Adding Priced Capacity for Congestion Relief Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Studies Reason Foundation www.reason.org/transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Update March Background As the region grows, increased travel demand on our aging Metro Highway System will continue to create additional.
Advertisements

Forecasting Traffic and Toll Revenue for Public-Private Partnerships (P3) vs. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO): A comparison 14 th TRB National.
Interstate Tolling: Financing Reconstruction and Shifting to Mileage-Based User Fees by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation.
Getting Started with Congestion Pricing A Workshop for Local Partners Federal Highway Administration Office of Operations.
Thoughts on 21 st Century Public Transit Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Studies Reason Foundation
Tolling and P3 Trends in 2009 by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy, Reason Foundation
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned I-15 Managed Lanes: Building on Success And Lessons Learned.
February 26, 2012 Managed Lanes Overview Dr. Adrian Moore Vice President Reason Foundation
FHWA Policy and Guidance
TRB Lianyu Chu *, K S Nesamani +, Hamed Benouar* Priority Based High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes Operation * California Center for Innovative Transportation.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation Enabling Congestion Pricing in the.
1 Lei Xu Term Project Presentation – CVEN 689 – Spring 2005 CVEN 689 – SPRING 2005 LEI XU May 2th, 2005 hide A GIS-BASED STUDY OF HOW THE HOT LANE IMPLEMENTATION.
Externalities on highways Today: We apply externalities to a real-life example.
Developing a Regional Express Lane Network Hercules City Council Meeting April 28, 2009 Doug Kimsey MTC Planning Director.
1 1 Providing New Transportation Choices through Transit Prioritization Strategies BRT ON MANAGED LANES or PARK & RIDE on HOV LANES.
Less Stop More Go EXPRESS LANES Travel Choices and Strategies to Relieve Congestion Presentation to FDOT’s Annual ITS Working Group Meeting March 2008.
Presentation to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Peggy Catlin, Deputy Executive Director.
1/20/2011 US DOT/RITA Volpe National Transportation Systems Center 1 Economic Costs and Benefits of Road Pricing Douglass B Lee Jr Volpe Center.
Tolling and Congestion Pricing Patrick DeCorla-Souza Office of Innovative Program Delivery Federal Highway Administration Presentation to Transportation.
Freeway Revolts: Why not the Twin Cities? Thomas More Nick Dobda Xiaozheng He.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Mark Burris, Texas Transportation Institute Jessie Yung, Federal Highway Administration.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
A New Regional Vision ASPA Conference April 2010 Steve Heminger, MTC Executive Director.
Express Toll Lane Networks: Better Transportation for Drivers and Transit Users By Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Studies Reason Public.
I-680 Value Pricing: A “Smart Carpool “ Lane Demonstration Project June 2004.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
What are Managed Lanes What are Express Lanes What are HOT Lanes Regional Express Lanes Network I-95 Express I-595 Express I-75 Express.
THEA Overview. (Excerpt for Hillsborough County) 2.
Transportation Program Status Orange County Transportation OCBC Infrastructure Committee Meeting April 14, 2009 Kia Mortazavi, OCTA, Executive Director,
Center on Tolling Research Technology for Managed Lanes Christopher Poe, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Agency Director Director, Center on Tolling Research Texas.
Urban Partnership Agreement Summary August 27, 2007.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
Tolling and Public Private Partnerships: How Can They Help California Achieve High Performance Transportation? Michael Replogle Environmental Defense March.
Urban Road Pricing: US DOT Congestion Initiative and Urban Partnerships 14 th World Congress on ITS IBEC Special Session October 10, 2007 Beijing Exhibition.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
1 Senate Transportation & Housing Committee December 13, 2005 Orange County Transportation Authority.
TRB Transportation Applications Conference Congestion-Free Freeways US Department of Transportation Establishing a Metropolitan.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Modeling HOT Lanes TPB’s Approach AMPO Travel Modeling Group March 21, 2006 I:\ateam\meetings_conf\ampo_tms\ \Hot_Lane_Pres_to_AMPO_Final.ppt.
High-Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes Recent Developments Planning and Operations Committee September 9, 2005.
Overview of PPI’s in Georgia April 26, 2006 Earl Mahfuz, Treasurer.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overview of Metro’s Transportation Program Pam O’Connor Metro Chair July 25, 2007.
Economics of Congestion Jagadish Guria Presentation to the the 8th Annual New Zealand Transport Summit 25 February 2008.
1 CTC Discussion P3 Ingenuity Made Congestion Managing Pricing a Success James Martling, April 9, 2008.
Regional HOT Lanes Study Preliminary Findings An Informational Hearing of the Senate Transportation and Housing Committee Toll Roads and Managed Lanes.
FAST Lanes Program Transportation and General Government Policy Committee Association of Metropolitan Municipalities August 16, 2004 Minnesota Department.
Tom Norton, Executive Director Colorado Department of Transportation American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials September 9, 2003.
S.H. 121 – Dallas, Texas Case Study Presentation National Summit on Future Transportation Funding and Finance Strategies April 11, 2007 Michael Morris,
US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements I-95 Corridor Coalition EPS Summit September 19, 2007 Boston, Massachusetts Jeffrey F. Paniati.
Interstate Tolling: Why and How by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Policy Reason Foundation
MnPASS I-394 High Occupancy Toll (HOT) Lanes Case Study 7 group: Brendon Slotterback Chris Romansky Feng Xie Gabe Gubash
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
91 Express Lanes Kirk Avila Treasurer/General Manager.
NEW STARTS/SMALL STARTS. New Starts Eligibility  Based on the results of planning and Alternatives Analysis  At least 50% or more of the total project.
Externalities on highways Today: We apply externalities to a real-life example.
THE EL MONTE HOV / BUSWAY: A Policy Driven Experiment in Congestion Management Frank Quon Division of Operations Deputy District Director HOV LANES IN.
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
Managed Lanes and Bus Rapid Transit: Emerging New Financing Opportunities ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Ed Regan Senior Vice President.
I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012 I-15 Express Lanes Project January 2012.
Minnesota’s Urban Partnership Agreement UPA Timeline The UPA agreement with the US DOT requires that the project be operational by September 30, 2009,
I-680 Value Pricing: A HOT Lane Demonstration Project of “Smart Carpool Lanes” Sponsor: Alameda County Congestion Management Agency 2003 Sponsor: Alameda.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee Overview of RCTC’s Major Projects December 8, 2015.
December 4, 2008 Preserving the American Dream 1 1 Faster by Bus By Gabriel Roth.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
Status Report on the Regional Value Pricing Study Ronald F. Kirby, Director of Transportation Planning November 15, 2006 Item 11.
Garden State Parkway HOT Lanes By Matt Lawson October 14, 2010.
TMCs – The Next Generation ITS Tennessee Annual Meeting / October 8, 2009 Dr. Robert Edelstein, PE, PTOE.
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
Presentation transcript:

Adding Priced Capacity for Congestion Relief Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Studies Reason Foundation

Not Just New Capacity: Priced Capacity Value pricing keeps the lanes uncongested, offers premium service. During rush hours, priced lanes offer much greater througput. Self-generated revenues mean they can get built now, not “ someday. ”

What Types of Priced Capacity? HOT Lanes Express Toll Lanes Express Toll Networks Truck-Only Toll Lanes New beltways Missing links in freeway systems

HOT Lanes: A First Step Priced lanes offer meaningful congestion relief to those willing to pay. Ensure use of all of the expensive capacity. Toll revenues can help pay for the large investment needed. High performance is sustainable, long- term.

Value Pricing Offers Precise Traffic Flow Control I-15 quasi-real-time variable pricing 91-Express: fine-tuned rate schedule, periodically adjusted 49% of peak traffic with 33% of lane capacity Both offer reliable high speeds during rush hours.

91 Express Lanes, Orange County, California

Priced Lane Projects, 2006

Synergy of Priced Lanes and Bus Rapid Transit Value-priced lane is virtual equivalent of exclusive busway (VEB). Pricing limits vehicle flow to what ’ s compatible with LOS C conditions. Reliable high speed is sustainable long- term, thanks to pricing. Houston implementing first VEB on Katy Freeway managed lanes.

VEB Prototype: Houston’s Katy Managed Lanes 3-way public-public partnership Transit agency (METRO) Toll agency (HCTRA) State DOT (TxDOT) 4 new lanes in median, with value pricing HCTRA funds and manages the priced lanes METRO guaranteed 65 buses/hr and 25% of capacity for bus + HOV3+ LOS C to be maintained, via pricing and occupancy controls

Implications of Katy Agreement Transit funding: no toll revenues to METRO, but still a great deal (free guideway). Busway capacity: 65/hr. is 62% increase; should be ample. FTA approval: granted, based on LOS C. Occupancy changes: going to HOV-3 now and HOV-4 as needed. Pricing sustainability: MOU commitment.

Network Comparisons 500-lane-mile VEB Network cost is $4 to $6 billion, based on Reason studies. 250 route-mile light rail system cost is $31 billion, based on latest FTA data. 250 route-mile heavy rail system would be $38 billion, per FTA. Plus, the VEB guideway would not depend on [limited] FTA funding.

Where can we add new capacity? Go up — add elevated lanes above existing freeway Go under — bored tunnels under sensitive areas (e.g., for missing links) Re-use untraditional ROW: Rail lines Flood plains Power line corridors

Tampa’s elevated express toll lanes

Conclusions Value-priced toll lanes provide “ congestion insurance ” for all motorists, even if they don ’ t use them often. A network of priced lanes is the virtual equivalent of a regionwide busway network, offering a low-cost alternative to rail. New capacity can be added above and below existing roads and lands, and along non- highway ROW. Toll revenues can pay for much of the cost of new priced capacity.

Adding Priced Capacity for Congestion Relief Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Studies Reason Foundation