OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of

20% Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation is the Governor’s signature.

20% Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures Knowledge of Students & Student Learning Knowledge of Content & Instructional Planning Instructional Practice Learning Environment Assessment for Student Learning Professional Responsibilities and Collaboration Professional Growth Growth over time Compared to Expected Growth Some Variables Considered SLOs Required Moment in time or growth Local or Purchased Some Variables Considered SLOs Optional APPR Could be school- wide measure

Overall Differences  Does not impact district decisions with regard to probationary teachers and principals  Subcomponent scores provided by last day of school; summative by September 1 st  Appeals must be timely and expeditious  Submit plans (prescribed form?) to SED for approval by July 1 st (but no penalty until January withhold aid action)  SED will monitor scores (low correlation, inadequate differentiation)  HEDI points (91-100, 75-90, 65-74, 0-64) need to be set up for each of the three components at beginning of the year Revised Regulations

Content of APPR Plan 1. Plan to ensure SED gets all the data they require, including teacher subcomponent scores 2. Assessment development, securing, and scoring procedures 3. Describe how 60% are determined 4. Describe “timely feedback” and provision of subcomponent and summative scores 5. Appeals process 6. Improvement plan process 7. Required certifications (Lead Evaluator, etc.) and process for ensuring reliability over time Revised Regulations

60% Multiple Measures 20% Student Growth Growth over time Compared to Expected Growth Some Variables Considered SLOs Required Revised Regulations Changes:  HEDI point ranges (which can matter when setting SLO Gs)  Some more options mentioned  Score distribution monitored by SED with the right to be inspect assessments in SLOs  3 rd part assessments will not be required for any subjects (but are an option)  Attendance may not be considered

20% Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures Revised Regulations Changes:  HEDI definitions (well-above, meet, below, well-below)  Could use different assessments in different schools if “certified” comparability  Some more options mentioned, including state assessments in a different way  Score distribution monitored by SED  School-wide measures permitted  Attendance may not be considered Moment in time or growth Local or Purchased Some Variables Considered SLOs Optional Could be school- wide measure

60% Multiple Measures Knowledge of Students & Student Learning Knowledge of Content & Instructional Planning Instructional Practice Learning Environment Assessment for Student Learning Professional Responsibilities and Collaboration Professional Growth Revised Regulations Changes:  At least 31 points based on observations (out of the total 60)  At least one observation unannounced (of the multiple observations)  Score distribution monitored by SED  Feedback gathering from parents or students must use approved tool  Stand alone goals no longer permitted

60% Multiple Measures Knowledge of Students & Student Learning Knowledge of Content & Instructional Planning Instructional Practice Learning Environment Assessment for Student Learning Professional Responsibilities and Collaboration Professional Growth APPR Rubrics:  In our BOCES, one of these three being used (so far):  FFT 2007 (ASCD)  FFT 2011 (Teachscape)  Professional Practice (NYSUT & NYSED)

Points: <29 points  Outside, impartial observation  Peer observation  Student feedback  Parent feedback  Other evidence of student development and performance (lesson plans, portfolios, other artifacts) Revised Regulations points  Based on multiple observations  Use an approved rubric

Points: Revised Regulations 60 points  Could all be from the rubric

Points: Revised Regulations >31 points  From the rubric from multiple observations <29 points  From the list of other possibilities, would need system of point determination

Rubrics: FFT 2011  Four Domains  No cost to use rubrics  Can only be used with Teachscape electronic system APPR FFT 2007  Four Domains  No cost to use rubrics  Can be used with 3 rd party electronic systems NYS Practice  NYS Teaching Standards (7)  No cost to use rubrics  Can be used with 3 rd party electronic systems

OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of