Children's Online Privacy Protection Act and the Video Privacy Protection Act By: Alana Rushing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 OVERVIEW. FAIR INFORMATION PRACTICES The Privacy Act is primarily concerned with fair information practices. The Privacy Act is primarily.
Advertisements

Information for Students MGH Institute of Health Professions Use your down arrow or click your mouse to advance through the presentation.
Family Education Rights & Privacy Act of 1974 FERPA, You, & UC.
1 Marketing Violent Entertainment to Children The FTC’s Reports on Self-Regulation and Industry Practices in the Motion Picture, Music Recording & Electronic.
Confidentiality and HIPAA
HIPAA PRIVACY REQUIREMENTS Dana L. Thrasher Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLC (205) ; Victoria Nemerson.
Silicon Valley Apps for Kids Meetup Laura D. Berger October 22, 2012 The views expressed herein are those of the speaker, and do not represent the views.
IS3350 Security Issues in Legal Context
CIPA Update. FOR SCHOOLS – By July 1, 2012, amend your existing Internet safety policy (if you have not already done so) to provide for the education.
March 19, 2009 Changes to HIPAA Privacy and Security Requirements Joel T. Kopperud Scott A. Sinder Rhonda M. Bolton.
1 Freedom of Expression Prepared By Joseph Leung.
2/16/2010 The Family Educational Records and Privacy Act.
Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
FERPA 2008 New regulations enact updates from over a decade of interpretations.
Disclaimer This Presentation is provided “as is” without any express or implied warranty. This Presentation is for educational purposes only and does not.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 17 Administrativ e Law.
Children, Privacy and the Internet. Why do we need special protection for children?
NTIA Privacy Multistakeholder Meeting March 25, 2014 Amanda Koulousias, Attorney Division of Privacy and Identity Protection Federal Trade Commission FTC.
Anglican Province of Canada Privacy Policy. Commitment to Privacy The Privacy Policy, including the Web Privacy Statement, is the Anglican Province of.
Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools Advisory Committee Meeting February 21, 2007.
Tina Kraigher and Milena Podjed-Fabjančič 18 April 2010 Processing of Telephone Traffic Data of Employees ( a Case Study )
“Internet” and “Operator” (COPPA Statute) InternetOperator Collectively the myriad of computer and telecommunications facilities, including equipment.
What the government does A2 Economics and Business Unit 4B By Mrs Hilton for revisionstation.
Newsgathering: Access to Meetings & Records. Access and the First Amendment How has the U.S. Supreme Court responded to claims that the First Amendment.
LAW SEMINARS INTERNATIONAL New Developments in Internet Marketing & Selling November 13 & 14, 2006 San Francisco, California Moderator : Maureen A. Young.
FERPA Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act and Rebecca Macon Registrar University of Georgia Presentation for GASFAA October.
Understanding the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act, the “Red Flag” Regulations, and their impact on Health Care Providers Raising a “Red Flag”
Acceptable Use Policies, Online Safety, and Photo Permission Forms Elizabeth White Tara Dykes Julie Howe.
Class 6 Internet Privacy Law Social Media Privacy.
Public Communications Law Lecture 15 Slide 1 The Right to Access Information Freedom of speech, and of the press, generally does not include the right.
STANDARD 5.3 Objective 3 Students will explain and understand the need for confidentiality.
25-1 Chapter 1 Legal Heritage and the Digital Age.
Federal Trade Commission required to issue and enforce regulations concerning children’s online privacy. Initial COPPA Rule effective April 21, 2000;
Legal Environment for a New Century. Click your mouse anywhere on the screen when you are ready to advance the text within each slide. After the starburst.
STUDENTS AND THE INTERNET WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW. Issues  Internet Safety  Cyberbullying  Social Media  Digital Citizenship.
2006 SISO Executive Conference Legal Issues in Using Mailing Lists: The CAN-SPAM ACT The Junk Fax Prevention Act The National Do Not Call Registry.
IBT - Electronic Commerce Privacy Concerns Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University.
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) CCAC.
Institute for Criminal Justice Studies FERPA Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act ©This TCLEOSE approved Crime Prevention Curriculum is the property.
1 Chapter 32 e-business Copyright © Nelson Australia Pty Ltd 2003.
Understanding HIPAA (Health Insurandce Portability and Accountability Act)
COPYRIGHT © 2011 South-Western/Cengage Learning. 1 Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears,
Privacy & How IT Will Help JEFF NORTHROP, CTO
CYBERLAW Cyberlaw Meets Family Law: The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 (COPPA) Class of Nov. 11, 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer.
LAW OF COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY FALL 2015 © 2015 MICHAEL I. SHAMOS Regulatory Law Michael I. Shamos, Ph.D., J.D. Institute for Software Research School of.
Online Safety Issues in Our School Topics of Discussion All about Acceptable Use Policies Significance of Signatures on an AUP What is included in an.
October 21, 2008 Jennifer Q.; Loriane M., Michelle E., Charles H. Internet Safety.
Slides prepared by Cyndi Chie and Sarah Frye A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase Chapter 3: Freedom of Speech.
Computer Issues Acceptable Use Policy Online Safety Photo Permission Forms Rachel Gorsuch Stephanie Herbin Natalie Wu Acceptable Use Policy Online Safety.
Student Financial Assistance. Session 55-2 Session 55 Internet Privacy Laws.
The Legalities of using U.S.(foreign) Servers with Canadian students by Erin Gibbs and Rob Airey.
Digital Safety Helping Parents Navigate the Social Media Waters.
Cyberlaw. “The moving finger writes; and, having writ Moves on: nor all thy piety nor wit Shall lure it back to cancel half a line. Nor all thy tears.
Sharing Information (FERPA) FY07 REMS Initial Grantee Meeting December 5, 2007, San Diego, CA U.S. Department of Education, Office of Safe and Drug-Free.
FERPA for the Financial Aid Office NCASFAA Fall Conference November 2012.
“Kids First, New Mexico Wins!” NMPED Data Conference Spring 2016 Dan Hill General Counsel, Public Education Department Randi Johnson General Counsel, State.
Protection of Personal Information Act An Analysis on the impact.
FERPA Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act
Silicon Valley Apps for Kids: COPPA BASICS
Chapter 10 Cyberlaw, Social Media, and Privacy
Freedom of Expression.
The E-Rate Program CIPA Update Fall 2011 Applicant Trainings.
Final Amended COPPA Rule
CHAPTER 33 Cyberlaw.
General Data Protection Regulations
Health Care: Privacy in a Digital Age
A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
A Gift of Fire Third edition Sara Baase
Privacy Update John L. Wood – Egerton, McAfee, Armistead & Davis, P.C.
Presentation transcript:

Children's Online Privacy Protection Act and the Video Privacy Protection Act By: Alana Rushing

Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) The act, effective April 21, 2000, applies to the online collection of personal information by persons or entities under U.S. jurisdiction from children under 13 years of age. The act details….. -what a website operator must include in a privacy policy -when and how to seek verifiable consent from a parent or guardian -what responsibilities an operator has to protect for children's privacy and safety online including restrictions on the marketing to those under 13.

Continued… While children under 13 can legally give out personal information with their parents' permission, many websites altogether disallow underage children from using their services due to the amount of work involved. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has the authority to issue regulations and enforce COPPA. Also under the terms of COPPA, the FTC designated "safe harbor" provision is designed to encourage increased industry self-regulation. The Act applies to websites and online services operated for commercial purposes that are either directed to children under 13 or have actual knowledge that children under 13 are providing information online. Most recognized non-profit organizations are exempt from most of the requirements of COPPA.

Cont… The type of "verifiable parental consent" that is required before collecting and using information provided by children under 13 is based upon a "sliding scale" set forth in a Federal Trade Commission regulation that takes into account the manner in which the information is being collected and the uses to which the information will be put.

2013 revision The revised COPPA Rule aims to strengthen children’s privacy protections and give parents greater control over the personal information that websites and online services can collect. Among the more significant changes in the revised Rule are an expanded definition of the term “personal information” and revisions to how companies may obtain parental consent. The updates are primarily aimed at mobile privacy, but are intended to reflect the FTC’s commitment to “helping to create a safer, more secure online experience for children” in the face of rapid technological change.

Violations to COPPA The FTC has brought a number of actions against website operators for failure to comply with COPPA requirements, including actions against Girl's Life, Inc. American Pop Corn Company, Lisa Frank, Inc., Mrs. Field's Cookies, and Hershey Foods. The website Xanga was fined $1 million for COPPA violations, for repeatedly allowing children under 13 to sign up for the service without getting their parent's consent.

Criticisms of COPPA COPPA is highly controversial, and has been criticized as ineffective and potentially unconstitutional by many people. They say it attacks children's rights to freedom of speech, and self-expression. Mark Zuckerberg, co-founder and CEO of Facebook, has expressed opposition to COPPA and stated "That will be a fight we take on at some point. My philosophy is that for education you need to start at a really, really young age."

Video Privacy Protection Act (VPPA) This was a bill passed by the United States Congress in 1988 and signed into law by President Ronald Reagan. It was created to prevent what it refers to as "wrongful disclosure of video tape rental or sale records [or similar audio visual materials, to cover items such as video games and the future DVD format]." Congress passed the VPPA after Robert Bork's video rental history was published during his Supreme Court nomination. It makes any "video tape service provider" that discloses rental information outside the ordinary course of business liable for up to $2500 in actual damages.

The law in effect In 2008, a class action lawsuit against Blockbuster Inc. was filed over the release of customer rental and sales records to Facebook through the controversial Facebook Beacon program. The lawsuit alleged the release of the records was a violation of the Act. In December 2009, an anonymous plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the online DVD rental company Netflix over its release of data sets for the Netflix Prize, alleging that the company's release of the information constituted a violation of the VPPA. In 2012, Netflix changed its privacy rules so that it no longer retains records for people who have left the site

Revisions On January 10, 2013, President Obama signed into law amendments to the VPPA that facilitate social media sharing of video viewing preferences when users consent to disclosure of information via the Internet. The amendments provide that a consumer’s written consent can now be obtained through electronic means using the Internet, provided that the consent is in a “form separate and distinct from any form setting forth other legal or financial obligations of the consumer.”

Revisions cont.. The amendments also permit the consumer to choose between giving consent to disclosure either: in advance for a set period of time, up to two years or until consent is withdrawn, or each time disclosure is sought (like under the old statute). The service provider must give the consumer “in a clear and conspicuous manner” the opportunity to withdraw consent either on a case-by-case basis or from ongoing disclosures, at the consumer’s election.