EST/CSE/ISE 323 Spring 2011 Tony Scarlatos

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DEVELOPING A METHODOLOGY FOR MS3305 CW2 Some guidance.
Advertisements

Man and Machine: HCI Principles
© De Montfort University, Characteristics of Good Dialogues Howell Istance Department of Computer Science De Montfort University.
User Interface Design Lecture #4 Part-B.
Ch 11 Cognitive Walkthroughs and Heuristic Evaluation Yonglei Tao School of Computing and Info Systems GVSU.
11 HCI - Lesson 5.1 Heuristic Inspection (Nielsen’s Heuristics) Prof. Garzotto.
Electronic Communications Usability Primer.
Multimedia and the World Wide Web
Dialog Styles. The Five Primary Styles of Interaction 4 Menu selection 4 Form fill-in 4 Command language 4 Natural language 4 Direct manipulation.
Dialog Styles. The Six Primary Styles of Interaction n Q & A n Menu selection n Form fill-in n Command language n Natural language n Direct manipulation.
MScIT HCI Web GUI design. IBM’s CUA guidelines - taster Design Principles Each principle has supporting implementation techniques. The two design.
Part 4: Evaluation Days 25, 27, 29, 31 Chapter 20: Why evaluate? Chapter 21: Deciding on what to evaluate: the strategy Chapter 22: Planning who, what,
AJ Brush Richard Anderson
Testing your design Without users: With users: Cognitive walkthrough
Today’s class Group Presentation More about principles, guidelines, style guides and standards In-class exercises More about usability Norman’s model of.
Evaluation techniques Part 1
Heuristic Evaluation of Usability Teppo Räisänen
Dialogue Styles.
1 User Interface Design CIS 375 Bruce R. Maxim UM-Dearborn.
Human-Computer Interaction
1 SKODA-AUTO.CZ prototype evaluation Poznań, 23th of March 2015.
Heuristic evaluation IS 403: User Interface Design Shaun Kane.
Heuristic Evaluation: Hotels.com
1 ISE 412 Human-Computer Interaction Design process Task and User Characteristics Guidelines Evaluation.
User Centred Design Overview. Human centred design processes for interactive systems, ISO (1999), states: "Human-centred design is an approach to.
Mario Čagalj University of Split 2013/2014. Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)
1 Human-Computer Interaction  Design process  Task and User Characteristics  Guidelines  Evaluation.
SAMPLE HEURISTIC EVALUATION FOR 680NEWS.COM Glenn Teneycke.
INFO3315 Week 4 Personas, Tasks Guidelines, Heuristic Evaluation.
CS 4720 Usability and Accessibility CS 4720 – Web & Mobile Systems.
Basic Principles of HCI Lecture Requirements Analysis Establish the goals for the Website from the standpoint of the user and the business. Agree.
Nielsen’s Ten Usability Heuristics
Usability Evaluation/LP Usability: how to judge it.
10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design.
Multimedia Specification Design and Production 2012 / Semester 1 / week 5 Lecturer: Dr. Nikos Gazepidis
Click to edit Master subtitle style USABILITY and USER INTERFACE DESIGN Application.
SEG3120 User Interfaces Design and Implementation
Design 2 (Chapter 5) Conceptual Design Physical Design Evaluation
LZW Compression Grant Friedline Robert Frankeny Thomas Sutcavage.
Mahindra Infotainment System Heuristic Evaluation v1.0 Maya Studios July 6, 2010.
Evaluating a UI Design Expert inspection methods Cognitive Walkthrough
Information Systems and Organisations
 What to “know”? ◦ Goals of information visualization. ◦ About human perceptual capabilities. ◦ About the issues involved in designing visualization for.
Usability 1 Usability evaluation Without users - analytical techniques With users - survey and observational techniques.
Developed by Tim Bell Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering University of Canterbury Human Computer Interaction.
CENG 394 Introduction to HCI Usability Heuristics.
INTERFACE COMPOSITION GAME DESIGN. OBJECTIVES After this lesson, students will be able to: Identify the Eight Golden Rules of Human-Computer Interface.
Heuristic Evaluation Short tutorial to heuristic evaluation
Alan Woolrych My Background Currently – Research & Liaison Officer (DMN) From 1 st January 2003 Usability Researcher with.
CMSC 345, Version 1/11 S. Mitchell 1 Usability and User Interface Design.
Usability Heuristics Avoid common design pitfalls by following principles of good design Nielsen proposes 10 heuristics, others propose more or less. Inspect.
Equipping you for the unexpected challenges of Testing Emma My Knife– Mando.
Human-Computer Interaction Design process Task and User Characteristics Guidelines Evaluation ISE
Basic Elements.  Design is the process of collecting ideas, and aesthetically arranging and implementing them, guided by certain principles for a specific.
CS 575 Spring 2012 CSULA Bapa Rao Lecture 6. Agenda for today Review of previous meeting Student Comments Heuristic Evaluation Presentation Team reports.
User Interface Evaluation Heuristic Evaluation Lecture #17.
© 2016 Cognizant. © 2016 Cognizant Introduction PREREQUISITES SCOPE Heuristic evaluation is a discount usability engineering method for quick, cheap,
Ten Usability Heuristics These are ten general principles for user interface design. They are called "heuristics" because they are more in the nature of.
Principles Determine users' skill levels Novice or first-time users - Knowledgeable intermittent users - create templates Expert frequent users-
User Interface Design SCMP Special Topic: Software Development
Human-Computer Interaction
Human Computer Interaction Slide 2
A NEW FACE OF THE TECHNICAL COMMUNICATOR – UX IS OUR STRENGTH – WE DESIGN TO WRITE BY CHRIS GANTA © 2016, STC INDIA CHAPTER.
Unit 14 Website Design HND in Computing and Systems Development
Heuristic Evaluation Jon Kolko Professor, Austin Center for Design.
Software Engineering D7025E
One-timer?. A new face of the technical communicator – UX is our strength – we design to write.
10 Design Principles.
Nilesen 10 hueristics.
CHAPTER 2: Guidelines, Principles, and Theories
Presentation transcript:

EST/CSE/ISE 323 Spring 2011 Tony Scarlatos Interaction Design EST/CSE/ISE 323 Spring 2011 Tony Scarlatos

Top 2 Principles Recognize Diversity “The average computer user” is a fiction Age, Gender, Culture, Abilities and Disabilities, Education, Socioeconomic Status, and many other factors distinguish one user from another Prevent Error Using a computer should always make a task easier than not using one Productivity gains and satisfaction come from optimal design, losses and frustration come from inferior design

Howard Gardner Hobbs Professor of Cognition and Education at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. Recipient of a MacArthur Prize Fellowship in 1981. Proposed a theory of Multiple Intelligences in 1983.

One view of diversity: Multiple Intelligences

Ben Shneiderman Ph.D. from Stony Brook University Computer Science Dept. in 1973. CS Professor at the HCI Lab at Univ. of Maryland, College Park. Introduced the term “Direct Manipulation Interface” in 1983. Developed Eight Golden Rules of Interface Design. Recipient of the ACM CHI Lifetime Achievement Award 2001.

Ben Shneiderman’s 8 Golden Rules of HCI Design (1 – 4) Strive for consistency Consistent actions should be required in similar situations. Identical terminology should be used in prompts, menus, and help screens. Consistent color, layout, capitalization, and fonts should be employed throughout. Enable frequent users to use shortcuts To increase the pace of interaction use abbreviations, special keys, and macros. Offer informative feedback For every user action, the system should respond in some way. Report on the state of the system. Design dialogs to yield closure Sequences of actions should be organized into groups with a beginning, middle, and end. Feedback at the completion of a group of actions shows the user their activity has completed successfully.

