27 April 2010 Jane Fendl MODULE G A Comparative Trial between Sun Rise Gum and Sun Set Gum in Healthy Gum Chewing Subjects NOTE: this presentation is just.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 US Investigator Meeting DIAS-4, Chicago, July 2011 Good Clinical Practice (GCP) for Investigators and the Research Team.
Advertisements

CROMS NIDCR Clinical Monitoring
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
The Principal Investigator’s Roles and Responsibilities Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator (May 2010)
Presentation of BE data in a product dossier Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
CBER Isolagen Therapy (IT) BLA FDA Clinical Review Agnes Lim, MD Yao-Yao Zhu, MD, PhD DCEPT/OCTGT/CBER, FDA October 9, 2009 Advisory Committee Meeting.
UTHSC IRB Donna Hollaway, RN, CCRC 11/30/2011 Authority to Audit 45 CFR (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by this.
1 Health and Disease in Populations 2002 Week 9 – 2/5/02 Randomised controlled trials 2 Dr Jenny Kurinczuk.
David Cloutier Director, Research Center Management and Development Budgeting for Industry Sponsored Clinical Trials.
1 Points to Consider of Protocol on Multinational Trial Masaaki Kuwahara, Ph.D. Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. The 4th Kitasato-Harvard symposium,
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory Protocol Compliance Monitoring Darcy Mallon May 7, 2009.
Clinical Pharmacy’s Role in Research Trials Sheree Miller Pharm.D. Investigational Drug Service University of Washington Medical Center.
Accredited Member of the Association of Clinical Research Professionals, USA Tips on clinical trials Maha Al-Farhan B.Sc, M.Phil., M.B.A., D.I.C.
Bioequivalence Studies Dr Sanet Aspinall, PhD Managing Director AddClin Research Pretoria 20 March 2009.
M ODULE H I NTERIM M ONITORING V ISIT Denise Thwing 21 Apr Version: Final 21-Apr-2010.
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
Overview of the Clinical Trial & Protocol Jane Fendl March 31, 2010
Yesterday, today, and tomorrow
Testing People Scientifically.  Clinical trials are research studies in which people help doctors and researchers find ways to improve health care. Each.
Janet Ellen Holwell, CCRC, CCRA President, NY Metropolitan Chapter of ACRP.
Elements of Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Regulatory Coordinator –SCTR SUCCESS Center QA Monitor – NIDA Clinical Trials Network Stephanie Gentilin,
MODULE I Close-Out Visit/Monitoring Reports Jane Fendl April 24, Versions: Final 24-Apr-2010.
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
Common Audit Findings UTHSC Institutional Review Board (IRB)
RESCUE: ACRIN 4701 Protocol Development & Regulatory Compliance (PDRC) Josephine Schloesser, ACRIN Monitor Chris Steward, ACRIN QC Auditor.
PREPARATION FOR A MONITORING VISIT KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme Version: 4-Nov-2008.
MODULE B: Case Report Forms Jane Fendl & Denise Thwing April 7, Version: Final 07-Apr-2010.
Adverse Event/Unanticipated Problems Policy and Procedures November 2007.
Clinical Trials - PHASE 1. WHAT ARE PHASE I TRIALS ?  Phase I trials refer to the first introduction of an experimental drug into the human population.
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
