Management of an IR: Selected forms and procedures to encounter during the lifespan of the IR Israel, February 8, 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PATENT OFFICE OF REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA. Introduction The provision in Article 108 (1) Council Regulation (EC) 40/94 on the Community trade mark (CTMR)
Advertisements

International Plant Protection Convention CPM 7, Rome March 2012
Trademark Portfolio Management
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
THE MADRID PROTOCOL SYSTEM AIPPI (Hyderabad 2011) Regina Quek One Legal LLC.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations MPU Review of International Application.
THE POSITION OF JOBSEEKERS Paul Minderhoud Centre for Migration Law Coordinator Network on Free Movement of Workers.
The Brussels II Regulation The jurisdiction of courts.
Extraordinary General Shareholders’ Meeting Brussels, 13 April 2011.
AIPPI FORUM AND EXCO TH OCTOBER 2011 INDIA AND THE MADRID PROTOCOL HIMANSHU W. KANE Advocate & Solicitor W. S. Kane & Company.
Overview of the Madrid System Legal Perspective Basic Level Place Day Month Year Legal Division Madrid Registry Brands and Designs Sector.
WIPO’s Activities in the ASEAN : Focus on the Madrid Protocol AIPA Annual Conference March 28, 2015 Denis CROZE Director, WIPO Office in Singapore.
Patty Bartlett Logan County Treasurer / Public Trustee.
Seminar and Roundtable on the Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks Tel Aviv February 8 and 9, Eric FONTAINE Assistant Team Coordinator.
Trademarks as a Business Asset and the Power of Branding Heinz Goddar / Ludwig Kouker April 26/28, /28HG-3 26/28/04/2014 – Trademarks in.
Legal Framework (II) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries of Madrid and.
Madrid – A System for Businesses Madrid Seminar Washington 23 October 2013 Rodrigo Garcia-Conde Examiner.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association MADRID SYSTEM VS. DIRECT INTERNATIONAL FILINGS BY U.S. PARTIES JPO/AIPLA Joint Meeting.
The Madrid system An update on the latest development Israel February 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal Division, Brands and Designs Sector.
The Madrid System Basic features and recent developments
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
Page 1 Free Powerpoint Templates Chapter # 04 The Court.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations After International Registration.
THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS André Ntamack Tel Aviv, July 4-5, 2007.
India and the Madrid Protocol An update on the Madrid system AIPPI, Hyderabad October 14, 2011 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal Division, Brands and Designs.
Exploring the Luxembourg Rail Protocol Martin J Fleetwood – Partner Secretary, Rail Working Group.
THE MADRID SYSTEM Legal Framework (I) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries.
The Madrid system for the International Registration of Marks Basic and General Principles when Filing an International Application Podgorica June 6, 2011.
Jerusalem July 2010 André Ntamack
Madrid – A System for businesses Handling the Madrid Portfolio Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International.
World Intellectual Property Organization THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS: OBJECTIVES AND BASIC FEATURES Tel Aviv, July 4,
Overview of the Madrid System USPTO GIPA 23 October 2013 Alan Datri Senior Counsellor  Slide updated 10/25/13.
2011 Japanese Patent Law Revision AIPLA Annual Meeting October 21, 2011 Yoshi Inaba TMI Associates.
Appeals in patent examination and opposition in Germany Karin Friehe Judge, Federal Patent Court, Munich, Germany.
Utilizing The Madrid Protocol Todd S. Bontemps, Esq. Cooley Godward LLP Christian Larsen Cooley Godward LLP Legal Texts regarding the Madrid System:
TAIEX Seminar on IP rights The Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks Ankara - November 7, 2005 Marie Paule Rizo, WIPO.
World Intellectual Property Organization Recent Developments in the Field of Trademarks and the Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 3 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
International Registration of GIs: Building on Existing Systems Matthijs Geuze WIPO.
Oppositions, Appeals and Oral Proceedings at the EPO Michael Williams.
World Intellectual Property Organization The Strategic Use for SME’s of the Madrid and Hague Systems Betty Berendson, Senior Information Officer Information.
The Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks Kiev March Noëlle Moutout Assistant Legal Officer.
1 REFUGEES AMENDMENT BILL, 2008 Presentation to the Select Committee on Social Services 17 June 2008 Caring, compassionate and responsive.
World Intellectual Property Organization The 1999 Geneva Act of the Hague System for the International Registration of Industrial Designs WIPO National.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations Miscellaneous Issues October 23,
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
BY Suhail Anjum Siddiqui,Advocate B.com.(Hons)LL.B(Hons.) MBA.
WIPO-INSME International Training Program on Intellectual Property and Management of Innovation in Small and Medium- Sized Enterprises May 12, 2005 José.
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
NA, Yanghee International Application Team Korean Intellectual Property Office National Phase of PCT international applications April 26,
1 TOPIC III - PATENT INVALIDATION PROCEDURES EU-CHINA WORKSHOP ON THE CHINESE PATENT LAW HARBIN, SEPTEMBER 2008 Dr. Gillian Davies.
Madrid Trademark Application Filing in Canada: Overview of the Madrid System Darlene H. Carreau Chairperson, Trademark Opposition Board Canadian Intellectual.
International Treaties regarding the Protection of Trademark.
Options for protecting your trademarks in the European Union A Presentation by Mark Kennedy – OHIM External Relations KIPO Seminar on The Community Trade.
Customs Rulings and Protests Tips and Best Practices Atlanta International Forwarders and Brokers Association March 8,
The International Registration of Designs Background and Key Principles of the Hague System.
NORTH AFRICA REGIONAL UPDATE MOHAMED ELDIB. TABLE OF CONTENTS  ABOUT ELDIB & CO  NORTH AFRICA OVERVIEW  LATEST DEVELOPMENTS  IP OVERVIEW  STATISTICS.
WIPO 에서의 국제상표 심사 황 영익 심사관 국제상표심사팀. International Application and Examination n Contents of the International Application n Examination by the Office of.
Content of Tender Dossier - Instructions to Tenderers - Tenders
How the OHIM will handle Madrid filings
WIPO IPAS Juneho Jang Senior Regional Manager
SPCs and the unitary patent package
Protecting a Valuable Asset – How to Protect Your Brand With Madrid
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin The Lisbon System facilitates the protection of appellations of origin.
A Business-Oriented Overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students
ON EUROPEAN TRADEMARKS AND DESIGNS
Presentation transcript:

Management of an IR: Selected forms and procedures to encounter during the lifespan of the IR Israel, February 8, 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal Division, Brands and Designs Sector

Various statements from DCP Offices of designated Contracting Parties (DCP) may communicate the status of protection of a mark through various statements in the course of their examination: Provisional refusal – Rule 17 Interim status – Rule 18bis Grant of protection – Rule 18ter(1) Final decisions – Rule 18ter(2) and (3) Further decision – Rule 18ter(4) Invalidation – Rule 19

In 2011 the IB received… 17,973 statements according to Rule 16 56,730 statements concerning the interim status of a mark – Rule 18bis 162,569 statements of grant of protection – Rule 18ter(1) 73,051 notifications of provisional refusal – Rule 17 62,179 statements concerning final decisions – Rule 18ter(2) and (3) 517 statements concerning further decisions – Rule 18ter(4) 443 notifications of invalidation - Rule 19

Interim status – Rule 18bis(1)(a) Conditions Without notification of provisional refusal Ex officio examination has been completed No grounds for refusal, but Protection subject to opposition or observation Content: Date by which opposition or observation may be filed, if known Timeliness: Optional but before the expiry of the applicable refusal time limit

Interim status – Rule 18bis(1)(b) Conditions After notification of provisional refusal Ex officio examination has been completed No grounds for refusal, but protection subject to opposition or observation Content: Date by which opposition or observation may be filed, if known Timeliness: Optional, but after sending a notification of provisional refusal

Grant of protection – Rule 18ter(1) Conditions Without notification of provisional refusal All procures completed, and there is no ground to refuse Form: Could take the form of a list, electronically or on paper Timeliness: As soon as possible, but before the expiry of the applicable refusal time limit

Protection following a provisional refusal – Rule 18ter(2) Conditions After notification of provisional refusal All procedures completed, and Provisional refusal is withdrawn (total withdrawal), or Protection granted for some goods and services (partial withdrawal or confirmation of partial provisional refusal) Content: Scope of protection, in a positive manner Timeliness: After sending a total or partial provisional refusal Model form 5 – statement of grant of protection following a refusal

