Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs). 2 Child Welfare Final Rule (excerpt from Executive Summary) The child and family services reviews … [focus]

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Strategies for addressing challenges around Termination of Parental Rights. Presenters: Bill Stanton, Consultant, ICF Consulting Mary Coogan, Esq. Advocates.
Advertisements

From QA to QI: The Kentucky Journey. In the beginning, we were alone and compliance reigned.
Family Services Division THE FAMILY CENTERED PRACTICE MODEL.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
Florida’s IV-E Waiver Mary I. Armstrong, Ph.D. Cathy Sowell, L.C.S.W. Svetlana Yampolskaya, Ph.D September 6, 2012.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
The Child and Family Services Review: An Agenda for Change Kathy Yurchisin Krista Hudson Kentucky CFSR Stakeholders Advisory Group.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
Building a System of Care in Child Welfare: North Carolina
White Earth Indian Child Welfare Initiative 2010
Understanding and Using CONCURRENT PLANNING To Achieve Permanency for Children and Youth
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley CFSR2 Data Indicators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly Center for Social Services.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
Strategic Thinking to Align Initiatives and Integrate Management, Supervision, and Practice Heidi D. McIntosh, MSW Deputy Commissioner Fernando J. Muñiz,
1 Agency/Court Collaboration in the CFSR: ENGAGING COURTS AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM The National Child Welfare Resource Center For Organizational Improvement.
1 Lessons Learned about the Service Array from the First Round of Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs) The Service Array Process National Child Welfare.
1 THE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES REVIEW (CFSR) PRACTICE PRINCIPLES: Critical Principles for Assessing and Enhancing the Service Array The Service Array.
Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention Program (CBCAP) 2006 Program Instruction Overview May 2006 Melissa Lim Brodowski Office on Child Abuse and Neglect,
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
Engaging Community Stakeholders and Building Community Partnerships
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Program Staff Presentation 1 Program Staff Presentation.
Minnesota Child Welfare Program Goals Safety Permanency Well-Being.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley The Child and Family Services Review Composite Scores: A “Great Start” Barbara.
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
Oregon’s Community-Involved Approach to Differential Response Implementation.
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
Indicating Success in Public Child Welfare Child Outcomes, System Performance and the CFSR Process Susan Smith and Lisa Tuttle Casey Family Programs July.
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION The nation’s voice for the protection of children & animals THE CHILD WELFARE RESPONSE CONTINUUM CHRONIC ISSUES THAT HAVE PLAGUED.
Training Agenda Continuous Quality Improvement Section Federal CFSR Oklahoma CFSR Oklahoma Program Improvement Plan (PIP) CFSR/Case Review Instrument.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
SSIS as a Case Management Tool Nan Beman Anne Broskoff.
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES PLAN and REVIEW. CFSP Child and Family Service Plan.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Georgia Georgia’s Lead Agency Plan Georgia 2 KVC Behavioral Healthcare The lead agency in the North East Region of Kansas and Metro Kansas City, Kansas.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
Understanding Applicable Laws in Child Protection and Child Welfare Cases: Presentation at TCAP Tribal Courts Conference – Minneapolis August 20, 2015.
IOWA PARTNERSHIPS Kara Hudson,CFSR State Coordinator (515) Michelle Muir, Executive Officer (515)
1 Executive Summary of the Strategic Plan and Proposed Action Steps January 2013 Healthy, Safe, Smart and Strong 1.
1 CHILDREN SAFE AND THRIVING WITH FOREVER FAMILIES, SOONER DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES Isabel Blanco, Deputy Director of Field Operations September.
Permanency.
Common Goals: Child Safety, Permanency and Well-Being Citizen Review Panel National Conference May 21-23, 2008 St. Paul, Minnesota Christeen Borsheim,
The Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) February 2008 Update.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
OVERVIEW OF FEDERAL PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention (CBCAP) and Promoting Safe and Stable Families (PSSF) Grantees Meeting.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
Standards and Competences for Social work Education for working with children and youth Prof dr Nevenka Zegarac Ass MA Anita Burgund.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
1 1 Child Welfare Policy and Practice for Supervisors.
1 Department of Human Services (DHS)/Child Welfare Services (CWS) Branch Child & Family Services Review (CFSR) & Program Improvement Plan (PIP)
STRONG FAMILIES SELF- SUFFICENT STABLE RELIANT SUPPORTIVE.
PIP effective January 1, 2017 & runs through December 31, 2018
Office of Children's Services
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services January 23, 2015
Pathways to Permanency: Safety, Permanency and Well-Being
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services November 14, 2014
Insert Meeting Date and Presenters
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Child and Family Services Reviews (CFSRs)

