurisdictions. The Home Jurisdiction (that sentencing was under) will determine Parole – not the one where the prisoner is being held – this is compliant with sovereignty. The protocols of Prisons and Community Corrections will dictate costs and processes of these arrangements and Prisons and Community Corrections Officers should meet to make themselves familiar with the relevant laws. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

PAROLE ISSUES (2) Breaches of Parole If the prisoner is arrested on a Revocation or Breach of Parole the prisoner is to be held in the jurisdiction where they were arrested. The Liaison Officers will then discuss the holding arrangements for the prisoner in accordance with the normal process for the holding of prisoners under the Cross-border Justice Scheme. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

IMPACTS FOR COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS Community Corrections have for many years worked routinely across borders in co-operation with other jurisdictions. The Cross-border Justice law means that it is no longer just a ‘favour’; it is now legal that one jurisdictions can supervise an offender on behalf of another jurisdiction. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS Duties of Community Correction officers may include: monitoring and supervision of offenders; supervision of interstate orders; pre-sentence assessments and reports; supervision of parole and re-entry release orders; pre-release planning for prisoners and parole reports; and supervision and co-ordination of community service orders, work orders, and work and development orders. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS Community Correction officers in each participating jurisdiction will be authorised to supervise, and deal generally with matters concerning interstate offenders ie. from anywhere within the cross-border region. Community Correction officers will be able to liaise outside their home state for the purpose of supervising offenders or carrying out other duties related to community-based sentences. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS Key principle: On-going communication, co-ordination, and consultation between the home state and the supervising state. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

EVALUATION The Cross-border Justice Act legislation requires the implementation of the Scheme to be formally evaluated after three years of operation. The University of Tasmania conducted this evaluation in 2012 and A copy of the evaluation is available upon request from the Cross-border Justice Scheme website. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

PROJECT EXECUTIVE GROUP A Project Executive Group (PEG), with senior representation from all jurisdictions oversee the Cross- border Justice Scheme and meet bi-annually. The PEG oversee the operation of the scheme with feedback from specific working groups. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

CROSS-BORDER WORKING GROUPS There are cross-jurisdictional working groups for: Police Prisons Community Corrections Juvenile Justice Courts. Senior officers meet bi-annually or as required to monitor/review and amend (if required) protocols or processes upon advice from operational staff. DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE

FURTHER INFORMATION AND LEGISLATION Northern Territory Cross-Border Justice Act 2009: see South Australia Cross-border Justice Act 2009: Western Australia Cross-border Justice Act 2008: DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE