Cold, dense quark matter NJL type models and the need to go beyond THOMAS KL ÄHN Collaborators: D. Zablocki, J.Jankowski, C.D.Roberts, R.Lastowiecki, D.B.Blaschke.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stellar Structure Section 6: Introduction to Stellar Evolution Lecture 18 – Mass-radius relation for black dwarfs Chandrasekhar limiting mass Comparison.
Advertisements

Lecture 1: basics of lattice QCD Peter Petreczky Lattice regularization and gauge symmetry : Wilson gauge action, fermion doubling Different fermion formulations.
Ilona Bednarek Ustroń, 2009 Hyperon Star Model.
The regularization dependence on the phase diagram in the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model Hiroaki Kohyama (CYCU)
Topological current effect on hQCD at finite density and magnetic field Pablo A. Morales Work in collaboration with Kenji Fukushima Based on Phys. Rev.
1 A Model Study on Meson Spectrum and Chiral Symmetry Transition Da
Thomas Klähn D. Blaschke R. Łastowiecki F. Sandin Sept 2, 2011Thomas Klähn – Symposium on NeD, Heraklion.
O(N) linear and nonlinear sigma-model at nonzeroT within the auxiliary field method CJT study of the O(N) linear and nonlinear sigma-model at nonzeroT.
The speed of sound in a magnetized hot Quark-Gluon-Plasma Based on: Neda Sadooghi Department of Physics Sharif University of Technology Tehran-Iran.
Thomas Klähn D. Blaschke R. Łastowiecki F. Sandin Thomas Klähn – Three Days on Quarkyonic Island.
Functional renormalization – concepts and prospects.
the equation of state of cold quark gluon plasmas
QCD – from the vacuum to high temperature an analytical approach an analytical approach.
Heavy quark potential and running coupling in QCD W. Schleifenbaum Advisor: H. Reinhardt University of Tübingen EUROGRADworkshop Todtmoos 2007.
Constraining neutron star properties with perturbative QCD Aleksi Vuorinen University of Helsinki University of Oxford Main reference: Kurkela,
1 Debye screened QGP QCD : confined Chiral Condensate Quark Potential Deconfinement and Chiral Symmetry restoration expected within QCD mm symmetryChiral.
Nuclear Symmetry Energy from QCD Sum Rule Phys.Rev. C87 (2013) Recent progress in hadron physics -From hadrons to quark and gluon- Feb. 21, 2013.
New Frontiers in QCD, October 28th, 2011 Based on K. Kim, D. Jido, S.H. Lee PRC 84(2011) K. Kim, Y. Kim, S. Takeuchi, T. Tsukioka PTP 126(2011)735.
Nuclear Symmetry Energy in QCD degree of freedom Phys. Rev. C87 (2013) (arXiv: ) Eur. Phys. J. A50 (2014) 16 Some preliminary results Heavy.
Geneva, October 2010 Dark Energy at Colliders? Philippe Brax, IPhT Saclay Published papers :
Quadrupole moments of neutron stars and strange stars Martin Urbanec, John C. Miller, Zdenek Stuchlík Institute of Physics, Silesian University in Opava,
Isospin effect in asymmetric nuclear matter (with QHD II model) Kie sang JEONG.
Sigma model and applications 1. The linear sigma model (& NJL model) 2. Chiral perturbation 3. Applications.
In-medium hadrons and chiral symmetry G. Chanfray, IPN Lyon, IN2P3/CNRS, Université Lyon I The Physics of High Baryon Density IPHC Strasbourg, september.
QUARK MATTER SYMMETRY ENERGY AND QUARK STARS Peng-cheng Chu ( 初鹏程 ) (INPAC and Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.
Precision Probes for Hot QCD Matter Rainer Fries Texas A&M University & RIKEN BNL QCD Workshop, Washington DC December 15, 2006.
QED at Finite Temperature and Constant Magnetic Field: The Standard Model of Electroweak Interaction at Finite Temperature and Strong Magnetic Field Neda.
Pengfei Zhuang Physics Department, Tsinghua University, Beijing
Hadron to Quark Phase Transition in the Global Color Symmetry Model of QCD Yu-xin Liu Department of Physics, Peking University Collaborators: Guo H., Gao.
Effect of thermal fluctuation of baryons on vector mesons and low mass dileptons ρ ω Sanyasachi Ghosh (VECC, Kolkata, India)
In-medium QCD forces for HQs at high T Yukinao Akamatsu Nagoya University, KMI Y.Akamatsu, A.Rothkopf, PRD85(2012), (arXiv: [hep-ph] ) Y.Akamatsu,
Instanton-induced contributions to hadronic form factors. Pietro Faccioli Universita’ degli Studi di Trento, I.N.F.N., Gruppo Collegato di Trento, E.C.T.*