Confirmation of total provisional refusal – Rule 18ter(3) Conditions After notification of provisional refusal All procedures completed, and A total provisional refusal is confirmed Timeliness: After sending a total provisional refusal

Further decisions – Rule 18ter(4) Conditions After declarations under Rules 18ter(2) o 18ter(3) Further decision affects the scope of protection, and The Office is aware of that decision Content: Scope of protection Timeliness: After sending a declaration concerning a final decision

Invalidation – Rule 19 The decision Has observed due process, Articles 5(6) of Protocol The effects of an IR are invalidated and the IR is not subject to appeal Content: The authority IRN and name of the holder Scope of the invalidation The fact that the decision is not subject to appeal The date the decision was pronounced and, if known, the effective date

18bis (1)(a) MF8 18bis (1)(a) MF8 17(1) & (3) MF3 17(1) & (3) MF3 18ter( 1) MF4 18ter( 1) MF4 18ter (2) MF5 18ter (2) MF5 18ter (3) MF6 18ter (3) MF6 18ter (4) 19(1) opposition all procedures completed opposition observation? grant refuse refusal based on opposition interim status grant of protection further decision invalidation no grounds for refusal total or partial protection confirmation of total provisional refusal further decision invalidation no opposition observation refusal limit total o partial total

17(1) (a) MF3 17(1) (a) MF3 18ter (2) MF5 18ter (2) MF5 18ter (3) MF6 18ter (3) MF6 18ter (4) MF7 18ter (4) MF7 19(1) grant refuse provisional refusal further decision invalidation grounds for refusal total or partial protection confirmation of total provisional refusal further decision invalidation 18bis (1)(b) MF8 18bis (1)(b) MF8 opposition or observation? opposition interim status 17(1) &(3) MF3 17(1) &(3) MF3 refusal based on opposition refusal limit total o partial total

Subsequent designation “Territorial extension of protection” (Art 3ter and Rule 24) A Contracting Party (CP) may be designated subsequently if, at the time of this subsequent designation, it is bound by the same treaty as: - the CP whose Office is the Office of origin (no change in ownership) - the CP with which the new holder has a connection (in case of change in ownership) Exception in Article 14(5) The subsequent designation does not have an independent lifetime of 10 years, but expires on the same date as the international registration to which it relates

The form MM4 (1) Form MM4 (compulsory)MM4 The subsequent designation may relate to one IR only May subsequently designate several CPs May be presented directly to the IB by the holder or via the Office of the CP of the holder Recording of necessary changes should be made before making the subsequent designation Representative may be appointed in MM4

The form MM4 (2) Certain requirements for certain CPs To declare in the form (2 nd language EU and intent to use) Separate forms (seniority claim, declaration of intention to use the mark) List of G&S must be within the scope of the IR No need to repeat miscellanous indications if they are already given in the international application Similar fee structure as for international applications

Date of Subsequent designation MM4 presented directly to the IB – it will bear the date in which it was received by the IB MM4 presented through an Office – it will bear the date on which it was received by the Office, provided that the IB receives it within 2 months from that date Where subsequent designation contains a request that it take effect immediately after some other event (renewal or the recording of a change or cancellation), the subsequent designation will bear the date of the recording of that other event Irregularities may effect the date of subsequent designation Recording, publication and notification

Conversion (opting-back provision) To the extent that a designation of EU in an IR has been withdrawn, refused or has ceased to have effect, conversion may be requested through a subsequent designation of its Member States under the Madrid system Offers the holder of an IR the option of converting the designation of the EU into either a national application filed directly with the Office of a Member State or a subsequent designation of that Member State under the Madrid system Form MM16 to be presented through OHIM Must indicate ground for the conversion A subsequent designation resulting from conversion will bear the date on which the EU was recorded in the International Register

Changes in the name and/or address Change of name or address of the holder Form MM9 is compulsory To be presented to the IB directly by holder or through Office of the CP of the holder Change of name or address of the representative Form MM10 is optional

Restrictions in the protection of the IR The holder may wish to record restrictions in the protection of his IR A limitation (MM6) A renunciation (MM7) A cancellation (MM8) Forms to be presented to the IB directly by the holder or by the Office of the CP of the holder

