Problems from Chapter 8. Galileo and the Papal Inquisition.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Random Dresser Wilbur has – 3 left shoes, all of different colors – 5 right shoes, all of different colors – 4 right gloves, all of different colors.
Advertisements

Bayes-Nash equilibrium with Incomplete Information
Some Problems from Chapt 13
The Unpleasant Professor Problem
Pondering more Problems. Enriching the Alice-Bob story Go to AGo to B Go to A Alice Go to B Go to A Go to B Go shoot pool Alice.
M9302 Mathematical Models in Economics Instructor: Georgi Burlakov 3.1.Dynamic Games of Complete but Imperfect Information Lecture
Crime, Punishment, and Forgiveness
Clicker Question-A Chicken Game 0, 0 0, 1 1, 0 -10, -10 Swerve Hang Tough Swerve Hang Tough Player 2 Pllayer 1 Does either player have a dominant strategy?
This Segment: Computational game theory Lecture 1: Game representations, solution concepts and complexity Tuomas Sandholm Computer Science Department Carnegie.
Cheap Talk. When can cheap talk be believed? We have discussed costly signaling models like educational signaling. In these models, a signal of one’s.
15 Backward induction: chess, strategies, and credible threats Zermelo Theorem: Two players in game of perfect information. Finite nodes. Three outcomes:
Chapter Twenty-Eight Game Theory. u Game theory models strategic behavior by agents who understand that their actions affect the actions of other agents.
Non-Cooperative Game Theory To define a game, you need to know three things: –The set of players –The strategy sets of the players (i.e., the actions they.
Chapter 6 Game Theory © 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Infinitely Repeated Games Econ 171. Finitely Repeated Game Take any game play it, then play it again, for a specified number of times. The game that is.
EC941 - Game Theory Lecture 7 Prof. Francesco Squintani
M9302 Mathematical Models in Economics Instructor: Georgi Burlakov 3.1.Dynamic Games of Complete but Imperfect Information Lecture
Taking Turns in the Dark (Subgame perfection with imperfect information) Econ 171.
Chapter 11 Game Theory and the Tools of Strategic Business Analysis.
Cheap Talk. When can cheap talk be believed? We have discussed costly signaling models like educational signaling. In these models, a signal of one’s.
1 Business System Analysis & Decision Making - Lecture 5 Zhangxi Lin ISQS 5340 July 2006.
Slide 1 of 13 So... What’s Game Theory? Game theory refers to a branch of applied math that deals with the strategic interactions between various ‘agents’,
Playing in the Dark Problems from Ch 8. The OS2 story Introduced by IBM in 1987 to compete with MS Windows. Faster and more reliable than Windows but.
Intro to Game Theory Revisiting the territory we have covered.
Todd and Steven Divide the Estate Problem Bargaining over 100 pounds of gold Round 1: Todd makes offer of Division. Steven accepts or rejects. Round.
More on Extensive Form Games. Histories and subhistories A terminal history is a listing of every play in a possible course of the game, all the way to.
Extensive and Strategic Form Games Econ 171. Reminder: Course requirements Class website Go to economics department home page. Under Links, find Class.
ECON6036 1st semester Format of final exam Same as the mid term
Static Games of Complete Information: Subgame Perfection
Game Applications Chapter 29. Nash Equilibrium In any Nash equilibrium (NE) each player chooses a “best” response to the choices made by all of the other.
Exam Questions. Fred and Elmer No Price War Price War.
Reading Osborne, Chapters 5, 6, 7.1., 7.2, 7.7 Learning outcomes
Chapter 9 Games with Imperfect Information Bayesian Games.
A Game-Theoretic Approach to Strategic Behavior. Chapter Outline ©2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All Rights Reserved. 2 The Prisoner’s Dilemma: An Introduction.
Punishment and Forgiveness in Repeated Games. A review of present values.
Dynamic Games of complete information: Backward Induction and Subgame perfection - Repeated Games -
EC941 - Game Theory Prof. Francesco Squintani Lecture 5 1.
M9302 Mathematical Models in Economics Instructor: Georgi Burlakov 4.1.Dynamic Games of Incomplete Information Lecture
Bayes-Nash equilibrium with Incomplete Information.
Games with Imperfect Information Bayesian Games. Complete versus Incomplete Information So far we have assumed that players hold the correct belief about.
Game-theoretic analysis tools Tuomas Sandholm Professor Computer Science Department Carnegie Mellon University.
Todd and Steven Divide the Estate Problem Bargaining over 100 pounds of gold Round 1: Todd makes offer of Division. Steven accepts or rejects. Round.
Extensive Games with Imperfect Information
Topic 3 Games in Extensive Form 1. A. Perfect Information Games in Extensive Form. 1 RaiseFold Raise (0,0) (-1,1) Raise (1,-1) (-1,1)(2,-2) 2.
ECO290E: Game Theory Lecture 13 Dynamic Games of Incomplete Information.
Lecture 5B Complete Information Games This lecture analyzes complete information games, before turning to a discussion of Home Depot.
Final Lecture. Problem 2, Chapter 13 Exploring the problem Note that c, x yields the highest total payoff of 7 for each player. Is this a Nash equilibrium?
Strategic Behavior in Business and Econ Static Games of complete information: Dominant Strategies and Nash Equilibrium in pure and mixed strategies.
Subgames and Credible Threats (with perfect information) Econ 171.
Subgames and Credible Threats
Subgames and Credible Threats. Nuclear threat USSR Don’t Invade Hungary 0101 Invade US Give in Bomb USSR
Chapter 6 Extensive Form Games With Perfect Information (Illustrations)
Dynamic games, Stackelburg Cournot and Bertrand
Extensive Form Games With Perfect Information (Illustrations)
Chapter 16 Oligopoly and Game Theory. “Game theory is the study of how people behave in strategic situations. By ‘strategic’ we mean a situation in which.
Subgames and Credible Threats. Russian Tanks Quell Hungarian Revolution of 1956.
Pondering more Problems. Enriching the Alice-Bob story Go to AGo to B Go to A Alice Go to B Go to A Go to B Go shoot pool Alice.
Extensive Form (Dynamic) Games With Perfect Information (Theory)
Cheap Talk. When can cheap talk be believed? We have discussed costly signaling models like educational signaling. In these models, a signal of one’s.
Taking Turns in the Dark: (Subgame perfection with incomplete information ) Econ 171.
Midterm Scores Total of 200 points, 40 per question. A B— C— D—50-79 F
Econ 805 Advanced Micro Theory 1 Dan Quint Fall 2009 Lecture 1 A Quick Review of Game Theory and, in particular, Bayesian Games.
Incomplete Information and Bayes-Nash Equilibrium.
Entry Deterrence Players Two firms, entrant and incumbent Order of play Entrant decides to enter or stay out. If entrant enters, incumbent decides to fight.
ECO290E: Game Theory Lecture 10 Examples of Dynamic Games.
M9302 Mathematical Models in Economics Instructor: Georgi Burlakov 2.1.Dynamic Games of Complete and Perfect Information Lecture
Dynamic Games of complete information: Backward Induction and Subgame perfection.
Final Lecture.
Somebody’s got to do it. Somebody’s got to do it.
Definition of Renegotiation-safe
Presentation transcript:

Problems from Chapter 8

Galileo and the Papal Inquisition

Describe strategies in the subgame perfect equilibrium. What does pope do? What does Galileo do at each of his decision nodes? What does the inquisitor do?

Strategic Form Three Players.—What are the strategies?

Strategic form if Pope refers case Confess Before Torture. Confess if tortured Confess before torture. Do not confess if tortured Do not confess before torture. Confess if tortured Do not confess before torture. Do not confess if tortured Torture 5,4,3 4,5,11,1,2 Do not torture 5,4,3 2,2,4 Galileo’s Strategy Payoffs if Pope Refers the Case to the Inquisition Inquisitor’s Strategy Payoffs listed x,y,z means x for Pope, y for inquisitor, z for Galileo

Strategic form if Pope doesn’t refer case Confess Before Torture and Confess if tortured Confess before torture but do not confess if tortured Do not confess before torture, confess if tortured Do not confess before torture, do not confess if tortured Torture 3,3,5 Do not torture 3,3,5 Galileo’s Strategy Payoffs if Pope Does not refer the Case to the Inquisition Inquisitor’s Strategy Payoffs listed x,y,z means x for Pope, y for inquisitor, z for Galileo

Some Nash equilibria Pope refers, Galileo will confess before torture and will confess if tortured, Inquisitor will torture if Galileo doesn’t confess beforehand. Pope refers, Galileo confess before torture, would not confess if tortured, Inquisitor will torture. Pope doesn’t refer, Galileo will not confess before torture, wouldn’t would confess if tortured, Inquisitor would torture if G doesn’t confess.

More Nash equilibria Pope doesn’t refer the case. Galileo would not confess either before or after torture. Inquisitor would torture. Pope doesn’t refer the case. Galileo would not confess either before or after torture. Inquisitor would not torture.

Piquant facts for fans of the waterboard. Galileo would rather confess before being tortured than be tortured. But if he is tortured, he would rather not confess. Pope would like Galileo to confess without being tortured. Pope would also be happy if Galileo is tortured and confesses. But Pope would rather not refer the case if Galileo would be tortured and not confess. So Galileo is not brought before the Inquisition.

