Methods: TOPS Generated 1km monthly Tave, Precip, VPD and solar radiation surfaces from downscaled WCRP CMIP3 scenarios (Maurer et al., 2007) Input ParameterUnited.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Simple Production Efficiency Model 1/18 Willem de Kooning ( ) A Tree in Naples.
Advertisements

Gridded Biome-BGC Simulation with Explicit Fire-disturbance Sinkyu Kang, John Kimball, Steve W. Running Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, School.
Satellite Remote Sensing and Applications in Hydrometeorology Xubin Zeng Dept of Atmospheric Sciences University of Arizona Tucson, AZ
Annual Precipitation (mm)
03/06/2015 Modelling of regional CO2 balance Tiina Markkanen with Tuula Aalto, Tea Thum, Jouni Susiluoto and Niina Puttonen.
G.S. Karlovits, J.C. Adam, Washington State University 2010 AGU Fall Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
Making Climate Change Data Easier to Find and Use Michael Corsello Seshu Vaddey
Dennis P. Lettenmaier Lan Cuo Nathalie Voisin University of Washington Climate Impacts Group Climate and Water Forecasts for the 2009 Water Year October.
Mapping future snow cover in Idaho Brandon C. Moore University of Idaho.
Biosphere Modeling Galina Churkina MPI for Biogeochemistry.
Hydrological Modeling FISH 513 April 10, Overview: What is wrong with simple statistical regressions of hydrologic response on impervious area?
ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology
PREFER 1 st Annual Review Meeting, 5-6 Dec 2013, Milano-Italy PREFER WP3.1 - Information Support to Preparedness/Prevention Phase Product: “Daily Fire.
Impact of Climate Change on Flow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
NCPP – needs, process components, structure of scientific climate impacts study approach, etc.
WaterSmart, Reston, VA, August 1-2, 2011 Steve Markstrom and Lauren Hay National Research Program Denver, CO Jacob LaFontaine GA Water.
The University of Mississippi Geoinformatics Center NASA MRC RPC Review Meeting: April, 2008 Evaluation for the Integration of a Virtual Evapotranspiration.
OUCE Oxford University Centre for the Environment “Applying probabilistic climate change information to strategic resource assessment and planning” Funded.
Ag. & Biological Engineering
Rapid Ecoregional Assessment. Climate was primarily modeled using models and data from the Scenarios Network for Alaska and Arctic Planning. See
Zhang Mingwei 1, Deng Hui 2,3, Ren Jianqiang 2,3, Fan Jinlong 1, Li Guicai 1, Chen Zhongxin 2,3 1. National satellite Meteorological Center, Beijing, China.
Real-time integration of remote sensing, surface meteorology, and ecological models.
AWRA Water Resources Conference Jacksonville, FL, November Modeling of Watershed Systems Lauren Hay Steve Markstrom Steve Regan.
Page 1 Met Office contribution to RL5 Task ‘Large-scale interactions between atmospheric moisture and water availability - coupling of atmospheric.
Experimental seasonal hydrologic forecasting for the Western U.S. Dennis P. Lettenmaier Andrew W. Wood, Alan F. Hamlet Climate Impacts Group University.
Assessment of Hydrology of Bhutan What would be the impacts of changes in agriculture (including irrigation) and forestry practices on local and regional.
Land Use, Land Cover, and the Impacts of Climate Change in Agriculture Hexbin plot of MLCT raw vs. NLCD (left) and of MLCT adjusted crop versus Agland2000.
Cristina Milesi Ecological Forecasting Lab CSU Monterey Bay / NASA Ames Research Center Co-Is: Forrest Melton and Weile Wang, CSU Monterey Bay / NASA Ames.
Streamflow Predictability Tom Hopson. Conduct Idealized Predictability Experiments Document relative importance of uncertainties in basin initial conditions.
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 Slide 1 Analysis of Evaporation Basic Calibration Workshop March 10-13, 2009 LMRFC.
Integrating Remote Sensing, Flux Measurements and Ecosystem Models Faith Ann Heinsch Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group (NTSG) University of Montana.
Reducing Canada's vulnerability to climate change - ESS J28 Earth Science for National Action on Climate Change Canada Water Accounts AET estimates for.
JULES on Eddie Richard Essery (with thanks to Mike Mineter and Magnus Hagdorn Contemporary Climate, 8 October 2009.