2 Child Welfare Final Rule (excerpt from Executive Summary) The child and family services reviews … [focus] … on outcomes and results for children and families, [provide] … technical assistance to assist States in improving their child welfare systems in a timely way, as well as accountability for non-compliance, [use] … multiple qualitative and quantitative information sources to better evaluate child and family outcomes and system performance, and [engage] … the States as partners in identifying strengths and weaknesses, defining program improvements, and crafting technical assistance that will result in better outcomes and systems.

3 Philosophy and Conceptual Framework Partnership Between the Federal and State Governments Examination of Outcomes of Services to Children and Families and State Agency Systems That Affect Those Services Identification of State Needs and Strengths Use of Multiple Sources To Assess State Performance Comprehensive Review of All Relevant Child Welfare Programs Promotion of Practice Principles Emphasis on Accountability Focus on Improving Systems Enhancement of State Capacity To Become Self- Evaluating

4 Practice Principles: Family-Centered Practice Community-Based Practice Individualizing Services Strengthening Parental Capacity

5 Safety Children are, first and foremost, protected from abuse and neglect Children are safely maintained in their own homes whenever possible and appropriate Permanency Children have permanency and stability in their living situations The continuity of family relationships and connections is preserved for children Child and Family Well-Being Families have enhanced capacity to provide for their children’s needs Children receive appropriate services to meet their educational needs Children receive adequate services to meet their physical and mental health needs Outcomes:

6 Systemic Factors: Information System CapacityInformation System Capacity Case Review SystemCase Review System Quality Assurance SystemQuality Assurance System TrainingTraining Service ArrayService Array Agency Responsiveness to CommunityAgency Responsiveness to Community Foster and Adoptive Parent Licensing, Recruitment, and RetentionFoster and Adoptive Parent Licensing, Recruitment, and Retention

7 SAFETY OUTCOME 1 Children are, first and foremost, protected from abuse and neglect. Item 1: Timeliness of initiating investigations of reports of child maltreatment Item 2: Repeat maltreatment

8 SAFETY OUTCOME 2 Children are safely maintained in their homes whenever possible and appropriate. Item 3: Services to family to protect child(ren) in the home and prevent removal or re-entry into foster care Item 4: Risk assessment and safety management

9 PERMANENCY OUTCOME 1 Children have permanency and stability in their living situations Item 5: Foster care re-entries Item 6: Stability of foster care placement Item 7: Permanency goal for child Item 8: Reunification, guardianship, or permanent placement with relatives Item 9: Adoption Item 10: Other planned permanent living

10 PERMANENCY OUTCOME 2 The continuity of family relationships and connections is preserved for children. Item 11: Proximity of foster care Item 12: Placement with siblings Item 13: Visiting with parents and siblings in foster care Item 14: Preserving connections Item 15: Relative placement Item 16: Relationship of child in care with parents

11 WELL-BEING OUTCOME 1 Families have enhanced capacity to provide for their children’s needs. Item 17: Needs and services of child, parents, and foster parents Item 18: Child and family involvement in case planning Item 19: Caseworker visits with child Item 20: Caseworker visits with parents

12 WELL-BEING OUTCOME 2 Children receive appropriate services to meet their educational needs. Item 21: Educational needs of the child

13 WELL-BEING OUTCOME 3 Children receive adequate services to meet their physical and mental health needs. Item 22: Physical health of the child Item 23: Mental/behavioral health of the child

14 SYSTEMIC FACTOR Statewide Information System Item 24: State is operating a Statewide information system that, at a minimum, can readily identify the status, demographic characteristics, location, and goals for the placement of every child who is (or within the immediately preceding 12 months, has been) in foster care.Item 24: State is operating a Statewide information system that, at a minimum, can readily identify the status, demographic characteristics, location, and goals for the placement of every child who is (or within the immediately preceding 12 months, has been) in foster care.