Chiral phase transition and chemical freeze out Chiral phase transition and chemical freeze out.
II Russian-Spanish Congress “Particle and Nuclear Physics at all scales and Cosmology”, Saint Petersburg, Oct. 4, 2013 RECENT ADVANCES IN THE BOTTOM-UP.
Scaling study of the chiral phase transition in two-flavor QCD for the improved Wilson quarks at finite density H. Ohno for WHOT-QCD Collaboration The.
Color neutrality effects in the phase diagram of the PNJL model A. Gabriela Grunfeld Tandar Lab. – Buenos Aires - Argentina In collaboration with D. Blaschke.
Probing QCD Phase Diagram with Fluctuations of conserved charges Krzysztof Redlich University of Wroclaw & EMMI/GSI QCD phase boundary and its O(4) „scaling”
Hadron Spectroscopy with high momentum beam line at J-PARC K. Ozawa (KEK) Contents Charmed baryon spectroscopy New experiment at J-PARC.
Nuclear Symmetry Energy from QCD Sum Rule The 5 th APFB Problem in Physics, August 25, 2011 Kie Sang JEONG Su Houng LEE (Theoretical Nuclear and Hadron.
Relativistic BCS-BEC Crossover in a boson-fermion Model
Study of the LOFF phase diagram in a Ginzburg-Landau approach G. Tonini, University of Florence, Florence, Italy R. Casalbuoni,INFN & University of Florence,
Study of chemical potential effects on hadron mass by lattice QCD Pushkina Irina* Hadron Physics & Lattice QCD, Japan 2004 Three main points What do we.
Threshold Resummation for Top- Quark Pair Production at ILC J.P. Ma ITP, CAS, Beijing 2005 年直线对撞机国际研讨会, Tsinghua Univ.
CPOD2011 , Wuhan, China 1 Isospin Matter Pengfei Zhuang Tsinghua University, Beijing ● Phase Diagram at finite μ I ● BCS-BEC Crossover in pion superfluid.
Holographic QCD in the medium
Heavy hadron phenomenology on light front Zheng-Tao Wei Nankai University 年两岸粒子物理与宇宙学 研讨会,重庆, 5.7—5.12 。
Operated by Jefferson Science Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 Check directly vs data.
Markus Quandt Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum St. Petersburg September 9,2014 M. Quandt (Uni Tübingen) A Covariant Variation Principle Confinement.
And Mesons in Strange Hadronic Medium at Finite Temperature and Density Rahul Chhabra (Ph.D student) Department Of Physics NIT Jalandhar India In cooperation.
1 Nontopological Soliton in the Polyakov Quark Meson Model Hong Mao ( 毛鸿 ) Department of Physics, Hangzhou Normal University With: Jinshuang Jin ( HZNU.
Helmholtz International Summer School, Dubna, 24 July 2008 Pion decay constant in Dense Skyrmion Matter Hee-Jung Lee ( Chungbuk Nat’l Univ.) Collaborators.
Can a R  T be a renormalizable theory ? J.J. Sanz-Cillero Can a resonance chiral theory be a renormalizable theory ? J.J. Sanz-Cillero (Peking U.)
Nuclear Matter Density Dependence of Nucleon Radius and Mass and Quark Condensates in the GCM of QCD Yu-xin Liu Department of Physics, Peking University.
Heavy quark energy loss in finite length SYM plasma Cyrille Marquet Columbia University based on F. Dominguez, C. Marquet, A. Mueller, B. Wu and B.-W.
高密度クォーク物質における カイラル凝縮とカラー超伝導の競 合 M. Kitazawa,T. Koide,Y. Nemoto and T.K. Prog. of Theor. Phys., 108, 929(2002) 国広 悌二 ( 京大基研) 東大特別講義 2005 年 12 月 5-7 日 Ref.
Neutron Stars and the high density Equation of State T.Klähn (Main) Collaborators: D.Blaschke (Wrocław), H.Chen (Peking), C.D. Roberts (ANL), F.Sandin.
1 NJL model at finite temperature and chemical potential in dimensional regularization T. Fujihara, T. Inagaki, D. Kimura : Hiroshima Univ.. Alexander.
Nuclear Symmetry Energy in QCD degree of freedom Phys. Rev
The Study of the Possible Phase Diagram of Deconfinement in FL Model
co-authors B. Kaempfer (HZDR, Germany), L.P. Kaptari (BLTPh)
dark matter Properties stable non-relativistic non-baryonic
Strangeness and charm in hadrons and dense matter, YITP, May 15, 2017
The Structure of Nuclear force in a chiral quark-diquark model
Check directly vs data That is, apply new effective force directly to calculate nuclear properties using Hartree-Fock (as for usual well known force)
Spontaneous P-parity breaking in QCD at large chemical potentials
Compact stars in the QCD phase diagram II,2009
Hyun Kyu Lee Hanyang University
QCD at very high density
A possible approach to the CEP location
Theory on Hadrons in nuclear medium
Presentation transcript:

Cold, dense quark matter NJL type models and the need to go beyond THOMAS KL ÄHN Collaborators: D. Zablocki, J.Jankowski, C.D.Roberts, R.Lastowiecki, D.B.Blaschke 2013/09/B/ST2/01560

Neutron Stars are born in Supernovae SN in A.D.1054 was visible from Earth

Neutron Stars are born in Supernovae SN in A.D.1054 was visible from Earth with naked eyes

Neutron Stars are born in Supernovae SN in A.D.1054 was visible from Earth with naked eyes for 23 days

Compact Stars are born in Supernova SN in A.D.1054 was visible with naked eyes for 23 days AT DAYLIGHT

Neutron Stars are born in Supernova SN in A.D.1054 was visible with naked eyes for 23 days Records found in: China

Neutron Stars are born in Supernova SN in A.D.1054 was visible with naked eyes for 23 days Records found in: China Middle East ?

Neutron Stars are born in Supernova SN in A.D.1054 was visible with naked eyes for 23 days Records found in: China Middle East America Europe... probably missed it East-West schism the very same year ?

Hubble ST Supernova remnant in Crab Nebula: detectable frequencies: - optical Courtesy of

Spitzer ST Courtesy of Supernova remnant in Crab Nebula: detectable frequencies: - optical - infrared

Chandra ST Courtesy of Supernova remnant in Crab Nebula: detectable frequencies: - optical - infrared - x-ray

Hubble ST Spitzer ST Chandra ST Courtesy of Supernova remnant in Crab Nebula: detectable frequencies: - optical - infrared - x-ray obviously a complex & structured system

Hubble ST Spitzer ST Chandra ST Courtesy of Supernova remnant in Crab Nebula: detectable frequencies: - optical - infrared - x-ray obviously a complex & structured system CRAB PULSAR

Hubble ST Spitzer ST Chandra ST Courtesy of Supernova remnant in Crab Nebula: detectable frequencies: - optical - infrared - x-ray obviously a complex & structured system CRAB PULSAR Age958 yrsRotation29.6 /s Mass?Radius? Luminosity?B-field?

Courtesy of CRAB PULSAR Age958 yrsRotation29.6 /s Mass?Radius? Luminosity?B-field?

Neutron Stars  Variety of scenarios regarding inner structure: with or without QM  Question whether/how QCD phase transition occurs is not settled  Most honest approach: take both (and more) scenarios into account and compare to available data

Neutron Stars = Quark Cores?  Variety of scenarios regarding inner structure: with or without QM  Question whether/how QCD phase transition occurs is not settled  Most honest approach: take both (and more) scenarios into account and compare to available data

Neutron Stars = Quark Cores?  Variety of scenarios regarding inner structure: with or without QM  Question whether/how QCD phase transition occurs is not settled  Most honest approach: take both (and more) scenarios into account and compare to available data

Neutron Stars = Quark Cores?  Variety of scenarios regarding inner structure: with or without QM  Question whether/how QCD phase transition occurs is not settled  Most honest approach: take both (and more) scenarios into account and compare to available data

Neutron Stars = Quark Cores?  Variety of scenarios regarding inner structure: with or without QM  Question whether/how QCD phase transition occurs is not settled  Most honest approach: take both (and more) scenarios into account and compare to available data

QCD Phase Diagram  dense hadronic matter HIC in collider experiments Won’t cover the whole diagram Hot and ‘rather’ symmetric NS as a 2 nd accessible option Cold and ‘rather’ asymmetric Problem is more complex than It looks at first gaze

QCD Phase Diagram  dense hadronic matter HIC in collider experiments Won’t cover the whole diagram Hot and ‘rather’ symmetric NS as a 2 nd accessible option Cold and ‘rather’ asymmetric Problem is more complex than It looks at first gaze pQCD?

