1 The National Environmental Policy Act in the Oil & Gas Industry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 | US DOE Geothermal Programeere.energy.gov Public Service of Colorado Ponnequin Wind Farm Geothermal Technologies Program Categorical Exclusions Doug.
Advertisements

Identify Problems, Planning Objectives and Constraints.
Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
Environmental Scoping Guidance Jerry Vogt Region Environmental Coordinator ODOT – Region 3.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
40 CFR REGULATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURAL PROVISIONS OF NEPA Legislative vs. Discretionary Timelines - Agency Requirements for Implementing.
Environmental Review: NEPA, TEPA and Tribes. NEPA – good and bad for Tribes Tribes can use as tool to slow, examine, participate in process and urge changes.
The Role of State, Local and Tribal Governments in the Federal NEPA Process Presented by Susan E. Bromm Director, Office of Federal Activities United States.
1 | US DOE Geothermal Programeere.energy.gov Public Service of Colorado Ponnequin Wind Farm Geothermal Technologies Office Geothermal Regulatory Roadmap.
Bureau of Land Management Regulations Washington State Association of Counties Cooperating Agency & Coordination Training November 22, 2013 – Vancouver,
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Conference on Environmental Assessments in Federations A Montana Perspective September 14, 2009 Tom Livers, Deputy Director Montana Department of Environmental.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
Historical Background to NEPA Early 60’s – Congress starts to consider growing pollution problem Early 60’s – Congress starts to consider growing pollution.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Negotiating the NEPA Maze: It Really Is Rocket Science Start.
Environmental Impact Assessment Review Process for Oil and Gas Projects In Saskatchewan Larry Lechner, P. Eng. Director Environmental Assessment Branch.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. Ryk Dunkelberg Barnard Dunkelberg & Company Roles Of Sponsor, Consultant and FAA During NEPA Process L O N G B E.
Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.
U. S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Division of Fluid Minerals, 1.
What If I Must Go Beyond a Preliminary Assessment? (the example of a USAID EA under Reg. 216) [DATE][SPEAKERS NAMES]
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
EPA!!!!.  One of the first laws ever created to protect the environment  Came into effect due to public concern about the deteriorating human environment.
Sept 18, 2008CVEN 4838/5838Slide #1 Lecture 8 Regulatory Processes.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
The Role of the Project Proponent in the NEPA Process PUBLIC LANDS ADVOCACY NEPA & PERMITTING SEMINAR Zeke Williams June 11, 2008.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
Buckhorn Mountain EIS Project August Buckhorn Mountain Exploration Project Echo Bay Exploration is seeking federal and state authorization for.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
CHAPTER 1 FOUNDATION. 1.1 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) “An act to establish a national policy for the environment, to provide for the establishment.
NPS Energy Summit January 21-23, 2002 EPA Presentation Cindy Cody Director, NEPA Program EPA Region 8 (303)
Energy, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Development Presented by Cat Shrier, Ph.D., P.G. Water Resources Planner (403)
Energy Exploration & Development On National Forest System Lands Barry Burkhardt
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Maryland State Highway Administration’s Secondary and Cumulative Effects Analysis Guidelines For.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The Pre-Filing Process IRWA/AI January 13-14, 2009 IRWA/AI.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Streamlining NEPA for Reusable Launch Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation May 2004.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES. --- “The driving impetus for conducting environmental impact studies is to comparatively present the effects of proposed alternatives.
1 Completing the CEQA Checklist Terry Rivasplata.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Tribal Voices a tale of 3 mines GSA National Conference November 2015 Kendra Zamzow, PhD, CSP2 Ann Maest, PhD, Buka Environmental.
LBNE Environmental Assessment NEPA Informational Meeting May 23, 2013 Rod Walton, LBNE NEPA Manager.
National Environmental Policy Act Environmental Engineer US Army Garrison.
Director’s Order 12 contains information concerning review of other agency proposals.
National Environmental Policy Act An established US national policy Draft Year: 1969 Amendment Years: Section amended May 27, 1986 “Environmental.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
FCC’s NEPA Process Overview of NEPA Overview of NEPA Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Overview of FCC’s NEPA rules and procedures Nuts and bolts.
ACA Conference - September 2017
Overview What is the CEQA environmental review process?
Welcome to Community Solutions: NEPA & EJ: Leveraging Federal Resources to Advance Community Environmental, Economic and Health Vitality “A Focus on.
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
SEQRA as a Tool to Review Energy Projects
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
IS YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT PREPARED
Environmental Requirements and planning grants
NEPA Assignment Program Overview
Federal EIS Air Quality Analysis
Presentation transcript:

1 The National Environmental Policy Act in the Oil & Gas Industry

2 Who are we? Kleinfelder is a 53-year-old employee- owned architecture, engineering, and science consulting firm with over 1,700 employees and 65 offices in the US, Canada, and Australia. 25 years providing engineering and environmental solutions to upstream, midstream, and downstream clients. Presence in all the major domestic and Canadian oil and gas plays.

3 What we are going to cover? Regulatory framework of NEPA. Schedule and Costs.

4 Regulatory Framework of NEPA The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) was enacted in NEPA is our nation’s charter for protection of the environment. NEPA process is intended to help public officials make better decisions about actions on public lands (NEPA is not intended to be an environmental group obstruction tool but frequently is).