15 SYSTEMIC FACTOR Case Review System Item 25: Provides a process that ensures that each child has a written case plan to be developed jointly with the child’s parent(s) that includes the required provisions.Item 25: Provides a process that ensures that each child has a written case plan to be developed jointly with the child’s parent(s) that includes the required provisions. Item 26: Provides a process for the periodic review of the status of each child, no less frequently than once every 6 months, either by a court or by administrative review.Item 26: Provides a process for the periodic review of the status of each child, no less frequently than once every 6 months, either by a court or by administrative review. Item 27: Provides a process that ensures that each child in foster care under the supervision of the State has a permanency hearing in a qualified court or administrative body no later than 12 months from the date the child entered foster care and no less frequently than every 12 months thereafter.Item 27: Provides a process that ensures that each child in foster care under the supervision of the State has a permanency hearing in a qualified court or administrative body no later than 12 months from the date the child entered foster care and no less frequently than every 12 months thereafter. Item 28: Provides a process for termination of parental rights proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Adoption and Safe Families Act.Item 28: Provides a process for termination of parental rights proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Adoption and Safe Families Act. Item 29: Provides a process for foster parents, preadoptive parents, and relative caregivers of children in foster care to be notified of, and have an opportunity to be heard in, any review or hearing held with respect to the child.Item 29: Provides a process for foster parents, preadoptive parents, and relative caregivers of children in foster care to be notified of, and have an opportunity to be heard in, any review or hearing held with respect to the child.

16 SYSTEMIC FACTOR Quality Assurance System Item 30: The State has developed and implemented standards to ensure that children in foster care are provided quality services that protect the safety and health of the children.Item 30: The State has developed and implemented standards to ensure that children in foster care are provided quality services that protect the safety and health of the children. Item 31: The State is operating an identifiable quality assurance system that is in place in the jurisdictions where the services included in the CFSP are provided, evaluates the quality of services, identifies strengths and needs of the service delivery system, provides relevant reports, and evaluates program improvement measures implemented.Item 31: The State is operating an identifiable quality assurance system that is in place in the jurisdictions where the services included in the CFSP are provided, evaluates the quality of services, identifies strengths and needs of the service delivery system, provides relevant reports, and evaluates program improvement measures implemented.

17 SYSTEMIC FACTOR Training Item 32: The State is operating a staff development and training program that supports the goals and objectives in the CFSP, addresses services provided under titles IV-B and IV-E, and provides initial training for all staff who deliver these services.Item 32: The State is operating a staff development and training program that supports the goals and objectives in the CFSP, addresses services provided under titles IV-B and IV-E, and provides initial training for all staff who deliver these services. Item 33: The State provides for ongoing training for staff that addresses the skills and knowledge base needed to carry out their duties with regard to the services included in the CFSP.Item 33: The State provides for ongoing training for staff that addresses the skills and knowledge base needed to carry out their duties with regard to the services included in the CFSP. Item 34: The State provides training for current or prospective foster parents, adoptive parents, and staff of State licensed or approved facilities that care for children receiving foster care or adoption assistance under title IV-E that addresses the skills and knowledge base needed to carry out their duties with regard to foster and adopted children.Item 34: The State provides training for current or prospective foster parents, adoptive parents, and staff of State licensed or approved facilities that care for children receiving foster care or adoption assistance under title IV-E that addresses the skills and knowledge base needed to carry out their duties with regard to foster and adopted children.

