1 Recharge on Non-irrigated Lands ESHMC 8 January 2008 B. Contor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Surface Water Quantity Model Development Connely Baldwin USU.
Advertisements

Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability to Contamination in Texas
Application of the FEWS Stream Flow (SF) Model to the Limpopo Basin, Mozambique Final Report Tanya Hoogerwerf.
Development of the Regional Arctic Climate System Model (RACM) --- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington Dec, 2009.
RunoffRunoff Creating a spatially explicit runoff grid.
Introducing Web-Based Decision Tools for Environmental Management To Lake Michigan Communities Bernie Engel Long-Term Hydrological Impact Assessment (L-THIA)
Recharge on Non-irrigated Land Mike McVay 06/24/2010.
Estimation of areal recharge for the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer J.R. Bartolino U.S. Geological Survey Idaho Water Science Center SVRP Aquifer.
Continuous Hydrologic Simulation of Johnson Creek Basin and Assuming Watershed Stationarity Rick Shimota, P.E. Hans Hadley, P.E., P.G. The Oregon Water.
The Caveat: Hydrology Complex Site specific Difficult to accurately quantify More questions than answers.
1 One-month Stress Period Considerations Presentation to ESHMC 8 January 2008 B. Contor.
City of Austin Water Quality Master Planning - GIS Model David Maidment Francisco Olivera Mike Barrett Christine Dartiguenave Ann Quenzer CRWR - University.
Modeling Water Quality. Special reference of this work to….
Climate Change, Biofuels, and Land Use Legacy: Trusting Computer Models to Guide Water Resources Management Trajectories Anthony Kendall Geological Sciences,
CURVE NO. DEVELOPMENT STEP 8 Soils data, land use data, watershed data, and CN lookup table are used to develop curve numbers for use in the SCS Curve.
PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.
FE Watershed Analysis Lecture 1a - Overview Finn Krogstad UW Forest Engineering
VIC Model Status Blowing Snow and Lake Algorithms Princeton Meeting December 4, 2006.
CVEN 689 Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Estimating Salt Concentration at Ungaged Locations from Parameters derived using GIS Ganesh Krishnamurthy Water.
Use of Spatial Climate Data Sets in an Optimum Species Selection System for the United States and China Matt Doggett Christopher Daly & David Hannaway.
Non-Point Source Pollutant Modeling Analysis and Prediction David Munn.
A Macroscale Glacier Model to Evaluate Climate Change Impacts in the Columbia River Basin Joseph Hamman, Bart Nijssen, Dennis P. Lettenmaier, Bibi Naz,
Urban Storm-Water Management Plan Utilizing Arc View and HEC-HMS College Station, Texas Kara Corcoran CVEN 689.
Water Budget Status Report ESHMC Meeting September 13, 2011 Presented by Stacey Taylor.
Opportunities for Development of a Global Water Information System David R. Maidment, University of Texas at Austin Definition of an information system.
WaterSmart, Reston, VA, August 1-2, 2011 Steve Markstrom and Lauren Hay National Research Program Denver, CO Jacob LaFontaine GA Water.
Climate Grid Analysis Toolset (CGAT) Kirk Sherrill - GIS Specialist Brent Frakes – Geographer NRPC – I&M Division – GIS Program George Wright Society Conference.
Internet Map Server Help This presentation briefly describes the Internet map server viewer and model interface and how to work them.
Ag. & Biological Engineering
The Water Cycle… from clouds to sea.. from sea to clouds…
Advancements in Simulating Land Hydrologic Processes for Land Surface Modeling (LSM) Hua Su Presentation for Physical Climatology.
Return Flows Discussion Continued ESHMC Meeting 6 May 2008 Stacey Taylor.
Summary Utility ESHMC August 2008 B. Contor. Background ESPAM.exe produces intermediate text files –*.celmodel cell dimensions & status –*.cnlcanal leakage.