Neutron Star Data  Data situation in general terms is good (masses, temperatures, ages, frequencies)  Ability to explain the data with different models in general is good, too.... sounds good, but becomes tiresome if everybody explains everything …  For our purpose only a few observables are of real interest  Most promising: High Massive NS with 2 solar masses (Demorest et al., Nature 467, (2010))

April 2012 Thomas Klähn – Seoul

NS masses and the (QM) Equation of State  NS mass is sensitive mainly to the sym. EoS (In particular true for heavy NS)  Folcloric: QM is soft, hence no NS with QM core  Fact: QM is softer, but able to support QM core in NS  Problem: (transition from NM to) QM is barely understood

NS masses and the (QM) Equation of State  NS mass is sensitive mainly to the sym. EoS (In particular true for heavy NS)  Folcloric: QM is soft, hence no NS with QM core  Fact: QM is softer, but able to support QM core in NS  Problem: (transition from NM to) QM is barely understood

NS masses and the (QM) Equation of State  NS mass is sensitive mainly to the sym. EoS (In particular true for heavy NS)  Folcloric: QM is soft, hence no NS with QM core  Fact: QM is softer, but able to support QM core in NS  Problem: (transition from NM to) QM is barely understood

NS masses and the (QM) Equation of State  NS mass is sensitive mainly to the sym. EoS (In particular true for heavy NS)  Folcloric: QM is soft, hence no NS with QM core  Fact: QM is softer, but able to support QM core in NS  Problem: (transition from NM to) QM is barely understood

NS masses and the (QM) Equation of State  NS mass is sensitive mainly to the sym. EoS (In particular true for heavy NS)  Folcloric: QM is soft, hence no NS with QM core  Fact: QM is softer, but able to support QM core in NS  Problem: (transition from NM to) QM is barely understood Dense Nuclear Matter in terms of Quark DoF is barely understood Problem is attacked in vacuum Faddeev Equations Baryons as composites of confined quarks and diquarks Bethe Salpeter Equations quarks hadrons QCD

NS masses and the (QM) Equation of State  NS mass is sensitive mainly to the sym. EoS (In particular true for heavy NS)  Folcloric: QM is soft, hence no NS with QM core  Fact: QM is softer, but able to support QM core in NS  Problem: (transition from NM to) QM is barely understood Dense Nuclear Matter in terms of Quark DoF is barely understood Problem is attacked in vacuum Faddeev Equations Baryons as composites of confined quarks and diquarks Bethe Salpeter Equations quarks hadrons QCD confinement dynamical breaking of chiral symmetry

QCD in dense matter  LQCD fails in dense (like DENSE) matter (Fermion-sign problem)  Perturbative QCD fails in non-perturbative domain DCSB is explicitly not covered by perturbative approach:  Solution: ‘some’ non-perturbative approach ‘as close as possible’ to QCD some = solvable; as close as possible = if possible DCSB, if possible confinement  State of the art: Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model(s) (+t.d. bag models, +hybrids)

NJL type models: brief reminder Partition function in path integral representation Current-current interaction Hubbard Stratonovich transformation mean field approximation w.r. to bosonic fields -> shifts in mass, chem. Pot., 1p-energy -> quasi particles

Effectively an ideal (SC) gas with medium dependent masses and chemical potentials NJL type models: brief reminder 2N c

NJL type models  S: DCSB  V: renormalizes μ  D: diquarks → 2SC, CFL  TD Potential minimized in mean-field approximation  Effective model by its nature; can be motivated (1g-exchange) doesn’t have to though and can be extended (KMT, PNJL)  possible to describe hadrons

NJL model study for NS (TK, R. Łastowiecki, D.Blaschke, PRD 88, (2013)) Set ASet B Conclusion: NS may or may not support a significant QM core. additional interaction channels won’t change this if coupling strengths are not precisely known.