5 Any federal action that has the potential to affect the human environment is subject to analysis under NEPA. What triggers NEPA?

6 Federal Action = Any activity that requires federal agency approval, permitting, and/or funding Typical O&G federal actions: Drilling federal or Tribal minerals. Building ROW across federal or Tribal lands. Drilling wells on State lands funded by federal dollars.

7 Human Environment = The natural and physical environment and relationship of people with that environment Typical effects that may trigger requirement for analysis under NEPA: Surface disturbance Habitat loss Noise impacts Socioeconomic benefits Changes in traffic patterns Air quality effects and more….

8 Definition of “human environment” allows for a lot of discretion in determining whether a federal action will have an effect that requires analysis under NEPA. When an agency determines that a federal action may affect the human environment, they are required under NEPA to evaluate and disclose those potential impacts to the public.

9 Types of NEPA Documents Environmental Assessment (EA) Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Categorical Exclusions (CE or CX) Documentation of NEPA Adequacy (DNA) Given time constraints we will only be discussing EAs and EISs.

10 Environmental Assessment Under NEPA and CEQ definitions, an EA addresses an action where the significance of social, economic, or environmental impact is not clearly established. In practice, an EA is written when the agency is fairly confident that the action will not have “significant” effects on the human environment.

11 Environmental Assessment Thresholds for determining “significance” often not clearly defined. E.g., a violation of federal CAA or CWA standards could be significant but how do you determine whether impacts to “recreational experience” is significant? Agencies have tremendous discretion in deciding whether or not to prepare an EA, or go straight to the more time consuming and costly EIS process. Decision is often heavily influenced by external pressures (e.g., from other agencies like EPA, environmental groups).

12 EAs will often include voluntary mitigation to avoid significant impacts, and hence avoid having to do an EIS: e.g., upfront surveys for threatened or endangered plants, archaeological clearance surveys. Environmental Assessment

13 Environmental Assessment If no significant impact is determined, a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is prepared and, depending on the agency, included within a Decision Record / Decision Memo. If the action analyzed in an EA is determined to have significant impacts then an EIS must be prepared.

14 Environmental Impact Statement Addresses an action likely to have significant impacts. The scope and schedule for EISs can vary dramatically among agencies, but are generally much more in-depth and longer than EAs. Projects analyzed in an EIS can have and are presumed to have significant impacts (reminder - in an EA there cannot be “significant” impacts).

15 Environmental Impact Statement EISs involve multiple, time-consuming steps required by regulation. Lengthy agency review of public notifications in the Federal Register 6- to 12-month alternative development phase 30- to 60-day public scoping period 30- to 60-day EIS comment periods All of which result in a lengthy completion process: 3-7 years for most O&G EISs in western U.S.

16 Connected Action Connected action is a term frequently heard when discussing EAs or EISs and merits definition… Connected actions are actions that are interdependent; one action depends on another action for their justification. Connected actions must be analyzed in the EA or EIS. Pipeline that begins at a well pad on Federal surface, and crosses onto privately-owned surface estate. Wells with privately owned surface and mineral estate that use the same proposed ROWs as wells on Federal surface or mineral estate. Underground injection control (UIC) wells on private surface estate that will be used for disposal of produced water from federal mineral estate wells.

17 Federal Lead Agency – Such as BLM, BIA, or USFS The Proponent/Applicant – The Operator Third-Party Contractor – The Consultant Cooperating Agencies (CAs) – Entities with legal jurisdiction; State Agencies, Counties, Indian Tribes, Other Federal Agencies (Fish & Wildlife Service, Environmental Protection Agency) Consulting Parties (CPs) – Entities with unique expertise; e.g., non-governmental organizations The Public – Environmental Groups, Landowners, Interested Citizens NEPA Process Participants

18 Operators are frequently caught off-guard by NEPA requirements and associated costs and timing. Costs can range depending on the type of NEPA document, scale of proposed development, location of the project, issues or resources within your project area, and the agency and/or agency personnel you are working with. Cost and Schedule

19 Typical NEPA costs: EAs: $25,000 - $500,000 EISs:$1,000,000 - $6,000,000+ Ancillary costs may include civil, biological, cultural, and paleontological surveys; stream and wetland delineations; and modeling $5,000 - $2,000,000+ Why does NEPA compliance cost so much? Complicated impact assessment models for air and water quality. Extensive coordination between consultant, agency, and operator. Significant labor hours to author the document.

20 Schedule for NEPA projects vary depending on the agency, issues associated with your project, and delays related to other agency priorities. Typical timeframes: EAs: 6 months to 3 years EISs: 3 to 7 years Schedule is heavily influenced by the operator and the agency.

21 Example EA Process Flow Chart With Agency Touch Points Project Kickoff Conduct Scoping Develop Alternatives Conduct and Analyze Data Publish Draft EA Solicit Public Comments Respond to Comments Publish Final EA Issue FONSI or Prepare EIS Agency IDT Agency Review

22 Conclusions In practice, NEPA compliance is guided by statute, regulation, politics, and personalities. The human element has salient effect on how individual NEPA projects are implemented, how long they take, and how much they cost. Critical to understand agency-specific guidelines and office-specific “guidelines” for NEPA compliance. Critical to build schedule and cost expectations into drilling plans. Critical to be informed and engaged throughout process.

23 Questions? Contact Information: Dawn Martin