Freedom of Assembly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Censorship of information before it is published Government likes this!!!! Government wants Control!!! Other Countries United States Supreme Court ruled….
Advertisements

Censorship: Politics and Pornography Social Implications of Computers.
Chapter 13.5 Freedom of Assembly Government Mr. Biggs.
Essential Question How does the Constitution protect citizen rights?
Know Your Rights Free Speech in Chicago Because Freedom Can’t Protect Itself.
Freedom of Speech. Purpose for Freedom of Speech: To guarantee to each person a right of Free expression, in the Spoken and the Written word, and by all.
Section 5 Introduction-1
Constitutional Freedoms. Constitutional Rights  The Constitution guarantees the basic rights of United States citizens in the Bill of Rights.  Today,
LEARNING OBJECTIVES/ GOALS/ SWBAT
Types of Speech Pure Speech –Calm –Passionate –Private –Public Supreme Court has provided the strongest protection.
Our First Amendment Rights
Freedom of Religion AMERICAN GOVERNMENT. As Stated The first and fourteenth amendments set out two guarantees concerning religious freedom in the United.
FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY AND PETITION. DeJonge v. Oregon (1937) DeJonge was convicted for holding a Communist Party meeting Found unconstitutional.
Civil Liberties. “…..the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” --1 st amendment.
CH FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY AND PETITION ADVANCED AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.
BELL WORK Write down three things from The Week In Rap.
Freedom of Assembly 1st Amendment Freedoms.
FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS Mr. Chris Sandford American Government and Politics.
HOW DOES THE FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECT FREEDOM TO ASSEMBLE, PETITION & ASSOCIATE? Unit Five Lesson 30.
Freedom of Speech and Press Prior Restraint Government CANNOT punish people for spoken or written words before they are expressed 1 st and 14 th amendments.
The First Amendment’s 5 Freedoms
Chapter 19 Ben Eric Craig 5 th Hour AP Gov. Section 1.
Jeopardy Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Final Jeopardy.
The Politics of Civil Liberties The threat of war leads to government narrowing the limits of permissible speech and activity Framers believed the Constitution.
Annie Ruch and Kylie McBride. The First A mendment “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise.
Freedom of Speech Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech”.
First Amendment.
INTERPRETING THE BILL OF RIGHTS BY SEAN KIGIN INTERPRETING THE BILL OF RIGHTS BY SEAN KIGIN.
Protection of Freedom of Assembly Without this freedom, there would be no interest groups and no political parties.
Jeopardy Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Final Jeopardy.
Freedom of Speech  Seems like a dumb question, but why is it so important to a democratic government?  Ability to debate actions and policies of elected.
Feiner v. New York – hostile audiences & the 1st amendment  Cantwell recognized speaker cannot be punished for trying to persuade others about offensive.
Bill of Rights Booklet Project Example Information
American Government Chapter 19 Section 5. Constitutional Guarantees Peaceable assembly No protection for: – Incitement of violence – Blocking public streets.
Chapter 19: Civil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms Section 4
Freedom of the Press Freedom of Assembly, Association, and Petition Unit 6: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights, Lesson 2 How has the Supreme Court expanded.
LESSON SEVEN – UNIT FIVE: THE GOVERNMENT OF MICHIGAN What are the Rights and Responsibilities of Michigan Citizens?
Freedom of Speech and Press. Freedom of Expression The 1 st amendment has two guarantees on freedom of expression #1 Guarantee to each person a right.
First Amendment Ch. 4, Les. 1. Civil Liberties  All Americans have certain basic civil liberties - the freedom to think and act without government interference.
Chapter 4.1 The First Amendment. First Amendment Freedoms  The Bill of Rights, added in 1791, protects our civil liberties – the freedoms we have to.
What is The Bill of Rights? The government gives its citizens rights or guarantees that must be protected under law! The government gives its citizens.
OBJECTIVES:  COMPARE and CONTRAST federal and state court systems  LIST and EXPLAIN the differences between criminal and civil cases  DESCRIBE the basic.
 District 87 mandating a 1 minute prayer at the beginning of each school day.  The class valedictorian conducting a prayer during his address at graduation.
Freedom of Petition and Assembly
Section Focus 5. Section 5-2 A.a right closely related to freedom of speech I.Protecting Freedom of Assembly B. DeJonge v. Oregon (1937) ruled that free.
First Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom.
Government Chapter 13 Civil Liberties We skipped 12, deal with it. Not 58 terms.
Objective; describe the kinds of speech the 1st Amendment does and does not protect.
The Citizenship Process! What makes a Citizen of the U.s.a?
19.2 – Freedom of Religion. - Protections against the arbitrary acts of the government are technically known as ___. -separation or isolation of a racial.
Q: What is the Bill of Rights and why do we have them? A: The Bill of Rights lists certain basic rights given to the people by the United States to protect.
By : Patrycja Kopec. Irving Feiner was arrested on the evening of March 8th, 1949, for disorderly conduct. Feiner had been speaking out against President.
Chapter 13 Constitutional Freedoms Section 5
Freedom of Speech.
What was the Bill of Rights originally intended for?
Interpreting the Bill of Rights
FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY AND PETITION
Freedom of Assembly Ch
Freedom of Speech.
Court Cases.
Chapter 10: Bill of Rights
FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
Other Civil Liberties Issues
Chapter 19: Civil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms Section 4
Life without Free Speech
Chapter 13.5 FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY
Chapter 13.5 FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY
Constitutional rights
Other Civil Liberties Issues
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989) Alysha Gerba.
Presentation transcript:

Freedom of Assembly

Protection of Freedom of Assembly Without this freedom, there would be no interest groups and no political parties.

DeJonge v. Oregon (1937) Public meeting held by Dirk DeJonge and three other Communist Party leaders. The Communist Party was outlawed in Oregon. They were arrested and convicted of holding an illegal meeting. Supreme Court ruled: “Peaceable assembly for lawful discussion cannot be made a crime.”

General Rule Time Reasonable Limits Reasonable Limits Place Manner Within reasonable limits, any group and any cause has the right to demonstrate or assemble. But no group can simply hold a spontaneous demonstration anytime, anywhere, and anyway it chooses. Time Reasonable Limits Reasonable Limits Place Manner

Assembly on Public Property May use parks, streets, sidewalks, etc. May interfere with the rights of public to use these public facilities. May advocate unpopular causes. May provoke violent response from observers. Therefore, parades & demonstrations are subject to some government regulation.

Assembly on Public Property The state can require permits for parades, protests, demonstrations, etc. The state can limit use of certain public property to those purposes for which it is intended. (jails, schools, courthouses, etc.) Permit

Assembly and Property Rights Not allowed to convert private property to your own use. (Example: Cannot “occupy” a mall, etc., to protest.) Not allowed to block the entrance to an abortion clinic. Not Fair

Freedom of Assembly versus Right to Privacy

Freedom of Assembly versus Right to Privacy Remember the discussion about protesting in front of the mayor’s house (Freedom of Speech)? Always remember that Right to Privacy will trump Freedom of Speech and Assembly.

Assembly and Disorder Nazis in Skokie, Illinois Collins v. Smith (1977) Small group of Nazis (25-30) filed for parade permit in suburb of Chicago with many Holocaust survivors. Because of fear/threat of violence from observers, city required $300,000 bond for parade permit to pay for police protection, potential damage, etc.

This event was so important that several books were written about it. Assembly and Disorder                           This event was so important that several books were written about it.

Assembly and Disorder ACLU assisted the Nazis in challenging the amount of the bond as an attempt by the city to limit the Nazi’s freedom of speech and assembly. Supreme Court said that no community can use parade permits to interfere with or stifle free speech and assembly. In the end, the Nazi’s decided to hold their demonstration in Chicago. Few people attended and there was little newspaper coverage.

Assembly and Disorder Westboro Baptist Church protests at military funerals. Supreme Court said that they have the right to say hateful things.

Assembly and Disorder The Heckler's Veto The public “vetoes” the free speech and assembly rights of unpopular groups by threatening counter-demonstrations and/or violence. Delimna: Free speech and assembly versus maintenance of public peace.

Assembly and Disorder Feiner v. New York (1950) Speaking on a street in Syracuse, Feiner urged African Americans to fight for civil rights. Made derogatory remarks about Truman, the American Legion, and local politicians. Crowd gathered and grew hostile. Three times, the police told Feiner to stop speaking because he was inciting a riot. He refused and was arrested for disturbing the peace (not because of the content of his speech). Were his free speech and assembly rights violated? Irving Feiner

Assembly and Disorder Feiner v. New York (1950) Supreme Court supported the police and upheld the conviction of Feiner. Police were not trying to suppress Feiner’s rights. They were trying to preserve public order. But must remember, Feiner was inciting a riot with his speech.

Assembly and Disorder Gregory v. City of Chicago (1969) Case was similar to Feiner, but was peaceful and no one was trying to incite the observers, instead the observers were threatening violence. Supreme Court overturned Gregory’s conviction saying that observers were at fault, not Gregory. Gregory in 1964 Gregory today