Ben Shneiderman’s 8 Golden Rules of HCI Design (5 - 8) Offer error prevention and simple error handling Design forms so that users cannot make a serious error; for example, prefer menu selection to form fill-in, and do not allow alphabetic characters in numeric entry fields. If users make an error, instructions should be written to detect the error and offer simple, constructive, and specific instructions for recovery. Permit easy reversal of actions Support internal locus of control Surprising system actions, tedious sequences of data entries, inability or difficulty in obtaining necessary information, and inability to produce the action desired all build anxiety and dissatisfaction. Reduce short-term memory load Reduce short term memory load by designing screens where options are clearly visible, or using pull-down menus and icons.

Jakob Nielsen Ph.D. in human-computer interaction from the Technical University of Denmark in Copenhagen. Sun Microsystems Distinguished Engineer. Inducted into the Scandinavian Interactive Media Hall of Fame (2000). Inducted into the ACM Computer-Human Interaction Academy (2006).

Jakob Nielsen’s Ten Usability Heuristics (1 – 5) Visibility of system status The system should always keep users informed about what is going on, through appropriate feedback within reasonable time. Match between system and the real world The system should speak the users' language, with words, phrases and concepts familiar to the user, rather than system-oriented terms. Follow real-world conventions, making information appear in a natural and logical order. User control and freedom Users often choose system functions by mistake and will need a clearly marked "emergency exit" to leave the unwanted state without having to go through an extended dialogue. Support undo and redo. Consistency and standards Users should not have to wonder whether different words, situations, or actions mean the same thing. Follow platform conventions. Error prevention Even better than good error messages is a careful design which prevents a problem from occurring in the first place. Either eliminate error-prone conditions or check for them and present users with a confirmation option before they commit to the action.

Jakob Nielsen’s Ten Usability Heuristics (6 – 10) Recognition rather than recall Minimize the user's memory load by making objects, actions, and options visible. The user should not have to remember information from one part of the dialogue to another. Instructions for use of the system should be visible or easily retrievable whenever appropriate. Flexibility and efficiency of use Accelerators -- unseen by the novice user -- may often speed up the interaction for the expert user such that the system can cater to both inexperienced and experienced users. Allow users to tailor frequent actions. Aesthetic and minimalist design Dialogues should not contain information which is irrelevant or rarely needed. Every extra unit of information in a dialogue competes with the relevant units of information and diminishes their relative visibility. Help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors Error messages should be expressed in plain language (no codes), precisely indicate the problem, and constructively suggest a solution. Help and documentation Even though it is better if the system can be used without documentation, it may be necessary to provide help and documentation. Any such information should be easy to search, focused on the user's task, list concrete steps to be carried out, and not be too large.

Six other laws (1 – 3) Moore's Law: (1950) Every 18 months, the number of transistors on integrated circuits will double. Designers can expect devices to become smaller, faster, cheaper and more powerful. Design for the future... not for the now. Fitts Law: (1954) The time it takes to move from a starting position to the final target is determined by the distance to the target and the size of the target. Relates to icon size (bigger), button placement (edges of the screen) and contextual (pop-up) menus. Hick's Law: (1952) The time it takes for users to make decisions is based on the number of choices they have. Users will make choices more quickly from one menu of 10 items than two menus of 5 items. Speed is also determined by familiarity of choices, and format of choices. Gordon Moore was a co-founder of Intel. Paul Fitts was a psychologist at Ohio State University. William Edmund Hick, British psychologist.

Six other laws (4 – 6) Miller’s Magical Number 7: (1956) The human mind is able to remember information best in chunks of 7 (plus or minus 2). For short-term memory, information is best presented in chunks of 5 to 9 pieces. Tesler's Law: There is a point beyond which a process cannot be simplified further, and the complexity can only be transferred from one place to another. Designers should strive to distribute complexity broadly. Poka-Yoke Principle: From the Japanese (Toyota)- avoiding (yokeru) inadvertent errors (poka). Designers put constraints on devices or products to prevent errors. George Miller got his Ph.D. at Harvard in 1946, and is currently at Princeton. Larry Tesler worked for the Stanford AI lab, Xerox PARC, Apple, Amazon, and Yahoo.

Dan Saffer’s Rules Qualities of Good Interaction Design: Trustworthy - Appropriate - Smart - Responsive - Clever - Ludic (playful) – Pleasurable