15 december 2009 Usefulness of GCM data for predicting global hydrological changes Frederiek Sperna Weiland Rens van Beek Jaap Kwadijk Marc Bierkens.
Variation of Surface Soil Moisture and its Implications Under Changing Climate Conditions 1.
An Adaptive Management Model for the Red River Basin of the North.
Evapotranspiration Partitioning in Land Surface Models By: Ben Livneh.
Evaluating Utah Energy Balance Snowmelt Model in Operational Forecasting John A Koudelka David Tarboton Utah State University 3/26/2015.
Gridded Biome-BGC Simulation with Explicit Fire-disturbance Sinkyu Kang, John Kimball, Steve W. Running Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, School.
Understanding hydrologic changes: application of the VIC model Vimal Mishra Assistant Professor Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Gandhinagar
A Bottom-Up Modelling Perspective on Representativeness: The Example of PIXGRO Europe J. Tenhunen.
Additional data sources and model structure: help or hindrance? Olga Semenova State Hydrological Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia Pedro Restrepo Office.
Feng Zhang and Aris Georgakakos School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology Sample of Chart Subheading Goes Here Comparing.
Deforestation and the Stream Flow of the Amazon River -- Land Surface Processes and Atmospheric Feedbacks Michael T. Coe1, Marcos Heil Costa2, and Britaldo.
An Improved Global Snow Classification Dataset for Hydrologic Applications (Photo by Kenneth G. Libbrecht and Patricia Rasmussen) Glen E. Liston, CSU Matthew.
Fine-Resolution, Regional-Scale Terrestrial Hydrologic Fluxes Simulated with the Integrated Landscape Hydrology Model (ILHM) David W Hyndman Anthony D.
Estimating Groundwater Recharge in Porous Media Aquifers in Texas Bridget Scanlon Kelley Keese Robert Reedy Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of.
Panut Manoonvoravong Bureau of research development and hydrology Department of water resources.
1 Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research Vegetation dynamics in simulations of radiatively-forced climate change Richard A. Betts, Chris D.
Evapotranspiration Estimates over Canada based on Observed, GR2 and NARR forcings Korolevich, V., Fernandes, R., Wang, S., Simic, A., Gong, F. Natural.
How much water will be available in the upper Colorado River Basin under projected climatic changes? Abstract The upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB), is.
Copernicus Observations Requirements Workshop, Reading Requirements from agriculture applications Nadine Gobron On behalf Andrea Toreti & MARS colleagues.
Dr. Monia Santini University of Tuscia and CMCC CMCC Annual Meeting
Enabling Ecological Forecasting by integrating surface, satellite, and climate data with ecosystem models Ramakrishna Nemani Petr Votava Andy Michaelis.
1 Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research Tropical vegetation dynamics in simulations of radiatively-forced climate change Richard Betts Hadley.
Arctic RIMS & WALE (Regional, Integrated Hydrological Monitoring System & Western Arctic Linkage Experiment) John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running.
Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS)
3-PG The Use of Physiological Principles in Predicting Forest Growth
The NCAR Community Climate System Model (CCSM)
Future Work Three timelines
150 years of land cover and climate change impacts on streamflow in the Puget Sound Basin, Washington Dennis P. Lettenmaier Lan Cuo Nathalie Voisin University.
Adam Butler & Glenn Marion, Biomathematics & Statistics Scotland •
Ensemble Ecosystem Model Experiment and Intercomparison using the Terrestrial Observation and Prediction System (TOPS) Weile Wang, Jennifer L. Dungan,
Hydrologic response of Pacific Northwest Rivers to climate change
University of Washington Center for Science in the Earth System
EC Workshop on European Water Scenarios Brussels 30 June 2003
Satellite data that we’ve acquired
Overview of Climate Impact Assessment Framework and Implementation
Gopal Bhatt1 and Lewis Linker2 1 Penn State, 2 US EPA
Regional Drought and Crop Yield Information System (RDCYIS)
Presentation transcript:

Methods: TOPS Generated 1km monthly Tave, Precip, VPD and solar radiation surfaces from downscaled WCRP CMIP3 scenarios (Maurer et al., 2007) Input ParameterUnited States (1km) Impervious surface area SERGoM (Theobald et al., 2009) Climate (baseline run) TOPOMET Weather Surfaces Climate (forecast) WCRP CMIP3 (Maurer et al., 2007) Ensemble average for scenarios A1B, A2, B1 ElevationNational Elevation Dataset (resampled to 1km) Leaf Area Index (baseline run) MODIS MOD15A2 LAI (Myneni et al., 2000) Leaf Area Index (forecast) Simulated by BIOME-BGC SoilsU.S. STATSGO2 database Land CoverMODIS MOD12Q1 Land cover (Friedl et al., 2002) LPJ?

Methods: Climate Downscaling Statistical downscaling: Bias-Correction Spatial Downscaling More info at:

Alternate Method for NPS Park-level scenarios? Climate change factor technique Tabor and Williams (2010) Methods proposed for use to generate 4km output that would serve as the basis for NPS park-level scenarios Similar overall approach, though the BCSD method makes corrections in relationships between predicted and observed climate for each GCM grid cell

Methods: Integration of SERGoM Data SERGoM ISA scenarios are used to adjust the soil depth in TOPS on a decadal time step Assumption: Decreases in soil water holding capacity are linearly proportional to increasing fractional ISA Approach worked well in Chesapeake and Delaware watersheds

Scenarios, A1B (avg + high + low) A2 (avg + high + low) B1 (avg + high + low) No LUC3 runs SERGoM LUC3 runs SERGoM + biome shifts? 3 runs SERGoM + BMPs + biome shifts? 3 runs High / low scenarios defined by 80 th and 20 th percentile for each monthly timestep runs, each producing ~2 TB of data Plus 9 1km monthly climate scenarios, and daily baseline runs for

Climate Maximum Temperature Minimum Temperature Average Temperature Precipitation Vapor Pressure Deficit Shortwave Radiation Vegetation Water stress factor Gross primary productivity Net primary productivity Respiration (Maintenance, Heterotrophic) Hydrology Outflow Evapotranspiration Soil water potential (another indicator of vegetation water stress) Snow water equivalent Soil moisture (VWC) BGC Biome Types Grasses Shrubs Savannah Broadleaf evergreen forest Broadleaf deciduous forest Needleleaf evergreen forest Needleleaf deciduous forest Unvegetated Urban (masked) TOPS Parameters

Data is natively produced as 32-bit floating point binary grids (flt32) Anticipate production of TB of data Objective: Transfer all data and metadata to NPS for archiving and distribution Options: Deliver as floats Convert to GeoTIFF Convert to NetCDF Data storage limitations? Data storage costs? Back-up and redundancy? Extract subsets for selectLCCs only? Data Formats & Delivery

Sample Climate (TopoMet) PrecipitationTmax/Tmin SradVPD

Sample TOPS Results GPP EvapoTranspiration Runoff

Projected Impervious and Climate GFDL CM2.0 A1B and A2

TOPS Results: Coupled Climate and Land Use Change 2100 Runoff 2100 GPP SRES A1 vs A2 over US urban areas Loss in GPP (kg C) Impervious Area (km 2 ) Total Runoff (mm) Coupled climate and land use change impacts over urban areas +54% +110% +60% +90% -40% -25%

Schedule TaskDates Port TOPS-BGC to monthly timestep (again) November to February (complete) Acquire PRISM data and prepare downscaling February (complete) Pre-process new SERGoM scenariosFeb 21 – March 7 (complete) Calculation of ensemble averages / downscaling to 1km w/Thrasher & Duffy March 1-21 (In progress) First runs (climate only)March Second runs (climate + LUC)March Third runs (climate + LUC + BMP)April 1-5 Data analysis and initial summariesApril 1-30 Data preparation for transferMay - June

PrecipitationTaveVPD Projected Climate under IPPCC SRES A1B 1km Downscaled GFDL CM2.0