Dynamic Memory Allocation I October 16, 2008 Topics Simple explicit allocators Data structures Mechanisms Policies lecture-15.ppt 15-213 “The course that.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamic Memory Management
Advertisements

Carnegie Mellon 1 Dynamic Memory Allocation: Basic Concepts : Introduction to Computer Systems 17 th Lecture, Oct. 21, 2010 Instructors: Randy Bryant.
Dynamic Memory Allocation I Topics Simple explicit allocators Data structures Mechanisms Policies CS 105 Tour of the Black Holes of Computing.
Dynamic Memory Allocation I Topics Basic representation and alignment (mainly for static memory allocation, main concepts carry over to dynamic memory.
Carnegie Mellon 1 Dynamic Memory Allocation: Basic Concepts / : Introduction to Computer Systems 18 th Lecture, March 24, 2015 Instructors:
Chris Riesbeck, Fall 2007 Dynamic Memory Allocation Today Dynamic memory allocation – mechanisms & policies Memory bugs.
1. Dynamic Memory Allocation. Dynamic Memory Allocation Programmers use dynamic memory allocators (such as malloc ) to acquire VM at run time.  For data.
Dynamic Memory Allocation Topics Simple explicit allocators Data structures Mechanisms Policies.
Some topics in Memory Management
University of Washington Today Dynamic memory allocation  Size of data structures may only be known at run time  Need to allocate space on the heap 
1 Dynamic Memory Allocation: Basic Concepts Andrew Case Slides adapted from Jinyang Li, Randy Bryant and Dave O’Hallaro.
Carnegie Mellon Introduction to Computer Systems /18-243, spring th Lecture, Mar. 31 st Instructors: Gregory Kesden and Markus Püschel.
Lab 3: Malloc Lab. “What do we need to do?”  Due 11/26  One more assignment after this one  Partnering  Non-Honors students may work with one other.
Dynamic Memory Allocation I Nov 5, 2002 Topics Simple explicit allocators Data structures Mechanisms Policies class21.ppt “The course that gives.
– 1 – Dynamic Memory Allocation – beyond the stack and globals Stack Easy to allocate (decrement esp) Easy to deallocate (increment esp) Automatic allocation.
Dynamic Memory Allocation I May 21, 2008 Topics Simple explicit allocators Data structures Mechanisms Policies.
Dynamic Memory Allocation I November 1, 2006 Topics Simple explicit allocators Data structures Mechanisms Policies class18.ppt “The course that.
1 Inner Workings of Malloc and Free Professor Jennifer Rexford COS 217.
L6: Malloc Lab Writing a Dynamic Storage Allocator October 30, 2006
University of Washington Today Lab 5 out  Puts a *lot* together: pointers, debugging, C, etc.
University of Washington Today Finished up virtual memory On to memory allocation Lab 3 grades up HW 4 up later today. Lab 5 out (this afternoon): time.
1 Dynamic Memory Allocation: Basic Concepts. 2 Today Basic concepts Implicit free lists.
Writing You Own malloc() March 29, 2003 Topics Explicit Allocation Data structures Mechanisms Policies class19.ppt “The course that gives CMU its.
CS 241 Discussion Section (11/17/2011). Outline Review of MP7 MP8 Overview Simple Code Examples (Bad before the Good) Theory behind MP8.
Carnegie Mellon /18-243: Introduction to Computer Systems Instructors: Bill Nace and Gregory Kesden (c) All Rights Reserved. All work.
Consider Starting with 160 k of memory do: Starting with 160 k of memory do: Allocate p1 (50 k) Allocate p1 (50 k) Allocate p2 (30 k) Allocate p2 (30 k)
Dynamic Memory Allocation II
Today Moving on to… Memory allocation.
Carnegie Mellon 1 Bryant and O’Hallaron, Computer Systems: A Programmer’s Perspective, Third Edition Dynamic Memory Allocation: Basic Concepts :
Dynamic Memory Allocation April 9, 2002 Topics Simple explicit allocators Data structures Mechanisms Policies Reading: 10.9 Problems: and class21.ppt.
University of Washington Today More memory allocation!
Carnegie Mellon 1 Dynamic Memory Allocation: Basic Concepts Instructors: Adapted from CMU course
CS 241 Discussion Section (12/1/2011). Tradeoffs When do you: – Expand Increase total memory usage – Split Make smaller chunks (avoid internal fragmentation)
University of Washington Implementation Issues How do we know how much memory to free given just a pointer? How do we keep track of the free blocks? How.
Dynamic Memory Allocation Alan L. Cox Some slides adapted from CMU slides.
Memory Management I: Dynamic Storage Allocation Oct 8, 1998 Topics User-level view Policies Mechanisms class14.ppt Introduction to Computer Systems.
Memory Management What if pgm mem > main mem ?. Memory Management What if pgm mem > main mem ? Overlays – program controlled.
Instructor: Phil Gibbons
Section 10: Memory Allocation Topics
CS 3214 Introduction to Computer Systems
Dynamic Memory Allocation I
Dynamic Memory Allocation
Instructor: Haryadi Gunawi
Memory Management I: Dynamic Storage Allocation Oct 7, 1999
Memory Management: Dynamic Allocation
Dynamic Memory Allocation I October 28, 2003
Dynamic Memory Allocation: Basic Concepts CS220: Computer Systems II
The Hardware/Software Interface CSE351 Winter 2013
Memory Allocation I CSE 351 Spring 2017
Dynamic Memory Allocation – beyond the stack and globals
Memory Management I: Dynamic Storage Allocation March 2, 2000
Memory Allocation I CSE 351 Spring 2017
User-Level Dynamic Memory Allocation: Malloc and Free
Dynamic Memory Allocation I
CS703 - Advanced Operating Systems
Dynamic Memory Allocation
Memory Allocation I CSE 351 Winter 2018
Dynamic Memory Allocation I
Dynamic Memory Allocation: Basic Concepts /18-213/14-513/15-513: Introduction to Computer Systems 19th Lecture, October 30, 2018.
Memory Allocation I CSE 351 Winter 2018
Memory Allocation II CSE 351 Autumn 2017
Memory Allocation II CSE 351 Winter 2018
Dynamic Memory Allocation November 2, 2000
Memory Allocation II CSE 351 Winter 2018
Dynamic Memory Allocation: Basic Concepts CSCI 380: Operating Systems
Dynamic Memory Allocation I
CS703 - Advanced Operating Systems
Instructors: Majd Sakr and Khaled Harras
Memory Allocation I CSE 351 Autumn 2018
Presentation transcript:

Dynamic Memory Allocation I October 16, 2008 Topics Simple explicit allocators Data structures Mechanisms Policies lecture-15.ppt “The course that gives CMU its Zip!”

, S’08 Process Memory Image kernel virtual memory run-time heap (via malloc ) program text (. text ) initialized data (. data ) uninitialized data (. bss ) stack 0 %esp memory protected from user code the “ brk ” ptr Allocators request Add’l heap memory from the kernel using the sbrk() function: error = sbrk (&amt_more)

, S’08 Dynamic Memory Allocation Explicit vs. Implicit Memory Allocator Explicit: application allocates and frees space E.g., malloc() and free() in C Implicit: application allocates, but does not free space E.g. garbage collection in Java, ML or Lisp Allocation A memory allocator doles out memory blocks to application A “block” is a contiguous range of bytes of any size, in this context Will discuss simple explicit memory allocation today Application Dynamic Memory Allocator Heap Memory Memory Allocator? VM hardware and kernel allocate pages Application objects are typically smaller Allocator manages objects within pages 4K page can hold ~64 64-byte objects

, S’08 Malloc Package #include void *malloc(size_t size) If successful: Returns a pointer to a memory block of at least size bytes, (typically) aligned to 8-byte boundary If size == 0, returns NULL If unsuccessful: returns NULL (0) and sets errno void free(void *p) Returns the block pointed at by p to pool of available memory p must come from a previous call to malloc() or realloc() void *realloc(void *p, size_t size) Changes size of block p and returns pointer to new block Contents of new block unchanged up to min of old and new size Old block has been free() 'd (logically, if new != old)