T16 Phase I studies – Phase I units and you, a Phase I unit’s expectation – A Day in the Life of a Phase I Study Coordinator Jeffery Wong, Clinical Research.
Role of the Oncology Research Team Carmen B. Jacobs, BS, RN,OCN, CCRP U.T.M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas U.S.A.
Research Studies GOTCHA’S By Sally Duffy. Failure to follow protocol, investigator agreements and regulations Did not use device/drug in manner specified.
CLINICAL TRIALS – PHASE III. What are phase III trials  Confirmatory phase (Therapeutic confirmatory trial)  Trials are done to obtain sufficient evidence.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
1 Denise K. Thwing, MAS, RN, CCRA March 31, 2010 Version: Final 31-Mar-2010.
Adverse Event Reporting & SAE Reporting for Investigators Trial Number: (POLO-AML-2) Date of training:23 February 2013 Trainer: Deepa Sachdev Venue:Investigator.
Development and Approval of Drugs and Devices EPI260 Lecture 6: Late Phase Clinical Trials April 28, 2011 Richard Chin, M.D.
Bioequivalence Dr Mohammad Issa Saleh.
Stroke Hyperglycemia Insulin Network Effort (SHINE) Trial Site Monitoring Shirley Frederiksen Donna Harsh.
INPULSIS® trial design and baseline characteristics
How to Start An Industry Sponsored Clinical Trial
RIHES-II: H ANDLING A UDITS AND I NSPECTIONS E FFECTIVE D ATE 25 D ECEMBER 2006 V ERSION : 3.0 บุญเหลือ พรึงลำภู 15 มกราคม 2557.
Serious Adverse Event Reporting Start-up Meeting March 25, 2010 Kingston, ON.
Sponsor Visits and Monitoring
Looking Ahead to MTN-017 Ross D. Cranston MD, FRCP Microbicide Trials Network IRMA.
CONDUCTING COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENTS Allen Ditch Director Corporate Quality Bristol Myers Squibb Medical Research Summit March 6, 2003.
Protocol Nichol McBee, MPH, CCRP BIOS Coordinating Center Johns Hopkins University.
Korea Food & Drug Administration Deputy director Kwang-Soo Joo Korea FDA Sep. 29, 2000 : Korean Good Clinical Practice & Relative Guidelines How to Manage.
LSU Journal Club Withdrawal of Inhaled Glucocorticoids and Exacerbations of COPD WISDOM study H. Magnussen MD, et al. Nisha Loganantharaj, PGY1 April 21,
Research Documentation Betty Wilson, CIP, MS Senior Compliance Manager MU IRB Lori Wilcox, EdD Director of Academic Compliance, Corporate Compliance.
The process of drug development. Drug development 0,8 – 1 mld. USD.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Sponsor Visits and Monitoring Barbara Gallagher, RN Clinical Research Nurse Jefferson Clinical Research Institute.
IMPAACT 2010 Screening Visits
The Role and Responsibilities of the Clinical Research Coordinator
IMPAACT 2010 Screening Visits
Dr. Iram Shad PGT-Medicine MU-1, HFH,RWP
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Safety Reporting V6.0 17/01/17.
Pharmacovigilance in clinical trials
IMPAACT 2010 Screening Visits
Bozeman Health Clinical Research
Protocol Review July 8, 2016 Katie Oldmixon, RN MGH DCC
Protocol Review July 8, 2016 Katie Oldmixon, RN MGH DCC
MTN-037 Protocol Overview
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S STUDY FILE
E-CRF Overview Oracle® Clinical Remote Data Capture Training (Version 4.6 HTML) e-CRF Completion John McDonach Manager CDM, PPD.
Good clinical practice
Serious Adverse Event Reconciliation
Presentation transcript:

27 April 2010 Jane Fendl MODULE G A Comparative Trial between Sun Rise Gum and Sun Set Gum in Healthy Gum Chewing Subjects NOTE: this presentation is just for demonstration & may not be consistent or accurate. 1Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

AGENDA Part I  Study Team  Trial Timelines  Overview of  Protocol Review  Trial Products  Inclusion / Exclusion Criteria  Visit Procedures  AEs, SAEs,  Questions Part II  Investigational drug  Monitoring  Questions 2Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

STUDY TEAM  Clinician  Associate Director  Project Manager  Data Manager  Statistician  Primary Clinical Research Associate  Project Associate Dr. Doublemint Dr. Juicey Fruit Jane Fendl Dr. Jot It Down Dr. Clinical Significance John “Omissions” Doe Jenny “Organized” Jones 3Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

TIMELINES  Screening:14 Apr 2010 – 30 Apr 2010  FPFV: 01 May 2010  FPFT to LPLT: 12 weeks  LPLV: 24 Jul 2010  DBL: 08 Sep 2010  Clinical Trial Report: 07 Nov Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

OVERVIEW OF CHEWING GUM Sun Rise is the new formulation of the ultra long lasting gum Sun Set is the current formulation of the ultra long lasting gum Sun Rise ◦ offers longer lasting flavor ◦ has predictable steady flavor profile that is expected to result in a reduced rate of buying 5Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

BACKGROUND As of today:  10 clinical trials have been conducted for Sun Rise and Sun Set gum  Includes 9 Phase 1 trials and 2 Phase 2 exploratory trials  1000 subjects have chewed Sun Rise or Sun Set gum  Data from Previous trials have shown  In single chew studies, peak flavor concentrations were observed at ~10 hours post initial chew  Elimination half-life (t½) of approximately 20 hours  Generally well enjoyed (most frequently reported AEs in the trials were headache, a common side effect in prolonged chewing and hunger ) 6Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

RATIONALE  The Sun Rise formulation will be compared to the Sun Set formulation. Both have identical formulations but the ingredients are from different campaigns as the manufacturing process has been optimized.  The current trial will test for taste equivalence between the two formulations Sun Rise (SR) and Sun Set (SS).  Achievement of taste equivalence between the two formulations will imply that the taste and chewability information obtained with Sun Rise (SR) thus far can be assumed to be identical to that with Sun Set (SS). 7Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

PROTOCOL OVERVIEW Randomized, Single-centre, Double-blind, Two-period cross- over trial in healthy gum chewing subjects 8Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

GENERAL TRIAL INFORMATION Trial Population  Males and females  Age (inclusive)  Number of subjects planned to screen: Up to 100  Planned number of subjects to be randomized: 80  Planned number of subjects to complete the trial: 60* Visits  Screening (-14 to -3 days)  Visits 2 & 3 (13-21 days between V2 & V3)  Visit 4 (7-21 days from V3) *Replacement of dropouts and withdrawals will take place in order to ensure that 60 subjects complete the trial. 9Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

 Primary objective:  to test for taste equivalence between two formulations of Sun Rise and Sunset based on AUC sr,0-10h,SD, C max,sr,SD, AUC ss,0-10h,SD and C max,ss,SD. OBJECTIVES  Secondary objectives:  to compare the taste of the two formulations  to evaluate the long term taste and chewability of the two formulations 10Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

PRIMARY ENDPOINTS  The onset of flavor AUC sr,0-10h,SD, area under the flavor concentration-time curve from 0 to 10 hours after single strip of gum ENDPOINTS  The onset of flavor AUC ss,0-10h,SD, area under the flavor concentration-time curve from 0 to 10 hours after single strip of gum 11Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

TRIAL DESIGN  Randomized, single–centre, double-blind, two period cross over trial in healthy gum chewing subjects.  Dose administration will occur at Visit 2, randomization):  Dose level of Sun Rise and Sun Set will be 1 strip of gum  Trial product will be administered as a single strip placed into the mouth of the subject.  Subjects will remain in the clinic until 12 hours after dose administration. 12Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

TRIAL DESIGN con’t  Subjects will return to the clinic at 18 hours, 24 hours, and 36 hours after dose administration for analysis.  Subjects will have a wash out period of days before returning to the clinic for the second treatment period (Visit 3).  Second treatment period is identical to the first treatment period.  Subjects will return to the clinic for a follow-up visit 7-21 days after dosing on Visit 3. 13Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

TRIAL PRODUCTS  Sun Rise a pack of 5 strips  Sun Set a pack of 5 strips 14Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

