Presented By: Alphie Paternostro, Supervisor, Linden

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

N.J.A.C. 6A:15 Bilingual Education Administrative Code Training
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Jonathan Gibson & Kulwadee Axtell Nevada Department of Education.
Civil Rights and English Learners Melanie Manares Kansas State Department of Education.
Title III-A All identified English language learners assessed for English language proficiency (ELP) with the ACCESS for ELLs TM, with all 4 domains (Reading,
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
1 Alternative Language Services (ALS) November 10, 2008.
1 Parent involvement is most successful when it is viewed, practice and promoted as a partnership between the home and the school. Resource: California.
LPAC overview - Fall 2004 The Language Assessment Process in Texas  LPAC, Language Assessment Proficiency Committee  ARD is the Admissions, Review and.
Overview of Florida Consent Decree
September, 2010 Accomack County Public Schools. DEFINITION OF AN LEP STUDENT  An LEP student is one: Who was not born in the U.S. or whose native language.
Paul McCold, Ph.D. Migrant, Bilingual and Native Education OSPI Webinar Friday May 10, :30 – 11:30 am 1.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network 1.
Title III Alamance Burlington School System
Impact of Changes to NYSED Part 154 of Commissioner’s Regulations
Lau vs. Nichols Group 1.
Title III: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient and Immigrant Students Serving English Language Learners – It’s the Law VAFEPA: October.
IDENTIFICATION 1 PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement a four step ELL identification process to ensure holistic and individualized decisions can.
The English as a Second Language Program
CAPELL Connecticut Administrators of Programs for English Language Learners English Language Learners and Special Education: A Resource Handbook.
Seattle Public School ELL Data Veronica Maria Gallardo, Director of ELL 1.
English Mastery: Nevada English Language Learner (ELL) Program September 6, 2013 For NNELI Program Overview – Background and Demographics – WIDA – World.
PREPARED BY DR. HAROLD SMITH EDAD 5399 Bilingual/ESL Education.
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
This session will begin with a discussion of strategies to ensure appropriate identification and interventions for ELLs as well as teacher resources. Strategies.
Selecting Students for Title I Services in a Targeted Assistance School (TAS)
Section III: Legislation & Supreme Court Rulings in Support of ELLs
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
NC DPI WEBINAR APRIL 24, 2012 Title III Application
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network.
Acquiring English Proficiency in the Torrington Public Schools Programs, Process, and Student Progress Cheryl F. Kloczko.
ESOL Program (English for Speakers of Other Languages) in Greenwood District Questions and Answers Updated July 2015.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Linden Public School District ESL/Bilingual K-12 Program April 2012 Alphonsina Paternostro, Supervisor.
ESL LEGISTLATION ELS Language Centers Daiva Berzinskas Contact Information:
1 Parent involvement is most successful when it is viewed, practiced and promoted as a partnership between the home and the school. Resource: California.
» September 3, 2015 » December 3, 2015 » February 4, 2016.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Title III, Part A: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient (LEP) and Immigrant Students  The purpose of Title III, Part A is to help ensure.
Questions and Answers.  Gwd 50 has over 1,000 ESOL students; each school has ESOL students.  ESOL is a federal program under Title III legislation.
English Language Learners and the Law Gema Sieh Highland Rim.
Laws Governing ESL Programs in the US Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI prohibits discrimination on the grounds of race, color,
ALBERTVILLE CITY SCHOOLS Enrollment, Identification and Education of EL Students
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,
What are the Differences Between Targeted and Schoolwide Title I Programs?
Directions: This is a Power Point presentation about ESL. The information is used for staff development and there is a short quiz at the end.
Title III: 101 Jacqueline A. Iribarren Ph.D. Title III, ESL & Bilingual Ed. Consultant October 20, 2011.
Time line of ESL Legislation Jena Tabor- ESL Teacher Flintville Elementary School
Title III and ESOL. Chapter 7: Serving Students with Special Needs IDEA Section 504 ESOL Chapter 8 – Student Discipline, Suspension, and Expulsion Student.
Virginia Department of Education November 5, 2015.
ELL – ACCESS for ELLs PIMS Data Collection School Year.
Agenda Review Public Comments Election of Chair NDE ELL Program Professionals: Jane Splean – Program Supervisor Kulwadee Axtell Jonathan Gibson Blakely.
ELL 101 Stephanie Johnson, LPSD38 ELL Coordinator.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
December 4, 2009 State Board of Education adopted:  Oregon Diploma  Modified Diploma  Extended Diploma  Alternative.
K - 12 students are identified as English Language Learners (ELLs) if, at the time of their enrollment, they meet the following criteria: 1. There is a.
Radford City Schools School Board Presentation
Title III Fiscal Requirements and ESSA changes
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
ESL in Wisconsin and the United States: Presented by Suzy Klein
January 14, 2016 Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Introduction to English learners and Related Federal and State Rules
Radford City Schools School Board Presentation
EL Access to Rigorous Coursework
August 5, 2015 – Proposal Level
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