DSE ↔ NJL  NJL model can be understood as an approximate solution of Dyson-Schwinger equations quark gluon q-g-vertex

DSE ↔ NJL  NJL model can be understood as an approximate solution of Dyson-Schwinger equations quark gluon q-g-vertex

Vacuum: single particle: quark self energy Inverse (Single-)Quark Propagator: Renormalised Self Energy: Loss of Poincaré covariance increases complexity → technically and numerically more challenging → no surprise, though General Solution: Similar structured equations in vacuum and medium, but in medium: 1. one more gap 2. gaps are complex valued 3. gaps depend on (4-)momentum, energy and chemical potential revokes Poincaré covariance Medium:

Effective gluon propagator Ansatz for self energy (rainbow approximation, effective gluon propagator(s)) Specify behaviour of Infrared strength running coupling for large k (zero width + finite width contribution) EoS (finite densities): 1st term (Munczek/Nemirowsky (1983))delta function in momentum space → Klähn et al. (2010) 2nd term → Chen et al.(2008,2011) NJL model: delta function in configuration space = const. In mom. space

NJL model within DS framework gap solutions are momentum independent. Simple: A=1 Renormalization of chem. pot. due to vector interaction mass gap equation This is a 1 to 1 reproduction of the (basic) NJL model

NJL model within DS framework Renormalization of chem. pot. due to vector interaction mass gap equation This is a 1 to 1 reproduction of the (basic) NJL model

NJL model within DS framework Renormalization of chem. pot. due to vector interaction mass gap equation This is a 1 to 1 reproduction of the (basic) NJL model Steepest descent approximation 1 to 1 NJL (regularization issue ignored)

NJL model within DS framework Renormalization of chem. pot. due to vector interaction mass gap equation This is a 1 to 1 reproduction of the (basic) NJL model Steepest descent approximation 1 to 1 NJL (regularization issue ignored)

Regularization Regularization completely ignored so far. Two sources for infinities: -zero point energy (usually resolved by vacuum subtraction) -scalar density (quadratically divergent, no vacuum subtraction if mass is not const/medium dep.) ‘Standard’ NJL: Cutoff (hard, soft (e.g. Lorentz, Gauss), 4-momentum) -finite quark density for any T > 0 at any μ > 0 (an ideal gas is an ideal gas is an…) -Have no ‘strict’ definition of confinement, BUT -Intuitively confinement implies n q =0 -problem for description of truly confined bound states in medium beyond a ‘chemical’ picture Recently exploited to investigate meson properties ( Gutierrez-Guerrero et al. 2010, … ) proper time regularization scheme ( Ebert et al ) UV: removes UV divergence +IR: removes poles in complex plane

Proper Time Regularization neat scheme in vacuum: more complicated at finite chem. potential: and then a bit more at finite chem. potential and temperature: (leading term in θ 4 =1 )

NJL * * Preliminary const while μ * <B No surprises

Munczek/Nemirowsky -> NJL‘s complement MN antithetic to NJL NJL:contact interaction in x MN:contact interaction in p

Wigner Phase to obtain model is scale invariant regarding μ/η well satisfied up to ‚small‘ chem. Potential: ← ~μ~μ 5 ~μ4~μ GeV T. Klahn, C.D. Roberts, L. Chang, H. Chen, Y.-X. Liu PRC 82, (2010) Munczek/Nemirowsky Ideal gas

Wigner Phase Less extreme, but again, 1particle number density distribution different from free Fermi gas distribution DSE – simple effective gluon coupling Chen et al. (TK) PRD 78 (2008)

Conclusions NJL model is a powerful tool to explore possible features of dense QCD It possibly might be a too powerful tool NJL mf approximation equals gluon mf in momentum space in DSE NB: Momentum independent gap solutions in their very nature result in quasi particle picture → essentially an ideal gas, eff. m and μ momentum dependent gap solutions enrich model space significantly and provide ability to investigate confinement/deconfinement + DCSB

Conclusions QCD in medium (near critical line): -Task is difficult -Not addressable by LQCD -Not addressable by pQCD -DSE are promising tool to tackle non-perturbative in-medium QCD -Qualitatively very different results depending on effective gluon coupling Thank you!