Management Application: Volume of Water in Storage (An Ogallala Example with Applicability to All Aquifers in Texas) Judy A. Reeves, Ph.D. Hydrogeologist,
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 Slide 1 Analysis of Evaporation Basic Calibration Workshop March 10-13, 2009 LMRFC.
By studying the layers of snowpack we can improve our predictions of when and where avalanches are likely to occur. Note that precipitation amounts seem.
Preliminary Applications of the HL-RDHM within the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Ed Clark, Hydrologist Presented July 26 th, 2007 as part of the.
Application of GIS and Terrain Analysis to Watershed Model Calibration for the CHIA Project Sam Lamont Robert Eli Jerald Fletcher.
al-weather-gang/wp/2014/10/28/hawaii- lava-flow-advances-now-less-than-100- yards-from-nearest-home-in- pahoa/?hpid=z3http://
Study on scaling property of Topindex and the aquifer rating-curve in Illinois with the application of TopModel CE394K Term Project Presentation CE394K.
1 Water Budget Update ESHMC Meeting November 22-23, 2010 S. Taylor, B. Contor.
San Juan Basin. San Juan-Pagosa Springs(PSPC2) Upper ( ) Middle ( ) Lower ( ) San Juan-Pagosa Springs(PSPC2)
ESPAM2 Water Budget Status ESHMC 21 September 2010 B. Contor.
Adjustment of Global Gridded Precipitation for Orographic Effects Jennifer Adam.
1 Recharge on Non-irrigated Lands ESHMC Meeting January 2009 W. Schreuder & B. Contor.
INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS for a safer, better world Capability of passive microwave and SNODAS SWE estimates for hydrologic predictions in selected U.S. watersheds.
Fluke Management In RI: Four Potential Approaches.
Prioritization Review ESHMC August 2008 B. Contor 1.
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center and Drought Related Forecasts Kevin Werner.
Preparing input for the TOPKAPI (TOPographic Kinematic Approximation and Integration) model PRASANNA DAHAL.
Review of ET Representation in ESPAM2.0 and How to Represent ET in ESPAM2.X Presented by Mike McVay September 12, 2012.
1 Canal Seepage ESHMC 8 January 2008 B. Contor. 2 Outline Current treatment of Canal Seepage Review of Recharge Tools PEST Possibilities Implications.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Automatic Generation of Parameter Inputs and Visualization of Model Outputs for AGNPS using GIS.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Scenario generation for long-term water budget.
Radiative forcing of climate by historical land cover change H. Damon Matthews, Andrew J. Weaver, Michael Eby, and Katrin J. Meissner Cory Martin Atmospheric.
Environmental Modeling Weighting GIS Layers Weighting GIS Layers.
TOP_PRMS George Leavesley, Dave Wolock, and Rick Webb.
Soil type Vegetation type / Forest density Land Use Fire activity Slopes Support NWS Flash Flood Warning Program: Development of Flash Flood Potential.
Land surface memory & hydrological cycle over the U.S. west coast states & monsoon region Yun Fan and Huug van del Dool CPC/NCEP/NOAA
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 4
California’s climate. Sierra Nevada snow depth, April 13, 2005 April 1 snowpack was 3 rd largest in last 10 years cm snow Source:
The aim of this project is to estimate changes in runoff, and nonpoint source (NPS) pollution resulting from past land use changes in the Great Lakes Area.
The aim of this project is to estimate changes in runoff, and nonpoint source (NPS) pollution resulting from past land use changes in the Great Lakes Area.
Raster/Map Algebra/Hydrology
How well does the NARR data simulate recharge to groundwater?
CEE 3430, Engineering Hydrology David Tarboton
Water Balance in MIKE-SWMM
Snowmelt runoff generation Snowmelt modeling
Manoa Watershed Runoff
EC Workshop on European Water Scenarios Brussels 30 June 2003
Presentation transcript:

1 Recharge on Non-irrigated Lands ESHMC 8 January 2008 B. Contor

2 Outline Review of current calculations Recharge tool review PEST possibilities Possible alternate methods

3

4

5 Current Calculation Recharge = non-linear function of precipitation Transition precip = ( 1/NK) (1/(N-1)) If precip <= trans. precip. then Rechg = K * Precip N else Rech = recharge at trans precip + (precip - trans precip) 3 sets of parameters, Lava rock Thin soil Thick soil

6 Current Calculation Accounts for processes of lower winter ET and snowmelt accumulation by calculating all winter recharge in Feb. –This will require some adjustment for monthly stress periods –I think the adjustments are doable

7 (stolen from DDW003)

8 Current Calculation Soil type 4 represents withdrawals for wetlands, cities & dryfarms NIR rasters are calculated off-line, prior to running recharge tools. NIR rasters are inputs to GIS recharge tool

9 User hands GIS tool five things: –Raster of non-irr recharge for each stress period –Map of irrigated lands –Map of model cells –soil-group map –starting multipliers for soil groups

10

11 GIS tool hands FORTRAN tool five things –total area in each cell –irrigated area in each cell –depth of NIR in each cell, for each stress period –predominant soil type in each cell –multipliers

12.sol file Soils Source of data 1 - new data 0 - no data -1 - use previous data Values soil type no value (stolen from May Training)

13.nir file Recharge on non-irrigated lands Source of data 1 - new data 0 - no data -1 - use previous data Non-irrigated recharge depth (ft) for each grid cell A value means a raster value was not available for the cell (stolen from May Training)

14 Multipliers Pest can be set up to touch these (though we didn't do this last time) 1 multiplier for each of 4 soil groups

15 FORTRAN tool calculates non-irrigated area in each cell: For each stress period, FORTRAN tool calculates recharge on non-irrigated lands: recharge = (non-irr. area) x (depth) x (multiplier) non-irr. area = (total area) – (irrigated area)

16 PEST Possibilities Use 4 existing multipliers to adjust NIR differently for each spatial dist. of cover type

17 Everything up to this slide has described the status quo.

18 Everything from this slide forward talks about possible modifications.

19 PEST Possibilities Allow additional multipliers (chop cover types into regions) Write little PEST-touchable utility to do the calculations & generate the *.nir input for FORTRAN tool Modify FORTRAN tool to do the NIR calculations internally, with PEST- touchable hooks Easy Difficult Moderate

20 Changing NIR Algorithm If we keep status-quo Recharge Tool processing, we can change offline calc. of NIR at will If we have FORTRAN calculate NIR, we will be committed to a single calculation algorithm

21 Alternate Algorithms USGS (Bauer & Vaccaro?) –physically-based calculation using soils, precip, runoff equations, ET... SVRP (Bartolino) –daily soil water balance using ET and precip (Rick Allen has already done some of this for ESPA?) Langbein –empirical relationship from nationwide data Other?

22 Alternate Algorithms - Concerns USGS (Bauer & Vaccaro?) –Quantabytes of data –Bazillions of parameters –Long-term average recharge

23 Alternate Algorithms - Concerns SVRP (Bartolino) –Needs to be adjusted for snow accumulation and melting –Needs adjustment for topographic concentration of runoff –Sparse weather-station data for calculations

24 Alternate Algorithms - Concerns Langbein –Tends to give much lower results than other methods –Total annual recharge

25 Alternate Algorithms - Concerns Other? –We have to find or invent the method –We have to agree on it

26

27 Backup Slides

28 Current Calculation Recharge = non-linear function of precipitation (stolen from DDW-003)

29 The NIR groups are based on 7 non-irrigated land-cover types

30 Recharge on Non-irrigated Lands Relationship Average non-irrigated recharge for each model cell Non-irrigated recharge is calculated for every cell but will only be used on non-irrigated lands Grid cells where a raster value is not present are represented as Non-irrigated recharge GIS raster Grid cells Amount of recharge depth for each grid cell (stolen from May Training)