, S’08 Malloc Example void foo(int n, int m) { int i, *p; /* allocate a block of n ints */ p = (int *)malloc(n * sizeof(int)); if (p == NULL) { perror("malloc"); exit(0); } for (i=0; i<n; i++) p[i] = i; /* add m bytes to end of p block */ if ((p = (int *) realloc(p, (n+m) * sizeof(int))) == NULL) { perror("realloc"); exit(0); } for (i=n; i < n+m; i++) p[i] = i; /* print new array */ for (i=0; i<n+m; i++) printf("%d\n", p[i]); free(p); /* return p to available memory pool */ }

, S’08 Assumptions Assumptions made in this lecture Memory is word addressed (each word can hold a pointer) Allocated block (4 words) Free block (3 words) Free word Allocated word

, S’08 Allocation Examples p1 = malloc(4) p2 = malloc(5) p3 = malloc(6) free(p2) p4 = malloc(2)

, S’08 Constraints Applications: Can issue arbitrary sequence of malloc() and free() requests Free() requests must correspond to a malloc()’d block Allocators Can’t control number or size of allocated blocks Must respond immediately to malloc() requests i.e., can’t reorder or buffer requests Must allocate blocks from free memory i.e., can only place allocated blocks in free memory Must align blocks so they satisfy all alignment requirements 8 byte alignment for GNU malloc ( libc malloc) on Linux boxes Can manipulate and modify only free memory Can’t move the allocated blocks once they are malloc()’d i.e., compaction is not allowed

, S’08 Performance Goals: Throughput Given some sequence of malloc and free requests: R 0, R 1,..., R k,..., R n-1 Goals: maximize throughput and peak memory utilization These goals are often conflicting Throughput: Number of completed requests per unit time Example: 5,000 malloc() calls and 5,000 free() calls in 10 seconds Throughput is 1,000 operations/second

, S’08 Performance Goals: Peak Memory Utilization Given some sequence of malloc and free requests: R 0, R 1,..., R k,..., R n-1 Def: Aggregate payload P k : malloc(p) results in a block with a payload of p bytes After request R k has completed, the aggregate payload P k is the sum of currently allocated payloads all malloc() ’d stuff minus all free() ’d stuff Def: Current heap size is denoted by H k Assume that H k is monotonically nondecreasing reminder: it grows when allocator uses sbrk() Def: Peak memory utilization: After k requests, peak memory utilization is: U k = ( max i<k P i ) / H k

, S’08 Internal Fragmentation Poor memory utilization caused by fragmentation. Comes in two forms: internal and external fragmentation Internal fragmentation For a given block, internal fragmentation is the difference between the block size and the payload size Caused by overhead of maintaining heap data structures, padding for alignment purposes, or explicit policy decisions (e.g., to return a big block to satisfy a small request) Depends only on the pattern of previous requests thus, easy to measure payload Internal fragmentation block Internal fragmentation

, S’08 External Fragmentation p1 = malloc(4) p2 = malloc(5) p3 = malloc(6) free(p2) p4 = malloc(6) Oops! Occurs when there is enough aggregate heap memory, but no single free block is large enough External fragmentation depends on the pattern of future requests  thus, difficult to measure

, S’08 Implementation Issues How do we know how much memory is being free() ’d when we are given only a pointer (no length)? How do we keep track of the free blocks? What do we do with extra space when allocating a block that is smaller than the free block it is placed in? How do we pick a block to use for allocation -- many might fit? How do we reinsert a freed block into the heap?

, S’08 Knowing How Much to Free Standard method Keep the length of a block in the word preceding the block. This word is often called the header field or header Requires an extra word for every allocated block free(p0) p0 = malloc(4)p0 Block sizedata 5

, S’08 Keeping Track of Free Blocks Method 1: Implicit list using lengths -- links all blocks Method 2: Explicit list among the free blocks using pointers within the free blocks Method 3: Segregated free list Different free lists for different size classes Method 4: Blocks sorted by size Can use a balanced tree (e.g. Red-Black tree) with pointers within each free block, and the length used as a key

, S’08 Method 1: Implicit List For each block we need (length, is-allocated?) Could store this information in two words - wasteful! Standard trick If blocks are aligned, some low-order address bits are always 0 Instead of storing an always-0 bit, use it as a allocated/free flag When reading size word, must mask out this bit size 1 word Format of allocated and free blocks payload a = 1: allocated block a = 0: free block size: block size payload: application data (allocated blocks only) a optional padding