Key Inclusion Criteria  Male or female aged years (both inclusive)  Considered generally healthy upon completion of medical history, physical examination, vital signs and ECG, as judged by the Investigator  Able to chew gum for long hours and without swallowing it 15Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

Key Exclusion Criteria  History of 1 st degree relatives that can’t chew gum and walk  Subject who has donated any blood or plasma in the past month or more than 500 mL within 3 months prior to screening  Use of any competing gum within 3 weeks prior to screening  Use of any nicotine gum or weight reduction gum 3 weeks prior to screening  Smoker 16Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

Withdrawal Criteria The subject may be withdrawn from the trial at the discretion of the Investigator or the sponsor due to a safety concern of if judged non-compliant with trial procedures. A subject must be withdrawn if the following applies:  Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant  Protocol deviation: If a protocol deviation or concurrent illness occurs, which, in the clinical judgment of the Investigator, may invalidate the study by interfering with the comparability of the study, the subject will be withdrawn by the Investigator  Withdrawal of consent  Blood donation during the course of the trial 17Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

Assessments for Safety  Physical Exams:  Complete/Full PE: Visits 1, 2, 3 and 4  Vital signs: All visits  ECG: Visits 1 and 4 (with rhythm strip)  Laboratory Assessments (biochemistry, hematology, urinalysis): Visits 1 and 4;  Pregnancy Testing: serum ß-HCG at Visits 1 and 4; urine test is acceptable for all other visits  Adverse event monitoring: All visits 18Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

Laboratory Assessments  Local Laboratory:  Hematology, Biochemistry, Urinalysis, Serum Pregnancy Test 19Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

Laboratory Assessment con’t 20Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

CONCOMITANT ILLNESS & MEDICATION Concomitant Illness: Present at the start of the trial (e.g., first visit) Concomitant Medication: Medication other than the trial products, taken during the trial, including screening and run-in periods 21Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

Randomization & Blinding  At screening the subject must be assigned the lowest available subject number.  At randomization, the subject must always be assigned the visit box with the lowest available 6 digit number.  The subject will only have one box containing two visit boxes each containing two packages of gum.  Subject box 1 will be dispensed to the subject at Visit 2. The second visit box will remain in the subject box until Visit 3.  A replacement subject must be allocated to the same treatment sequence as the subject he replaces. 22Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

Trial Supplies  Trial Supplies  Trial Products:  Sun Rise (SR) 1 strip of gum in a 5 strip pack  Sun Set (SS) 1 strip of gum in a 5 strip pack  Packaging and Distribution:  Double-blind  1 subject box with two visit boxes  two visit boxes per subject box (Visit 2 and Visit 3)  each visit box with will have 2 packs of gum  Subject box, visit box and gum pack will have same number 23Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

Delivery and Receipt  Trial products will be shipped directly from vendor  When dispatched, site will receive a Shipment Notification  Upon receipt, all products will be kept in secure, limited access area.  Check the materials against the shipping receipts (i.e. quantity, numbers, etc.)  Check that all materials are received in good condition 24Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

Trial Product Accountability  Trial Product accountability forms will be reviewed regularly  Trial product(s) will be stored in their recommended storage conditions  Any storage deviations will be reported immediately to the un-blinded CRA (this may result in quarantine of affected trial product)  Returned trial product will be accounted for by the CRA and destroyed onsite 25Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

Monitoring Case Report Forms (CRFs)  2 part NCR paper CRFs  Enter data into CRFs from source documentation  Corrections to CRFs  Affirmation Statement 26Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

Monitoring con’t  First MV within 2 weeks after the 1 st subject is screened  100% SDV (source data verification)  2-3 week intervals or more frequently, as required, depending on enrollment  Review Investigator Trial File (ITF) binders  Review regulatory documents  Collect CRFs and IRB documents  CRA to perform trial product accountability on a regular basis 27Version: Final 14-Apr-2010

Questions? 28Version: Final 14-Apr-2010