Basic well Logging Analysis – Sonic Log

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title Petrophysical Analysis of Fluid Substitution in Gas Bearing Reservoirs to Define Velocity Profiles – Application of Gassmann and Krief Models Digital.
Advertisements

B ASIC WELL L OGGING A NALYSIS – N EUTRON L OG Hsieh, Bieng-Zih Fall
第 5章 太陽電池MATLAB模擬 Program 1: 太陽能電池之輸出電壓、電流、功率響應
Basic well Logging Analysis
Logs : how to use them for QUALITIATIVE reservoir evaluation
Important for : Conversion from traveltime to depth Check of results by modeling Imaging of the data (migration) Classification and Filtering of Signal.
EAS 430: Petroleum Geology
Formation Evaluation (Lecture) Subsurface Methods 4233
B ASIC WELL L OGGING A NALYSIS – T HE R ESISTIVITY L OGS Hsieh, Bieng-Zih Fall
Basic well Logging Analysis – Log Interpretation
Lecture items Neutron log * Definition. * Types
Basic well Logging Analysis – The Spontaneous Potential (SP) Log
FORMATION EVALUATION PETE 321
WELL LOG (The Bore Hole Image)
Lecture items Sonic log * Definition. * Types * Units & Presentation.
Basic well Logging Analysis – The Gamma Ray (GR) Log
: Determine it 星等:★★★☆☆ 題組: Problem Set Archive with Online Judge 題號: 10520: Determine it 解題者:林祺光 解題日期: 2006 年 5 月 22 日 題意:給兩個值 a 1,n 和 n a i,j.
亂數產生器安全性評估 之統計測試 SEC HW7 姓名:翁玉芬 學號:
Chapter 9 Hypothesis tests with the t statistic. 當母體  為未知時 ( 我們通常不知 ) ,用樣本 s 來取代 因為用 s 來估計  ,所呈現出來的分佈已不 是 z distribution ,而是 t distribution.
Pioneer Natural Resources
CH22 可靠性加速測試方法 目的 基本假設 加速試驗模式 Inverse Power Model
微帶線濾波器 國立聯合大學 電機工程學系 主講人 : 徐振剛 何奕叡. 目 錄  設計程序理論說明  1. 微波諧振電路  2. 傳輸線特性  3.Chebyshev filter & Butterworth filter  4. 傳輸線殘段設計濾波器和步階阻抗式低通濾波器  設計模型.
錄音筆,MP3 撥放器, 隨身碟 之原理及規格. 定義 錄音筆 – 以錄音為首要功能 MP3 撥放器 – 以播放音樂為首要功能 隨身碟 – 以行動碟為功能.
&TwoDOE Class 90a1 &2 Simple Comparative Experiments Statistical Plots Sampling and Sampling Distributions Hypothesis Testing Confidence Interval.
演講者:蕭錫源 A new BEM formulation for transient axisymmetric poroelasticity via particular integrals K.H. Park a, P.K. Banerjee b,*
CH 15- 元件可靠度之驗證  驗證方法  指數模式之可靠度驗證  韋式模式之可靠度驗證  對數常態模式之可靠度驗證  失效數為零時之可靠度估算  各種失效模式之應用.
The application of boundary element evaluation on a silencer in the presence of a linear temperature gradient Boundary Element Method 期末報告 指導老師:陳正宗終身特聘教授.
位準量測 量測槽或桶內物體之高度值 直接式:日常生活中較常使用之方法 推論式:較適合遠距離監測應用.
Image Interpolation Use SSE 指導教授 : 楊士萱 學 生 : 楊宗峰 日 期 :
&5 二因子實驗設計 二因子無交互作用 &Four DOE Class_90a.
CH 14-可靠度工程之數學基礎 探討重點 失效時間之機率分配 指數模式之可靠度工程.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.,All Rights Reserved. 肆 資料分析與表達.