, S’08 Implicit List: Finding a Free Block First fit: Search list from beginning, choose first free block that fits Can take linear time in total number of blocks (allocated and free) In practice it can cause “splinters” at beginning of list Next fit: Like first-fit, but search list starting where previous search finished Should often be faster than first-fit – avoids re-scanning unhelpful blocks Some research suggests that fragmentation is worse Best fit: Search the list, choose the best free block: fits, with fewest bytes left over Keeps fragments small --- usually helps fragmentation Will typically run slower than first-fit p = start; while ((p < end) && \\ not passed end ((*p & 1) || \\ already allocated (*p <= len))) \\ too small p = p + (*p & -2); \\ goto next block

, S’08 Bit Fields How to represent the Header: Masks and bitwise operators #define SIZEMASK (~0x7) #define PACK(size, alloc) ((size) | (alloc)) #define GET_SIZE(p)((p)->size & SIZEMASK) Bit Fields struct { unsigned allocated:1; unsigned size:31; } Header; Check your K&R: structures are not necessarily packed

, S’08 Implicit List: Allocating in Free Block Allocating in a free block - splitting Since allocated space might be smaller than free space, we might want to split the block void addblock(ptr p, int len) { int newsize = ((len + 1) >> 1) << 1; // add 1 and round up int oldsize = *p & -2; // mask out low bit *p = newsize | 1; // set new length if (newsize < oldsize) *(p+newsize) = oldsize - newsize; // set length in remaining } // part of block p 2 4 addblock(p, 2)

, S’08 Implicit List: Freeing a Block Simplest implementation: Need only clear the “allocated” flag void free_block(ptr p) { *p = *p & -2} But can lead to “false fragmentation” There is enough free space, but the allocator won’t be able to find it free(p) p malloc(5) Oops!

, S’08 Implicit List: Coalescing Join (coalesce) with next and/or previous blocks, if they are free Coalescing with next block But how do we coalesce with previous block? free(p) p void free_block(ptr p) { *p = *p & -2; // clear allocated flag next = p + *p; // find next block if ((*next & 1) == 0) *p = *p + *next; // add to this block if } // not allocated 2 Logically gone

, S’08 Implicit List: Bidirectional Coalescing Boundary tags [Knuth73] Replicate size/allocated word at “bottom” (end) of free blocks Allows us to traverse the “list” backwards, but requires extra space Important and general technique! size 1 word Format of allocated and free blocks payload and padding a = 1: allocated block a = 0: free block size: total block size payload: application data (allocated blocks only) a sizea Boundary tag (footer) Header

, S’08 Constant Time Coalescing allocated free allocated free block being freed Case 1Case 2Case 3Case 4

, S’08 m11 Constant Time Coalescing (Case 1) m11 n1 n1 m21 1 m11 1 n0 n0 m21 1

, S’08 m11 Constant Time Coalescing (Case 2) m11 n+m20 0 m11 1 n1 n1 m20 0

, S’08 m10 Constant Time Coalescing (Case 3) m10 n1 n1 m21 1 n+m10 0 m21 1

, S’08 m10 Constant Time Coalescing (Case 4) m10 n1 n1 m20 0 n+m1+m20 0

, S’08 Summary of Key Allocator Policies Placement policy: First-fit, next-fit, best-fit, etc. Trades off lower throughput for less fragmentation Interesting observation: segregated free lists (next lecture) approximate a best fit placement policy without having to search entire free list Splitting policy: When do we go ahead and split free blocks? How much internal fragmentation are we willing to tolerate? Coalescing policy: Immediate coalescing: coalesce each time free() is called Deferred coalescing: try to improve performance of free() by deferring coalescing until needed. e.g., Coalesce as you scan the free list for malloc() Coalesce when the amount of external fragmentation reaches some threshold

, S’08 Implicit Lists: Summary Implementation: very simple Allocate cost: linear time worst case Free cost: constant time worst case  even with coalescing Memory usage: will depend on placement policy First-fit, next-fit or best-fit Not used in practice for malloc()/free() because of linear-time allocation  used in many special purpose applications However, the concepts of splitting and boundary tag coalescing are general to all allocators