Limitation (MM6) A limitation is a procedure to remove G&S in respect of all or some of the DCP in an IR One form may contain a limitation for several IRs The G&S will not be removed from the IR as recorded in the International Register The G&S may be subject to subsequent designation and will be taken into account when calculating the supplementary fees for renewal Voluntary limitation – no transformation later is possible Declaration that a limitation has no effect

Recording of a Limitation

Renunciation (MM7) A renunciation is a procedure intended to abandon the effects of an IR for all the G&S in respect of some of the DCP One form may be used to request the recording of a renunciation of several IRs The G&S may be subject to subsequent designation Voluntary renunciation – no transformation later is possible

Cancellation (MM8) A cancellation is a procedure to cancel the effects of an IR for all or some of the G&S in respect of all the DCP G&S will be permanently removed from the International Register No subsequent designation will be possible Would need to file a new International Application Voluntary cancellation – no transformation later is possible

Limitation, Renunciation, Cancellation Limitation (MM6) Renunciation (MM7) Cancellation (MM8) Goods & Services SomeAllSome or All Designated Offices Some or AllSomeAll Effects for Register Remain Removed Subsequent Designations  Renewals  Fees177 CHFN/A

Change in ownership Change in ownership may result from a contract (assignment), court decision, operation of law (inheritance or bankruptcy), or automatic (merger of two companies) May relate to all G&S or to only some G&S May be in respect of all the DCP or only some of them Form MM5 is compulsory and regard total and partial change in ownership

Entitlement of the transferee Change in ownership may be recorded only if the transferee is a person who is entitled to file an International Application Entitlement of the new owner is considered in respect of each DCP Several transferees – each of them must qualify as entitled A transferee may claim the necessary connection with several CPs (accumulation of entitlement)

Form MM5 The form may be presented to the IB by the holder, by the Office of the CP of the recorded holder, or by the Office of the CP of the transferee An Office may require the furnishing of evidence concerning the change in ownership A single request may relate to several IRs Total change in ownership: The recording of the representative of the transferor will be cancelled ex officio by the IB Partial change in ownership: The CPs in respect of which the change in ownership is to be recorded should be named and the G&S should be listed

CP of the transferor France Israel Spain Egypt Germany Algeria China CP of the transferee Recording of new holder?

Partial change in ownership Request of change in ownership of an IR in respect of only some G&S or some of the DCPs, the change will be recorded under the IRN concerned A separate IR is created – with indication of a capital letter The resulting separate IRs may be the subject of a subsequent total or partial change in ownership Possible merger of IRs resulting from partial change in ownership Declaration that a change in ownership has no effect

Ceasing of Effect and Transformation For a period of five years from the date of its registration, the international registration remains dependent on the basic mark If the basic mark ceases to have effect, the IR will no longer be protected Transformation limits the effects of dependency Cannot follow voluntary cancellation of designation Not possible for designations already subject to total refusal Must file in national/regional Office within 3 months from the date on which the IR was cancelled

Procedure of Ceasing of Effect Designated Office IB Holder Cancellation before the expiry of 5 yrs from the date of IR Local Rep. Basic mark a, b, c Cancellation Office of origin Transformation b, c 3 months from the date of cancellation Ceasing of effect Power of attorney Inscription to Register 2 5

Renewal of an IR (1) The IR is valid for a period of 10 years, and can be renewed by paying the renewal fees When renewing an IR, no modifications may be made Any modifications to be made, shall be duly presented on the required form, before or after the renewal Possible to renew for some DCP only Unofficial notice of renewal 6 months before the date of expiry Payment direct with the IB Fees are due at the date of expiry at the latest 6 months grace period (+ 50% basic fee) Payment by credit card or current account with WIPO E-renewal

Renewal of an IR (2) Designated Office IB Holder REP Reminder Six months before the expiry Renewal Notification + Payment 1.Renewal Reception 2.Data Entry 3.Renewal Examination 4.Finance processing 5.Renewal Inscription 6.1Gazette 6.2 Notification to the DCPs 6.3Certificate to the holder Renewal Request Reminder 1 Inscription to Register 3

Thank you for your attention