平流層臭氧與氟氯碳化物 (CFC) 林小杏. 對流層 平流層 ( 氣溫 )( 臭氧濃度 ) ( 臭氧層 ) 紫外線 平流層中,一百萬個氣體分子大約只有 10 個是臭氧分子 。這些少量的氣體分子不斷的吸收對生物有害的紫外線 ,而且與其他氣體分子不斷的作用,透過氣體分子之間 的碰撞,臭氧分子再將所吸收的熱量傳給其他氣體分子.
Some basic Log interpretation
Basic well Logging Analysis – Density Log
Lecture items Density log * Definition. * Types
Well Log Interpretation Basic Relationships
Dr. Tark Hamilton Camosun College
Origin and Sources of GR
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 21 Apr 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Last Time: Magnetotellurics (MT) Some (relatively minor) applications in oil & mining.
POROSITY DETERMINATION
Rock & Fluid Properties
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 23 Apr 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Last Time: Wireline Logging Wireline Logging is the practice of lowering a geophysical.
Lesson 21 Prediction of Abnormal Pore Pressure
A Petrophysically valid Xu- White Velocity Model Andy May March 19, 2014.
Seismic Data Driven Reservoir Analysis FORT CHADBOURNE 3-D Coke and Runnels Counties, TX ODOM LIME AND GRAY SAND.
Seismic Petrophysics Andy May April 14, Rock Physics Determine the in-situ acoustic properties of the reservoir and surrounding rocks and their.
DSI* Dipole Shear Sonic Imager
Childers Cove 1 Quicklook Petrophysics. Depth corrected Uncorrected Waarre Deeper Sand Nomenclature used in this document.
Bacha Khan University Charsadda
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 20 Apr 2016
Study of the Niobrara Formation in the Borie Field Abdulaziz Muhanna Alhubil, Gabrijel Grubac, Joe Lawson, Rachael Molyneux & David Scadden.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 18 Apr 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Magnetotellurics (MT) Some (minor but growing) applications in oil & mining;
Seismic Data Driven Reservoir Services FORT CHADBOURNE 3-D Coke and Runnels Counties,TX ODOM LIME AND GRAY SAND.
University of Kerala, India.
INSTRUCTOR © 2017, John R. Fanchi
What is Well Logging?
Small scale reflection seismology
1-4 熱膨脹 Thermal expansion.
Well Logging Gly 326.
Seismic Response What causes a seismic response?
Resistivity Logs High deep resistivity means:
Sonic (Velocity) Logs Sonic (DT)
PETROPHYSICS: ROCK/LOG/SEISMIC CALIBRATION
Caliper Logs What Do They Measure? How Do They Work?
POROSITY DETERMINATION FROM LOGS Most slides in this section are modified primarily from NExT PERF Short Course Notes, However, many of the NExT.
VARIATION OF VELOCITY WITH LITHOLOGY
WELL LOG (The Bore Hole Image)
WELL LOG (The Bore Hole Image)
Presentation transcript:

Basic well Logging Analysis – Sonic Log Hsieh, Bieng-Zih Fall 2009

Sonic Log The sonic log is a porosity log that measures interval transit time (Δt) of a compressional sound wave traveling through one foot of formation. Interval transit time (Δt) in microseconds per foot is the reciprocal of the velocity of a compressional sound wave in feet per second.

Sonic Log (Cont.) The sonic log device consists of one or more sound transmitters, and two or more receivers. Modern sonic logs are borehole compensated devices (BHC). These devices greatly reduce the spurious effects ( 假性效應) of borehole size variations (Kobesh and Blizard, 1959), as well as errors due to tilt (傾斜) of the sonic tool (Schlumberger, 1972).

Sonic Log 聲波井測為量測聲波 (通常為壓縮聲波)通 過 1英呎厚的地層所需 的間隔傳遞時間。 利用聲波井測所記錄的 間隔傳遞時間、配合已 知(或假設)的地層岩 基以及地層流體的間隔 傳遞時間,可估算出地 層孔隙率 (聲波孔隙率)。

Sonic Log (Cont.) Interval transit time (Δt) is record in tracks #2 and #3 (in your example Figure). A sonic derived porosity curve is sometimes recorded in tracks #2 and #3, along with the Δt curve. Track #1 normally contains a caliper log and a gamma ray log or an SP log.

sonic porosity

Sonic Log (Cont.) The interval transit time (Δt) is dependent upon both lithology and porosity. Therefore, a formation's matrix velocity (Table 1) must be known to derive sonic porosity either by chart (Fig. 27) or by formula (Wyllie et al, 1958).

(Table-1) matrix velocity Δtma    Vma Δtma (μsec/ft) (ft/sec) (μsec/ft) commonly used Sandstone 18,000 to 19,500 55.5 to 51.0 55.5 to 51.0 Limestone 21,000 to 23,000 47.6 to 43.5 47.6 Dolomite 23,000 to 26,000 43.5 to 38.5 43.5 Anhydrite 20,000 50.0 50.0 Salt 15,000 66.7 67.0 Casing (Iron) 17,500 57.0 57.0

(1) derive sonic porosity by chart

63 μsec/ft

Derive sonic porosity by chart Given: Vma=26000 ft/sec (Dolomite) Δt=63 μsec/ft @ 9310 ft Note: The formation's matrix velocity must be known

Exercise – find sonic porosity by chart (1) Depth = 9310 ft Lithology [=] Dolomite (Vma=26000 ft/sec) Sonic porosity = ? (2) Depth = 9320 ft Lithology [=] Limestone (Vma=21000 ft/sec)

(2) derive sonic porosity by formula

Derive sonic porosity by Wyllie formula Where: Фsonic = sonic derived porosity Δtma = interval transit time of the matrix Δtlog = interval transit time of formation Δtf = interval transit time of the fluid in the well bore (fresh mud = 189;salt mud = 185)

Exercise – find sonic porosity by formula (1) Depth = 9310 ft Lithology [=] Dolomite Mud [=] fresh mud Sonic porosity = ? (2) Depth = 9320 ft Lithology [=] Limestone

Sonic porosity for unconsolidated sands

Sonic porosity for unconsolidated sands The Wyllie et al. (1958) formula for calculating sonic porosity can be used to determine porosity in consolidated sandstones and carbonates. Where a sonic log is used to determine porosity in unconsolidated sands, an empirical compaction factor or Cp should be added to the Wyllie et al. (1958) equation: Where Cp = compaction factor

Sonic porosity for unconsolidated sands (Cont.) The compaction factor is obtained from: Where Cp = compaction factor Δtsh = interval transit time for adjacent shale C = a constant which is normally 1.0 (Hilchie,1978)

empirical corrections for hydrocarbon effect

empirical corrections for hydrocarbon effect The interval transit tie (Δt) of a formation is increased due to the presence of hydrocarbons (i.e. hydrocarbon effect). If the effect of hydrocarbons is not corrected, the sonic derived porosity will be too high. Hilchie (1978) suggests the following empirical corrections for hydrocarbon effect: Ф = Фsonic × 0.7 (gas) Ф = Фsonic × 0.9 (oil)

Sonic porosity for shaly sands

Sonic porosity for shaly sands After the volume of shale (Vsh) is determined, it can be used to correct the porosity log for shale effect. The formula for correcting the sonic log for volume of shale is (Dresser Atlas, 1979): Where Δtsh = interval transit time for adjacent shale

Homework #3 -- sonic log

Homework #3 – sonic log BHC

Homework #3 – sonic log Depth BHC Фs Vsh Фs-sh 7600 7610 7620 …. 7840 7850 Information: Δtma = 55.5 μsec/ft (Sandstone) Δtf = 189 μsec/ft (Fresh mud) Δtf = 185 μsec/ft (Salt mud) Δtsh = ? μsec/ft