NOAA Data Sharing Policy for Grants and Cooperative Agreements Ingrid Guch NOAA Environmental Data Management Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of University Partnerships Office of Policy Development and Research U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of University Partnerships.
Advertisements

Catholic School Councils A summary of 19 page document listed on school website.
Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Audit Requirements for Nonprofits.
Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Subpart – C Pre-Federal Award Requirements and Contents.
A Change in Plans: Grant Modifications
Office of University Partnerships Madlyn Wohlman-Rodriguez Hispanic-Serving Institutions Assisting Communities (HSIAC) 2006 Grant Terms and Conditions.
NIH Public Access Policy What it means to OHSU Researchers Presented by: Andrew Hamilton Date: 10/22/2009.
Not legally binding FP7 Rules for Participation and Grant agreement FP7 Helpdesk 
Grant Writing 101 – Part 2 Information and Tips for Preparing and Submitting a Grant Application Nancy Alexander, MBA Office of Sponsored Programs.
Rail Freight Assistance Program (RFAP) S ETTING THE S TAGE FOR THE F UTURE Rail Transportation Assistance Program (Rail TAP) RFAC Meeting April 28, 2010.
BUDGET BASICS FOR ADMINISTRATORS TIJUANNA DECOSTER, PH.D., MPA CHIEF GRANTS MANAGEMENT OFFICER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE.
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
NSF Data Management Plan Requirements Alex Kanous
Project Management: Post Award Policies, Procedures and Guidelines A Tutorial for New Principal Investigators.
Staff Timesheets 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
NIH Public Access Policy What it means to OHSU Researchers Presented by: Andrew Hamilton Date: 3/18/2007.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
North Dakota Open Records & Meetings Law Government in the Sunshine.
What Will My Records Retention Schedule Look Like ?
Pre-Award/Broad Agency Announcement Daniel A. Namur and Jane W. Piercy.
VIRGINIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE EDUCATION FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCURE ACT OF 2002 (PPEA) Augusta County Board of Supervisors Wednesday, January 6, 2009.
Circulation of authentic instruments under Regulation 650/2012 speaker – Ivaylo Ivanov – Bulgarian Notary Chamber.
SWIS Digital Inspections Project (SWIS DIP) Chris Allen, Information Management Branch California Integrated Waste Management Board November 5, 2008 The.
Proposed NOAA Data Policy for Grantees Information Briefing for DAARWG November 16, 2011 Ingrid Guch Director, NESDIS Cooperative Research Program.
Providing Access to Your Data Matthew Mayernik National Center for Atmospheric Research Version 1.0 Review Date.
1 Module 4: Post-Award Administration of Sponsored Projects (Part 1) Office of Research and Sponsored Programs The University of Mississippi 100 Barr Hall.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Dr. John N. Austin, Director and Ms. Renee S. Jones, Associate Director Delaware State University Office.
Advertising your data: Agency/Institution requirements for publishing metadata Nancy Hoebelheinrich Knowledge Motifs LLC Version 1.0 [Reviewed August 2012]
WORKING WITH SPO AND IAO Lynne HollyerNoam Pines Associate Director Research Administrator Industry Alliances OfficeSponsored Projects Office
Elements of a Data Management Plan Bill Michener University Libraries University of New Mexico Data Management Practices for.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
UVa Library Research Data Services
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
Ministry of Energy, Development and Environmental Protection of the Republic of Serbia Development of the Ecoregister, a national metaregister for environmental.
The Basics of the Effort Certification and Reporting Technology (ECRT) System.
Archival Information Packages for NASA HDF-EOS Data R. Duerr, Kent Yang, Azhar Sikander.
M u l t I b e a m III W o r k s h o p M u l t I b e a m III W o r k s h o p National Geophysical Data Center / World Data Centers NOAA Slide 1 End-to-End.
NOAA Administrative Order : Management of Environmental and Geospatial Data and Information Jeff Arnfield NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center Version.
Providing Access to Your Data Matthew Mayernik National Center for Atmospheric Research Copyright 2012 Matthew Mayernik. Version 1.0 October 2012 Section:
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
Changing Implementation of NSF Data Policy Dr. Jennifer M. Schopf, NSF OD/OIA/EPSCoR On behalf of the NSF Data Working Group March 17, 2011 CASC Spring.
Rabbanai T. Morgan Current as of 26 January 2006 Protests.
NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.
DRAFT EDMC Procedural Directives NOAA Environmental Data Management Committee 12/3/2015 1
Elements of a Data Management Plan Bill Michener University of New Mexico
Advertising your data: Agency requirements for submitting metadata Nancy J. Hoebelheinrich Version 1.0 September 2012 Section: Local Data Management Copyright.
BUDGET BASICS FOR ADMINISTRATORS TIJUANNA DECOSTER, PH.D., MPA CHIEF GRANTS MANAGEMENT OFFICER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Grants and Contracts Jim Butterfield and Kathy Blackwood October 5, 2004.
DOE Data Management Plan Requirements
Human Subjects Protection Program Office of Research Compliance Navigating through the current HSPP and IRB Presented by: Danielle Griffin, M.S. Research.
Managing Access at the University of Oregon : a Case Study of Scholars’ Bank by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services
Overview of Proposal and Award Process at UCLA A short “ How-to-Do ”
Office of Science Statement on Digital Data Management Laura Biven, PhD Senior Science and Technology Advisor Office of the Deputy Director for Science.
SEDAC Long-Term Archive Development Robert R. Downs Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center Center for International Earth Science Information Network.
It’s Time to Share: Proposed NOAA Data Policy Information Briefing for NOS Seminar Series September 7, 2011 Ingrid Guch Director, NESDIS Cooperative Research.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, associated professor.
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
NOAA Data Policy Developments Darien Davis OAR Representative NOAA Environmental Data Management Committee (Adapted from Ingrid Guch, NOAA GMD Presentation)
Tijuanna DeCoster, Ph.D. Chief, Grants Management Officer
The Basics of Intellectual Property Reporting
Presented by Urmila Bajaj January 26, 2017
Agency Requirements: NOAA Administrative Order Management of environmental and geospatial data and information This training module is part of.
Grants Management 101 Part A
Digital Stewardship Curriculum
Fundamental Science Practices (FSP) of the U.S. Geological Survey
Presentation transcript:

NOAA Data Sharing Policy for Grants and Cooperative Agreements Ingrid Guch NOAA Environmental Data Management Committee

Purpose Provide information about the new data sharing policy to grantees, NOAA Federal Program Officers, NOAA Competition Managers and other interested parties 2

New FFO term Provides Data Sharing Requirements and describes Data Information/Sharing Plan contents Note: FFO Page limits for project narratives should be increased by 2 to accommodate the plan New Language for NOAA Competition Announcements Environmental data and information, collected and/or created under NOAA grants/cooperative agreements must be made visible, accessible, and independently understandable to general users, free of charge or at minimal cost, in a timely manner (typically no later than two (2) years after the data are collected or created), except where limited by law, regulation, policy or by security requirements. 1.Unless otherwise noted in this federal funding announcement, a Data/Information Sharing Plan of no more than two pages shall be required as part of the Project Narrative. A typical plan may include the types of environmental data and information to be created during the course of the project; the tentative date by which data will be shared; the standards to be used for data/metadata format and content; policies addressing data stewardship and preservation; procedures for providing access, data, and security; and prior experience in publishing such data. The Data/Information Sharing Plan will be reviewed as part of the NOAA Standard Evaluation Criteria, Item 1 -- Importance and/or Relevance and Applicability of Proposed Project to the Mission Goals. 2.The Data/Information Sharing Plan (and any subsequent revisions or updates) will be made publicly available at time of award and, thereafter, will be posted with the published data. 3.Failing to share environmental data and information in accordance with the submitted Data/Information Sharing Plan may lead to disallowed costs and be considered by NOAA when making future award decisions. 3

New Programmatic SAC Provides Data Sharing Requirements New NOAA Programmatic Special Award Condition: Environmental data and information, collected and/or created under this grant/cooperative agreement will be made visible, accessible and independently understandable to users, free of charge or at minimal cost, in a timely manner (typically no later than two (2) years after the data are collected or created), except where limited by law, regulation, policy or by security requirements. The Data/Information Sharing Plan (and any subsequent revisions or updates) will be made publicly available at time of award and, thereafter, will be posted with the published data Environmental data and information produced under this award and which are made public must be accompanied by the following statement: These environmental data and related items of information have not been formally disseminated by NOAA and do not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination, view, or policy. NOAA may at its own discretion, use information from the Data/Information Sharing Plan to produce a formal metadata record and include that metadata in a catalogue to indicate the pending availability of new data. Failing to share environmental data and information in accordance with the submitted Data/Information Sharing Plan may lead to disallowed costs and be considered by NOAA when making future award decisions. 4

A Very Simple Data/Information Sharing Plan Note: This is not an actual plan. This project will generate environmental information. Publicly available GOES satellite data will be processed to generate maps of aerosols. Data products. along with information about the correct citation to use and the data/product limitations will be shared by December 31, 2014 along with documentation to read/use/understand the data and a point of contact for questions. This dataset will provide total column aerosol (aerosol optical depth units) for the Continental US at a 5KM resolution each day between Nov and Nov We will use NetCDF Climate and Forecast data/metadata conventions. We will publish the methodology for creating the products in the open literature. We will leave the data on the university website for at least three years. During that time period we will ask NOAA archives if they have interest/resources for archiving the data and work with them as needed. We have not had experience sharing data in the past, but we will work to set up a website similar to the format in Our website will be password protected and available only to co-Pis until we determine it is beneficial to share the data more widely or our primary findings are accepted for publication or December 31, 2014, whichever comes first. If resources allow we will also include current daily aerosol maps as gif images on the website for real-time users. 5

Sharing-related items to minimize/prevent  Grantees and research institutions being scooped  Intellectual property misunderstandings  Users confused or wasting time with data not fully quality controlled  Users believing data to be more accurate than it is and making conclusions or decisions 6

Information Quality Act Environmental data and information produced under this award and which are made public must be accompanied by the following statement: These environmental data and related items of information have not been formally disseminated by NOAA and do not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination, view, or policy. – In order to remove this disclaimer NOAA must verify that the data meet NOAA Information Quality Act guidelines and approve dissemination to the public. 7

What if data is to be shared after award closes? – The NOAA FPO will verify the data sharing plan is available and being followed prior to closing the award file and take enforcement actions if necessary (NOAA could seek a post-award disallowance of costs if data is not shared per the data sharing plan) – PIs who will seek future NOAA funds will be motivated to follow their data sharing plan even after the award has closed because they will need to indicate how and when they have made their data accessible and usable by the community in the past. This will be reviewed as part of the NOAA Standard Evaluation Criterion “Importance and/or relevance and applicability of proposed project to the mission goals.” 8

What if I don’t have a logical place to make my data and/or data sharing plan widely available? Propose something reasonable. – If this is a new application for funding then your data sharing plan will be evaluated by experts in your field and they should understand the logistics that make sharing difficult. – If this is not a new application, consult with your NOAA FPO on ways to comply. 9

Thank you for your support of the new NOAA data sharing policy. 10