Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

MISO Day 2: A Transmission Users (Marketers) Perspective Leon White August 8, 2007.
Standard Market Design (SMD) in New England Federal Energy Regulation Commission Conference on Standard Market Design January 22, 2002 David LaPlante Vice.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
1 July 15, 2007Alcoa Energy Regulatory Affairs NARUC / FERC Demand Response Collaborative Perspectives of a Large End Use Participant of NYISO Programs.
Highlights of the 2004 State of the Market Report New York Electricity Markets David B. Patton, Ph.D. Potomac Economics Independent Market Advisor May.
Resource Adequacy in PJM
The Benefits of Dynamic Pricing of Default Electricity Service Bernie Neenan UtiliPoint International Prepared for Assessing the Potential for Demand Response.
Valuing Load Reduction in Restructured Markets Supply Cost Curve Regressions Market Price vs. Value of Load Reduction Photovoltaic Case Study William B.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Electricity Markets Overview Lo-Cal seminar, 09/21/2010.
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
A Capacity Market that Makes Sense Peter Cramton & Steven Stoft 18 March 2005.
Wind Power in Ireland: Treatment of wind in the Single Electricity Market APEx Conference, Paris 16 th October 2007.
Electric Utility Basics An overview of the electric industry in New England and the operation of consumer-owned utilities 1.
Overview of LMP Markets Features of ISOs / RTOs David Withrow Senior Market Economist Fall 2007 Meeting of the NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and.
North American Electricity Markets APEX Paris, France October 15-16, 2007 Kenneth Laughlin, PJM.
ASSOCIATION OF ENERGY ENGINEERS – SW OHIO PJM AND OHIO REGULATORY CHANGES HOWARD PETRICOFF VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR & PEASE LLP 1.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen 1 © 2011 D. Kirschen and the University of Washington.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
Economic Demand Response Sheldon Fulton Executive Director, IPCAA November 4, 2008.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
GE Energy Asia Development Bank Wind Energy Grid Integration Workshop: Issues and Challenges for systems with high penetration of Wind Power Nicholas W.
Floyd Trefny Director of Product Development Future of Demand Response In ERCOT A Presentation to the Workshop – September 15, 2006 Project Number
Battling Load Growth in NYC Chris Smith NYSERDA NARUC 2007 Summer Meeting.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
Building the Energy Markets of Tomorrow... Today The Market Value of Demand Response Aaron Breidenbaugh Demand Response Program Coordinator New York Independent.
LMP Electricity Markets: Market Operations, Market Power, and Value for Consumers EMRI Symposium American Public Power Association February 5, 2007 Presented.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
Retail Competition: Managing a Difficult Transition David L. O’Connor Commissioner Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources (DOER) Presentation to National.
EPSA REGULATORY AFFAIR CONFERENCE 2006 Washington, DC October 25, 2006 Garry Brown Vice President, External Affairs New York ISO.
Liberalization of Electricity Market in Taiwan Su, Jin-sheng Energy Commission Ministry of Economic Affairs August 8, 2001.
1 Capacity Markets Investment in Generation Capacity Payments October 31, 2005 J. W. Charlton.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
Privatization and Liberalization of the Electric Power Industry in Taiwan Energy Commission Ministry of Economic Affairs October 5, 2001.
1 The Costs of Participating in Restructured Wholesale Markets American Public Power Association February 5, 2007 William M. Bateman Robert C. Smith.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
PJM©2012www.pjm.com PJM’s Experience with Capacity Markets Terry Boston President & CEO PJM Interconnection Power Across Texas September 21, 2012.
Demand Response: Next Steps OPSI Annual Meeting October 1, 2012 Howard J. Haas.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
Demand Response as Capacity in New York National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Winter Committee Meetings Washington, DC February 17,
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
Illinois Wholesale Market Update December 10, 2003.
Transmission Rights. The Markets EnergyForwardTransmissionRightsAncillaryServices Must Run Contracts Energy OperatingReserveCapacityReserve Procurement.
Texas Nodal Team Cost Benefit Group Background to Standard Market Design in New England March 2, 2004 Michael Taniwha Manager, Market Administration ISO.
©2003 PJM North American Markets Status APEx Seoul, Korea October 29-31, 2006 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
New Incentives for Pursuing Demand Response Scott Strauss and Sean Flynn Spiegel & McDiarmid APPA Legal Seminar San Francisco – November 2004.
Role Of ERC in the WESM To enforce the rules and regulations governing the operations of the WESM and monitors the activities of the Market Operator and.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
California Independent System Operator 1 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July,
Overview of the NYISO Demand Response Programs
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
North American Markets Status
Electricity Wholesale Markets: Designs for a low-carbon future
Marginal Cost Pricing: Why Is It Important? Have We Achieved It?
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen
Long-term Capacity Market
Presentation transcript:

Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006

New York and Neighbors * = Peak Load in Megawatts IMO 25,414 MW* Hydro Quebec 35,137 MW* ISO - New England 25,348 MW* New York ISO 30,983 MW* PJM / PJM West 63,762 MW*

The NY Marketplace Deregulated since late 90’s Nearly all generators are owned by IPPs NYISO administers capacity and energy markets Energy is bought and sold on a day ahead basis at zonal hourly prices (LMP) The highest priced bids accepted in a zone for each hour set the price

Bilaterals 50% Real Time <5% NYISO Day-Ahead Market 45 – 50% Bilateral Contracts 50% Day-Ahead Market % Real-Time Market <5% 100% New York’s Energy Market

New York’s Capacity Market Load Serving Entities must procure 118% of the load they serve – This covers the reserve margin of 18% Capacity beyond that is assigned a decreasing value as supply becomes more abundant This value is set by a demand curve and funded through uplift (socialized)

The value of DR DR provides the same benefit to the system as generators, so should be given the same value This holds true for both capacity and energy DR acts like a peaking plant, and should be valued as such for both capacity and energy (peaking plants typically only run when energy is expensive)

DR Program Options Capacity Based –Could be combined with energy based program –Could be called either for reliability or when DR is more economic than generated electricity –Performance should be mandatory to justify capacity payments Energy Based –Can be voluntary if capacity is not valued –Could be called either for reliability or when DR is more economic than generated electricity –If scheduled economically, performance should be mandatory

New York’s Capacity Program NY has a capacity based program where DR is bid into the same capacity market as generators Resources are paid LMP for energy (not less than $500/MWh) DR is penalized for underperformance as a generator would be Resources are called for grid reliability, not price mitigation

New York’s Emergency DR Program (Energy Based) Resources are paid LMP for energy (not less than $500/MWh) Resources are called for grid reliability, not price mitigation Response is voluntary Participants are often in this program to be good citizens rather than for the money

New York’s Day Ahead DR Bidding Program DR bids an energy price at which they are willing to load-shed Bids are entered in competition with generators If DR bids are less than the market clearing price, they are selected to run and receive the clearing price, just as a generator would This provides the market with the option of choosing DR instead of generators when DR is more cost effective

DR – Safety Net or Market Efficiency? Both – DR can serve as a safety net to avoid brownouts or blackouts, but… Why schedule a generator at $300/MWh if DR will provide a like resource for $200/MWh? DR could be integrated into the market to compete with generators on both a capacity and energy basis for either emergency or economic dispatch

The System Benefit In addition to the reliability benefit, DR can result in ratepayer savings If DR is more cost effective than the more expensive generators, rate payers pay less DR empowers end users to act like a resource, giving them market power DR is more than just an “insurance policy”, it’s an alternative to generation and can delay T&D upgrades

Questions/Comments? Chris Smith NYSERDA ext. 3360