Goblins Gold Problem Seven goblins, A,B,E,G,K,R, and U, divide 100 gold pieces A proposes an allocation of the gold. If at least half vote yes, allocation is accepted If not, A is sent away. Then B proposes and the remaining Goblins vote. This process continues down the list until either a proposal is accepted or only U is left in which case U gets all the gold.

Working backwards If only two goblins are left, R and U, then it is R’s turn to propose. R can make anything pass by voting for it. So he will choose 100 for R and 0 for U. Suppose there are 3 goblins left, K, R, and U, then it is K’s turn to propose. K’s best strategy is to offer 1 to U, 0 to R and 99 to himself. Why?

What’s the pattern? What if there were 100 goblins? How about 200? How about 300? What does this problem have to do with subgame perfection?

Thomas Schelling’s idea for dealing with kidnappers

Taking Turns in the Dark: (Subgame perfection with incomplete information ) Econ 171

Subgame Perfection with Imperfect Information How can the notion of subgame perfection help us if there is incomplete information? Look back at kidnapper game

What is a subtree of a game? It is a non-terminal node, together with all of the nodes that could be reached from this node. Incidentally, a Proper Subtree is a subtree that is not the entire game.

What is a regular subtree of a game? It is a subtree starting from one of the nodes of the game such that this subtree contains an entire information set if it contains at least one node from that set. A subgame is defined to be a regular subtree together with the associated payoffs. A proper subgame of a game is a subgame that does not contain the entire game. (by analogy to a proper subset of a set)

Subgame perfection In a game with imperfect information, a strategy profile is a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium if for every proper subgame of the game, its substrategy profile is a Nash equilibrium. That is, the actions taken in the proper subgame are a Nash equilibrium for the game that consists of just that subgame.

What is a substrategy profile? A strategy profile for a game specifies what a player will do at every information set in the game and specifies the payoffs at the end of the game. A substrategy profile of the original strategy profile specifies what each player will do at every information set in the subgame.

Alice and Bob Play in the Dark Bob Go to AGo to B Go to A Alice Go to B Go to A Go to B How many proper subgames does this game have? A)0 B)1 C)2 D)3 E)More than 3

Alice and Bob Play in the Dark Bob Go to AGo to B Go to A Alice Go to B Go to A Go to B How many subgame perfect Nash equilibria does this game have? A)0 B)1 C)2 D)3 E)4

Alice, Bob, and the outside option Go to AGo to B Go to A Alice Go to B Go to A Go to B Go shoot pool What are the subgame perfect equilibria in this game? Bob Go to Movies

Valuable Trade Secret?

What are the Nash equilibria? EnterDon’t Enter Invest25,-25700,0 Don’t Invest400,501,000,0

What if they know if you have invested? What is the subgame perfect equilibrium?

Entry deterrence

The Yule Ball Tale

The Yule Ball Story Page 283, in your text. How many proper subgames (subgames not equal to the whole game) does this game have? A)0 B)1 C)2 D)3 E)More than 3

Dating Dilemma Ron Hermione Victor Asks Y,Y,YY,Y,NY,N,YY,N,NN,Y,YN,Y,NN,N,YN,N,N Ask8,3,6 1,8*,8* 3,2,4 Don’t 7*,6*,5* 2,5,3 2,5*,3 Hermione Victor Doesn’t Ask Y,Y,YY,Y,NY,N,YY,N,NN,Y,YN,Y,NN,N,YN,N,N Ask 4,7*,7*6,1,24,7*,7*6,1,2*4,7*,7*6,1,2*4,7*,7* 6,1,2 Don’t5,4,1 Ron

Simplifying the Game If Hermione ever reaches either of the two nodes where Ron gets to ask her, she would say Yes. So a subgame perfect equilibrium must be a Nash equilbrium for the simpler game in which Hermione always says “yes” to Ron if she hasn’t accepted a date from Victor.

Yes to VictorNo to Victor Ask8,3,61,8*,8* Don’t Ask7*,6*,5*2,5,3 Victor Asks Hermione’s strategy Ron’s Strategy Yes to VictorNo to Victor Ask4,7*,7*4*,7*,7* Don’t Ask5,4,1* Hermione’s strategy Victor Doesn’t Ask Ron’s Strategy

One lesson: Subgame Perfection does not eliminate all of love’s quandries

When does a lawmaker want a moderate law? Pick numbers so that a gentle law is enforced but not obeyed, and a severe law is neither enforced nor obeyed, but a moderate law is enforced and obeyed. Make b=f=j>4 (Violate law and not convicted is better than obeying the law) Make c>g>k. (Judge doesn’t like to punish) Make a > 4 (Weak law not obeyed if enforced) Make i<e<4 (Moderate and strong laws obeyed if enforced) Make g>8>k. (judge will enforce moderate law but not strong law. Make d=h=l Try g=9, c=10, k=7,,d=f=g=6, a=5