18 SYSTEMIC FACTOR Service Array Item 35: The State has in place an array of services that assess the strengths and needs of children and families and determine other service needs, address the needs of families in addition to individual children in order to create a safe home environment, enable children to remain safely with their parents when reasonable, and help children in foster and adoptive placements achieve permanency.Item 35: The State has in place an array of services that assess the strengths and needs of children and families and determine other service needs, address the needs of families in addition to individual children in order to create a safe home environment, enable children to remain safely with their parents when reasonable, and help children in foster and adoptive placements achieve permanency. Item 36: The services in item 35 are accessible to families and children in all political jurisdictions covered in the State’s CFSP.Item 36: The services in item 35 are accessible to families and children in all political jurisdictions covered in the State’s CFSP. Item 37: The services in item 35 can be individualized to meet the unique needs of children and families served by the agency.Item 37: The services in item 35 can be individualized to meet the unique needs of children and families served by the agency.

19 SYSTEMIC FACTOR Agency Responsiveness to the Community Item 38: In implementing the provisions of the CFSP, the State engages in ongoing consultation with tribal representatives, consumers, service providers, foster care providers, the juvenile court, and other public and private child- and family-serving agencies and includes the major concerns of these representatives in the goals and objectives of the CFSP.Item 38: In implementing the provisions of the CFSP, the State engages in ongoing consultation with tribal representatives, consumers, service providers, foster care providers, the juvenile court, and other public and private child- and family-serving agencies and includes the major concerns of these representatives in the goals and objectives of the CFSP. Item 39: The agency develops, in consultation with these representatives, annual reports of progress and services delivered pursuant to the CFSP.Item 39: The agency develops, in consultation with these representatives, annual reports of progress and services delivered pursuant to the CFSP. Item 40: The State’s services under the CFSP are coordinated with services or benefits of other Federal or federally assisted programs serving the same population.Item 40: The State’s services under the CFSP are coordinated with services or benefits of other Federal or federally assisted programs serving the same population.

20 SYSTEMIC FACTOR Foster and Adoptive Licensing, Recruitment, and Retention Item 41: The State has implemented standards for foster family homes and child care institutions which are reasonably in accord with recommended national standardsItem 41: The State has implemented standards for foster family homes and child care institutions which are reasonably in accord with recommended national standards Item 42: The standards are applied to all licensed or approved foster family homes or child care institutions receiving title IV-E or IV-B funds.Item 42: The standards are applied to all licensed or approved foster family homes or child care institutions receiving title IV-E or IV-B funds.

21 Two Phases of CFSR: Statewide Assessment On-Site Review  Final Report  Program Improvement Plan (PIP)

22 Statewide Assessment Six months before the on-site review, ACF transmits data profiles to the state which then begins the Statewide Assessment using the specified instrument, to be submitted 60 days prior to the on-site review. The data profile includes data composites and measures relevant to Safety (based on NCANDS data) and Permanency (based on NCANDS and AFCARS data). The data composites use data from a 12 month period of data submissions following the end of the two-year PIP period.

23 Statewide Assessment Narrative assessments of a)child and family outcomes and b)systemic factors Emphases on a)meaningful stakeholder involvement (particularly with courts, tribes and youth) b)descriptive and evaluative language c)use of data

24 On-Site Review 3 sites largest metro 2 sites selected using SA info Outcomes (using On-Site Review Instrument) 65 case record reviews 25 in-home 40 foster care (stratified) Systemic Factors (using Stakeholder Interview Guide) stakeholder interviews

25 On-Site Review Largest metro 31 cases 11 in-home 20 foster care 2 sites selected using SA info 17 cases 7 in-home 10 foster care

26 Final Report  The Final Report includes the written determination of substantial conformity – based on the Statewide Assessment and findings from the On-Site Review – for each of the outcomes and systemic factors reviewed.

27 Program Improvement Plan (PIP)  Addresses all areas of non-conformity Emphasis on collaboration

28 The Collaborative Process A common goal Benefit to all parties A vehicle for collaborating The ability to come to consensus Strong leadership A process for ensuring meaningful stakeholder involvement Shared success Use of stakeholders to engage new partners A shared vision for the future Ongoing evaluation