What Every School Leader Should Know About the Legal Requirements for English Language Learners Presented By: Alphie Paternostro, Supervisor, Linden Maria Romero, Supervisor, Carteret David Nash, Esq., Director of Legal Education, FEA

Objectives Participants will gain an understanding of legal requirements under state and federal law related to: Identification and Registration of ELL Students Parental Rights Program Requirements, Triggers and Waivers Accountability Addressing Students with Multiple Needs Student Exiting, Reentry, Movement in and Out of District

Sources of Law U.S. and New Jersey Constitutions Title III State and Federal Anti-Discrimination Laws (e.g., NJ Law Against Discrimination, Title VI) New Jersey Statute and Code N.J.S.A. 18A:35-15 to 26 N.J.A.C. 6A:15 State and Federal Case Law

Key Cases on ELL Lau v. Nichols – involved Title VI, Chinese students in San Francisco schools Plyler v. Doe – Involved questions on citizenship B.A. and J.H. v. Board of Ed. of Somerville (2009) New Jersey case on student who graduated in another country, right to education in NJ OCR settlement – Los Angeles School Dist. Involved disparate impact, lesser percentage of ELL and African American students in advanced classes, lesser access to best teachers

USDOE Office for Civil Rights First proactive civil rights enforcement action taken by Obama Administration Addressed disparities in educational opportunities for English Language Learners and African-American students Critical of underenrollment of ELL students in challenging courses, lack of access to effective teachers Requires district to develop, implement, monitor plan to strengthen delivery of instruction and increase participation in challenging courses

Potential Impact of OCR Case Sends powerful signal that USDOE is not sitting back, waiting for complaints Indicates OCR not focused solely on purposeful, overt discrimination Forces ALL school districts to ask difficult questions about current participation of ELL students in all aspects of district’s educational program Should focus districts on developing plans to improve high end outcomes, NOT just focus on meeting minimum state standards

Discussion Question What is your district’s current level of participation of ELL students in challenging courses (AP, honors, G & T, college prep)? What about current involvement in extra- curricular activities, clubs, etc.? What steps can you take to improve these levels?

Identification Screening Process - Home Language Survey Must include date of initial entry to U.S. Use of multiple criteria for determining initial eligibility for services Identification of Eligible Preschool Students for accountability purposes (linked to student count for Title III funds) N.J.A.C. 6A:15 – 1.3

Registration Cannot request information on citizenship - Plyler v. Doe Cannot request social security number, income tax returns Cannot demand any single form of proof of residency, must consider any evidence provided Addressing Students from Other States Addressing Students from Other Countries See N.J.A.C. 6A:22

Dangers in Current Registration Processes Often times process is largely unregulated in local districts May depend on the whims of the secretary in main office May indicate inadvertent support for discriminatory practices if left unchecked Cannot decide student is ineligible simply because student has a diploma from another case. Need case by case analysis – See Somerville case However, we must honor high school diploma for student from another state in U.S.

Program Requirements/Triggers Must establish bilingual education program when enrollment of LEP student reaches 20 or more in district ESL program – 10 or more ELL students in district English Language Services – Between 1 and 9 ELL students enrolled in district

District Waivers See N.J.A.C. 6A:15-1.5 May request waiver from requirement for bilingual education program. Must demonstrate would be impractical due to: Age range Grade span Geographic location

Addressing Students with Multiple Needs Districts have legal obligation to address special education needs of ELL students Critical to determine if academic difficulties are related to language proficiency, lack of literacy in native language and/or learning disability

Parental Rights Right to refuse student participation in bilingual program Right to remove student from bilingual program Need county approval to remove midyear Right to parental involvement in development and review of program Mandatory parent advisory committee Right to notifications in native language

Parental Notice Initial identification as eligible for enrollment Must include notice of right to decline Must be in writing in native language and in English Notices provided to all other parents regarding their child’s academic progress and rights regarding student safety and discipline Notice that student should exit program based on appropriate exit criteria

Title III Purpose is to help ensure that LEP students attain English proficiency, develop high levels of academic achievement and meet same academic standards as all students are expected to meet Establishes standards (WIDA), assessments (ACCESS) and accountability requirements (AMAO) Provides federal funds targeted to Increasing English language proficiency Providing professional development

AMAO Issue Student enrolls in PreK in district Primary language spoken in home is not English For purposes of accountability under Title III (Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives) does the student’s time in preK count? Answer – It Depends If district is receiving Title III funds for student, then time counts for AMAO

Exiting Program See N.J.A.C. 6A:15-1.3(c) Criteria for Exiting Results of English language proficiency test Assessing the level of reading in English Reviewing previous academic performance of students Standardized test results in English Input of teaching staff members

Entitled to Same Protections as all other students Teen Dating Violence Act New Jersey Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights Protected characteristics include national origin, ancestry Catch all other distinguishing characteristics would include English language proficiency