National Association for Court Management July, 2008 Good Courts That Effectively Process Cases and Achieve Due Process Brett Taylor Center for Court Innovation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REPORTING VIOLATIONS OF PROBATION
Advertisements

CRIMINAL JUSTICE POLICING IN AMERICA DUTIES OF THE POLICE  4 MAJOR DUTIES Keep the peace Apprehend violators Prevent crime Provide Social Services.
The Scottish Association for the Study of Offending Glasgow Branch Annual Conference 12 May 2008 Community Courts: Bringing Community Justice into the.
Project Director: Brian Ostrom, Ph.D. National Center for State Courts Assessing Consistency & Fairness in Sentencing: A Comparative Study in Three States.
DUI AMENDMENTS PROPOSED BY ART LUSSE JUNE 30, 2010 LAW & JUSTICE INTERIM COMMITTEE.
Yamhill County: Evidence-Based Decision Making (EBDM)
Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Meeting The purpose of community notification is to provide information to protect you and your family,
The judicial system in Albania The judicial power is exercised by the courts of first instance, the courts of appeal and the High Court. Courts may be.
Probation in Albania. Probation Service was established in 2009 Key legal changes in 2008 EU Twinning working with English Probation 10,000 cases in past.
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 3/1/2014]
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 5/18/2012]
Probation Modification and Termination
King County Regional Mental Health Court Navigating the mental health and chemical dependency communities.
Law Enforcement Response. Historically ● Beating one’s wife was not a crime ● Police were not allowed to make arrests in misdemeanor cases - - UNLESS.
Downtown Community Court Canadian Criminal Justice Association CONGRESS 2009 Halifax, Nova Scotia October 30, 2009 Honourable Judge Tom Gove Provincial.
The Brooklyn Task Force, formed under the auspices of the ABA’s Racial Justice Improvement Project.
Probation and Parole Chapter 12.
Chapter 7 Probation Modification and Termination.
Implementation & Recruitment Implementation & Recruitment
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Needs and Gaps FY
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Needs and Gaps FY 2013.
Chapter Seven: Defense Attorneys. The RIGHT TO COUNSEL SIXTH AMENDMENT “In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right…..to have the assistance.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 31 FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE April 3, 2002.
What’s in it for Me?. Recognition Program The Recognition Program requires extra work on the part of a Department. Why do we need to do it???
Free Press/Fair Trial: Prosecutors & the Media Lee Ann Barnhardt Director of Education & Communication ND Supreme Court.
ST. LOUIS FAMILY COURT Judge Jimmie M. Edwards July 21, 2011.
IDB Experience in Justice Reform February 12, 2003.
CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections.
Chapter 16 Sections Objectives: 4.05, 4.09, 6.02, 6.07, 6.08.
Courts and Courtroom Work Groups What are the different levels of courts? Roles of Judges, Prosecutors, and Defense attorneys.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 4 Diversion and Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished 1.
Presentation to the Orange County Board of County Commissioners Chief Judge Belvin Perry, Jr. February 22, 2011.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Welcome to HN 499 Dr. Dawn Burgess: Instructor March Term.
YOUTH JUSTICE.
1 Agenda for 2 nd Class Misc. –Name plates Methods of Statutory Interpretation Warden Grim.
Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections. JUSTIFICATION Reintegration Preparing offenders to return to the community unmarred by further criminal.
The Courts What reporters need to know. Civil and criminal  Criminal law covers harms done against the people.  Examples: Murder, theft, reckless driving.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
Corrections Chapter Twelve Reading
North Carolina Judicial Branch Chapter 13 Section 3.
Constitutional Criminal Procedure
Procedural Law By Felix Romero. Review-Procedural Law “Mandates the steps in the criminal justice process and provides legal protections for criminal.
EOC Review Week 1. Day 2 The Preamble  The Constitution begins with a one sentence introduction called the Preamble.  The Preamble explains the goals.
Navigating the Justice System. 4-1  Describe the seven phases of the criminal justice process.  Identify at least two key victims’ rights in each phase.
Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions 1.  Intermediate sanctions emerged in the 1980s due to three factors: The belief that prisons were being overused Prison.
Procedures in Juvenile Court.  Delinquent or Status Offenses  Police have a broad authority to release or detain the juvenile Minor offense  Issue.
Homeless Court Program Taking the Court to the Streets Presented by Steven R. Binder, Esq. Poverty Law: Academic Activism February 19, 2016 Seattle University.
Trial Procedures.  Trials may be held in either a family court or a youth justice court  Trial follow the same rules of evidence and are equally formal.
February 11, 2016 Welcome 1.Please copy from Content Library “The Federal Court System.” 2.Paste to Unit 5 Tab 3.You may begin Warm-up 71.
This Week’s Focus: What is the Law? What are the Functions of the Law? Where Does Law Come From? U.S. Constitution v. State Constitutions Federal Court.
Criminal Justice BHS Law Related Education Chapter 4: A Separate System for Juveniles LESSON OBJECTIVES 4-1 Analyze and define the legal doctrine of parens.
Fall  Alternative Enforcement : The City of Mankato has established an Administrative Enforcement and Hearing Program as an enforcement option.
Problem Solving Courts Bench Bar Conference Double Tree Hotel April 20, rd Judicial District Court of Common Pleas – Berks County.
Chapter 16 – Juvenile Justice. History & Overview of Juvenile Courts Reformers began to argue that the failure of the family was the cause of delinquent.
DELAWARE OFFICE OF DEFENSE SERVICES DELAWARE CRIMINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL THE STATE OF DELAWARE PUBLIC DEFENSE COUNSEL AT PRETRIAL Hon. J. Brendan O’Neill,
Enforcing Firearms Surrender
Civics & Economics – Goals 5 &6 Juveniles and Juvenile Courts
Do now pg.59 1.What are all the steps in a criminal court case?
STANDARDS: SS8CG6 The student will explain how the Georgia court system treats juvenile offenders. a. Explain the difference between delinquent behavior.
Learning Objectives Describe the seven phases of the criminal justice process. Identify at least two key victims’ rights in each phase of the criminal.
Community Supervision Modification & Termination
Des Moines Municipal Court
Chapter 4 Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished
Community Corrections
Navigating the Justice System
Sherene Crawford, Esq. February 1, 2018
Gideon v. Wainwright The Right to Legal Counsel
Presentation transcript:

National Association for Court Management July, 2008 Good Courts That Effectively Process Cases and Achieve Due Process Brett Taylor Center for Court Innovation

Demonstration Projects Technical Assistance The Center for Court Innovation is dedicated to enhancing the performance of courts and those whose work intersects with the courts (prosecutors, probation offices and others). In performing this work, the Center’s goals are to reduce crime, aid victims, strengthen neighborhoods, and promote public confidence in justice.

“ Aren’t you worried that by working with the same people everyday that your ability to be a zealous advocate for your clients will be compromised?”

“ You’re setting them [defendants] up for failure.”

“ That’s not what lawyers are supposed to do.”

“ You’re a social worker not a lawyer”

Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 1973 U.S. Supreme Court that ruled probation/parole revocations were to be afforded preliminary and final revocation hearings.

Gagnon ruling: Notice of hearing Purpose of hearing The alleged violation The right to call witnesses The right to be present A neutral judge/magistrate A written record

First Problem-Solving Court: 1989 – Miami, Florida; Drug Court 2008 – over 2500 problem-solving courts

If due process applies, what process is due

Red Hook, Brooklyn

Red Hook Needs Assessment Community Issues: High concentration of visible public disorder Public housing-related problems Concern for youth Lack of services in community Low trust + confidence in justice system

What is a Community Court? A neighborhood focused court project that Harnesses the power of the justice system To solve local problems

Red Hook Community Justice Center

Inspector Kemper Commanding Officer NYPD 76 Precinct

Inspector Kemper Quote: “I believe that the RHCJC has contributed significantly to our success. The relationship we have with them is instrumental and I look forward to working with them in the future.” --Interview in February 2008 after being named #1 precinct in crime reduction in NYC over the past two years.

Red Hook Needs Assessment System Issues: Long arrest to arraignment times Few sentencing options Low offender compliance Fragmented court system Little focus on outcomes

Housing Repairs The local NYCHA buildings had a backlog of more than 1,000 requests for repairs when the RHCJC started hearing housing cases. Today the backlog is under 100.

Community Service Each year the RHCJC contributes approximately 70,000 hours of community service to Red Hook – that is the equivalent of over $500,000 worth of labor to the benefit of the community

Increased Compliance The compliance rate for defendants mandated to community service, treatment or educational programs has been over 75% on a consistent basis. Conventional courts in New York city struggle to reach a 50% compliance rate.

Levels of Fear One year prior to the opening of the RHCJC, 77% of local residents said they were afraid to go to the parks or subway. Five years after the RHCJC opened, that number dropped to 43% -- a 45% decrease.

Public Trust Approval ratings for the justice system prior to the RHCJC opening : 12% One year after opening: 38% Five years after opening: 72%

Procedural Fairness A recent survey showed that 85% of criminal defendants reported that their cases were handled fairly. 93% agreed or strongly agreed that the judge treated them fairly. Results of the survey did not significantly change regardless of race, sex or outcome of the case.

Judge Alex Calabrese: “The Constitution comes first, problem-solving comes second.”

Resources/Bibliography Constitutional and Other Legal Issues in Problem- Solving Courts; Judge William G. Meyer (ret.), May 2008 Ethics for the Problem-Solving Court Judge: The New ABA Model Code; Louraine Arkfield, The Justice System Journal, Vol. 28 Number 3 (2007) Risky Business: Criminal Specialty Courts and the Ethical Obligations of the Zealous Criminal Defender; 12 Berkeley J. Crim. L. 75 (Spring, 2007) Don’t Reinvent the Wheel: Lessons from Problem- Solving Courts; Robert V. Wolf, 2007

Resources/Bibliography (cont.) The Dictionary of the History of Ideas, Electronic Text Center; University of Virginia, 2003 et seq Problem-Solving Courts: Public Defender’s Perspective; Judges’ Journal, 2002 ABA Model Code of Professional Responsibility ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct U.S. Constitution Declaration of Independence Magna Carta

Questions? Brett Taylor Center for Court Innovation